Treatment response assessment in mCRPC: is PSMA-PET/CT going to take the lead?

The assessment of response to therapy in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is an ongoing, open issue. Prostate-specific antigen has limitations, especially in advanced metastatic PCa, which often displays intratumor variability in terms of response to therapy. Conventional imaging (i.e. computerized tomography and bone scan) is of limited use for its low sensitivity and specificity. Positron-emission tomography (PET) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity, and novel PSMA-based criteria have been recently proposed for treatment response, with promising results in different scenarios, from chemotherapy to radioligand therapy. PSMA-based criteria have been found to outperform the current RECIST 1.1 and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 frameworks in describing the behavior of PCa, precisely assessing tumor phenotypes through molecular-imaging-derived parameters. This review critically explores the current evidence about the role of PSMA PET/computed tomography in the assessment of treatment response.

Detection of tumour heterogeneity in patients with advanced, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), some patients show low/absent PSMA expression in tumour lesions on positron emission tomography (PET) scans, indicating heterogeneity and heightened risk of non-response to PSMA-RLT (radioligand therapy). Imaging cancer-associated fibroblasts and glucose uptake may further characterise tumour heterogeneity in mCRPC patients. Here, we aimed to evaluate tumour heterogeneity and its potential implications for management in mCRPC patients assessed for PSMA-RLT using [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46, 2-[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 PET. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with advanced, progressive mCRPC underwent clinical [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007, 2-[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to evaluate treatment with PSMA-directed RLT. Tumour detection/semiquantitative parameters were compared on a per-lesion/-region basis. Two phenotypes were defined: Criteria for the mixed phenotype were: (a) PSMA-negative findings for lymph node metastases ≥ 2.5 cm, any solid organ metastases ≥ 1.0 cm, or bone metastases with soft tissue component ≥ 1.0 cm, (b) low [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 uptake and/or (c) balanced tumour uptake of all radioligands. The PSMA-dominant phenotype was assigned if the criteria were not met. RESULTS: In ten patients, 472 lesions were detected on all imaging modalities (miTNM regions: M1b: 327 (69.3%), M1a: 95 (20.1%), N1: 26 (5.5%), M1c: 18 (3.8%), T: 5 (1.1%) and Tr: 1 (0.2%). [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 (n = 453 (96.0%)) demonstrates the highest detection rate, followed by [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 (n = 268 (56.8%))/2-[18F]FDG (n = 241 (51.1%)). Semiquantitative uptake was highest for [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 (mean SUVmax (interquartile range): 22.7 (22.5), vs. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 (7.7 (3.7)) and 2-[18F]FDG (6.8 (4.7)). Seven/three patients were retrospectively assigned to the PSMA-dominant/mixed phenotype. Median overall survival was significantly longer for patients who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT and were retrospectively assigned to the PSMA-dominant phenotype (19.7 vs. 9.3 months). CONCLUSION: Through whole-body imaging, we identify considerable inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity of mCRPC and potential imaging phenotypes. Regarding uptake and tumour detection, [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 was superior to [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and 2-[18F]FDG, while the latter two were comparable. Patients who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT based on clinical-decision making had a longer overall survival and could be assigned to the PSMA-dominant phenotype.

Immunohistochemistry analysis of PSMA expression at prostatic biopsy in high-risk prostate cancer: potential implications for PSMA-PET patient selection.

