Remdesivir and corticosteroids in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic infection caused by the newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Remdesivir (RDV) and corticosteroids are used mainly in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. The main objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of remdesivir with and without corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. We conducted a prospective observational study, including adult patients consecutively hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 and acute respiratory failure. Patients were divided according to treatment strategy: RDV alone versus RDV with corticosteroids. The primary outcome was the time to recovery in both treatment groups. We included 374 COVID-19 adult patients, 184 were treated with RDV, and 190 were treated with RDV and corticosteroid. Patients in the RDV group had a shorter time to recovery in comparison with patients in the RDV plus corticosteroids group at 28 days after admission [11 vs. 16 days (95% confidence Interval 9.7-12.8; 14.9-17.1; p = .016)]. Patients treated with RDV alone had a shorter length of hospital stay. The use of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy of RDV was not associated with improvement in mortality of COVID-19 patients.

Successful treatment of persistent and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in a high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient using Ronapreve™ antibodies.

Patients with lymphoproliferative diseases are at an increased risk of an incomplete immune response following vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection and might develop persistent viral infection and severe COVID-19 disease. We present a case of successful treatment of persistent and mechanical-ventilation-requiring SARS-CoV-2 infection in a del17+ CLL patient using exogenous antibodies.

A prospective, observational study to evaluate adverse drug reactions in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir or hydroxychloroquine: a preliminary report.

OBJECTIVES: Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the pressure to minimise its impact on public health has led to the implementation of different therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of which for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was unknown at the time. Remdesivir (REM) was granted its first conditional marketing authorisation in the EU in June 2020. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and local health authorities all across the EU have since strongly recommended the implementation of pharmacovigilance activities aimed at further evaluating the safety of this new drug. The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to either REM or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, a Portuguese hospital centre based in Lisbon. We present the preliminary results reporting plausible adverse effects of either HCQ or REM. METHODS: An observational cohort study was carried out between 16 March and 15 August 2020. Participants were divided into two cohorts: those prescribed an HCQ regimen, and those prescribed REM. Suspected ADRs were identified using an active monitoring model and reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System through its online notification tool. The ADR cumulative incidence was compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: The study included 149 patients, of whom 101 were treated with HCQ and the remaining 48 with REM. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. A total of 102 ADRs were identified during the study period, with a greater incidence in the HCQ cohort compared with the REM cohort (47.5% vs 12.5%; p<0.001). Causality was assessed in 81 ADRs, all of which were considered possible. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data are crucial to further establish the safety profile for REM. HCQ is no longer recommended for the treatment of COVID-19.

Phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency: molecular epidemiology and predictable BH4-responsiveness in South Portugal PKU patients.

Hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA, OMIM #261600), which includes phenylketonuria (PKU), is caused by mutations in the gene encoding phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH), being already described more than 600 different mutations. Genotype-phenotype correlation is a useful tool to predict the metabolic phenotype, to establish the better tailored diet and, more recently, to assess the potential responsiveness to BH(4) therapy, a current theme on PKU field. The aim of this study was the molecular analysis of the PAH gene, evaluation of genotype-phenotype relationships and prediction of BH(4)-responsiveness in the HPA population living in South Portugal. We performed the molecular characterization of 83 HPA patients using genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood samples or Guthrie cards. PAH mutations were scanned by PCR amplification of exons and related intronic boundaries, followed by direct sequence analysis. Intragenic polymorphisms were determined by PCR-RFLP analysis. The results allowed the full characterization of 67 patients. The mutational spectrum encompasses 34 distinct mutations, being the most frequent IVS10nt-11G>A (14.6%), V388M (10.8%), R261Q (8.2%) and R270K (7.6%), which account for 46% of all mutant alleles. Moreover, 12 different haplotypes were identified and most mutations were associated with a single one. Notably, more than half of the 34 mutations belong to the group of more than 70 mutations already identified in BH(4)-responsive patients, according to BIOPKU database. Fifty one different genotypic combinations were found, most of them in single patients and involving a BH(4)-responsive mutation. In conclusion, a significant number (30-35%) of South Portugal PKU patients may potentially benefit from BH(4) therapy which, combined with a less strict diet, or eventually in special cases as monotherapy, may contribute to reduce nutritional deficiencies and minimize neurological and psychological dysfunctions.