Inflammatory reaction in eyes with late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the inflammatory reaction in eyes with late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. METHODS: This prospective clinical study with fellow-eye comparison consists of 76 of the patients (76 eyes) with late in-the-bag IOL dislocation enrolled in the LION trial. The main outcome measure was anterior chamber flare before surgery measured with a laser flare meter in photon counts per millisecond (pc/ms). The dislocation was graded as 1 (small: optic still covering the visual axis), 2 (optic equator close to the visual axis) or 3 (optic decentred beyond the visual axis, but the IOL-capsule complex partly visible in the pupillary area). The secondary aim was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) before surgery. RESULTS: Flare levels before surgery were significantly higher in the dislocation eyes than in the fellow eyes with a median flare of 21.5 (range 5.4-135.7) pc/ms versus 14.1 (2.0-42.9) pc/ms, respectively (p ˂ 0.001). A regression analysis of log-transformed flare values showed that the dislocation eyes had a non-significant tendency towards higher flare in dislocation grade 1 with a median flare of 24.6 (5.4-135.7) pc/ms compared to grade 2; 19.6 (6.5-41.5) pc/ms (p = 0.06), and no significant difference compared to grade 3; 19.4 (10.2-53.5) pc/ms (p = 0.47). The IOP was significantly higher in the dislocation eyes than in the fellow eyes (p ˂ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with late in-the-bag IOL dislocation had increased flare levels compared to their fellow eyes. This suggests that inflammation is part of the clinical picture of late in-the-bag IOL dislocation.

Long-term risk of suture breakage after scleral fixation of late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation with a polypropylene 10-0 suture.

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term risk of suture breakage after scleral fixation with a polypropylene 10-0 suture in eyes with late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. SETTING: Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Patients operated with scleral suturing of late in-the-bag IOL dislocation from 2007 to 2016. 192 eyes (176 patients) operated with scleral suture (polypropylene 10-0 suture) fixation of a dislocated IOL-capsule complex were identified; 91 patients (47%) were men. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after the operation was 6.2 (95% CI, 5.7-6.7) years, and 98 patients (56%) deceased during the study. 11 eyes (6%) (11 patients) had suture breakage that required reoperation with a mean time of 5.5 (3.4-7.6) years after IOL repositioning surgery. These patients had a mean age of 73.5 (67.9-79.2) years at the time of the operation for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation vs 81.3 (79.8-82.9) years for patients who did not experience this complication ( P = .004). No cases of late endophthalmitis were registered. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term risk of suture breakage was quite low after scleral fixation of late in-the-bag IOL dislocation, particularly in the oldest patients. Hence, the polypropylene 10-0 suture seems to be a safe option for scleral fixation in this patient group.

Intraocular Inflammation in Eyes Operated for Late In-the-bag intraOcular lens dislocatioN (LION): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular inflammation after 2 surgical approaches for late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. METHODS: We randomly assigned 100 patients (100 eyes) referred to Oslo University Hospital (tertiary referral center) with late in-the-bag IOL dislocation into IOL repositioning by scleral suturing (n=49) or IOL exchange with retropupillary fixation of an iris-claw lens (n=51). Patients were examined before surgery and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months after surgery. The main outcome measure was anterior chamber laser flare, measured with a laser flare meter as photon counts per millisecond (pc/ms). RESULTS: Two weeks following surgery, median flare values were 28.9 pc/ms (range, 7.9-140) in the repositioning group and 31.6 pc/ms (range, 9.8-92.3) in the exchange group (P = .83). Flare levels were still elevated after 6 weeks with no difference between the groups (P = .93), whereas it decreased to baseline levels after 6 months. Six weeks following surgery, the central retinal thickness was similar (P = .97); cystoid macular edema (CME) was found in 4 and 5 patients, respectively (P = .85); and the mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.17 (95% CI 0.09, 0.25) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.09, 0.32) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively (P = .61). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed similar levels of intraocular inflammation following IOL repositioning and IOL exchange. There was no significant difference regarding risk of CME and visual outcome. The prolonged elevation in postoperative flare indicates a possible requirement for an extended anti-inflammatory treatment period after these operations.