Survival prediction in everolimus-treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma incorporating tumor burden response in the RECORD-1 trial.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 RECORD-1 study demonstrated clinical benefit of everolimus over placebo (median progression-free survival: 4.9 mo compared with 1.9 mo, p<0.001) in treatment-resistant patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) objective response rate was low. OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential role of tumor burden response to everolimus in predicting patient survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: RECORD-1 patients with at least two tumor assessments (baseline and weeks 2-14) were included (n=246). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact of various prognostic factors on overall survival (OS). Components of RECIST progression were explored using univariate Cox regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The baseline sum of longest tumor diameters (SLD) and progression at weeks 2-14 were prognostic factors of OS by multivariate analysis. Univariate analysis at weeks 2-14 demonstrated that growth of nontarget lesions and appearance of new lesions were predictive of OS (p<0.001). This retrospective analysis used data from one arm of one trial; patients in the placebo arm were excluded because of confounding effects when they crossed over to everolimus. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identified baseline SLD as a predictive factor of OS, and the appearance of a new lesion or progression of a nontarget lesion at first assessment after baseline also affects OS in patients with mRCC treated with everolimus.

Using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data in early decision making regarding drug development: a phase I clinical trial evaluating tyrosine kinase inhibitor, AEE788.

PURPOSE: In this first-in-human study of AEE788, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER-2, and VEGFR-2, a comprehensive pharmacodynamic program was implemented in addition to the evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of AEE788 in cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced, solid tumors received escalating doses of oral AEE788 once daily. Primary endpoints were to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). A nonlinear model (Emax model) was used to describe the relationship between AEE788 exposure and target-pathway modulation in skin and tumor tissues. RESULTS: Overall, 111 patients were treated (25 to 550 mg/day). DLTs included rash and diarrhea; MTD was 450 mg/day. Effects on biomarkers correlated to serum AEE788 concentrations. The concentration at 50% inhibition (IC(50)) for EGFR in skin (0.033 µmol/L) and tumor (0.0125 µmol/L) were similar to IC(50) in vitro suggesting skin may be surrogate tissue for estimating tumor EGFR inhibition. No inhibition of p-MAPK and Ki67 was observed in skin vessels at ≤ MTD. Hence, AEE788 inhibited EGFR, but not VEGFR, at doses ≤ MTD. A total of 16 of 96 evaluable patients showed a >10% shrinkage of tumor size; one partial response was observed. CONCLUSION: Our pharmacodynamic-based study showed effective inhibition of EGFR, but not of VEGFR at tolerable AEE788 doses. Emax modeling integrated with biomarker data effectively guided real-time decision making in the early development of AEE788. Despite clinical activity, target inhibition of only EGFR led to discontinuation of further AEE788 development.

Phase I study of AEE788, a novel multitarget inhibitor of ErbB- and VEGF-receptor-family tyrosine kinases, in recurrent glioblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) play a significant role in glioblastoma angiogenesis and proliferation, making tyrosine kinase (TK) receptors logical targets for treatment. We evaluated AEE788, a reversible TK inhibitor that inhibits EGFR and VEGFR, in recurrent glioblastoma patients. METHODS: In this dose-escalation, phase I study, patients with recurrent glioblastoma received AEE788 once daily in 28-day cycles in stratified subgroups: those receiving (1) non-enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants drugs or no anticonvulsants (Group A) and (2) enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant drugs (Group B). A dose-expansion phase stratified patients by surgical eligibility. Primary objectives were to determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives included evaluating (1) safety/tolerability, (2) pharmacokinetics, and (3) preliminary antitumor activity. RESULTS: Sixty-four glioblastoma patients were enrolled. Two Group A patients experienced DLTs (proteinuria and stomatitis) at 550 mg; 550 mg was, therefore, the highest dose evaluated and dose limiting. One Group B patient receiving 800 mg experienced a DLT (diarrhea). The initially recommended dose for dose-expansion phase for Group A was 400 mg; additional patients received 250 mg to assess the hepatotoxicity. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea and rash. Serious AEs, most commonly grade 3/4 liver function test elevations, were responsible for treatment discontinuation in 17% of patients. AEE788 concentrations were reduced by EIACD. The best overall response was stable disease (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous, once-daily AEE788 was associated with unacceptable toxicity and minimal activity for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. The study was, therefore, discontinued prematurely.

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction between AEE788 and RAD001 causing thrombocytopenia in patients with glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Treating glioblastoma through the simultaneous inhibition of multiple transduction pathways may prove more effective than single-pathway inhibition. We evaluated the safety, biologic activity, and pharmacokinetic profile of oral AEE788, a selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), plus oral RAD001, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, in glioblastoma patients. METHODS: This phase IB/II, open-label, multicenter, 2-arm, dose-escalation study enrolled adult glioblastoma patients at first or second recurrence/relapse. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of AEE788 combined with RAD001. Secondary objectives included determining the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of the combination. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled (AEE788 200 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg/day, 2 patients; AEE788 150 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg every other day [qod], 14); all patients discontinued the study most commonly because of disease progression. Four patients experienced DLT (AEE788 200 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg/day, 1 patient; AEE788 150 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg qod, 3). Both patients receiving AEE788 (200 mg/day) plus RAD001 (5 mg/day) experienced clinically significant thrombocytopenia requiring a dose reduction/interruption. AEE788 appeared to inhibit the metabolism of RAD001. The study was terminated prematurely before an MTD was determined because of safety findings in other studies evaluating AEE788 monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of AEE788 and RAD001 in glioblastoma patients caused a clinically significant thrombocytopenia and a higher-than-expected RAD001 area under the curve concentration when dosed at 200 and 5 mg/day, respectively. After a dose reduction to AEE788 (150 mg/day) and RAD001 (5 mg qod), the combination appeared to be better tolerated.

