The Relationship Between Social Risks and the Mental Health of School-Age Children in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The study's goal was to measure the association between social risks and the mental health of school-age children in primary care. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban safety-net hospital-based pediatric clinic using data collected from 2 standardized screening tools administered at well-child care visits for children age 6 to 11. Psychosocial dysfunction was measured with the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17), and 6 social risks (caregiver education, employment, child care, housing, food security, and household heat) were measured with the WE CARE screener. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to measure the association between scores while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Among N = 943 patients, cumulative social risks were significantly associated with a positive PSC-17 total score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.5; P = .02), indicating psychosocial dysfunction. Children with ≥3 social risks were 2.4 times more likely to have a positive PSC-17 total score compared to children with <3 social risks (95% CI 1.5-3.9; P < .001). Of the individual social risks measured, only food insecurity significantly predicted a positive PSC-17 total score (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.2; P = .02) and attention score (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.4; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Number of risks on a social risk screener was associated with psychosocial dysfunction in school-age children. Food insecurity was the only individual risk associated with psychosocial dysfunction, in particular attention problems. Screening tools for social risks could be used to identify at-risk children whose mental health may be adversely impacted by their social conditions.

Does a Therapist's World View Matter?

While past research indicates that mental health professionals are less religious than the public they serve, little is known about the implications of therapists' world views for their practice. In this study, approximately 50 therapists completed surveys that assessed self-identification in relation to spirituality, religion, and/or world view; how relevant they considered their patients' and their own world views; and responses to clinical vignettes involving issues arising in treatment. While a minority considered themselves religious, a majority indicated that they considered themselves moderately or very spiritual. When asked how they would respond to a series of clinical vignettes involving topics such as assisted suicide and encouraging the use of spiritual resources, responses varied significantly by world view. Respondents endorsed several factors limiting the integration of religion/spiritualities/world views into their clinical work. These data raise questions about how to further explore the clinical relevance of the therapist's world view.