Introduction: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein expressed by normal prostatic tissue. Therefore, molecular imaging targeting PSMA (PSMA-PET) has gained particular interest and diffusion for PCa staging and restaging. Several factors may affect PSMA-PET results, and many tools have been proposed to improve patient selection. Furthermore, PSMA expression is not homogeneous among different tissues and within the prostate itself. The aims of this study were to evaluate immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of prostate biopsy samples and to assess their correlation with whole-mount specimens and PSMA-PET parameters. Methods: We included consecutive high-risk PCa patients who underwent PSMA-PET for staging proposal at our institution from January 2022 to December 2022. The PET parameters selected were SUVmax, total volume (TV), and total lesion activity (TL). Each patient underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and fusion-targeted prostate biopsy prior to surgery. IHC analyses were performed on the index lesion cores. IHC visual score (VS) (1, 2, 3) and visual pattern (VP) (membranous, cytoplasmic, and combined) and the percentage of PSMA-negative tumor areas (PSMA%neg) within biopsy cores were evaluated. Results: Forty-three patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy after PSMA-PET were available for analyses. Concordance between VS and VP at biopsy and final pathology showed a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.39 and 0.38, respectively. Patients with PSMA%neg <20% had a higher concordance in VS and VP (Cohen's kappa 0.49 and 0.4, respectively). No difference emerged in terms of median PSMA-TV (p = 0.3) and PSMA-TL (p = 0.9) according to VS at biopsy, while median SUVmax was higher in patients with VS 3 (p = 0.04). Higher SUVmax was associated with membranous and combined VP expression (p = 0.008). No difference emerged between patients with PSMA%neg <20% or PSMA%neg >20% on biopsy cores in terms of SUVmax, PSMA-TL, and PSMA-TV (p = 0.5, p = 0.5, and p = 0.9 respectively). Conclusions: We found a correlation between IHC VS and VP on targeted biopsy cores and SUVmax at PSMA-PET. However, the correlation between the IHC parameters of biopsy cores and final pathology was not as high as expected. Nevertheless, the presence of PSMA%neg <20% seems to have a better concordance in terms of visual score.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu- or 90Y-SSTR peptides in malignant pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs): results from a single institutional retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare tumors and available systemic therapies are limited. AIM: To explore the role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Yttrium-90 (90Y) and Lutetium-177 (177Lu) peptides in pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed more than 1500 patients with histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177Lu- or 90Y-DOTA-TATE or -TOC between 1999 to 2017 at our Institute. Overall, 30 patients with confirmed malignant PCCs and PGLs matched inclusion/exclusion criteria and were considered eligible for this analysis. RESULTS: Thirty (n = 30) patients were treated: 22 with PGLs and 8 with PCCs (12 M and 18 F, median age 47 [IQR: 35-60 years]). Eighteen patients (n = 18) had head and neck PGLs, 3 patients thoracic PGLs and 1 patient abdominal PGL. Sixteen patients (53%) had locally advanced and fourteen (47%) had metastatic disease. Twenty-seven (90%) patients had disease progression at baseline. Four (13%) patients were treated with 90Y, sixteen (53%) with 177Lu and ten (33%) with 90Y + 177Lu respectively. The median total cumulative activity from treatment with 90Y- alone was 9.45 GBq (range 5.11-14.02 GBq), from 177Lu- alone was 21.9 GBq (7.55-32.12 GBq) and from the combination treatment was 4.94 GBq from 90Y- and 6.83 GBq from 177Lu- (ranges 1.04-10.1 and 2.66-20.13 GBq, respectively). Seven out of 30 (23%) patients had partial response and 19 (63%) stable disease. Median follow up was 8.9 years (IQR: 2.9-12). The 5-y and 10-y PFS was 68% (95% CI: 48-82) and 53% (95% CI: 33-69), respectively, whereas 5-y and 10-y OS was 75% (95% CI: 54-87) and 59% (95% CI: 38-75), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 acute hematological toxicity occurred in three patients, two with leucopenia and one with thrombocytopenia, respectively. CONCLUSION: PRRT with 177Lu- or 90Y-DOTA-TATE or -TOC is feasible and well tolerated in advanced PGLs and PCCs.

