Topping-Off a Long Thoracic Stabilization With Semi-Rigid Constructs May Have Favorable Biomechanical Effects to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Biomechanical Comparison.

STUDY DESIGN: In-vitro cadaveric biomechanical study. OBJECTIVES: Long posterior spinal fusion is a standard treatment for adult spinal deformity. However, these rigid constructs are known to alter motion and stress to the adjacent non-instrumented vertebrae, increasing the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). This study aimed to biomechanically compare a standard rigid construct vs constructs "topped off" with a semi-rigid construct. By understanding semi-rigid constructs' effect on motion and overall construct stiffness, surgeons and researchers could better optimize fusion constructs to potentially decrease the risk of PJK and the need for revision surgery. METHODS: Nine human cadaveric spines (T1-T12) underwent non-destructive biomechanical range of motion tests in pure bending or torsion and were instrumented with an all-pedicle-screw (APS) construct from T6-T9. The specimens were sequentially instrumented with semi-rigid constructs at T5: (i) APS plus sublaminar bands; (ii) APS plus supralaminar hooks; (iii) APS plus transverse process hooks; and (iv) APS plus short pedicle screws. RESULTS: APS plus transverse process hooks had a range of motion (ie, relative angle) for T4-T5 and T5-T6, as well as an overall mechanical stiffness for T1-T12, that was more favourable, as it reduced motion at adjacent levels without a stark increase in stiffness. Moreover, APS plus transverse process hooks had the most linear change for range of motion across the entire T3-T7 range. CONCLUSIONS: Present findings suggest that APS plus transverse process hooks has a favourable biomechanical effect that may reduce PJK for long spinal fusions compared to the other constructs examined.

Characterizing In-Situ Metatarsal Fracture Risk During Simulated Workplace Impact Loading.

Metatarsal fractures represent the most common traumatic foot injury; however, metatarsal fracture thresholds remain poorly characterized, which affects performance targets for protective footwear. This experimental study investigated impact energies, forces, and deformations to characterize metatarsal fracture risk for simulated in situ workplace impact loading. A drop tower setup conforming to ASTM specifications for testing impact resistance of metatarsal protective footwear applied a target impact load (22-55 J) to 10 cadaveric feet. Prior to impact, each foot was axially loaded through the tibia with a specimen-specific bodyweight load to replicate a natural weight-bearing stance. Successive iterations of impact tests were performed until a fracture was observed with X-ray imaging. Descriptive statistics were computed for force, deformation, and impact energy. Correlational analysis was conducted on donor age, BMI, deformation, force, and impact energy. A survival analysis was used to generate injury risk curves (IRC) using impact energy and force. All 10 specimens fractured with the second metatarsal being the most common fracture location. The mean peak energy, force, and deformation during fracture were 46.6 J, 4640 N, 28.9 mm, respectively. Survival analyses revealed a 50% fracture probability was associated with 35.8 J and 3562 N of impact. Foot deformation was not significantly correlated (p = 0.47) with impact force, thus deformation is not recommended to predict metatarsal fracture risk. The results from this study can be used to improve test standards for metatarsal protection, provide performance targets for protective footwear developers, and demonstrate a methodological framework for future metatarsal fracture research.

Loading at the distal radius and ulna during active simulated dart throw motion.

Loading at the distal forearm during dart throw motion (DTM) has been examined under static loads but there is no consensus on how loading is affected by active motion. In this work two implants were designed to measure forearm loading in a cadaveric model of wrist motion. Loads through the radius and ulna were significantly greater in reverse DTM than forward DTM. Radius loads were greatest in extended and radial deviated positions, and ulnar loads were greatest in flexed and ulnar deviated position. This work gives insight into the biomechanics of loading of the forearm to guide further studies.

An In Vitro Study to Determine the Effect of Ulnar Shortening on Distal Forearm Loading During Wrist and Forearm Motion: Implications in the Treatment of Ulnocarpal Impaction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of ulnar shortening on distal forearm loading following simulated dynamic motion. METHODS: Ulnar shortening was simulated using a custom-built adjustable implant to simulate up to 4 mm of ulnar shortening (-4 mm) in 9 cadaveric extremities. Load cells were placed in the distal ulna and radius to quantify axial loading. Using a wrist and forearm motion simulator, absolute and percentage loads were measured during dynamic flexion, ulnar deviation (UD), flexion dart throw (DT), and pronation. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in absolute and percentage distal ulnar loads at each interval of ulnar shortening during flexion, UD, DT, and pronation. The distal ulna bore no compressive loads, and in fact, tensile loads were measured in the ulna at 2 mm of ulnar shortening during DT and pronation, at 3 mm during flexion, and at 4 mm during UD. CONCLUSIONS: A progressive decrease in distal ulnar loads with generation of tensile loads was observed with sequential ulnar shortening. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ulnar shortening greater than 2 mm can result in tensile loading in the distal ulna. When managing ulnar impaction syndrome, excessive shortening may not be required to provide relief of symptoms.

Effect of Radial Lengthening on Distal Forearm Loading Following Simulated In Vitro Radial Shortening During Simulated Dynamic Wrist Motion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of radial length change on distal forearm loading during simulated dynamic wrist motion. METHODS: A custom-built adjustable radial implant was used to simulate up to 4 mm of distal radius shortening (-4 mm) and 3 mm of lengthening (+3 mm). Load cells were placed in the distal radius and ulna in cadavers to measure their respective axial loads. The specimens were mounted on a wrist motion simulator that produced active wrist motion via tendon actuation. To simulate radial lengthening osteotomy following radial shortening from malunion, the radius was sequentially lengthened by 1-mm intervals from -4 mm to +3 mm. Radial and ulnar loads were measured during simulated wrist flexion, ulnar deviation (UD), and flexion dart throw (DT) at each interval of radial lengthening up to +3 mm. RESULTS: During wrist flexion and UD, for each millimeter of radial lengthening from -4 mm to the native length, there was a significant increase in distal radial loads. No significant change in radial load was observed beyond the native length during flexion and UD. There was no change in distal radial loads during DT for each interval of radial lengthening from -4 mm to +3 mm. A sequential decrease in ulnar loads was observed as the radius was lengthened from -4 mm to +3 mm for all wrist motions evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Radial lengthening beyond the native length was not detrimental to radial loading and further reduced distal ulnar loading; achieving at least native ulnar variance seems to be appropriate to restore normal biomechanical loading based on this in vitro study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lengthening of the radius beyond native variance in the setting of ulnar impaction syndrome, distal radius malunion, or distal radioulnar instability may not result in excessive loading of the distal radius and further reduces loading on the distal ulna. Surgeons should obtain contralateral wrist x-rays to serve as a template when performing distal radius osteotomies.