Cognitive assessment to optimize prediction of functional outcome in subacute hip fracture: a short-term prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is a long-known negative prognostic factor after hip fracture. Cognition is usually screened by a single easy-to-administer bedside tool, but recent studies have shown that screening tests may be not enough to rule out cognitive impairment with an unfavorable prognostic role. Unfortunately, data on outcome prediction by further cognitive assessments is sparse. AIM: We focused on patients with subacute hip fracture defined cognitively intact or mildly impaired on the screening evaluation performed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). We hypothesized that each of 3 further cognitive tests could independently predict activities of daily living, with optimal prediction of function obtained by performing all three the tests. DESIGN: Short-term prospective study. SETTING: Rehabilitation ward. POPULATION: Inpatients with subacute hip-fracture. METHODS: Three cognitive tests were performed on admission to rehabilitation in the patients who made ≤4 errors on the SPMSQ: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT, immediate and delayed recall) and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). We assessed activities of daily living by the Barthel index. Successful rehabilitation was defined with a Barthel Index Score ≥85. RESULTS: Each of the three cognitive tests assessed before rehabilitation significantly predicted the Barthel index scores measured at the end of the rehabilitation course in our sample of 280 inpatients. However, only the MoCA score retained its significant predictive role when the scores from the three tests were included together as independent variables in a multiple regression model, with adjustments for a panel of potential confounders (P=0.007). The adjusted odds ratio to achieve successful rehabilitation for a seven-point change in MoCA score was 1.98 (CI 95% from 1.02 to 3.83; P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, MoCA but not RAVLT and FAB retained the prognostic role when the scores from the three tests were evaluated together as potential predictors of functional ability in activities of daily living. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: In the presence of a normal (or mildly altered) score on the SPMSQ in subacute hip fracture, MoCA scores improve prediction of activities of daily living and should be routinely performed.

A screening test is not enough to define the prognostic role of cognitive impairment after hip fracture: a short-term prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment assessed by easy-to-administer tests successfully predicts function after hip fracture, whereas the prognostic role of additional cognitive evaluations is largely unknown. AIMS: To investigate the capability of further assessments to discriminate cognitive impairment with prognostic relevance in hip-fracture women defined cognitively intact or mildly impaired on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). METHODS: We prospectively investigated women with subacute hip fracture admitted to our rehabilitation facility. The women who made ≤4 errors on the SPMSQ were further assessed by 4 tests: Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (immediate and delayed recall) and Frontal Assessment Battery. Activities of daily living (ADL) were measured by the Barthel index. Successful rehabilitation was defined with a Barthel index score ≥85. RESULTS: Data from 127 women were available. Each of the 4 cognitive tests assessed at admission significantly predicted the Barthel index scores measured at discharge. The predictive role persisted after multiple adjustments. For a change in cognitive scores corresponding to the difference between 25° and 75° percentiles in their distribution in the sample, the adjusted odds ratio to achieve successful rehabilitation roughly ranged from 2 to 4, depending on which cognitive test was adopted. DISCUSSION: The women with subacute hip fracture defined cognitively intact or mildly impaired on the SPMSQ could have cognitive impairment revealed by further examination, with prognostic disadvantages in ADL. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing cognition by the SPMSQ seems not enough to exclude the presence of cognitive impairment with relevant prognostic disadvantage in hip-fracture women.

Reach planning with someone else's hand.

To investigate the relationship between the sense of body ownership and motor control, we capitalized on a rare bizarre disorder wherein another person's hand is misattributed to their own body, i.e., a pathological form of embodiment (E+). Importantly, despite E+ is usually associated with motor deficits, we had the opportunity to test two E+ patients with spared motor function, thus able to perform a reaching task. Crucially, these patients had proprioceptive deafferentation, allowing us to purely isolate the embodiment-dependent effect from proprioception-dependent ones that are usually associated in experimental manipulations of body ownership in healthy participants. Previous evidence suggests that the reaching movement vector is attracted towards an embodied hand during the rubber hand illusion (RHI). However, these results are confounded by the spared proprioception, whose modulation alone could explain the effects on reach planning. The neuropsychological approach employed here provides unambiguous evidence about the role of body ownership in reach planning. Indeed, three brain-damaged patients with proprioceptive deafferentation, two E+ and a well-matched control patient without pathological embodiment (E-), and 10 age-matched healthy controls underwent a reaching task wherein they had to reach for a target from a fixed starting point, while an alien hand (the co-experimenter's) was placed on the table. Irrespective of proprioception, damaged in all patients, only in E+ patients reaching errors were significantly more shifted consistently with the pathological belief, i.e., as if they planned movements from the position of the alien (embodied) hand, as compared to controls. Furthermore, with an additional experiment on healthy participants, we demonstrated that reaching errors observed during the RHI correlate with the changes in ownership. In conclusion, our neuropsychological approach suggests that when planning a reach, we do so from where our owned hand is and not from its physical location.

Is sarcopenia associated with osteoporosis? A cross-sectional study of 262 women with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Several lines of evidence support the view that sarcopenia and osteoporosis are strictly connected. However, the capability of the updated sarcopenia definition to capture the concomitant presence of osteoporosis has been scarcely investigated. AIM: The main aim was to assess the association between sarcopenia defined according to the revised criteria from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) and osteoporosis in women with a hip fracture. A second aim was to investigate the thresholds for low appendicular lean mass (aLM) and handgrip strength to optimize osteoporosis detection. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. POPULATION: Women with subacute hip fracture. METHODS: A scan by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed to assess body composition. A Jamar dynamometer was used to measure handgrip strength. Sarcopenia was diagnosed with both handgrip strength <16 kg and aLM <15 kg. Osteoporosis was identified with femoral bone mineral density lower than 2.5 standard deviations below the mean of the young reference population. RESULTS: We studied 262 of 290 women. Osteoporosis was found in 189 of the 262 women (72%; 95% CI: 67-78%) whereas sarcopenia in 147 (56%; 95% CI: 50-62%). After adjustment for age, time interval between fracture and DXA scan and body fat percentage the odds ratio to have osteoporosis for a sarcopenic woman was 2.30 (95% CI: 1.27-4.14; P=0.006). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that the best cut-off points to discriminate osteoporosis were 20 kg for handgrip strength and 12.5 kg for aLM. Adopting the optimized thresholds to define sarcopenia, the adjusted odds ratio to have osteoporosis for a sarcopenic woman was 3.68 (95% CI: 1.93-7.03; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study shows a positive association between sarcopenia defined according to the EWGSOP2 criteria and osteoporosis in 262 women with hip fracture. The association may be bettered by refining the cut-off points for low aLM and handgrip strength. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Sarcopenia seems to be a risk factor for osteoporosis in hip-fracture women. The issue, and the potential role of optimized thresholds should be addressed by robust longitudinal studies.

What is the role of placebo in neurotherapeutics?

INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of the word 'placebo' in the medical literature emphasizes the importance of this phenomenon in modern biomedical sciences. Neuroscientific research over the past thirty years shows that placebo effects are genuine psychobiological events attributable to the overall therapeutic context, and can be robust in both laboratory and clinical settings. AREAS COVERED: Here the authors describe the biological mechanisms and the clinical implications of placebo effects with particular emphasis on neurology and psychiatry, for example in pain, movement disorders, depression. In these conditions, a number of endogenous systems have been identified, such as endogenous opioids, endocannabinoids, and dopamine, which contribute to the placebo-induced benefit. EXPERT OPINION: Every effort should be made to maximize the placebo effect and reduce its evil twin, the nocebo effect, in medical practice. This does not require the administration of a placebo, but rather the enhancement of the effects of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments through a good doctor-patient interaction.

Sarcopenic obesity and function in women with subacute hip fracture: a short-term prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role exerted by the concurrent presence of sarcopenia and obesity after hip fracture has not been elucidated. AIM: To assess the effect of sarcopenic obesity on ability to function in women with subacute hip fracture. DESIGN: Short-term prospective study. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. POPULATION: Women with subacute hip fracture. METHODS: At admission, grip strength, by a Jamar dynamometer, and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were assessed. Sarcopenia was defined according to the criteria released by the European Working Group for Sarcopenia in Older People in 2019, with both grip strength <16 kg and appendicular lean mass (aLM)<15 kg. Alternatively, aLM/(height)2<5.5 kg/m2 was substituted for aLM<15 kg to confirm sarcopenia in the women with grip strength <16 kg. Obesity was diagnosed with fat mass exceeding 40% of total body mass. Function was assessed by the Barthel index. RESULTS: We assessed 183 of 200 women. Sarcopenic women had lower Barthel index scores assessed at the end of subacute inpatient rehabilitation (U=300,0; z=-4.3; P<0.001) and lower Batrhel index effectiveness (U=310,0; z=-4.2; P<0.001) than non-sarcopenic women. Conversely, we found no significant differences in function between obese and non-obese women. The concurrent presence of sarcopenia and obesity did not worsen the functional prognosis versus the presence of isolated sarcopenia. After adjustment for Barthel index scores before rehabilitation, age, hip-fracture type and cognitive impairment, sarcopenia was significantly associated with Barthel index scores (P=0.001) and Barthel index effectiveness (P<0.001), whereas obesity was not. The results did not materially change when aLM/(height)2<5.5 kg/m2 was substituted for aLM <15 kg to confirm sarcopenia in the women whose handgrip strength was <16 kg. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent presence of obesity did not worsen the negative prognostic role of sarcopenia in the short-term recovery of ability to function after hip fracture in women. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: In women with subacute hip fracture, sarcopenia but not obesity should be assessed to contribute to the prediction of the short-term functional outcome.

Effectiveness of a dance-physiotherapy combined intervention in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapies have been recommended as crucial components in Parkinson's disease (PD) rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to examine the effectiveness of a new dance-physiotherapy combined intervention, called DArT method, in mild PD patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled pilot trial was conducted on 38 mild PD patients under dopaminergic therapy. The intervention consisted in an add-on protocol: the control group received 1 h of conventional physiotherapy followed by 1 h of conventional physiotherapy each day, 3 times a week, for 5 weeks. The experimental group received 1 h of conventional physiotherapy followed by 1 h of dance class each day, 3 times a week, for 5 weeks. The week before and after the training period, patients were assessed for motor, cognitive, emotional, and sensory components of PD, with MDS-UPDRS-III as primary outcome measure. RESULTS: DArT method was associated with a 2.72-point reduction in the post-treatment MDS-UPDRS-III total score compared to control group (95% CI - 5.28, - 0.16, p = 0.038, d = 0.71), and with a 2.16-point reduction in the post-treatment MDS-UPDRS-III upper body subscore (95% CI - 3.56, - 0.76, p = 0.003, d = 1.02). Conversely, conventional physiotherapy program was associated with a 2.95-point reduction in the post-treatment trait anxiety compared to the experimental group (95% CI 0.19, 5.71, p = 0.037, d = 0.70). Withdrawal and fall rates were equal to 0% in both groups. CONCLUSION: DArT method showed to be safe, well accepted, and more effective than an intensive program of conventional physiotherapy in improving motor impairment in mild PD.

The handgrip strength threshold of 16 kg discriminates successful rehabilitation: A prospective short-term study of 258 women with hip fracture.

AIM: In 2019 the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) indicated weakness as the key characteristic of sarcopenia and released the threshold of 16 kg for handgrip strength to define weakness in women. We aimed to externally validate the 16 kg cut-off point for predicting functional recovery in 258 women with subacute hip fracture admitted to our rehabilitation ward. METHODS: We assessed handgrip strength by a hand-grip Jamar dynamometer at admission to inpatient rehabilitation and functional ability in activities of daily living by the Barthel index at the end of the rehabilitation course. Successful rehabilitation was defined with a Barthel index score ≥85 and highest possible recovery with a Barthel index effectiveness = 100 %. RESULTS: A handgrip strength ≥16 kg significantly predicted both successful rehabilitation (χ2 = 23.5, P < 0.001) and highest possible recovery (χ2 = 31.05, P < 0.001). For the women with a handgrip strength ≥16 kg, the odds ratios to gain successful rehabilitation and highest possible recovery were 2.68 (95 % CI from 1.19 to 6.04; P = 0.018) and 2.81 (95 % CI from 1.47 to 5.37; P = 0.002), after adjustment for Barthel index scores before rehabilitation, age, hip-fracture type (either medial or lateral), cognitive impairment and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. CONCLUSION: Our results provide an external validation of the 16 kg handgrip strength threshold recently released to discriminate functional outcomes: it significantly predicted the short-term ability to perform activities of daily living after hip fracture in women.