The clinical acceptability of short versus long duration acquisitions for head and neck cancer using long-axial field-of-view PET/CT: a retrospective evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of long duration (10 min) acquisitions compared to standard 4 min scans in the evaluation of head and neck cancer (HNC) using a long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) system in 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT. METHODS: HNC patients undergoing LAFOV PET/CT were included retrospectively according to a predefined sample size calculation. For each acquisition, FDG avid lymph nodes (LN) which were highly probable or equivocal for malignancy were identified by two board certified nuclear medicine physicians in consensus. The aim of this study was to establish the clinical acceptability of short-duration (4 min, C40%) acquisitions compared to full-count (10 min, C100%) in terms of the detection of LN metastases in HNC. Secondary endpoints were the positive predictive value for LN status (PPV) and comparison of SUVmax at C40% and C100%. Histology reports or confirmatory imaging were the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 1218 records were screened and target recruitment was met with n = 64 HNC patients undergoing LAFOV. Median age was 65 years (IQR: 59-73). At C40%, a total of 387 lesions were detected (highly probable LN n = 274 and equivocal n = 113. The total number of lesions detected at C100% acquisition was 439, of them 291 (66%) highly probable LN and 148 (34%) equivocal. Detection rate between the two acquisitions did not demonstrate any significant differences (Pearson's Chi-Square test, p = 0.792). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for C40% were 83%, 44%, 55%, 76% and 36%, whilst for C100% were 85%, 56%, 55%, 85% and 43%, respectively. The improved accuracy reached borderline significance (p = 0.057). At the ROC analysis, lower SUVmax was identified for C100% (3.5) compared to C40% (4.5). CONCLUSION: In terms of LN detection, C40% acquisitions showed no significant difference compared to the C100% acquisitions. There was some improvement for lesions detection at C100%, with a small increment in accuracy reaching borderline significance, suggestive that the higher sensitivity afforded by LAFOV might translate to improved clinical performance in some patients.

68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Interobserver Agreement on Tumor Assessment: An International Multicenter Prospective Study.

68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) are promising radiotracers for cancer imaging, with emerging data in the recent years. Nonetheless, the interobserver agreement on 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT study interpretations in cancer patients remains poorly understood. Methods: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was performed on 50 patients with various tumor entities (sarcoma [n = 10], colorectal cancer [n = 10], pancreatic adenocarcinoma [n = 10], genitourinary cancer [n = 10], and other types of cancer [n = 10]). Fifteen masked observers reviewed and interpreted the images using a standardized approach for local, local nodal, and metastatic involvement. Observers were grouped by experience as having a low (<30 prior 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT studies; n = 5), intermediate (30-300 studies; n = 5), or high level of experience (>300 studies; n = 5). Two independent readers with a high level of experience and unmasked to clinical information, histopathology, tumor markers, and follow-up imaging (CT/MRI or PET/CT) served as the standard of reference (SOR). Observer groups were compared by overall agreement (percentage of patients matching SOR) and Fleiss κ with mean and corresponding 95% CI. We defined acceptable agreement as a κ value of at least 0.6 (substantial or higher) and acceptable accuracy as at least 80%. Results: Highly experienced observers agreed substantially on all categories (primary tumor: κ = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.71-0.71; local nodal involvement: κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.61-0.62; distant metastasis: κ = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.75-0.75), whereas observers with intermediate experience showed substantial agreement on primary tumor (κ = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.73-0.73) and distant metastasis (κ = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.65-0.65) but moderate agreement on local nodal stages (κ = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.55-0.55). Observers with low experience had moderate agreement on all categories (primary tumor: κ = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.57-0.58; local nodal involvement: κ = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.51-0.52; distant metastasis: κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.53-0.54). Compared with SOR, the accuracy for readers with high, intermediate, and low experience was 85%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. In summary, only highly experienced readers showed substantial agreement and a diagnostic accuracy of at least 80% in all categories. Conclusion: The interpretation of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for cancer imaging had substantial reproducibility and accuracy among highly experienced observers only, especially for local nodal and metastatic assessments. Therefore, for accurate interpretation of different tumor entities and pitfalls, we recommend training or experience with at least 300 representative scans for future clinical readers.

PSMA-PET Guided Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligorecurrent Progression after Previous Salvage Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is used to select recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients for metastases-directed therapy (MDT). We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of second-line PSMA-guided MDT in oligo-recurrent PCa patients. METHODS: we performed a retrospective analysis of 113 recurrent PCa after previous radical prostatectomy and salvage therapies with oligorecurrent disease at PSMA-PET (≤3 lesions in N1/M1a-b) in three high-volume European centres. Patients underwent second-line salvage treatments: MDT targeted to PSMA (including surgery and/or radiotherapy), and the conventional approach (observation or Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ADT]). Patients were stratified according to treatments (MDT vs. conventional approach). Patients who underwent MDT were stratified according to stage in PSMA-PET (N1 vs. M1a-b). The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant PCa free survival (CRPC-FS). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS. Multivariable Cox regression models identified predictors of progression and metastatic disease. RESULTS: Overall, 91 (80%) and 22 (20%) patients were treated with MDT and the conventional approach, respectively. The median follow-up after PSMA-PET was 31 months. Patients who underwent MDT had a similar PFS compared to the conventional approach (p = 0.3). Individuals referred to MDT had significantly higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to those who were treated with the conventional approach (73.5% and 94.7% vs. 30.5% and 79.5%; all p ≤ 0.001). In patients undergoing MDT, no significant differences were found for PFS and MFS according to N1 vs. M1a-b disease, while CRPC-FS estimates were significantly higher in patients with N1 vs. M1a-b (100% vs. 86.1%; p = 0.02). At multivariable analyses, age (HR = 0.96) and ADT during second line salvage treatment (HR = 0.5) were independent predictors of PFS; MDT (HR 0.27) was the only independent predictor of MFS (all p ≤ 0.04) Conclusion: Patients who underwent second-line PSMA-guided MDT experienced higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to men who received conventional management.

Histology and PSMA Expression on Immunohistochemistry in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Comparison with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Features in Primary Staging.

PSMA-PET/CT is a suitable replacement for conventional imaging in the primary staging of PCa. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between parameters discovered by PSMA PET/CT in primary staging and either prostate histopathology (pT) findings or PSMA-IHC expression in a cohort of biopsy-proven high-risk PCa candidates for surgery. Clinical information (age, iPSA-value, and grading group) and PSMA-PET/CT parameters (SUVmax, PSMA tumor volume [PSMA-TV], and total lesion [PSMA-TL]) were compared with pT (including histologic pattern, Gleason grade, and lymphovascular invasion [LVI]) and PSMA-IHC features, including visual quantification (VS) with a four-tiered score (0 = negative, 1+ = weak, 2+ = moderate, 3+ = strong), growth pattern (infiltrative vs expansive), and visual pattern (cytoplasmic vs membranous). In total, 44 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 67 (IQR 57-77); the median iPSA was 9.4 ng/dL (IQR 12.5-6.0). One patient (3%) was grading group (GG) 3, 27/44 (61%) were GG4, and 16/44 (36%) were GG5. PSMA-PET/CT detection rate for the presence of primary prostate cancer was 100%. Fused/poorly formed Gleason grade 4 features were predominant (22/44-50%); a cribriform pattern was present in 18/44 (41%) and acinar in 4/44 (9%). We found that lower PSMA-TVs were mostly related to acinar, while higher PSMA-TVs correlated with a higher probability to have a cribriform pattern (p-value 0.04). LVI was present in 21/44(48%) patients. We found that higher PSMA-TV and PSMA-TL are predictive of LVI p-value 0.002 and p-value 0.01, respectively. There was no correlation between PET-parameters and perineural invasion (PNI), probably because this was present in almost all the patients. Moreover, patients with high PSMA-TL values displayed the highest PSMA-IHC expression (VS3+) with a membranous pattern. In conclusion, PSMA-TV and PSMA-TL are predictors of a cribriform pattern and LVI. These conditions are mostly related to higher aggressiveness and worse outcomes.

Case report: PSMA PET/CT addresses the correct diagnosis in a patient with metastatic prostate cancer despite negative core biopsies and mpMRI. A diagnostic challenge.

This is a case of [68 Ga]Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT in a 73-years old patient presenting high Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels despite both multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and 12-core saturation biopsy negative for prostate cancer (Pca). This is a highly interesting case because, despite the advanced metastatic spread at initial presentation as showed by [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET/CT, the primary Pca was detected by none of the diagnostic techniques (12 random sample biopsy, mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT). However, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET/CT showed a suspicious axillary lesion suitable for biopsy, which finally resulted as Pca metastasis. This case report is therefore a brilliant example of how [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET/CT optimized patient's management.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression on PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Monitoring therapy response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with novel hormonal therapies, taxanes, and newly approved therapies is crucial for optimizing treatment. [68Ga]Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) is a promising target for managing treatment in patients with prostate cancer. PSMA is overexpressed in patients with mCRPC; understanding how expression might change in patients undergoing treatment could determine its potential for guiding clinical decisions. We examined PSMA expression in patients with CRPC and compared PET/CT response with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variation as a prognostic factor for progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational cohort study in patients with CRPC enrolled in the PSMA-PROSTATA registry study (EudraCT: 2015-004589-27). A first and second (if applicable) PSMA PET/CT were performed to determine PSMA expression (absence or presence). PET/CT response was assessed as responders (patients with stable disease, partial or complete response) versus nonresponders (patients with progressive disease) by comparing the first with the second PET/CT. PSA variation (increase or decrease from baseline) was assessed across the same time period. PFS was defined as the time between second PET/CT and PSA recurrence or evidence of radiologic progression. Results: Overall, 160 patients with CRPC were included in the analysis. At first PET/CT, nearly all (n = 152; 95.0%) patients had PSMA expression (classified as mCRPC), irrespective of prior systemic therapy. SUVmax was positively associated with baseline PSA levels and velocity (both P < 0.001). According to PET/CT response, median SUVmax on first PET/CT was numerically lower in nonresponders than in responders (17.5 vs. 20.4; P = 0.127). Similarly, patients with a PSA increase had significantly lower median SUVmax on first PET/CT (15.8) than did those with a PSA decrease (30.4; P = 0.018). PSA change was, on average, 146% in nonresponders and -57% in responders between first and second PET/CT (P < 0.001). Agreement between PET/CT and PSA response was 79% (k = 0.553, P < 0.001). Among the 63 patients included in PFS/OS analyses, 76.2% had a relapse and 36.5% died before 24-mo follow-up; median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 24 mo, respectively. PET/CT response, independent of PSA variation, was a significant prognostic factor for PFS. OS was not significantly different between PET/CT responders and nonresponders. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT may be a useful imaging method predictive of treatment response in patients with mCRPC, regardless of ongoing systemic therapy. Data also suggest that response assessed by PET/CT is a potentially more significant prognostic factor than PSA for PFS. Further studies are needed to understand the potential involvement of PSMA expression on survival.

The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography in the management of prostate cancer patients: could we ask for more?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Thanks to the development of novel PSMA-based peptides, molecular imaging, such as PET/CT paired with theranostic-based approaches have recently been proposed for treatment of prostate cancer. Patient selection, however, remains challenging because of the absence of strong prospective data to interpret and translate imaging scans into effective and well tolerated treatment regimens. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we discuss the latest findings in PSMA imaging in prostate cancer patients. Particularly, we go into detail into the impact of PSMA imaging on the treatment management in primary staging, biochemical recurrence and in advanced prostate cancer. SUMMARY: For primary prostate cancer staging, PSMA PET/CT seems crucial for primary therapy assessment, being able in some cases to detect lesions outside the surgical template, thus permitting a change in management. Moreover, N+ condition at PSMA has been correlated with a worse biochemical recurrence-free and therapy-free survival. The early detection of PSMA-positive findings in recurrent prostate cancer is associated with a better time to relapse survival. Similarly, for advanced prostate cancer patients, accurate restaging with PSMA imaging is gaining importance for early prediction of response to systemic therapies and to assure the best outcome possible. With regards to theranostics, appropriate selection of patients eligible for 177Lu-PSMA requires PSMA imaging, whereas the role of added FDG-PET for discriminating those with PSMA/FDG discordance needs to be further evaluated.

The Impact of PSMA-PET on Oncologic Control in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Experienced PSA Persistence or Recurrence.

