[Diagnostics and treatment of traumatic aortic injuries]. / Diagnostik und Therapie traumatischer Aortenverletzungen.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic aortic injuries (TAI) are rare injuries in blunt thoracic trauma, which have a high morbidity and mortality. Rapid and accurate diagnosis as well as the correct choice of treatment are elementary for patient survival. OBJECTIVE: Determination of the current standards for diagnostics of TAI in the acute trauma setting and evaluation of the current guidelines for treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was carried out for articles describing diagnostics of TAI. Furthermore, the guidelines for treatment and follow-up of TAI were summarized. RESULTS: Despite the low specificity conventional chest X­ray is still named in the literature as initial diagnostic procedure. Primarily, computed tomography (CT) should follow as the method of choice for diagnostics and treatment stratification due to the high sensitivity and specificity. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is recommended by all guidelines as first line treatment of higher grades of TAI (grades II-IV) and has replaced open surgery in most cases. CONCLUSION: After rapid diagnosis and classification of TAI with CT, in most cases TEVAR has become the preferred treatment over open surgery.

Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to show that the liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) improves the detection of significant liver fibrosis on portal venous CT scans by adding the liver vein to cava attenuation (LVCA) to the liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent portal venous phase abdominal CT scans and MR elastography (reference standard) within 3 months between 02/2016 and 05/2017 were included. The LSVAR was calculated on portal venous CT scans as LSVR*LVCA, while the LSVR represented the volume ratio between Couinaud segments I-III and IV-VIII, and the LVCA represented the density of the liver veins compared to the density in the vena cava. The LSVAR and LSVR were compared between patients with and without significantly elevated liver stiffness (based on a cutoff value of 3.5 kPa) using the Mann-Whitney U test and ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: The LSVR and LSVAR allowed significant differentiation between patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 122) significantly elevated liver stiffness (p < 0.001). However, the LSVAR showed a higher area under the curve (AUC = 0.96) than the LSVR (AUC = 0.74). The optimal cutoff value was 0.34 for the LSVR, which detected clinically increased liver stiffness with a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 88%. With a cutoff value of 0.67 for the LSVAR, the sensitivity increased to 95% while maintaining a specificity of 89%. CONCLUSION: The LSVAR improves the detection of significant liver fibrosis on portal venous CT scans compared to the LSVR.

Value of MRI/CT Image Fusion for Targeting "invisible" Lesions in Stereotactic Microwave Ablation (SMWA) of Malignant Liver Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the technical feasibility of MRI/CT image fusion and completeness of ablation treatment for primary or metastatic liver lesions invisible on contrast-enhanced CT planning scans and outcome in patients treated with stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Patients who underwent SMWA between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All liver lesions for which MRI/CT fusion was performed due to invisibility on pre-interventional CT planning scans were included and reassessed. The outcome measurement was successful ablation of the lesion at first follow-up imaging. RESULTS: During the study period, 236 patients underwent 312 SMWAs with ablation of 496 lesions. Twenty-four lesions in 15 patients (mean age, 62 years; range, 43-80 years) were included. Following MRI/CT image fusion, all 24 lesions could be sufficiently localized to perform SMWA. The first follow-up imaging showed complete ablation of 22 lesions. Two initially incompletely ablated lesions were hepatocellular carcinomas and were successfully re-ablated afterwards. CONCLUSION: SMWA with MRI/CT image fusion is an accurate and safe treatment option for patients with liver lesions not detectable on contrast-enhanced CT planning scans. MRI/CT image fusion may allow more patients with malignant liver lesions to benefit from local ablation treatment even if their lesions are not visible on CT planning examinations.

Liver MR relaxometry at 3T - segmental normal T1 and T2* values in patients without focal or diffuse liver disease and in patients with increased liver fat and elevated liver stiffness.

Magnetic resonance (MR) T1 and T2* mapping allows quantification of liver relaxation times for non-invasive characterization of diffuse liver disease. We hypothesized that liver relaxation times are not only influenced by liver fibrosis, inflammation and fat, but also by air in liver segments adjacent to the lung - especially in MR imaging at 3T. A total of 161 study participants were recruited, while 6 patients had to be excluded due to claustrophobia or technically uninterpretable MR elastography. Resulting study population consisted of 12 healthy volunteers and 143 patients who prospectively underwent multiparametric MR imaging at 3T. Of those 143 patients, 79 had normal liver stiffness in MR elastography (shear modulus <2.8 kPa, indicating absence of fibrosis) and normal proton density fat fraction (PDFF < 10%, indicating absence of steatosis), defined as reference population. T1 relaxation times in these patients were significantly shorter in liver segments adjacent to the lung than in those not adjacent to the lung (p < 0.001, mean of differences 33 ms). In liver segments not adjacent to the lung, T1 allowed to differentiate significantly between the reference population and patients with steatosis and/or fibrosis (p ≤ 0.011), while there was no significant difference of T1 between the reference population and healthy volunteers. In conclusion, we propose to measure T1 relaxation times in liver segments not adjacent to the lung. Otherwise, we recommend taking into account slightly shorter T1 values in liver segments adjacent to the lung.