Sarcopenia, osteoporosis and the burden of prevalent vertebral fractures: a cross-sectional study of 350 women with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: The concurrent presence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis may enhance fracture risk. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between sarcopenia, osteoporosis, or the concurrent presence of both the conditions (osteosarcopenia) and the burden (number and severity) of vertebral fractures in women with hip fracture. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Division of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. POPULATION: We studied 350 women with subacute hip fracture. METHODS: Lateral radiographs of the spine were taken 18.2±4.5 days after fracture occurrence and the Spine Deformity Index (SDI) was calculated. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Low muscle mass was identified with appendicular lean mass <15.02 kg and low bone mineral density with a femoral T-Score <-2.5. RESULTS: The presence of sarcopenia (P=0.033) and osteoporosis (P=0.032) was associated with the SDI scores independently of each other and independently of age, percentage of body fat and hip-fracture type. The 350 women were categorized into 3 groups according to the absence of both osteoporosis and sarcopenia (N.=25), presence of either osteoporosis or sarcopenia (N.=95) or presence of osteosarcopenia (N.=230). We found a significant difference in SDI scores across the 3 groups: χ2 (2, N.=350) = 15.29; P<0.001. The categorization of the 350 women into the 3 groups was associated with the SDI scores (P=0.001) independently of age, percentage of body fat and hip-fracture type. CONCLUSIONS: Both osteoporosis and sarcopenia were independently associated with the burden of prevalent vertebral fractures in women with hip fracture. The concurrent presence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis was associated with a higher SDI Score than the presence of only one of the 2 conditions. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Subjects with both low bone mass and low muscle mass should be considered at particularly high risk for vertebral fractures. Interventions targeting both the components of the muscle-bone unit, including exercise, nutrition, and possibly new medications, should be investigated to optimize fracture prevention.

Simultaneous hip and upper-limb fractures are associated with lower Geriatric Nutritional Index scores than isolated hip fractures: a cross-sectional study of 858 women.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Factors associated with simultaneous fractures at hip and upper limb have scarcely been investigated. Our aim was to assess the association between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) scores and concurrent upper-limb fractures in women with a fall-related hip fracture. METHODS: We investigated 858 of 907 women admitted to our Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine ward following a fall-related hip fracture. RESULTS: GNRI scores were significantly lower in the 41 women with a simultaneous upper-limb fracture than in the 817 with an isolated hip fracture: median (interquartile range) were 85.9 (80.6-94.1) ad 90.3 (83.4-98.0), respectively, in the two groups (p = 0.021). After adjustment for age, height, body mass index, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, femoral-neck bone mineral density, cognitive impairment, neurologic impairment and type of hip fracture we confirmed a significant association between GNRI scores and the concomitant upper-limb fractures (p = 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for suffering a concomitant fracture was 7.53 (95% CI from 1.79 to 31.72; p = 0.006) for the 190 women of the GNRI lowest class (GNRI score < 82) versus the 213 women of the highest class (GNRI score > 98). CONCLUSIONS: Data show that GNRI scores were significantly lower in the subgroup of women with hip fracture and concurrent upper-extremity fracture than in the controls with isolated hip fracture. Although caution is needed in interpreting our results due to the cross-sectional design of the study, we suggest that low GNRI scores may have a role in the genesis of the concurrent fractures.

A New Threshold for Appendicular Lean Mass Discriminates Muscle Weakness in Women With Hip Fracture: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between measures of muscle mass and grip strength in women with subacute hip fracture. Firstly, we aimed to assess the capability of the current thresholds for appendicular lean mass, appendicular lean mass/body mass index ratio and appendicular lean mass/height to separate weak and nonweak women. Secondly, we aimed to explore alternative thresholds for the three measures of muscle mass to discriminate weakness. DESIGN: This is cross-sectional study of 160 women with hip fracture admitted to a rehabilitation hospital. We assessed appendicular lean mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and grip strength by a Jamar hand dynamometer. Weakness was defined as grip strength of less than 16 kg. RESULTS: Weakness was not significantly associated with appendicular lean mass of less than 15.02 kg, appendicular lean mass/body mass index ratio of less than 0.512 or appendicular lean mass/height of less than 5.67 kg/m. For appendicular lean mass (but not for the other 2 measures of muscle mass), an alternative threshold (11.87 kg instead of 15.02 kg) significantly discriminated weakness: χ (1, n = 160) = 10.77 (P = 0.001). The association between appendicular lean mass of less than 11.87 kg and grip strength of less than 16 kg persisted after adjustment for age and body mass index (odds ratio = 2.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.17-5.34, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that the current thresholds for measures of muscle mass do not discriminate weakness in women with subacute hip fracture. For appendicular lean mass, an alternative cutoff point actually separated weak and nonweak women.

Classes of vitamin D status and functional outcome after hip fracture: a prospective, short-term study of 1350 inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D depletion is associated with unfavourable outcomes after hip fracture. However, the classes of vitamin D status currently in use, which are defined according to serum calcifediol levels, have not been validated for their predictive capability of the functional recovery. AIM: To investigate the association between serum calcifediol categorized into 4 classes and the functional recovery after hip fracture. DESIGN: Prospective, short-term observational study. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital in Italy. POPULATION: We evaluated 1350 of 1412 inpatients with hip fracture. METHODS: Serum calcifediol was measured by an immunoenzymatic assay 14.7±4.4 (mean±SD) days after surgery and categorized into 4 classes: I class <12 ng/mL; II class 12-20 ng/mL; III class 21-29 ng/mL; IV class ≥30ng/mL. The functional outcome was assessed by using the Barthel Index. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in Barthel index scores at the end of inpatient rehabilitation across the 4 classes of vitamin D status: χ2 (3, N.=1350) 27.2; P<0.001. The difference persisted after adjustment for 8 covariates (P=0.004). By comparing pairs of classes, we found that Barthel index scores were lower in the 829 patients of the I class than in the 275 of the II (P=0.005) who had in turn Barthel index scores lower than the 132 patients of the III class (P=0.038). Conversely, no significant differences emerged between the patients of the III class and the 114 patients of the IV class (P=0.421). The results did not materially change when Barthel Index effectiveness was substituted for Barthel Index scores as the outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Calcifediol levels below 12ng/mL were associated with a worse recovery than those between 12 and 20ng/mL that were in turn associated with a worse recovery than those between 21 and 29 ng/mL. Conversely, no significant differences were found between the patients with calcifediol between 21 and 29ng/mL and those with calcifediol ≥30 ng/mL. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Despite caution due to the observational design, our study suggests that vitamin D depletion should be treated after hip fracture to optimize the functional outcome, with a target level for serum calcifediol of 21-29ng/mL and no further advantages associated with calcifediol levels of 30ng/mL or higher.

Is there a definition of low lean mass that captures the associated low bone mineral density? A cross-sectional study of 80 men with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Subjects with osteosarcopenia, the concurrent presence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis, have prognostic disadvantages and can benefit from treatments targeted at both the conditions. Our aim was to elucidate whether the available definitions of low appendicular lean mass (aLM) capture or not the men with associated low bone mineral density (BMD) following a hip fracture. METHODS: 80 men admitted to our rehabilitation hospital underwent a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan 19.1 ± 4.1 (mean ± SD) days after hip fracture occurrence. Low aLM was identified according to either Baumgartner's definition (aLM/height2 < 7.26 kg/m2) or the criteria from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH): aLM < 19.75 kg, or aLM adjusted for body mass index (BMI) < 0.789. Low BMD was diagnosed with a T-score < - 2.5 at the unfractured femur. RESULTS: We found a significant positive correlation between aLM and BMD assessed at either femoral neck (r = 0.44; p < 0.001) or total hip (r = 0.50; p < 0.001). After categorization according to the FNIH threshold for aLM, we found a significant association between low aLM and low BMD: χ2(1, n = 80) = 5.4 (p = 0.020), which persisted after adjustment for age and fat mass. Conversely, categorization according to neither Baumgartner's threshold for aLM/height2 nor to the FNIH threshold for aLM/BMI was associated with low BMD. CONCLUSIONS: The association between low aLM and low BMD in men with hip fracture dramatically depends on the adopted definition of low aLM. FNIH threshold for aLM (< 19.75 kg) emerges as a useful tool to capture men with damage to both the components of the muscle-bone unit.