Early Optimistic Effect in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry Trials.

Differences in effect estimates between early primary trials included in a meta-analysis and the pooled estimate of meta-analysis might indicate potential novelty bias. The objective of this study was to assess the presence of novelty bias in a sample of studies published in periodontology and implant dentistry. On August 7, 2020, we searched the PubMed database for meta-analyses of clinical studies published between August 2015 and August 2020. Meta-analyses with at least 4 primary studies were selected for assessment. We fitted logistic regression models using trial characteristics as predictors to assess the association between these characteristics and 1) the odds of the first trial's estimate to be included in the meta-analysis confidence interval (CI) and 2) the odds of overlap between the first trial's CI and the meta-analysis prediction interval (PI). Ninety-two meta-analyses provided data for assessment. In absolute values, 70% of the meta-analyses have a pooled estimate smaller than the corresponding estimate of the first trial, although there was overlap of the CI of estimates from the first trial and the meta-analysis in 87% of the cases. This is probably due to the small number of trials in most meta-analyses and the subsequently large uncertainty associated with the pooled effect estimate. As the number of trials in the meta-analysis increased, the odds of the treatment effect estimate of the first trial to be included in the meta-analysis CI decreased by 15% for every additional trial (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.96). Meta-analytic effect estimates appear to be more conservative than those from the first trial in the meta-analysis. Our findings show evidence of novelty bias in periodontology and implant dentistry; therefore, clinicians should be aware of the risk of making decisions based on the information reported in new trials because of the risk of exaggerated estimates in these trials.

In Vitro Calcification of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Test Fluid Validation on Prosthetic Material Samples.

Calcification is a major failure mode of bioprosthetic heart valves. So far, cost and time saving in vitro analyses of calcification potentials are unreliable, mostly due to superficial or spontaneous precipitation of the applied fluids. In this study, we developed a near-physiological non-spontaneously precipitating fluid for an accelerated in vitro calcification assessment, and validated it by analyzing the calcification potential of two prosthetic materials within two reference-tests. The first test focused on the comparison of four calcification fluids under dynamic contact with n=12 commercial bovine pericardium patches. The second one focused on the validation of the most appropriate fluid by analyzing the calcification potential of pericardium vs. polyurethane. The patches were mounted in separate test compartments and treated simultaneously with the respective fluids at an accelerated test frequency. Calcification propensity and progression were detected macroscopically and microscopically. Structural analyses of all deposits indicated hydroxyapatite by X-ray powder diffraction, which is also most commonly observed in vivo. Histological examination by von Kossa staining showed matrix internal and superficial calcifications, depending on the fluid composition. The present study reveals promising results towards the development of a meaningful, cost and time saving in vitro analysis of the calcification potential of bioprosthetic heart valves.

In Vitro Calcification of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Investigation of Test Fluids.

Calcification is a major reason for the failure of bioprosthetic heart valves. Therefore, several attempts towards an accelerated in vitro model were undertaken in order to provide a cost- and time-saving method for the analysis of calcification processes. Due to the problem of superficial or spontaneous precipitation, which occurred in the fluids applied, we focused our study on the development of a near-physiological calcification fluid. The desired fluid should not precipitate spontaneously and should neither promote nor inhibit calcification. Eleven different fluid compositions were tested without contact to potentially calcifying materials. Crucial factors regarding the fluid properties were the ionic product, the ionic strength, and the degree of supersaturation concerning dicalciumphosphate-dihydrate, octacalciumphosphate, and hydroxyapatite. The fluids were kept in polyethylene bottles and exposed to a slight vibration within a durability tester at 37 °C. The precipitation propensity was monitored optically and colorimetrically. A structural analysis of the deposits was carried out by x-ray powder diffraction and IR-spectroscopy, which showed the development of the crystal phases that are relevant in vivo. Only two of the fluids did not precipitate. Resulting from the computations of the effective fluid contents, the saturation degree concerning dicalciumphosphate-dihydrate seems to be the key factor for spontaneous precipitation.

A simplified method for treating Graves' disease with radioactive 131I.

We reviewed the medical records of 53 patients treated in 1986 for Graves' disease with moderate doses of 131I. The cumulative incidence of hypothyroidism at 3 and 12 months after therapy was 38 and 80%, respectively. The hyperthyroidism, however, was rapidly cured and only 4(7.5%) patients required a second dose of 131I. In a separate study of 21 patients with Graves' disease, we determined that the 4-hour 123I uptake measurement was as reliable as the standard 24-hour test for supporting the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism. We also demonstrated that the 4-hour uptake accurately predicted the 24-hour uptake. Based on these findings and a review of the literature, we believe that either a 4 or 24-hour 123I uptake study followed by the administration of a fixed dose of 131I (10 or 15 mCi) provides a convenient and cost-effective method for treating Graves' disease.