Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 76(2): 2191-2204, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566738

RESUMO

Our study aimed to enhance understanding of nasal polyp pathophysiology by reviewing the data for variations of NLR values between patients with nasal polyp and healthy controls. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus up to 2 April 2023. The search strategy was not limited to any specific language. Twelve studies were included in our study. Of them, ten studies, involving 898 nasal polyp patients and 590 control patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The NLR levels in nasal polyp patients were statistically greater than in the control group (SMD = 0.56; 95%CI 0.04-1.08, P = 0.036). Subgroup analysis based on study design yielded that patients with nasal polyp exhibited significantly higher NLR levels than healthy controls in retrospective studies (SMD = 0.83; 95%CI 0.30-1.35, P = 0.002) but not in prospective studies (SMD = 0.10; 95%CI = -1.03 to 1.23, P = 0.85). Also, we found that the NLR levels in nasal polyp patients were significantly higher than healthy controls in high-quality studies (SMD = 1.00; 95%CI 0.38-1.62, P = 0.002) but not in low-quality studies (SMD = 0.11; 95%CI = -0.69 to 0.91, P = 0.79). A total of 312 patients with recurrence and 550 patients without recurrence were included in the study. The combined results revealed that NLR levels in nasal polyp recurrence patients were significantly higher than those of the nasal polyp without recurrence group (SMD = 0.06, 95% CI 0.39-0.81, P = 0.000). These results showed the relationship between the NLR in nasal polyps and can help medical doctors to predict the recurrence of the disease in such patients.

2.
Eur J Med Res ; 28(1): 523, 2023 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37974254

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present study aims to review the existing scientific literature on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) to perform a meta-analysis on the available data. METHODS: The electronic repositories Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically explored starting from their establishment up until June 9, 2022. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis after multiple screening according to the PRISMA guidelines. The combined findings indicated that individuals with DPN had higher levels of NLR in comparison to those without DPN (SMD = 0.61; CI 95% = 0.40-0.81, p < 0.001). In the subgroup assessment based on ethnicity, it was observed that diabetic patients with DPN exhibited increased NLR levels in contrast to those without DPN in studies conducted in India (SMD = 1.30; CI 95% = 0.37-2.24, p = 0.006) and East Asia (SMD = 0.53; CI 95% = 0.34-0.73, p < 0.001) but not in studies conducted in Turkey (SMD = 0.30; CI 95% = - 0.06-0.67, p = 0.104) and Egypt (SMD = 0.34; CI 95% = -0.14-0.82, p = 0.165). The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.49-0.81), and the pooled specificity was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.81). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of NLR were 2.30 (95% CI = 1.71-3.09), 0.45 (95%CI = 0.30-0.67), and 5.06 (95% CI = 3.16-8.12), respectively. CONCLUSION: NLR serves as a distinct marker of inflammation, and its rise in cases of DPN suggests an immune system imbalance playing a role in the development of the disease.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Neuropatias Diabéticas , Humanos , Neutrófilos , Linfócitos , Índia , Turquia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA