Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 27(12): 1022.e1-1022.e6, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34571211

RESUMO

Changes to donor availability, collection center capacity, and travel restrictions during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic led to routine cryopreservation of most unrelated donor products for hematopoietic transplantation prior to the recipient commencing the conditioning regimen. We investigated the effect of this change on unrelated donor product quality and clinical outcomes. Product information was requested from transplantation centers in Australia and New Zealand and clinical outcome data from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR). In total, 191 products were collected between April 1, 2021, and September 30, 2021, and most (74%) were from international collection centers. Median post-thaw CD34 recovery was 78% (range 25% to 176%) and median post-thaw CD34 viability was 87% (range 34% to 112%). Median time to neutrophil recovery was 17 days (interquartile range 10 to 24 days), and graft failure occurred in 6 patients (4%). These clinical outcomes were similar to those of "fresh" unrelated donor transplants reported to the ABMTRR in 2019. However, recipient transplantation centers reported problems with 29% of products in the form of damage during transit, low cell dose, inadequate labeling, missing representative samples, or missing documentation. These problems were critical in 7 cases (4%). At last follow-up, 22 products (12%) had not been infused. Routine cryopreservation of unrelated donor hemopoietic progenitor cell products has enabled safe continuation of allogeneic transplant services during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, practices for product tracing, documentation, and transportation can be optimized, and measures to reduce the incidence of unused unrelated donor product are required.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Criopreservação , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 32(6): 538-545, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688198

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the introduction of new targeted therapies for hematological malignancies comes the challenges of both assessing the risk of developing an IFD while being treated with these agents, as well as managing the drug--drug interactions between azole antifungals and the agents. RECENT FINDINGS: New targeted therapies for hematological malignancy include chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells), Bi-specific T-cell Engager (BiTE) blinatumomab, and the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) of calicheamicin inotuzumab ozogamicin for acute lymphoblasic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma; the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3Kδ) inhibitor idelalisib for lymphoma and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors, such as midostaurin, sorafenib and gilteritinib for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); and the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax for a range of hematological malignancies including lymphoma and leukemia. This review summarizes recommendations for IFD prophylaxis using these therapies and evidence for managing concomitant azole administration. SUMMARY: Whilst some evidence exists to guide IFD prophylaxis using new targeted therapies for hematological malignancies, there is an overall lack of descriptive, robust studies specifically describing IFD risk and management. With the emergence of novel agents, clinical judgment must be used to assess the risk of developing an IFD. Care must also be taken when administering azoles with drug--drug interactions, often requiring dose adjustment of the cancer therapies.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Azóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/etiologia , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Antifúngicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Azóis/administração & dosagem , Azóis/efeitos adversos , Quimioprevenção , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Gerenciamento Clínico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Incidência , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/epidemiologia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Intern Med J ; 48(8): 988-991, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30133987

RESUMO

Graft failure affects approximately 5% of allogeneic stem cell transplants, with a poor prognosis. Salvage second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT2) is limited by high rates of transplant-related mortality from infection and graft-versus-host disease. We report on five adult patients receiving rescue alloSCT2 using haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells. All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, two subsequently died from sepsis and disease relapse, respectively. Three patients remain alive up to 2 years post-transplant. We suggest consideration of haploidentical alloSCT2 for patients with graft failure.


Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Rejeição de Enxerto/terapia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/fisiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico/métodos , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Transplante Haploidêntico/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico/tendências , Terapia de Salvação/tendências , Transplante Haploidêntico/tendências , Falha de Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA