RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2021, an EULAR task force published a definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA). Our current knowledge of D2T RA with the EULAR definition is based on European and Asian cohorts, and no North American cohort has yet to be published. The aim of this study was to compare D2T RA patients to non-D2T RA who are good responders to advanced therapy, and to describe their evolution in an university health center patient cohort. METHODS: This is a retrospective single centre study of the medical records of all adults with RA on at least one biologic or target synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD). D2T RA group was defined according to the EULAR definition of D2T RA. The non-D2T RA group was defined as a b/tsDMARD good responder who had low-disease activity or remission for at least one year on 1 or 2 b/tsDMARD mechanism of action. We compared the patients' comorbidities, and history of b/tsDMARD use. Descriptive statistics and proportions were calculated. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to estimate and compare median survival. RESULTS: Among the 417 patients, 101 (24%) were D2T RA and 316 (76%) were non-D2T RA. D2T RA group was slightly younger (63 ± 9 years versus 65 ± 12 years, p = 0.045), more likely to have concomitant non-inflammatory pain (28% versus 8%, p < 0.0001) and to discontinue at least one b/tsDMARD due to intolerance (39% versus 10%, p < 0.0001). In the D2T RA group, JAK inhibitors were associated with longer drug continuation when used as the third b/tsDMARD. Fewer patients were using corticosteroid at their most recent follow-up in this Canadian cohort compared to others (16% versus from 29 to 74%). CONCLUSION: Concomitant non-inflammatory pain was more prevalent in D2T RA patients compared to b/tsDMARD good responder non-D2T RA patients. Steroid-sparing strategies is possible even in D2T RA patients. Future prospective research may compare JAK inhibitors with other mechanisms of action in D2T RA.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Humanos , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estudos de Coortes , Indução de Remissão , Adulto , ComorbidadeRESUMO
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic autoimmune disease caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Rare variants with low predicted effects in genes participating in the same biological function might be involved in developing complex diseases such as RA. From whole-exome sequencing (WES) data, we identified genes containing rare non-neutral variants with complete penetrance and no phenocopy in at least one of nine French multiplex families. Further enrichment analysis highlighted focal adhesion as the most significant pathway. We then tested if interactions between the genes participating in this function would increase or decrease the risk of developing RA disease. The model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction (MB-MDR) approach was used to detect epistasis in a discovery sample (19 RA cases and 11 healthy individuals from 9 families and 98 unrelated CEU controls from the International Genome Sample Resource). We identified 9 significant interactions involving 11 genes (MYLK, FLNB, DOCK1, LAMA2, RELN, PIP5K1C, TNC, PRKCA, VEGFB, ITGB5, and FLT1). One interaction (MYLK*FLNB) increasing RA risk and one interaction decreasing RA risk (DOCK1*LAMA2) were confirmed in a replication sample (200 unrelated RA cases and 91 GBR unrelated controls). Functional and genomic data in RA samples or relevant cell types argue the key role of these genes in RA.
RESUMO
It is unclear if AGEs are involved in the bone fragility of type 1 diabetes (T1D). We evaluated whether skin AGEs by skin autofluorescence and serum AGEs (pentosidine, carboxymethyl-lysine [CML]) are independently associated with BMD by DXA (lumbar spine, hip, distal radius), trabecular bone score (TBS), serum bone turnover markers (BTMs: CTX; P1NP; osteocalcin), and sclerostin in participants with and without T1D. Linear regression models were used, with interaction terms to test effect modification by T1D status. In participants with T1D, correlations between skin and serum AGEs as well as between AGEs and 3-year HbA1C were evaluated using Spearman's correlations. Data are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). We included individuals who participated in a cross-sectional study and had BMD and TBS assessment (106 T1D/65 controls, 53.2% women, age 43 ± 15 yr, BMI 26.6 ± 5.5 kg/m2). Participants with T1D had diabetes for 27.6 ± 12.3 yr, a mean 3-yr HbA1C of 7.5 ± 0.9% and skin AGEs of 2.15 ± 0.54 arbitrary units. A subgroup of 65 T1D/57 controls had BTMs and sclerostin measurements, and those with T1D also had serum pentosidine (16.8[8.2-32.0] ng/mL) and CML [48.0 ± 16.8] ng/mL) measured. Femoral neck BMD, TBS, and BTMs were lower, while sclerostin levels were similar in participants with T1D vs controls. T1D status did not modify the associations between AGEs and bone outcomes. Skin AGEs were significantly associated with total hip and femoral neck BMD, TBS, BTMs, and sclerostin before, but not after, adjustment for confounders. Serum AGEs were not associated with any bone outcome. There were no significant correlations between skin and serum AGEs or between AGEs and 3-yr HbA1C. In conclusion, skin and serum AGEs are not independently associated with BMD, TBS, BTMs, and sclerostin in participants with relatively well-controlled T1D and participants without diabetes.