Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(25): e2117485119, 2022 06 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35704762

RESUMO

Warning signals are well known in the visual system, but rare in other modalities. Some moths produce ultrasonic sounds to warn bats of noxious taste or to mimic unpalatable models. Here, we report results from a long-term study across the globe, assaying moth response to playback of bat echolocation. We tested 252 genera, spanning most families of large-bodied moths, and document anti-bat ultrasound production in 52 genera, with eight subfamily origins described. Based on acoustic analysis of ultrasonic emissions and palatability experiments with bats, it seems that acoustic warning and mimicry are the raison d'être for sound production in most moths. However, some moths use high-duty-cycle ultrasound capable of jamming bat sonar. In fact, we find preliminary evidence of independent origins of sonar jamming in at least six subfamilies. Palatability data indicate that jamming and warning are not mutually exclusive strategies. To explore the possible organization of anti-bat warning sounds into acoustic mimicry rings, we intensively studied a community of moths in Ecuador and, using machine-learning approaches, found five distinct acoustic clusters. While these data represent an early understanding of acoustic aposematism and mimicry across this megadiverse insect order, it is likely that ultrasonically signaling moths comprise one of the largest mimicry complexes on earth.


Assuntos
Mimetismo Biológico , Ecolocação , Reação de Fuga , Mariposas , Acústica , Animais , Mimetismo Biológico/fisiologia , Quirópteros/fisiologia , Ecolocação/fisiologia , Reação de Fuga/fisiologia , Mariposas/classificação , Mariposas/fisiologia , Filogenia , Comportamento Predatório/fisiologia , Piridinas , Ultrassom
2.
Sci Adv ; 4(8): eaat6601, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140743

RESUMO

Many defended animals prevent attacks by displaying warning signals that are highly conspicuous to their predators. We hypothesized that bioluminescing fireflies, widely known for their vibrant courtship signals, also advertise their noxiousness to echolocating bats. To test this postulate, we pit naïve big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) against chemically defended fireflies (Photinus pyralis) to examine whether and how these beetles transmit salient warnings to bats. We demonstrate that these nocturnal predators learn to avoid noxious fireflies using either vision or echolocation and that bats learn faster when integrating information from both sensory streams-providing fundamental evidence that multisensory integration increases the efficacy of warning signals in a natural predator-prey system. Our findings add support for a warning signal origin of firefly bioluminescence and suggest that bat predation may have driven evolution of firefly bioluminescence.


Assuntos
Comunicação Animal , Quirópteros/fisiologia , Ecolocação/fisiologia , Vaga-Lumes/fisiologia , Comportamento Predatório/fisiologia , Asas de Animais/fisiologia , Animais , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA