Endovascular Treatment and Outcomes for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Insights from the XLPAD Registry.

Background: There is limited "real-world" evidence examining treatment modalities and outcomes in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease undergoing endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) in-stent restenosis (ISR). Materials and Methods: We compared outcomes in 2,895 patients from the XLPAD registry (NCT01904851) between 2006 and 2019 treated for FP ISR (n = 347) and non-ISR (n = 2,548) lesions. Primary endpoint included major adverse limb events (MALE) at 1 year, a composite of all-cause death, target limb repeat revascularization, or major amputation. Results: ISR patients were more frequently on antiplatelet (94.5% vs 89.4%, p=0.007) and statin (68.9% vs 60.3%, p=0.003) therapies. Lesion length was similar (ISR: 145 ± 99 mm vs. non-ISR: 142 ± 99 mm, p=0.55). Fewer treated ISR lesions were chronic total occlusions (47.3% vs. 53.7%, p=0.02) and severely calcified (22.4% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001). Atherectomy (63.5% vs. 45.0%, p < 0.001) and drug-coated balloons (DCB; 4.7% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001) were more frequently used in ISR lesions. The distal embolization rate was higher in ISR lesions (2.4% vs. 0.9%, p=0.02). Repeat revascularization (21.5% vs. 16.7%, p=0.04; Figure) was higher and freedom from MALE at 1 year was significantly lower (87% vs. 92.5%, p < 0.001) in the ISR group. Conclusion: Atherectomy and DCB are more frequently used to treat FP ISR lesions. Patients with FP ISR have more intraprocedural distal embolization, higher repeat revascularization procedures, and lower freedom from MALE at 1 year.

Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device During Percutaneous EVAR and TEVAR Procedures.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA percutaneous vascular closure device in patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (PEVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Materials and Methods: The SAFE MANTA Study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02908880) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial in patients undergoing endovascular interventions using large-bore sheaths (transcatheter aortic valve replacement, PEVAR, or TEVAR) at 20 sites in North America. Patient selection intended to test the MANTA device in populations without morbid obesity, severe calcification, or a severely scarred femoral access area. Of the 263 patients enrolled in the primary analysis cohort, 53 (20.2%) patients (mean age 74.9±8.9 years; 41 men) underwent PEVAR (n=51) or TEVAR (n=2) procedures and form the cohort for this subgroup analysis. Per protocol a single MANTA device was deployed in all PEVAR/TEVAR cases. Results: The mean time to hemostasis in the PEVAR/TEVAR cohort was 35±91 seconds, with a median time of 19 seconds vs 24 seconds in the overall SAFE MANTA population. The MANTA device met the definition for technical success in 52 (98%) of 53 PEVAR/TEVAR cases compared with 97.7% in the overall SAFE MANTA population. One (1.9%) major complication (access-site stenosis) occurred in this subgroup compared to 14 (5.3%) events in the SAFE population. In the PEVAR/TEVAR group, 1 pseudoaneurysm was noted prior to discharge, another at 30-day follow-up, and one at 60 days. One (1.9%) of the 3 minor pseudoaneurysms was treated with ultrasound-guided compression and the other 2 required no treatment. Conclusion: The MANTA device demonstrated a short time to hemostasis and low complication rates compared with published literature results of other percutaneous closure devices. Time to hemostasis and complication rates were comparable between the PEVAR/TEVAR patients and the full SAFE MANTA study cohort. The MANTA device provides reliable closure with a single percutaneous device for PEVAR/TEVAR procedures.

Acute and 30-Day Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of Eximo Medical's B-Laser™, a Novel Atherectomy Device, in Subjects Affected With Infrainguinal Peripheral Arterial Disease: Results of the EX-PAD-03 Trial.

BACKGROUND: B-Laser™ is a novel atherectomy device that uses a solid-state third harmonic pulsed Nd:YAG laser with an output of 355 nm. Early data showed that the B-Laser™ is safe in treating a broad range of infrainguinal arterial lesions. We present the results of the EX-PAD-03 U.S. pivotal trial of the EXIMO B-Laser™. METHODS: EX-PAD-03 is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, international, open-label, clinical study. The study enrolled patients in the United States and Europe. The primary efficacy endpoint was the average reduction in residual diameter stenosis of >20% from baseline prior to any adjunctive therapy achieved by the B-Laser™ catheter alone. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) defined as: unplanned target limb amputation above the ankle, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and cardiovascular related death. RESULTS: A total of 97 subjects (107 lesions) were enrolled. Mean age was 70.5 years and 51% were males. Diabetes mellitus was present in 42.3%. Mean lesion length was 53.96 ±â€¯43.18 mm and 26.2% had severe calcification. Lesions were de novo (79.4%), followed by in-stent restenosis (ISR) (15.9%) and non in-stent restenosis (4.7%). The mean percent stenosis at the target lesion as assessed by the Core lab was 85.7% ±â€¯12.2 (femoro-popliteal 85.6 ±â€¯12.8%; tibials 86.0 ±â€¯9.6%). Post B-Laser™ and prior to adjunctive therapy, the mean percent stenosis at the target lesion was 52.1%. This resulted in a mean reduction from baseline to post B-Laser™ of 33.6% ±â€¯14.2% meeting the primary efficacy endpoint goal. The freedom from MAE through the 30-day follow-up period after intervention was 98.9%. Per Core lab, there was no device-related distal embolization, dissections that required additional therapy, perforation, or pseudoaneurysm. Bailout stenting was 0.9%. A significant improvement from baseline in ABI (0.24 ±â€¯0.18), Rutherford category (-1.79 ±â€¯1.22) and WIQ (0.26 ±â€¯0.28) were noted at 1 month. There was no target lesion revascularization and the patency was 96.8% by duplex ultrasound criteria at 30-day follow up. CONCLUSION: The Eximo B-Laser™ is effective and safe in ablating atherosclerotic and restenotic tissue for both above and below the knee obstructive arterial disease. The device has a high safety profile including a low risk of distal embolization.

Novel laser-based catheter for peripheral atherectomy: 6-month results from the Eximo Medical B-Laser™ IDE study.

BACKGROUND: The B-Laser™ atherectomy system (Eximo Medical, Israel) is a 355 nm solid-state Nd:YAG short pulse laser for de-novo and restenotic infrainguinal PAD with enhanced affinity for atheroma and calcified plaque. METHODS: The study was a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, international, open-label study assessing the B-Laser™ in symptomatic (Rutherford 2 to 4) infrainguinal peripheral artery disease. Primary core lab efficacy was mean reduction in diameter stenosis >20% by the B-Laser™ catheter alone. Cardiovascular death, major amputation, target lesion revascularization, WIQ, ABI and Rutherford class were obtained at baseline and out to 6 months. Duplex ultrasound patency (PSVR <2.5), was evaluated by Core Lab. RESULTS: 97 (77 in USA) PAD subjects (51 male, mean 70.5 years [range 46-86]) with 107 lesions were treated with B-Laser™ (average length 5.4 cm [range 1-24], 29.0% infrapopliteal. 77.6% calcification [26.2% severe], 21.5% chronic total occlusions, 20.6% re-stenotic). Average reduction in residual stenosis post B-Laser™ alone was 33.6 ± 14.2%. Baseline and final stenosis (post laser and adjunctive therapy) were 85.7 ± 12.2% and 17.7 ± 11.0%, respectively. Duplex patency was 96.8% at 30-days and 85.6% at 6 months (95.7% 6-month patency with severe calcification), and did not differ between POBA vs. DCB sub-groups. ABI, Rutherford category and WIQ all improved. There was one MAE and three TLRs out of 101 lesions. No procedural distal embolization was noted and there were no major device-related dissections. CONCLUSIONS: Experience with the B-Laser™ atherectomy system in infrainguinal PAD procedures demonstrates a high level of safety and efficacy for denovo and restenotic infrainguinal arterial lesions.

Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device.

BACKGROUND: Open surgical closure and small-bore suture-based preclosure devices have limitations when used for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The MANTA vascular closure device is a novel collagen-based technology designed to close large bore arteriotomies created by devices with an outer diameter ranging from 12F to 25F. In this study, we determined the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA vascular closure device. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective, single arm, multicenter investigation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair at 20 sites in North America. The primary outcome was time to hemostasis. The primary safety outcomes were accessed site-related vascular injury or bleeding complications. A total of 341 patients, 78 roll-in, and 263 in the primary analysis cohort, were entered in the study between November 2016 and September 2017. For the primary analysis cohort, transcatheter aortic valve replacement was performed in 210 (79.8%), and percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair was performed in 53 (20.2%). The 14F MANTA was used in 42 cases (16%), and the 18F was used in 221 cases(84%). The mean effective sheath outer diameter was 22F (7.3 mm). The mean time to hemostasis was 65±157 seconds with a median time to hemostasis of 24 seconds. Technical success was achieved in 257 (97.7%) patients, and a single device was deployed in 262 (99.6%) of cases. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 major vascular complications occurred in 11 (4.2%) cases: 4 received a covered stent (1.5%), 3 had access site bleeding (1.1%), 2 underwent surgical repair (0.8%), and 2 underwent balloon inflation (0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In a selected population, this study demonstrated that the MANTA percutaneous vascular closure device can safely and effectively close large bore arteriotomies created by current generation transcatheter aortic valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair devices. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02908880.

Impact of bivalirudin and paclitaxel-eluting stents on outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention of the left anterior descending artery.

Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) are at increased risk for cardiovascular events compared with patients undergoing non-LAD PCI. We assessed the impact of bivalirudin and paclitaxel-eluting stenting (PES) in patients with STEMI who underwent LAD PCI. In the HORIZONS-AMI trial, 1,445 patients had LAD PCI and 1,884 patients had non-LAD PCI. The 3-year composite rates of death, reinfarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization were significantly higher in patients who underwent LAD PCI compared with non-LAD PCI (24.0% vs 20.6%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 1.39, p = 0.013), driven by a statistically significant increase in cardiac death (5.4% vs 2.7%, HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.86, p = 0.001). For patients who underwent LAD PCI, treatment with bivalirudin resulted in significantly lower rates of cardiac death (3.8% vs 6.8%, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.89, p = 0.01), reinfarction (5.3% vs 9.5%, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83, p = 0.004), and major bleeding events (7.3% vs 11.8%, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.86, p = 0.004) compared with unfractionated heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Randomization to PES compared with bare-metal stenting resulted in a significant lower rate of target vessel revascularization (13.2% vs 19.8%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.86, p = 0.003) with no significant differences in stent thrombosis, reinfarction, or death. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI of LAD, the use of bivalirudin was associated with a reduction in mortality and bleeding rates at 3 years. PES reduced revascularization rates in this population but did not have a significant impact on mortality.

Adverse event rates following primary PCI for STEMI at US and non-US hospitals: three-year analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.

AIMS: To examine outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at US sites versus sites outside the US (OUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HORIZONS-AMI trial 3,602 STEMI patients in 11 countries were randomised to primary PCI with bivalirudin versus heparin + glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. US patients (n=814) had more diabetes, prior infarction, prior bypass surgery, and renal insufficiency. OUS patients (n=2,788) had longer door-to-balloon times, more radial access, fewer bypass surgeries, and were discharged more often on beta-blockers and statins. At three years US patients had higher mortality (9.7% vs. 6.0%, p=0.0003), reinfarction (10.2% vs. 6.4%, p=0.001), major adverse cardiac events (MACE; 28.2% vs. 20.1%, p<0.0001), major bleeding (16.9% vs. 6.4%, p<0.0001) and net adverse clinical events (NACE; 36.6% vs. 23.8%, p<0.0001), which persisted after adjusting for baseline risk. CONCLUSIONS: In the HORIZONS-AMI trial, STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI at US versus OUS sites had higher rates of adverse events, which persisted after adjusting for baseline risk. The reasons for these differences are not clear but may be due to unmeasured confounders, different thresholds for event reporting, or valid differences in systems of care and treatments.

Impact of transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention on survival and clinical outcomes (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial).

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We evaluated whether presentation of patients with STEMI to a noninterventional facility requiring transfer for primary PCI compared to direct admission to a PCI center has an impact on clinical outcomes. Of 3,602 patients enrolled in the multicenter, prospective HORIZONS-AMI trial, 988 (24.7%) were transferred for primary PCI and 2,614 were directly admitted to an interventional hospital. Clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were evaluated. Median time to reperfusion in patients with transfer was 67 minutes longer compared to patients without transfer (272 vs 205 minutes, p <0.001), and first door-to-balloon time was 47 minutes longer (134 vs 87 minutes, p <0.001). At 30 days and 1 year there were no significant differences between patients with and without transfer in the rates of major adverse cardiac events (30 days 5.8% vs 5.4%, p = 0.68; 1 year 11.6% vs 12.0%, p = 0.74), major bleeding (30 days 7.3% vs 6.9%, p = 0.66; 1 year 7.9% vs 7.4%, p = 0.63), or mortality (30 days 2.6% vs 2.6%, p = 0.92; 1 year 4.0% vs 4.2%, p = 0.81). In transfer and nontransfer patients use of bivalirudin compared to unfractionated heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was associated with lower rates of bleeding, cardiac death, and net adverse clinical events. In conclusion, in the HORIZONS-AMI trial, 30-day and 1-year survival rates and clinical outcomes were comparable in patients with STEMI requiring and not requiring transfer for primary PCI.

Outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention results from the STENT (strategic transcatheter evaluation of new therapies) group.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention. BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of DES in patients undergoing SVG intervention is controversial. METHODS: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) registry is a multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes with DES. Our study population includes patients undergoing PCI of SVG lesions with DES (n = 785) or BMS (n = 343) who completed 9-month or 2-year follow-up. Outcomes were adjusted with propensity analyses. RESULTS: The DES patients had fewer emergent procedures but had smaller vessels and longer lesions. The DES patients had less death or myocardial infarction at 9 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33 to 0.83, p = 0.006) and less death at 2 years (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.98, p = 0.041). Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was less with DES at 9 months (7.2% vs. 10.0%, HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.61, p < 0.001) but was no different by 2 years (18.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.86), although adjusted TVR rates were lower (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.90, p = 0.014). The DES reduced TVR at 9 months in SVG lesions with diameter <3.5 mm (8.0% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.013) but not >or=3.5 mm (6.0% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SVG lesions with DES vs. BMS is effective in reducing TVR at 9 months, although most of this advantage is lost at 2 years. The DES seem safe with less death or myocardial infarction, although selection bias might have affected these results. Our data suggest that DES might have short-term advantages over BMS in SVG lesions with diameter <3.5 mm.

Outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies (STENT) Group.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares outcomes with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: DESs have been effective in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but their safety and efficacy in patients with STEMI have not been well studied. METHODS: The STENT Registry is a multicenter United States registry evaluating outcomes of DES. Our study population includes patients with STEMI treated with either a DES or BMS who completed 9-month or 2-year follow-up. Outcomes were adjusted using propensity score analysis. RESULTS: DES patients were younger, had less prior infarction and prior bypass surgery, but had smaller vessels and longer lesions. After adjusting for differences in baseline variables, there were no significant differences between DES and BMS in death, reinfarction, or major adverse cardiac events (MACE). DES had lower rates of stent thrombosis at 9 months (1.0% vs. 2.7%, HR 0.40 [0.17-0.95]) and lower rates of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 9 months (4.0% vs. 7.5%, HR 0.55 [0.34-0.88]) and 2 years (8.0% vs. 11.3%, HR 0.57 [0.35-0.92]). There was a nonsignificant increase in stent thrombosis with DES versus BMS from 1 to 2 years (1.1% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that DES used with primary PCI for STEMI are more effective than BMS in reducing TVR and are safe for up to 2 years. Whether DES are safe beyond 2 years and whether the reduction in TVR is enough to justify their use in STEMI will have to wait for the results of large randomized trials.

Outcomes and complications with off-label use of drug-eluting stents: results from the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) group.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates outcomes and complications in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) for "off-label" indications. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents have been effective in randomized trials, but their safety and efficacy for off-label indications has not been well studied. METHODS: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Registry is the largest multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes of DES. Off-label indications included ostial, left main, long, bifurcation, and in-stent restenotic lesions, saphenous vein grafts, chronic total occlusions, small or large vessels, multilesion or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity analyses. RESULTS: Drug-eluting stents were used in an off-label manner in 59% of patients. The patients who received off-label treatment were more often male, had a higher incidence of prior infarction and bypass surgery, and lower ejection fractions. Off-label versus "on-label" use of DES was associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis at 9 months and 2 years. Off-label use of DES compared with off-label use of bare-metal stents (BMS) had lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months and 2 years and lower rates of stent thrombosis at 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label use of DES is associated with higher event rates compared with on-label use of DES, which is consistent with a higher risk clinical and lesion profile. However, event rates with off-label use of DES are lower compared with off-label use of BMS. Pending results from randomized trials, our data support the use of DES for off-label indications in selected patients.

Comparative clinical outcomes of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents: results from a large prospective multicenter registry--STENT Group.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the 9-month clinical outcomes of patients treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) registry is the first multicenter registry in the U.S. to collect long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents from "real-world" practice. METHODS: Data on all percutaneous coronary interventions in 8 U.S. hospital centers were collected in the STENT registry between 2003 and 2005. In this prospective, nonrandomized, observational study, the choice of procedures was at the physicians' discretion. Patients who only received a PES (n = 4,671) or SES (n = 4,555) and completed 9-month follow-up (93.8% of eligible) were included for analysis. Primary end points were death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 9 months. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (any of the 3 primary end points) and stent thrombosis. RESULTS: At 9 months, death, MI, and TVR occurred in 2.2%, 2.0%, and 4.1%, respectively, of the PES group and 2.5%, 2.2%, and 4.3%, respectively, of the SES group (p = NS); MACE occurred in 7.5% of the PES group and 8.0% of the SES group (p = 0.37). After adjustments for group differences in baseline characteristics, TVR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 1.32; p = 0.26) and MACE (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12; p = 0.56) were similar for PES and SES. Stent thrombosis at 9 months occurred in 0.7% of both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that clinical restenosis and MACE events after PES and SES procedures in "real-world" patients are infrequent and similar at 9 months.