Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Transl Med ; 16(745): eade4510, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691621

RESUMO

Human inborn errors of immunity include rare disorders entailing functional and quantitative antibody deficiencies due to impaired B cells called the common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) phenotype. Patients with CVID face delayed diagnoses and treatments for 5 to 15 years after symptom onset because the disorders are rare (prevalence of ~1/25,000), and there is extensive heterogeneity in CVID phenotypes, ranging from infections to autoimmunity to inflammatory conditions, overlapping with other more common disorders. The prolonged diagnostic odyssey drives excessive system-wide costs before diagnosis. Because there is no single causal mechanism, there are no genetic tests to definitively diagnose CVID. Here, we present PheNet, a machine learning algorithm that identifies patients with CVID from their electronic health records (EHRs). PheNet learns phenotypic patterns from verified CVID cases and uses this knowledge to rank patients by likelihood of having CVID. PheNet could have diagnosed more than half of our patients with CVID 1 or more years earlier than they had been diagnosed. When applied to a large EHR dataset, followed by blinded chart review of the top 100 patients ranked by PheNet, we found that 74% were highly probable to have CVID. We externally validated PheNet using >6 million records from disparate medical systems in California and Tennessee. As artificial intelligence and machine learning make their way into health care, we show that algorithms such as PheNet can offer clinical benefits by expediting the diagnosis of rare diseases.


Assuntos
Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/diagnóstico , Aprendizado de Máquina , Algoritmos , Masculino , Feminino , Fenótipo , Adulto , Doenças não Diagnosticadas/diagnóstico
2.
Am J Hum Genet ; 110(6): 927-939, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37224807

RESUMO

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of variants for disease risk. These studies have predominantly been conducted in individuals of European ancestries, which raises questions about their transferability to individuals of other ancestries. Of particular interest are admixed populations, usually defined as populations with recent ancestry from two or more continental sources. Admixed genomes contain segments of distinct ancestries that vary in composition across individuals in the population, allowing for the same allele to induce risk for disease on different ancestral backgrounds. This mosaicism raises unique challenges for GWASs in admixed populations, such as the need to correctly adjust for population stratification. In this work we quantify the impact of differences in estimated allelic effect sizes for risk variants between ancestry backgrounds on association statistics. Specifically, while the possibility of estimated allelic effect-size heterogeneity by ancestry (HetLanc) can be modeled when performing a GWAS in admixed populations, the extent of HetLanc needed to overcome the penalty from an additional degree of freedom in the association statistic has not been thoroughly quantified. Using extensive simulations of admixed genotypes and phenotypes, we find that controlling for and conditioning effect sizes on local ancestry can reduce statistical power by up to 72%. This finding is especially pronounced in the presence of allele frequency differentiation. We replicate simulation results using 4,327 African-European admixed genomes from the UK Biobank for 12 traits to find that for most significant SNPs, HetLanc is not large enough for GWASs to benefit from modeling heterogeneity in this way.


Assuntos
Genética Populacional , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Humanos , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/métodos , Frequência do Gene/genética , Genótipo , Fenótipo , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética
3.
Nat Genet ; 55(4): 549-558, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36941441

RESUMO

Individuals of admixed ancestries (for example, African Americans) inherit a mosaic of ancestry segments (local ancestry) originating from multiple continental ancestral populations. This offers the unique opportunity of investigating the similarity of genetic effects on traits across ancestries within the same population. Here we introduce an approach to estimate correlation of causal genetic effects (radmix) across local ancestries and analyze 38 complex traits in African-European admixed individuals (N = 53,001) to observe very high correlations (meta-analysis radmix = 0.95, 95% credible interval 0.93-0.97), much higher than correlation of causal effects across continental ancestries. We replicate our results using regression-based methods from marginal genome-wide association study summary statistics. We also report realistic scenarios where regression-based methods yield inflated heterogeneity-by-ancestry due to ancestry-specific tagging of causal effects, and/or polygenicity. Our results motivate genetic analyses that assume minimal heterogeneity in causal effects by ancestry, with implications for the inclusion of ancestry-diverse individuals in studies.


Assuntos
Genética Populacional , Herança Multifatorial , Humanos , Herança Multifatorial/genética , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/métodos , Grupos Raciais/genética , Negro ou Afro-Americano/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética
4.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Jan 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36747759

RESUMO

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of variants for disease risk. These studies have predominantly been conducted in individuals of European ancestries, which raises questions about their transferability to individuals of other ancestries. Of particular interest are admixed populations, usually defined as populations with recent ancestry from two or more continental sources. Admixed genomes contain segments of distinct ancestries that vary in composition across individuals in the population, allowing for the same allele to induce risk for disease on different ancestral backgrounds. This mosaicism raises unique challenges for GWAS in admixed populations, such as the need to correctly adjust for population stratification to balance type I error with statistical power. In this work we quantify the impact of differences in estimated allelic effect sizes for risk variants between ancestry backgrounds on association statistics. Specifically, while the possibility of estimated allelic effect-size heterogeneity by ancestry (HetLanc) can be modeled when performing GWAS in admixed populations, the extent of HetLanc needed to overcome the penalty from an additional degree of freedom in the association statistic has not been thoroughly quantified. Using extensive simulations of admixed genotypes and phenotypes we find that modeling HetLanc in its absence reduces statistical power by up to 72%. This finding is especially pronounced in the presence of allele frequency differentiation. We replicate simulation results using 4,327 African-European admixed genomes from the UK Biobank for 12 traits to find that for most significant SNPs HetLanc is not large enough for GWAS to benefit from modeling heterogeneity.

5.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 18(6): e1009598, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35696417

RESUMO

Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be difficult to determine which method is best suited for a particular model. In this paper, we explain a variety of differential sensitivity methods and assess their value in some typical biological models. First, we explain the mathematical basis for three numerical methods: adjoint sensitivity analysis, complex perturbation sensitivity analysis, and forward mode sensitivity analysis. We then carry out four instructive case studies. (a) The CARRGO model for tumor-immune interaction highlights the additional information that differential sensitivity analysis provides beyond traditional naive sensitivity methods, (b) the deterministic SIR model demonstrates the value of using second-order sensitivity in refining model predictions, (c) the stochastic SIR model shows how differential sensitivity can be attacked in stochastic modeling, and (d) a discrete birth-death-migration model illustrates how the complex perturbation method of differential sensitivity can be generalized to a broader range of biological models. Finally, we compare the speed, accuracy, and ease of use of these methods. We find that forward mode automatic differentiation has the quickest computational time, while the complex perturbation method is the simplest to implement and the most generalizable.


Assuntos
Modelos Biológicos , Processos Estocásticos , Incerteza
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA