Prehabilitation for Older Adults Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review and Needs Assessment.

Early-stage lung cancer patients are increasingly considered for preoperative systemic therapy. Older adults in particular are among the most vulnerable patients, with little known on how preoperative therapies affect the risk-benefit of surgery. We sought to summarize the current literature and elucidate existing evidence gaps on the effects of prehabilitation interventions relative to age-related functional impairments and the unique needs of older patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. A literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, of all scientific articles published through April 2022 which report on the effects of prehabilitation on patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. We extracted current prehabilitation protocols and their impact on physical functioning, resilience, and patient-reported outcomes of older patients. Emerging evidence suggests that prehabilitation may enhance functional capacity and minimize the untoward effects of surgery for patients following lung resection similar to, or potentially even better than, traditional postoperative rehabilitation. The impact of preoperative interventions on surgical risk due to frailty remains ill-defined. Most studies evaluating prehabilitation include older patients, but few studies report on activities of daily living, self-care, mobility activities, and psychological resilience in older individuals. Preliminary data suggest the feasibility of physical therapy and resilience interventions in older individuals concurrent with systemic therapy. Future research is needed to determine best prehabilitation strategies for older lung cancer patients aimed to optimize age-related impairments and minimize surgical risk.

Conduit Selection for Reconstruction After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

The reconstruction of the esophagus after esophagectomy presents many technical and management challenges to surgeons. An effective gastrointestinal conduit that replaces the resected esophagus must have adequate length to reach the upper thoracic space or the neck, have robust vascular perfusion, and provide sufficient function for an adequate swallowing mechanism. The stomach is currently the preferred conduit for esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy. However, there are circumstances, where the stomach cannot be utilized as a conduit. In these cases, an alternative conduit must be considered. The current alternative conduits include colon, jejunum, and tubed skin flaps.

A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Importance: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with substantial learning curves. In other complex minimally invasive procedures, suboptimal surgical performance has convincingly been associated with less favorable patient outcomes as assessed by peer review of the surgical procedure. Objective: To develop and validate a procedure-specific competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this international quality improvement study, a procedure-specific MIE-CAT was developed and validated. The MIE-CAT contains 8 procedural phases, and 4 quality components per phase are scored with a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. For evaluation of the MIE-CAT, intraoperative MIE videos performed by a single surgical team in the Esophageal Center East Netherlands were peer reviewed by 18 independent international MIE experts (with more than 120 MIEs performed). Each video was assessed by 2 or 3 blinded experts to evaluate feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. MIE-CAT version 2 was composed with refined content aimed at improving interrater reliability. A total of 32 full-length MIE videos from patients who underwent MIE between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2023. Exposure: Performance assessment of transthoracic MIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility, content validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity, including correlations with both experience of the surgical team and clinical parameters, of the developed MIE-CAT. Results: Experts found the MIE-CAT easy to understand and easy to use to grade surgical performance. The MIE-CAT demonstrated good intrarater reliability (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.807 [95% CI, 0.656 to 0.892] for quality component score to 0.898 [95% CI, 0.846 to 0.932] for phase score). Interrater reliability was moderate (range of ICCs, 0.536 [95% CI, -0.220 to 0.994] for total MIE-CAT score to 0.705 [95% CI, 0.473 to 0.846] for quality component score), and most discrepancies originated in the lymphadenectomy phases. Hypothesis testing for construct validity showed more than 75% of hypotheses correct: MIE-CAT performance scores correlated with experience of the surgical team (r = 0.288 to 0.622), blood loss (r = -0.034 to -0.545), operative time (r = -0.309 to -0.611), intraoperative complications (r = -0.052 to -0.319), and severe postoperative complications (r = -0.207 to -0.395). MIE-CAT version 2 increased usability. Interrater reliability improved but remained moderate (range of ICCs, 0.666 to 0.743), and most discrepancies between raters remained in the lymphadenectomy phases. Conclusions and Relevance: The MIE-CAT was developed and its feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity were demonstrated. By providing insight into surgical performance of MIE, the MIE-CAT might be used for clinical, training, and research purposes.

Incident Atrial Fibrillation and Survival Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer following Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) associates with long-term cardiotoxicity. In preclinical models, RT exposure induces early cardiotoxic arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF). Yet, whether this occurs in patients is unknown. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Leveraging a large cohort of consecutive patients with esophageal cancer treated with thoracic RT from 2007 to 2019, we assessed incidence and outcomes of incident AF. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as AF, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death, by cardiac RT dose. We also assessed the relationship between AF development and progression-free and overall survival. Observed incident AF rates were compared with Framingham predicted rates, and absolute excess risks were estimated. Multivariate regression was used to define the relationship between clinical and RT measures, and outcomes. Differences in outcomes, by AF status, were also evaluated via 30-day landmark analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of cardiac substructure RT dose (eg, left atrium, LA) on the risk of post RT-related outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, from 238 RT treated patients with esophageal cancer, 21.4% developed incident AF, and 33% developed MACE with the majority (84%) of events occurring ≤2 years of RT initiation (median time to AF, 4.1 months). Cumulative incidence of AF and MACE at 1 year was 19.5%, and 25.7%, respectively; translating into an observed incident AF rate of 824 per 10,000 person-years, compared with the Framingham predicted rate of 92 (relative risk, 8.96; P < .001, absolute excess risk 732). Increasing LA dose strongly associated with incident AF (P = .001); and those with AF saw worse disease progression (hazard ratio, 1.54; P = .03). In multivariate models, outside of traditional cancer-related factors, increasing RT dose to the LA remained associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with esophageal cancer, radiation therapy increases AF risk, and associates with worse long-term outcomes.