Association of prognostic nutritional index with peripheral artery disease in US adults: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: The present study is a cross-sectional study based on the National Health and Nutrition Survey (1999-2004). The laboratory-calculated PNI was divided into four groups based on quartiles(Q1:PNI ≤ 50.00; Q2: 50.01-53.00; Q3:53.01-56.00; Q4: > 56.00). PAD was defined as an ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) ≤ 0.9 on the left or right. The relationship between PNI and PAD was examined using multifactor weighted logistic regression analysis, as well as subgroup analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: A total of 5,447 individuals were included in our final analysis. The age of the participants was 59.56 ± 13.10 years, and males accounted for 52.8% (n = 2820). The prevalence of PAD was 6.7% (n = 363). After adjusting for all factors, participants with Q1 still had an increased risk of PAD, with an OR value of 1.593 and a 95% CI of 1.232-1.991. Subgroup analysis showed no significant interaction among multiple factors. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we report that lower PNI are associated with a higher risk of PAD in US adults. It is hoped that this discovery can provide a reference for the prevention of PAD.

Safety and Efficacy of Excimer Laser Atherectomy Combined with a Drug-Coated Balloon in De Novo Femoral Popliteal Artery Disease: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for de novo femoropopliteal artery disease (FPAD) is currently unknown. This case series evaluated the clinical outcomes of ELA combined with DCB in de novo FPAD from a real-world clinical perspective. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated with ELA + DCB for de novo FPAD between November 2016 and January 2020. The primary efficacy endpoint was the initial patency rate; secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization without clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and technical success. Primary safety endpoints included all-cause death, unplanned major amputation, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 37.8 ± 25.3 months and included 56 consecutive patients (68.23 ± 8.01 years, 41 men). Forty-three patients had lifestyle-restricted claudication, and 13 patients had critical limb-threatening ischemia. The mean length of the lesion was 178.41 mm in all patients. The total lesion occlusion rate was 48.2 (n = 27), and the overall technical success rate was 100%. The 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, and 48-month primary patency rates of the ELA + DCB group were 75%, 66.1%, 58.9%, and 42.8%, respectively. Freedom from CD-TLR at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 83.9%, 80.3%, 76.8%, and 57.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world clinical practice, ELA + DCB appears to be a safe and effective endovascular treatment for de novo FPAD, with a low rate of freedom from CD-TLR and a good patency rate.

Efficacy and Safety of Atherectomy Combined With Balloon Angioplasty vs Balloon Angioplasty Alone in Patients With Femoro-Popliteal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty (BA), including drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), has traditionally been used to treat femoral-popliteal lesions. However, in recent years, atherectomy (ATH) has been proposed as a complementary approach. To assess the effectiveness of ATH compared with BA alone in patients with femoral-popliteal artery lesions, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We included RCTs that focused on patients with femoral-popliteal artery lesions and reported data on the use of ATH and BA therapy. Two reviewers conducted a literature search, refined the data, and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: We included a total of 6 RCTs involving 399 patients with femoral-popliteal artery lesions. The use of ATH in combination with BA appeared to improve the patency rate at 12 months (odds ratio [OR]=2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.14-3.62). In addition, ATH with BA was associated with lower major amputation rates (MD=2.01, 95% CI=0.06-0.77, p=0.02) and a decreased likelihood of bailout stenting (OR=0.07, 95% CI=0.02-0.25, p=0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and distal embolization events. In addition, we performed subgroup analysis for different ATH devices and BA types. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this meta-analysis, it can be concluded that the use of ATH in combination with BA is a safe and effective method for treating femoral-popliteal artery lesions. In addition, the patency rate at 1 year is superior to treatment with BA alone. Atherectomy also reduces the likelihood of amputation and bailout stenting. Clinicians should consider these findings when designing future RCTs and developing clinical practice guidelines. CLINICAL IMPACT: This meta-analysis summarises a number of existing studies to advance understanding of the atherectomy devices and to reveal its potential. This new technique, when compared with drug coated balloon, shows the possibility of obtaining better clinical outcomes in femoro-popliteal lesions than drug-coated balloon alone, such as higher 12-month primary patency rates as shown in some studies. Currently, it is important to consider the appropriate technology applicable for individualised treatment. atherectomy devices seem to provide clinicians with additional options in clinical practice and to benefit patients in the future. This requires more high quality studies to explore the role and benefits of atherectomy devices in femoro-popliteal lesions.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to summarize whether the application of additional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can change the outcomes of endovascular treatment in femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions compared with conventional angiography alone based on the existing study and evidence. METHODS: Studies published until September 2022 were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the methods of combination of Medical Subject Headings and free text words. The outcomes included in these studies were primary patency rate or restenosis rate and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) rate, and most studies were concerned about the 12-month results. Two independent authors conducted the process of study selection. And the pooled analysis was attempted. RESULTS: Finally, the inclusion criteria were met by 4 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 3 retrospective studies) involving 1160 patients. IVUS played its role in measuring lesions and/or guiding wiring passage. Most of the included studies showed that IVUS could achieve a higher 12-month primary patency rate (from 70% to 90%) and higher 12-month freedom from cdTLR rate (from 83.9% to 94.7%) than angiography. The tentative pooled analysis also showed that IVUS significantly improved the 12-month primary patency rate (OR: 2.21, 95%CI: [1.38-3.55], p=0.001) and the 12-month freedom from cdTLR rate (OR: 1.70, 95%CI [1.04-2.78], p=0.03) compared with angiography alone. CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound-guided endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions may have its own advantages such as higher primary patency rate and freedom from cdTLR rate at 12 months. As a novel technology, IVUS is expected to become another beneficial option to guide clinicians performing endovascular therapy in addition to angiography and may achieve better clinical outcomes. More prospective and high-quality studies are needed in the future to investigate the role of IVUS in the process of femoropopliteal artery lesions endovascular treatment. CLINICAL IMPACT: This review summarized a few available studies to promote understanding of IVUS and reveal its potential. This novel technology shows the possibility of achieving better clinical outcomes than angiography in femoropopliteal artery lesions endovascular therapy such as higher 12-month primary patency rate shown in some studies. Currently, it is important to consider suitable technologies applied to individualized treatment. IVUS seems to provide clinicians additional option in clinical practice and benefit patients well in the future. And it needs us to conduct more high-quality studies to explore its roles and advantages in endovascular treatment.