Practice Patterns of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Use in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Myocarditis: A Survey-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is used to diagnose myocarditis in adults and children based on the original Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) and more recently the revised LLC. The major change included in the revised LLC was the incorporation of parametric mapping, which significantly increases the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. Subsequently, scientific statements have recommended the use of parametric mapping in the diagnosis of myocarditis in children. However, there are some challenges to parametric mapping that are unique to the pediatric population. Our goal is to characterize clinical CMR and parametric mapping practice patterns for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatric centers. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Evaluation in Return to Athletes for Myocarditis in COVID-19 and Immunization Consortium created a REDCap survey to evaluate clinical practice patterns for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatrics. This survey was distributed to the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance community. RESULTS: 59 responses from 51 centers were received, with only one response from each center being utilized. Only 35% of centers (37% of North America, 31% of international) reported using CMR routinely in all patients with a suspicion for myocarditis. Diagnostic uncertainty was noted as the most important reason for CMR, while cost was noted as the least important consideration. The majority of centers reported using the revised LLC (37/51, 72%) compared to original LLC (7/51, 14%) or a hybrid criteria (6/51, 12%). When looking at the use of parametric mapping, only 5/47 (11%) for T1 mapping and 11/49 (22%) for T2 mapping reported having scanner-specific pediatric normative data. CONCLUSION: Routine CMR imaging for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatrics is infrequently performed at surveyed centers despite the focus on a group of non-invasive cardiac imagers. While the majority reported using parametric mapping, few centers reporting having pediatric scanner-specific normative data. This highlights an important gap in the utilization of CMR that may aid in the diagnosis of myocardial disease.

COVID-19 Positive Versus Negative Complete Kawasaki Disease: A Study from the International Kawasaki Disease Registry.

To determine clinical differences for children with complete Kawasaki disease (KD) with and without evidence of preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection. From January 2020, contemporaneous patients with complete KD criteria were classified as either SARS-CoV-2 positive (KDCOVID+; confirmed household exposure, positive PCR and/or serology) or SARS-CoV-2 negative (KDCOVID-; negative testing and no exposure) and compared. Of 744 patients in the International Kawasaki Disease Registry, 52 were KDCOVID- and 61 were KDCOVID+. KDCOVID+ patients were older (median 5.5 vs. 3.7 years; p < 0.001), and all additionally met diagnostic criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). They were more likely to have abdominal pain (60% vs. 35%; p = 0.008) and headache (38% vs. 10%; p < 0.001) and had significantly higher CRP, troponin, and BUN/creatinine, and lower hemoglobin, platelets, and lymphocytes. KDCOVID+ patients were more likely to have shock (41% vs. 6%; p < 0.001), ICU admission (62% vs. 10%; p < 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean lowest LVEF 53% vs. 60%; p < 0.001), and to have received inotropic support (60% vs. 10%; p < 0.001). Both groups received IVIG (2 doses in 22% vs. 18%; p = 0.63), but KDCOVID+ were more likely to have received steroids (85% vs. 35%; p < 0.001) and anakinra (60% vs. 10%; p = 0.002). KDCOVID- patients were more likely to have medium/large coronary artery aneurysms (CAA, 12% vs. 0%; p = 0.01). KDCOVID+ patients differ from KDCOVID-, have more severe disease, and greater evidence of myocardial involvement and cardiovascular dysfunction rather than CAA. These patients may be a distinct KD phenotype in the presence of a prevalent specific trigger.