Toma de decisión compartida en la asesoría preprueba de la ecografía de las 11 a las 13 semanas de gestación: revisión bibliográfica / Shared decision making in pretest counseling at the 11 to 13 weeks ultrasound scan: bibliographic review

Resumen ANTECEDENTES: En el diagnóstico prenatal confluye un grupo de tecnologías enfocadas a la detección de defectos o anomalías congénitas de origen genético y multifactorial. Con independencia del tipo de prueba de que se trate, cualquier tecnología de diagnóstico prenatal debe ir acompañada de asesorías pre y posprueba. La sustentación ética de estas asesorías es de primordial interés para la Medicina prenatal y ha sido tarea de diversas organizaciones. METODOLOGÍA: Estudio retrospectivo, de búsqueda en las bases de datos PubMed, Web of Science y Google Scholar, con los términos MeSH: "Pregnancy", "Prenatal Diagnosis", "Genetic Conuseling", "Relational Autonomy" y "Decision Making". RESULTADOS: Se encontraron 909 referencias de las que se eliminaron las de más de 20 años de publicación, las que no contaban con textos completos y las duplicadas por la búsqueda en distintas bases de datos. Al final se analizaron 25 artículos en texto completo que sirvieron de base para la revisión bibliográfica. CONCLUSIONES: En la actualidad, el ultrasonido es la principal puerta de entrada al mundo del diagnóstico prenatal. Aludir a la indicación y uso éticos de cualquier tecnología de diagnóstico prenatal previene daño al embarazo en su conjunto y desincentiva la necesidad de una normatividad jurídica detallada que, por el momento, no existe en muchos países, incluido el nuestro. Hoy en día se dispone de lineamientos éticos claros para la asesoría de la ecografía como técnica de diagnóstico prenatal.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Prenatal diagnosis brings together a group of technologies that focus on the detection of congenital defects or anomalies of genetic and multifactorial origin. Irrespective of the type of test, any prenatal diagnostic technology must be accompanied by pre- and post-test counselling. The ethical underpinning of such counselling is of paramount interest to prenatal medicine and has been the task of several organisations. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective study, searching PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases using the MeSH terms: "pregnancy", "prenatal diagnosis", "genetic counselling", "relational autonomy" and "decision making". RESULTS: We found 909 references from which we eliminated those older than 20 years of publication, those without full text and those duplicated by searching in different databases. In the end, 25 full-text articles were analysed and served as the basis for the literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is currently the main gateway to the world of prenatal diagnosis. The ethical indication and use of any prenatal diagnostic technology prevents harm to the pregnancy as a whole and avoids the need for detailed legal regulation, which currently does not exist in many countries, including our own. Clear ethical guidelines are now available for advice on ultrasound as a prenatal diagnostic technique.

[Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: review]. / Colestasis intrahepática del embarazo: una revisión.

The etiology of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy includes genetic and environmental factors. Bile acids elevation in maternal and fetal blood is the main fact of its physiopathology, causing maternal itching and high perinatal morbidity and mortality. High levels of maternal blood bile acids are diagnostic. Best treatment is ursodeoxycolic acid and clearly it produces amelioration of bile acid levels and itching, but it is uncertain if it reduces perinatal morbidity and mortality. As far as fetal death is one of sudden onset, probably due to acute hypoxia, tests to evaluate and predict fetal condition are useless. Pregnancy interruption at 36-37 gestation weeks is the best strategy for lowering fetal death incidence. The purpose of this work is to achieve an actualized literature review on this disease.

[Genetic disease and diagnostic strategies in stillbirth]. / Alteraciones genéticas y estrategias diagnósticas en muerte fetal.

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth occurs in about 1 in 1000 pregnancies. The causes are maternal, fetal, and placental; but in half of the cases, no cause can be determined. Genetic disease, a common cause of stillbirth, is diagnosed in 25-35% of patients with birth defects. OBJECTIVE: Describe birth defects found in stillbirth cases at the Instituto Nacional de Perinatología in a period of 3 years, analyze risk factors in each pregnancy, and propose an adequate approach to effectively reach the proper diagnosis of defined genetic entities related to stillbirth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All stillbirths cases presenting birth defects and assessed by the Department of Genetics from January 2008 to December 2010 were included in this study. RESULTS: We evaluated 55 stillbirths with birth defects. 31% of them showed multiple defects; 14.5%, single defects; 20%, single gene disorders; 14.5%, chromosomal abnormalities; 9%, disruptive processes; 7%, non-immune fetal hydrops, and 4% twin pregnancy. The karyotype was obtained in all cases from amniocentesis, and in half of them from umbilical cords as well. In 95% of the cases prenatal findings were confirmed through prenatal USG, and necropsy was performed in 74.5% of them. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound, karyotype, autopsy and assessment by a medical geneticist allowed an accurate diagnosis in 81% of cases. Genetic counseling helps reduce parental anxiety and stillbirth from unknown causes.