Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis: Does the Type of Fixation Modify Outcomes?

The goal of the present study was to analyze a modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale score, time to union, and the incidence of fusion after isolated arthroscopic posterior subtalar arthrodesis using either 1 or 2 screws of different diameters. We reviewed a consecutive series of 65 patients, mean age 50.0 ± 15.6 years, including 38 males (58.5%) and 27 females (41.5%), who had undergone arthrodesis from May 2004 to February 2011. The mean follow-up duration was 57.5 (range 24 to 105) months. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the fixation method used: group 1 (n = 12; 18.5%) underwent fixation with one 6.5-mm screw; group 2 (n = 40; 61.5%) with one 7.3-mm screw; and group 3 (n = 13; 20%) with two 7.3-mm screws. An overall statistically significant (p <.0001) improvement was seen in the modified AOFAS scale score for all 3 fixation groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = .79) among the fixation groups. Fusion was achieved in 62 patients (95.4%) after a mean of 12.1 (range 9 to 16) weeks. The difference in the time to union was not statistically significant (p = .781) among the fixation groups. Nine patients (13.8%) experienced complications, and nonunion was significantly (p = .005) more prevalent in the single 6.5-mm screw group. In conclusion, all 3 screw configurations led to improved modified AOFAS scale scores, although nonunion was more common among patients fixed with a single 6.5-mm screw.

Subtalar arthroscopic arthrodesis: Technique and outcomes.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to describe the surgical technique and our results with arthroscopic posterior subtalar arthrodesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective case series of 65 patients (38 men and 27 women) averaging 50 years of age (range 21-72 years) undergoing posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using one or two percutaneous 6.5-7.3mm screws between May 2004 and February 2011, with a mean follow-up of 57.5 months (range 24-105 months). RESULTS: We achieved a 95.4% union rate after an average of 12.1 weeks (range 9 to 16 weeks). 12.3% of patients suffered complications, including superficial infection, nonunion and need for hardware removal. The AOFAS score improved from 51.5 points (19-61 points) preoperatively to 81.9 points (60-94 points) in the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the surgical technique for arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis, which as proven to be a safe and reliable technique in our experience, with consistent improvements in AOFAS scores.

Results of Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity vs Posttraumatic Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare results with arthroscopic posterior subtalar arthrodesis between patients treated for adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) due to posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and patients with posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 61 consecutive patients (group 1: posttraumatic arthritis, n = 37; group 2: AAFD, n = 24) averaging 49 years of age (range, 21-72 years) undergoing posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis via 1 or 2 percutaneous 6.5- to 7.3-mm screws, with a mean follow-up of 57.5 months (range, 24-105 months). Fusion was defined as the appearance of bony trabeculae across the subtalar joint on standard x-rays, along with clinical signs of union. RESULTS: Patients with posttraumatic arthritis (group 1) were more predominantly male and younger than patients treated for AAFD (group 2). Overall, we achieved a 95.1% radiologic union rate after an average of 11.7 weeks. Complications appeared in 14.8% of patients. Union rate and complications did not differ significantly between groups. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores improved significantly for both patient groups, although patients with AAFD showed significantly larger improvement and higher postoperative AOFAS scores, even after adjusting for age and sex (mean improvement in AOFAS scores: 27.0 ± 9.1 points for the posttraumatic arthritis group vs 34.9 ± 7.4 points for the AAFD group; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis was a safe and reliable technique, with consistent improvement in AOFAS scores throughout different patient subgroups, as well as comparable time to union and complication rates. Improvements were larger for patients treated for AAFD, even after adjusting for age and sex. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case series.