Safety and efficacy of addition of sitagliptin to rapid-acting insulin secretagogues for glycemic control, including post-prandial hyperglycemia, among Japanese with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The safety and efficacy of sitagliptin as add-on therapy to glinides, rapid-acting insulin secretagogues, were evaluated for Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This 52-week study consisted of a 12-week double-blind period, followed by a 40-week open-label period. During the double-blind period, patients were randomized to sitagliptin 50 mg q.d. (S/S group) or placebo (P/S group) as add-on therapy to glinide monotherapy. During the open-label period, all patients in both groups were administered sitagliptin 50 mg q.d. (or 100 mg q.d. after up-titration). During the double-blind period, the overall occurrence of adverse experiences (AE) was similar in both treatment groups. The frequency of reported AE of hypoglycemia in both groups was low and not notably different. The nature of clinical AE during the open-label period for both groups was not notably different from that of clinical AE in the sitagliptin group during the double-blind period. The between-group difference in HbA1c least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline (95 % CI) at Week 12 was -1.1 % (-1.3, -0.8) in favor of sitagliptin (P < 0.001). LS mean of reductions from baseline of fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postmeal glucose were significantly greater in the sitagliptin group than in the placebo group: -23.1 mg/dL (-32.2, -13.9) and -51.2 mg/dL (-67.4, -35.0), respectively (both P < 0.001). The changes from baseline in glycemic data in the S/S group remained generally stable throughout the 52-week treatment period.

Sitagliptin added to voglibose monotherapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive disease that frequently requires patients to use more than one oral antihyperglycemic agent to achieve adequate glycemic control. The present multicenter, randomized study assessed the efficacy and safety of the addition of sitagliptin to ongoing voglibose monotherapy (0.2-0.3 mg three times daily) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had inadequate glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin ≥6.9% and <10.5%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study had an initial 12-week, double-blind treatment period in which patients were randomized (1:1) to sitagliptin 50 mg/day (n = 70) or placebo (n = 63), followed by a 40-week, open-label treatment period during which all patients received sitagliptin 50 mg/day, that could have been increased to 100 mg/day for patients meeting predefined glycemic criteria. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, treatment with sitagliptin resulted in placebo-subtracted mean changes from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (the primary end-point), fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postmeal glucose of -0.9%, -22.5 mg/dL and -51.3 mg/dL, respectively (all, P < 0.001). During the double-blind period, adverse experiences were reported with similar frequency in both treatment groups, and the occurrences of hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal adverse experiences were low. In the open-label period, sustained improvements in glycemic parameters were observed with sitagliptin treatment, and sitagliptin was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin added on to ongoing voglibose monotherapy provided significant improvements in glycemic parameters and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had inadequate glycemic control. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT00837577).

A double-blinded head-to-head trial of minodronate and alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION: In a randomized, active-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of minodronate were examined and compared to that of alendronate. METHODS: A total of 270 postmenopausal osteoporotic women >or=45 years of age were randomized into the minodronate group (n=135) or alendronate group (n=135). Each subject received 1 mg minodronate or 5 mg alendronate once a day for 12 months. RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed similar changes in BMD after 12 months. After 1 year of treatment, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.86% and 6.29% in the minodronate and alendronate groups, respectively, and the total hip BMD increased by 3.47% and 3.27%, respectively. Bone turnover markers were rapidly reduced within 1 month in both treatment groups. Urine DPD was significantly lower in the minodronate group than in the alendronate group at 6 months, and urine NTX was significantly lower in the minodronate group than in the alendronate group at 1 and 9 months. Both completion rates for the 12-month study and the overall incidence of clinical adverse events, including gastrointestinal events, were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The effects on lumbar and hip BMD and the safety profile of minodronate are comparable to those of alendronate. Minodronate is a promising new potent bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

[Therapeutic agents for disorders of bone and calcium metabolism: Minodronic acid hydrate].

Minodronic acid hydrate is one of the new-generation bisphosphonates containing nitrogen. This drug has an inhibitory effect on bone resorption by suppressing the osteoclastic function, and it is being developed as a therapeutic drug of osteoporosis. In non-clinical study, the drug has an inhibitory effect on the decrease of the bone mineral density and the bone intensity in ovariectomized rat osteoporosis models. The one of two Phase III studies, conducted so far, indicated that minodronic acid hydrate, administered once daily for 104 weeks, reduced the risk of vertebral fracture compared to placebo in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis. The other study conducted that minodronic acid hydrate increases the bone mineral density at least equivalent to that of alendronate for 48 weeks. The safety analysis in the latest study revealed that the adverse events of minodoronic acid hydrate have no statistically significant differences from the placebo group. We expect that minodronic acid hydrate will be used for a number of patients with osteoporosis as a potent and safe domestically created bisphosphonate in the near future.