Statistical methods for a phase II oncology trial with a growth modulation index (GMI) endpoint.

For cytostatic cancer therapies, alternatives to traditional phase II endpoints are needed. Von Hoff (1998) proposed an intrapatient progression-free survival (PFS) ratio, the growth modulation index (GMI). Current practice in estimation of the GMI success rate is conservative and omits a measure of uncertainty. We investigated nonparametric and parametric methods to estimate the GMI success rate, including an approach using midranks for paired survival outcomes (Hudgens and Satten (2002)). Estimators were applied to a phase II GMI dataset (Bonetti et al. (2001)). From simulation studies, it was determined that a rank-based estimator had the most favorable statistical properties. Its point estimate bias was consistently within 1.5%; its bias and precision were robust over a range of effect and censoring scenarios. Using a proof of concept criterion of {P(GMI≥1)≥θ}, a simulation investigation found that a θ of 50%, for sample sizes between 20 and 30 patients, had type I error of ≤20% and a power to detect Von Hoff's 1.33 effect of ≥80%. When the amount of censoring was ≥20%, the midrank estimator had a minimum of 14% greater power over the simple percentage estimator for the GMI success rate. Future investigations reporting the GMI should consider adopting the midrank methodology.

An efficient algorithm to determine the optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs in oncology clinical trials.

Sun et al. (2009) proposed an optimal two-stage randomized multinomial design that incorporates both response rate (RR) and early progression rate (EPR) in designing phase II oncology trials. However, determination of the design parameters in their approach requires evaluating huge numbers of combinations among possible values of design parameters, and thus requires highly intensive computation. In this paper we develop an efficient algorithm to identify the optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs in phase II oncology clinical trials comparing a treatment arm to a control arm. The proposed algorithm substantially reduces the computation intensity via an approximation method. Some other techniques are also used to further improve its efficiency. Examples show that the proposed algorithm has more than a 90% reduction in computation time while having an acceptably low approximation error. This may enhance usage of the optimal two-stage multinomial design in clinical trials and also make it feasible to extend the design to more complicated scenarios.

Phase III study of valspodar (PSC 833) combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone in patients with stage IV or suboptimally debulked stage III epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered with or without the multidrug resistance modulator valspodar (PSC 833) in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred sixty-two patients with stage IV or suboptimally debulked stage III ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either valspodar 5 mg/kg every 6 hours for 12 doses, paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2), and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (PC-PSC; n = 381) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 (PC; n = 381). Time to disease progression (TTP) was the primary end point. Secondary end points were overall survival time (OS), response rate (RR), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 736 days (range, 1 to 2,280 days), the median TTP was 13.2 and 13.5 months in the PC-PSC and PC groups, respectively (P = .67); the median OS was 32 and 28.9 months, respectively (P = .94). The overall RR was higher in the PC group (41.5% v 33.6%; P = .02). Central and peripheral nervous system and GI toxicities were more common in the PC-PSC group. Ataxia occurred in 53.5% and 3.2% of PC-PSC-and PC-treated patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in the PC-PSC group. More PC-PSC-treated patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events (AEs), experienced serious AEs, and required paclitaxel dose reductions. CONCLUSION: The addition of valspodar to PC did not improve TTP or OS and was more toxic compared with PC in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to imatinib mesylate can occur in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Preclinical in vitro studies have shown that nilotinib (AMN107), a new BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is more potent than imatinib against CML cells by a factor of 20 to 50. METHODS: In a phase 1 dose-escalation study, we assigned 119 patients with imatinib-resistant CML or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to receive nilotinib orally at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg, and 1200 mg once daily and at 400 mg and 600 mg twice daily. RESULTS: Common adverse events were myelosuppression, transient indirect hyperbilirubinemia, and rashes. Of 33 patients with the blastic phase of disease, 13 had a hematologic response and 9 had a cytogenetic response; of 46 patients with the accelerated phase, 33 had a hematologic response and 22 had a cytogenetic response; 11 of 12 patients with the chronic phase had a complete hematologic remission. CONCLUSIONS: Nilotinib has a relatively favorable safety profile and is active in imatinib-resistant CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00109707 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for the pharmacological response of PTK787/ZK 222584, an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and liver metastases: results from two phase I studies.

PURPOSE: PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK), an orally active inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinases, inhibits VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. The pharmacodynamic effects of PTK/ZK were evaluated by assessing changes in contrast-enhancement parameters of metastatic liver lesions using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated in two ongoing, dose-escalating phase I studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients had DCE-MRI performed at baseline, day 2, and at the end of each 28-day cycle. Doses of oral PTK/ZK ranged from 50 to 2000 mg once daily. Tumor permeability and vascularity were assessed by calculating the bidirectional transfer constant (Ki). The percentage of baseline Ki (% of baseline Ki) at each time point was compared with pharmacokinetic and clinical end points. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation exists between the % of baseline Ki and increase in PTK/ZK oral dose and plasma levels (P =.01 for oral dose; P =.0001 for area under the plasma concentration curve at day 2). Patients with a best response of stable disease had a significantly greater reduction in Ki at both day 2 and at the end of cycle 1 compared with progressors (mean difference in % of baseline Ki, 47%, P =.004%; and 51%, P =.006; respectively). The difference in % of baseline Ki remained statistically significant after adjusting for baseline WHO performance status. CONCLUSION: These findings should help to define a biologically active dose of PTK/ZK. These results suggest that DCE-MRI may be a useful biomarker for defining the pharmacological response and dose of angiogenesis inhibitors, such as PTK/ZK, for further clinical development.