ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology.

Parenteral nutrition offers the possibility of increasing or ensuring nutrient intake in patients in whom normal food intake is inadequate and enteral nutrition is not feasible, is contraindicated or is not accepted by the patient. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of parenteral nutrition in cancer patients. They were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with accepted standards, are based on the most relevant publications of the last 30 years and share many of the conclusions of the ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition in oncology. Under-nutrition and cachexia occur frequently in cancer patients and are indicators of poor prognosis and, per se, responsible for excess morbidity and mortality. Many indications for parenteral nutrition parallel those for enteral nutrition (weight loss or reduction in food intake for more than 7-10 days), but only those who, for whatever reason cannot be fed orally or enterally, are candidates to receive parenteral nutrition. A standard nutritional regimen may be recommended for short-term parenteral nutrition, while in cachectic patients receiving intravenous feeding for several weeks a high fat-to-glucose ratio may be advised because these patients maintain a high capacity to metabolize fats. The limited nutritional response to the parenteral nutrition reflects more the presence of metabolic derangements which are characteristic of the cachexia syndrome (or merely the short duration of the nutritional support) rather than the inadequacy of the nutritional regimen. Perioperative parenteral nutrition is only recommended in malnourished patients if enteral nutrition is not feasible. In non-surgical well-nourished oncologic patients routine parenteral nutrition is not recommended because it has proved to offer no advantage and is associated with increased morbidity. A benefit, however, is reported in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Short-term parenteral nutrition is however commonly accepted in patients with acute gastrointestinal complications from chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and long-term (home) parenteral nutrition will sometimes be a life-saving maneuver in patients with sub acute/chronic radiation enteropathy. In incurable cancer patients home parenteral nutrition may be recommended in hypophagic/(sub)obstructed patients (if there is an acceptable performance status) if they are expected to die from starvation/under nutrition prior to tumor spread.

Central venous catheter complications in 447 patients on home parenteral nutrition: an analysis of over 100.000 catheter days.

RATIONALE: The purpose of this study is to report the frequency of central venous catheter (CVC) complications and to analyze the potential risk factors for complications requiring CVC removal in home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients. METHODS: A questionnaire developed by the ESPEN HAN WORKING GROUP was distributed to 12 European centers to investigate the complications occurring during the period between January 1995 and December 2000 when HPN patients used their first CVC. The questionnaire collected informations related to the Home Parenteral Nutrition technique and the underlying disease. Factors affecting the time of CVC removal were jointly investigated using Cox's multivariable regression models. RESULTS: The study was performed on 447 patients for a total of 110869 CVC-days. Complications occurred in about 1/4 of patients, approximately half were infections and about half required Central Venous Catheter removal. The Cox analysis showed that using the CVC 7 times/week and implanted ports were associated with a hazard ratio of 3 and 2.8, respectively. A reduced risk of removal (of about 40%) was associated with using CVC also for non-nutritional purposes (P = 0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this retrospective investigation, the type of CVC, the type of administration of HPN and the type of training are important factors associated with occurrence of complications or with CVC removal. However, in our opinion, proper care of the CVC, of preparation and administration of the nutritive admixture seem to be paramount for a safe management of HPN.

Home enteral tube feeding following cerebrovascular accident.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the UK, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is the third commonest cause of death and the commonest diagnosis in patients receiving home enteral feeding (HETF). This study aimed to use data from the British Artificial Nutrition Survey (BANS) collected between 1996 and 1999 to assess the outcome of patients on HETF, including mortality, return to oral feeding, level of physical activity, and level of dependency, which has resource implications. RESULTS: it is estimated that about 1.7% of all patients suffering a CVA in the UK between 1996 and 1999 received HETF. At one year, 29.6% died while receiving HETF and another 13% returned to oral feeding. Mortality increased with age and was twice as high in those managed in nursing homes compared to those in their own homes. The patients receiving tube feeding spent only 0.6% of their time in hospital. A total of 43.9% of patients were bed-bound at home (1.9% unconscious) and an additional 30.3% were house-bound. Only 21.2% were independent, and the majority were totally dependent on their carers. In CVA patients on HETF the level of dependency was greater than for those with all types of diagnoses (n=12,997). CONCLUSION: This study has described the outcome of a large number of patients receiving HETF in the UK. Since patients spent less than 1% of their time in hospital, HETF relieves pressure on the expensive hospital environment, but places more demands on the carers, who have to deal with severely disabled patients. Recovery of swallowing function should be assessed intermittently to prevent unnecessary HETF.

Investigation of the effect of short-term change in dietary magnesium intake in asthma.

Epidemiological evidence suggests that a low dietary intake of magnesium is associated with impaired lung function, bronchial hyperreactivity and wheezing. This study was designed to investigate whether short-term alterations of dietary magnesium intake have an effect on the clinical control of asthma. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 17 asthmatic subjects adhered to a low magnesium diet for two periods of 3 weeks, preceded and separated by a 1 week run-in/wash-out, in which they took either placebo or magnesium (400 mg x day(-1)) tablet supplementation. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the provocative dose of methacholine required to cause a 20% fall in FEV1 from baseline (PD20,FEV1) were measured at the beginning and end of each treatment period, and variation in peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate, bronchodilator use and symptom scores recorded throughout. Asthma symptom scores were significantly lower during the magnesium treatment period, the median (95% confidence interval) difference from placebo being 3.8 (0.5-7.0) symptom points per 7 days (p=0.02). However, there was no significant improvement in FEV1, PD20,FEV1, log amplitude percentage mean PEF variation or bronchodilator use during magnesium supplementation. A high magnesium intake was associated with improvement in symptom scores, though not in objective measures of airflow or airway reactivity, in these stable asthmatic subjects.

Screening by nurses and junior doctors to detect malnutrition when patients are first assessed in hospital.

Four hundred and fifty four ward nurses and 319 junior doctors in 70 hospitals were interviewed about the last patient they had admitted, using a brief questionnaire. The availability of weighing scales and height measuring equipment was assessed by observers who visited the wards of 107 hospitals. Two thirds of nurses and doctors asked patients about recent food intake; half of the nurses and three quarters of the doctors asked about unintentional weight loss. Answers to the questions were recorded in the notes on 52-80 per cent of occasions. Two thirds of nurses weighed the patient, but only 11 per cent (%) measured height; approximately 80% of results were recorded. Most nurses and doctors who asked no questions about nutrition and made no measurements failed to do so because they regarded them as unimportant. Weighing scales were adequately provided, but height measuring equipment was available in only 17% of wards.