RESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal cord ischemia is a rare but ominous clinical situation with high levels of disability. There are emerging reports on COVID-19 and spinal cord ischemic events. PURPOSE: To investigate the cardinal manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 associated spinal cord ischemia, review treatment paradigms, and follow outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review. METHODS: The current study was conducted under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published up to February 12, 2023, on spinal cord ischemia and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data on patient demographics, study methods, medical records, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from eligible articles. For each data set, the authors performed pooled estimates examining 3 factors of interest, which were (1) predisposing factors (2) treatment regimens, and (3) neurological rehabilitation outcomes. Neurological status was reported as the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale reported by data sets. RESULTS: Six data sets were identified. The mean age of the study population was 50 years old, with 66.6% male predominance. Sixty-six percent of the patients had severe COVID-19. Five data sets reported preexisting coagulopathy. ASIA A and B were the most prevalent primary neurological status (80%). The mean interval between COVID-19 and the first neurological deficit was 13 days. Anterior spinal artery lesions were the most prevalent ischemic pattern. The most common treatment regimens were heparin and steroid therapy. Physical rehabilitation showed poor functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 is associated with spinal cord ischemia through multiple neuropathological mechanisms. Proper coagulation profile control and aggressive rehabilitation may play a promising role in the prevention and recovery of spinal cord infarction in SARS-CoV-2 patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Isquemia do Cordão Espinal , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The neurological manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, including spontaneous spinal hemorrhage (SSH), are diverse. SSH is a detrimental neurosurgical event requiring immediate medical attention. We aimed to investigate the association between SARS-CoV-2 and SSH and delineate a rational clinical approach. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published up to January 25, 2023, on SSH and SARS-CoV-2 infection. For each dataset, the authors performed pooled estimates examining three outcomes of interest: (1) early post-intervention neurological status, (2) mortality, and (3) post-intervention neurological rehabilitation outcomes. After reviewing 1341 results, seven datasets were identified for the final analysis. Fifty-seven percent of patients were females. Twenty-eight percent of the patients experienced severe systemic infection. The mean interval between the SARS-CoV-2 infection and neurological presentation was 18 days. Pain and sensorimotor deficits were the most common (57%). Spinal epidural hematoma (EDH) was the most common presentation (71.4%). Three patients were treated conservatively, while 4 received neurosurgical intervention. Pain and sensorimotor deficits had the best treatment response (100%), while the sphincter had the worst response (0%). Long-term follow-up showed that 71% of patients had good recovery. SARS-CoV-2-associated SSH is a rare complication of infection, with an often insidious presentation that requires high clinical suspicion. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and new neurological symptoms or disproportionate neck or back pain require a neuroaxis evaluation. Neurosurgical intervention and conservative management are both viable options to treat SSH following COVID-19. Still, a homogenous approach to the treatment paradigm of SSH cannot be obtained, but lesions with space-occupying effects are suitable for neurosurgical evacuation-decompression while more indolent lesions could be treated conservatively. These options should be tailored individually until larger studies provide a consensus.