Background: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is currently recommended to restage prostate cancer (PCa) and to guide the delivery of salvage treatments. We aim to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with recurrent PCa who received PSMA-PET. Methods: 324 hormone-sensitive PCa with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy who underwent PSMA-PET in three high-volume European Centres. Patients have been stratified as pre-salvage who never received salvage treatments (n = 134), and post-salvage, including patients who received previous salvage therapies (n = 190). Patients with oligorecurrent (≤3 lesions), PSMA-positive disease underwent PSMA-directed treatments: salvage radiotherapy (sRT) or Metastases-directed therapy (MDT). Patients with polirecurrent (>3 lesions) PSMA-positive disease were treated with systemic therapy. Patients with negative PSMA-PET were treated with sRT or systemic therapies or observation. The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were: Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant Pca free survival (CRPC-FS). Results: median follow up was 23 months. In the pre-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 66.2% vs. 38.9%, 95.2% vs. 73.7% and 94.9% vs. 93.1% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≥ 0.2). In the post-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 59.5% vs. 29.1%, 92.7% vs. 65.1% and 98.8% vs. 88.8% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≤ 0.01). At multivariable analyses, a positive PSMA-PET was an independent predictor of progression (HR = 2.15) and metastatic disease (HR 2.37; all p ≤ 0.03). Conclusion: PSMA-PET in recurrent PCa detects the site of recurrence guiding salvage treatments and has a prognostic role in patients who received previous salvage treatments.

PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Prostate Cancer: What You Might See on PET and Should Never Forget.

2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) gained an impressive role in the diagnostic management of many oncological diseases, even though its use in imaging prostate cancer (PC) is limited to selected cases, mostly advanced stage of PC and selection for prostate specific antigen membrane (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT). In the past years, several PET tracers have been developed for both staging and restaging PC. The three most employed PET molecules in daily practice are [11C] or [18F]F-Choline, [18F]F-Fluciclovine (Anti-1- amino-3-[18F]Fluorocyclobutane-1-Carboxylic Acid, also known as (Anti-[18F]FACBC), [68Ga]Ga-PSMA and recently FDA approved the first Fluorinated PSMA-based named [18F]F-DCFPyl. Each one has its own physiological and peculiarity which are worth exploring. Moreover, an increasing number of case reports and studies have reported tracers' variants, pitfalls, or even non-prostatic diseases (benign and malignant) incidentally detected. In prostate oncology, PET can be performed with several indications in different stages of disease, as highlighted in the EAU Guidelines on PC. A correct scan interpretation depends on the knowledge of both the physiological distribution of the tracers and the uptake of possible variants and pitfalls. The aim of this critical review is to provide a comprehensive knowledge of physiological distribution of these three tracers, as well as an updated overview of variants and pitfalls.

The Role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Characterization of High-Risk Primary Prostate Cancer: Comparison with [11C]Choline PET/CT and Histopathological Analysis.

The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the characterization of intra-prostatic lesions in high-risk primary PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy, in comparison with conventional [11C]Choline PET/CT and validated by prostatectomy pathologic examination. Secondary aims were to determine the performance of PET semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax; target-to-background ratios [TBRs], using abdominal aorta, bone marrow and liver as backgrounds) for malignant lesion detection (and best cut-off values) and to search predictive factors of malignancy. A six sextants prostate template was created and used by PET readers and pathologists for data comparison and validation. PET visual and semi-quantitative analyses were performed: for instance, patient-based, blinded to histopathology; subsequently lesion-based, un-blinded, according to the pathology reference template. Among 19 patients included (mean age 63 years, 89% high and 11% very-high-risk, mean PSA 9.15 ng/mL), 45 malignant and 31 benign lesions were found and 19 healthy areas were selected (n = 95). For both tracers, the location of the "blinded" prostate SUVmax matched with the lobe of the lesion with the highest pGS in 17/19 cases (89%). There was direct correlation between [18F]Fluciclovine uptake values and pISUP. Overall, lesion-based (n = 95), the performance of PET semiquantitative parameters, with either [18F]Fluciclovine or [11C]Choline, in detecting either malignant/ISUP2-5/ISUP4-5 PCa lesions, was moderate and similar (AUCs ≥ 0.70) but still inadequate (AUCs ≤ 0.81) as a standalone staging procedure. A [18F]Fluciclovine TBR-L3 ≥ 1.5 would depict a clinical significant lesion with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 68% respectively; whereas a SUVmax cut-off value of 4 would be able to identify a ISUP 4-5 lesion in all cases (sensitivity 100%), although with low specificity (52%). TBRs (especially with threshold significantly higher than aorta and slightly higher than bone marrow), may be complementary to implement malignancy targeting.

Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on most prostate cancer (PCa) cells, and several PSMA ligands for PET imaging are now available worldwide. 68Ga-PSMA-11 has already received U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval, and use of PSMA PET is currently suggested by several international guidelines for investigating PCa in different clinical settings. In primary PCa, PSMA PET has been shown to be superior to cross-sectional imaging for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases with subsequent clinical management changes. Additionally, it might also have a role in intraprostatic tumor localization, especially when combined with multiparametric MRI. In a setting of PCa recurrence, higher detection rates have been observed than for any other available imaging techniques, especially at low prostate-specific antigen values. Furthermore, PSMA PET consistently led to a shift in clinical management, thus increasing the proportion of radiotherapy, surgery, or other focal therapies at the expense of systemic options or no treatment. In oligometastatic disease after radical surgery, PSMA PET may be relevant in guiding a metastasis-directed therapy approach, as preliminary data seem to suggest a benefit in terms of progression-free survival after treatment of PSMA PET-positive lesions. As a staging and gatekeeping technique, PSMA PET represents a reliable whole-body imaging procedure in combination with second-line therapy of castration-resistant PCa, as well as being pivotal when assessing patients eligible for radioligand therapy such as 177Lu-PSMA. This critical review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the latest literature on the current or emerging main indications, as well as a general outlook on the recommended interpretation criteria for PSMA PET imaging.

Theragnostics in prostate cancer.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a molecular target for both imaging diagnostics and therapeutics, i.e., a theragnostics target. There has been a growing body of evidence supporting PSMA theragnostics approaches in the management of prostate cancer (PCa) for tailored precision medicine. Tumor characterization through PSMA-ligand PET imaging is crucial for assessing the molecular signature and eligibility for PSMA radioligand therapy. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of two new drug applications for PSMA PET imaging contribute to reinforce PSMA as an oncologic blockbuster. Additionally, relevant progress in the PSMA treatment has been made in the last five years. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy for patients with progressive PSMA-avid metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) significantly increased overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival, according to the results of an international, prospective, open label, multicenter, randomized, phase III study (VISION trial). The objective of this comprehensive review is to highlight the recent advances in PCa theragnostics, focusing on actual clinical applications and future perspectives.

Identification of PCWG3 Target Populations Is More Accurate and Reproducible with PSMA PET Than with Conventional Imaging: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand PET is potentially useful for screening of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) clinical trial target populations. We investigated the impact of PSMA PET on Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) clinical subtype classification when compared with conventional imaging (CI). Methods: A multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients who had undergone PSMA PET for CRPC, had prostate-specific antigen values of at least 1 ng/mL, and had undergone CI-that is, CT plus bone scanning or whole-body MRI. The clinical PCWG3 subtype was determined for PET versus CI by 3 masked readers. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included, and PSMA PET led to up-staging in 15% (10/67) of patients; of these, 6 of 10 (60%) had nonmetastatic CRPC on CI. PSMA PET resulted in down-staging in 15% (10/67) of patients. Agreement for PET versus CI PCWG3 clinical subtypes was 0.81 versus 0.51, 0.74 versus 0.47, 0.95 versus 0.72, or 0.59 versus 0.66 for local, nodal, bone, or visceral disease, respectively. Conclusion: Despite 70% concordance with CI, PSMA PET demonstrated superior reproducibility and accuracy especially for non-metastatic CRPC and should be implemented in future clinical trial entry procedures.

Colon Sarcoidosis Mimicking Cancer at 18F-FDG PET/CT.

This 68-year-old woman with a 9-year history of skin sarcoidosis presented with abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea. Following positive occult fecal blood, a diagnosis of ascending colon sarcoidosis was pathologically confirmed after colonoscopy. FDG PET/CT was performed for sarcoid staging, and the ascending colon demonstrated the only focal site of active sarcoidosis (SUVmax = 10).