Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in oligometastatic disease.

Oligometastatic cancers designate cancers in which the number of metastases is less than five, corresponding to a particular biological entity whose prognosis is situated between a localized and metastatic disease. The liver is one of the main sites of metastases. When patients are not suitable for surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy provides high local control rate, although these data come mainly from retrospective studies, with no phase III study results. The need for a high therapeutic dose (biologically effective dose greater than 100Gy) while respecting the constraints on the organs at risk, and the management of respiratory movements require expertise and sufficient technical prerequisites. The emergence of new techniques such as MRI-guided radiotherapy could further increase the effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy of liver metastases, and thus improve the prognosis of these oligometastatic cancers.

Prevention of radiation enteritis by interposition of an intra-abdominal spacer before irradiation of an appendiceal tumour abscess drainage route.

The initial presentation of a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix can be a peri-appendicular abscess. The abdominal wall muscles can be invaded during radiological or surgical drainage. The management of such a tumour is complex. The resection of a drainage route can be uncertain and R1. In this case, further treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy may be necessary. One possible deleterious side effect of radiotherapy on the abdominal wall is radiation injury to the bowel. As a preventive measure, a spacer (here a breast prosthesis) can be interposed.

Optic nerve motion and gaze direction: Their impact on intraorbital tumor radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Management of inter- and intra-fraction movements of target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) during radiotherapy is essential. While there is little OAR or target volume movement, the movements and orientation of the eyes can be significant during radiotherapy and they can affect the position of the optic nerve. The objective of the present study was to assess the variations of the optic nerve position due to gaze direction and to discuss their clinical consequences on the radiation treatment of intraorbital tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three patients without a history of oculomotor nerve palsy underwent six CT acquisitions with a thermoplastic mask: eyes open with different gaze directions (straight ahead, left, right, up, down) and eyes closed. The acquisition with the straight-ahead gaze was chosen as the reference position. Left and right optic nerves were segmented on the six acquisitions, and total volumes and maximum amplitude motions were calculated in three dimensions. RESULTS: Maximum differences were observed while looking left and up, with a median maximum amplitude of 5 and 6mm [range: 2-7mm], respectively. These motions induced a position variation of more than 50% of the volume of the optic nerve (compared to the reference position). Greater variations of motion were observed for the anterior portion of the nerve. The gaze position with the fewest variations compared to the reference position was eyes closed. CONCLUSION: Optic nerve positions vary significantly due to the gaze direction, especially for the anterior portion of the nerve. These variations should be taken into account for the treatment of small intraorbital tumors involving the anterior third of the optic nerve.

Rectal cancer radiotherapy.

We present the updated recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists in chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal resection and adjuvant chemotherapy according to nodal status. Although this strategy efficiently reduced local recurrences rates below 5% in expert centres, functional sequelae could not be avoided resulting in 20 to 30% morbidity rates. The early introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven beneficial in recent trials, in terms of recurrence free and metastasis free survivals. Complete pathological responses were obtained in 15% of tumours treated by chemoradiation, even reaching up to 30% of tumours when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated to chemoradiotherapy. These good results question the relevance of systematic radical surgery in good responders. Personalized therapeutic strategies are now possible by improved imaging modalities with circumferential margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, by intensity modulated radiotherapy and by refining surgical techniques, and contribute to morbidity reduction. Keeping the same objectives, ongoing trials are now evaluating therapeutic de-escalation strategies, in particular rectal preservation for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment, or radiotherapy omission in selected cases (Greccar 12, Opera, Norad).

Implementation of image-guided brachytherapy as part of non-surgical treatment in inoperable endometrial cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed outcomes of inoperable endometrial cancer (IEC) patients treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a 3D image-guided brachytherapy boost. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with EBRT followed by 3D image-guided brachytherapy for IEC were retrospectively included. EBRT delivered a dose of 45Gy. Then, patients had an uterovaginal brachytherapy guided by 3D imaging. Clinical target volume (CTVBT) included the whole uterus and the initial disease extent. Gross tumour volume (GTVres) included the residual disease at time of brachytherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified. Causes of inoperability were comorbidities (37%) or tumour loco regional extent (63%). Including EBRT and brachytherapy, the median D90 (minimal dose delivered to 90% of the volume) was 60.7 GyEQD2 (IQR = 56.4-64.2) for the CTVBT, and was 73.6 GyEQD2 (IQR = 64.1-83.7) for the GTVres. The median overall treatment time was 50 days (IQR = 46-54). The mean follow-up was 36.5 months (SD = 30.2). The cumulative incidence of local, pelvic and distant failures was 19% (n = 5), 7% (n = 2) and 26% (n = 7), respectively. Five-year overall survival was 63% (95% CI = 43-91). Late urinary and gastro intestinal toxicities ≥ grade 2 were reported in four (15%) and two patients (7%) respectively. No vaginal toxicity ≥ grade 2 was reported. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy seems to be an effective option for IEC. The implementation of 3D concepts at time of brachytherapy may contribute to high local control probability and low toxicity profile. Large scale retrospective or prospective data are needed to confirm these early data.

[Follow-up after radiotherapy of anal canal carcinoma]. / Suivi après radiothérapie d'un cancer du canal anal.

Anal canal carcinoma is a rare and curable disease for which the standard of care is radiation therapy with concurrent 5-fluoro-uracil and mitomycine-based chemotherapy. Post-treatment follow-up however is rather poorly defined. This article offers a review of the various post-treatment surveillance options both for early diagnosis of relapse and care for late treatment effects. While follow-up remains mostly clinical, we will discuss morphologic (endorectal echoendoscopy, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, tomodensitometry and positron emission tomography) and biologic (squamous cell carcinoma antigen and pathology) follow-up so as to determine their diagnostic and prognostic value.

Successful readministration of trastuzumab after severe immune reactions in two breast cancer patients.

Trastuzumab is a standard treatment in breast cancer overexpressing Her2 oncogene. However, its administration carries the risk of severe immune adverse events which often lead to the discontinuation of trastuzumab. There is no clear guideline on how patients experiencing trastuzumab-related reaction should be rechallenged with the monoclonal antibody. Here, we present two case reports of patients who have presented severe anaphylactic reactions during trastuzumab infusion. Both of them have been successfully rechallenged in intensive care units with premedication, lower rate of infusion and vitals monitoring. Thereafter, trastuzumab could be continued without any serious adverse reaction. Given the positive impact of trastuzumab on patients' survival, treatment rechallenge should be carefully considered in patients who presented anaphylactic reactions.