Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Complications and Failures of Autologous Heterotopic Cranial Bone versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties.

BACKGROUND: Fresh autologous cranial bone graft has been traditionally regarded as the ideal cranioplasty material, however long-term comparisons of outcomes with modern alloplastic materials are absent in the literature. In this work, we evaluated complications and failures among cranioplasties performed with fresh, heterotopic, cranial bone graft versus three common alloplastic materials. METHODS: Random-effects meta-analyses of logit-transformed proportions were performed on studies published between 1971-2021 to evaluate complications and failures of cranioplasties performed with fresh, autologous, heterotopic cranial bone, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), or titanium with a mean follow-up ≥12 months. Generalized mixed model meta-regressions were performed to account for heterogeneity and to evaluate the contributions of moderators to outcomes variables. RESULTS: 1490 patients (mean age 33.9±10.8 years) were included. Pooled, all-cause complications were 6.2% for fresh, heterotopic, autologous cranial bone (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.1-17.0%; I2=55.0%, p=0.02), 18.5% for PEEK (95%CI:14.0-24.0%; I2=0.0%, p=0.58), 26.1% for titanium (95%CI:18.7-35.1%; I2=60.6%, p<0.01), and 28.4% for PMMA (95%CI:12.9-51.5%; I2=88.5%, p<0.01). Pooled all-cause failures were 2.2% for fresh, autologous cranial bone (95%CI:0.4-10.6%; I2=0.0%, p=0.45), 6.3% for PEEK (95%CI:3.2-12.3%; I2=15.5%, p=0.31), 11.4% for titanium (95%CI:6.7-18.8%; I2=60.8%, p<0.01), and 12.7% for PMMA (95%CI:6.9-22.0%; I2=64.8%, p<0.01). Meta-regression models indicated that each alloplastic subtype significantly and independently predicted higher complications, while titanium and PMMA were significant predictors for all-cause failures compared to autologous bone. All three subtypes were predictive of higher cranioplasty failures secondary to infection compared to autologous bone. CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasties performed with fresh, autologous heterotopic cranial bone grafts resulted in lower complications and failures compared to alloplastic materials.

Surgical and Endoscopic Resection of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors Have Similar Disease-Specific Survival Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs) are rare, and their management is not well-defined. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend surgical resection of large dNETs (> 2 cm) and endoscopic resection of small tumors (< 2 cm). We compared the survival outcomes between surgical and endoscopic resection in various dNET sizes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using patient data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Variables analyzed included age, tumor size, grade, stage, and lymph node status. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was compared for endoscopic and surgical groups in dNET size strata: 0-0.5, 0.5-1, 1-2, 2-3, and > 3 cm. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: The study included 465 patients, with 124 (26.7%) undergoing surgical resection. The average age was 61.9 years, and tumor sizes ranged from 0.1 to 10.5 cm. Endoscopic resection had 40.5% of tumors between 0 and 0.5 cm, while surgery had only 21% (p < 0.001). In the surgical cohort, 79.8% had grade 1 tumors compared to 88.3% in the endoscopy group (P = 0.024). Among surgically resected cases, 48.4% (60 patients) had lymph node involvement. Age, tumor size, grade, and stage did not significantly predict survival after surgical resection. Stratified by tumor size, no difference in DSS was observed between surgery and endoscopy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection demonstrated similar survival outcomes to surgical resection across dNET sizes in this national analysis. Given the risks and the lack of survival benefits for surgery, endoscopic resection may be beneficial for both small and large tumors. Further studies are warranted to validate the current NCCN guidelines.

Learning Curves in Establishing a New Minimally Invasive Pancreas Program.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (rPD) is a complex operation with a reported learning curve of 80 cases. Two recent graduates of a formal robotic complex general surgical oncology training program have been performing rPD at our institution since 2016, which had no previous institutional experience with rPD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning curve associated with developing a new robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (rPD) program by fellowship trained surgeons with institutional support. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing rPD from 2016 to 2022 were reviewed for and compared with proficiency benchmarks set by the University of Pittsburg experience. RESULTS: By 30 cases, operative time met the proficiency benchmark of 391 minutes. Additionally, the entire cohort had comparable rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (6.7% vs 3%, P = .6), 30-day mortality (0% vs 3%, P = .18), major complications (Clavien >2; 23% vs 17%, P = .14), and length of stay (6 vs 7 days, P = .49) when compared to the benchmark. CONCLUSION: Perioperative outcomes were comparable to proficiency benchmarks from initiation of the new rPD program, and operative time reached proficiency benchmark by 30 cases. This data suggests that graduates of formal rPD training programs can safely establish new minimally invasive pancreas programs at sites with no previous institutional rPD experience.

Immersive Virtual Reality and Cadaveric Bone are Equally Effective in Skeletal Anatomy Education: A Randomized Crossover Noninferiority Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) technology is transforming medical education. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of IVR with cadaveric bone models in teaching skeletal anatomy. DESIGN: A randomized crossover noninferiority trial was conducted. SETTING: Anatomy laboratory of a large medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Incoming first-year medical students. Participants were randomized to IVR or cadaveric groups studying upper limb skeletal anatomy, and then were crossed over to use the opposite tool, to study lower limb skeletal anatomy. Participants in both groups completed a pre-and postintervention knowledge test. The primary endpoint of the study was change in performance from the pre-to postintervention knowledge test. Surveys were completed to assess participant's impressions on IVR as an educational tool. RESULTS: Fifty first-year medical students met inclusion criteria and were randomized. Among all students, the average score on the preintervention knowledge test was 14.6% (standard deviation (SD) = 18.2%) and 25.0% (SD = 17%) for upper and lower limbs, respectively. Percentage increase in scores between pre-and postintervention knowledge test, was 15.0% in the upper limb IVR group, and 16.7% for upper limb cadaveric bones (p = 0.286). For the lower limb, score increase was 22.6% in the IVR and 22.5% in the cadaveric bone group (p = 0.936). 79% of participants found that IVR was most valuable for teaching 3-dimensional orientation, anatomical relationships, and key landmarks. Majority of participants were favorable towards combination use of traditional methods and IVR technology for learning skeletal anatomy (LSM>3). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, there was no significant difference in knowledge after using IVR or cadaveric bones for skeletal anatomy education. These findings have further implications for medical schools that face challenges in acquiring human cadavers and cadaveric parts.

Association of Patient-Reported Anxiety and Pain After Alveolar Bone Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of psychosocial well-being on perioperative pain and opioid use among patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) undergoing alveolar bone grafting (ABG). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary level craniofacial clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 34 patients with CLP (median age: 11.7 years), including 25 (73.5%) unilateral CLP and 9 (26.5%) bilateral CLP, who underwent ABG from 2015 to 2022. INTERVENTIONS: ABG using iliac crest bone graft. Patients were prospectively administered four patient-reported psychosocial instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative opioid use in morphine equivalent dosage/kilogram, patient-reported pain scores, and length of hospital stay after ABG. RESULTS: Patient-reported anxiety (r = 0.41, p = 0.02) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.35, p = 0.04) correlated to higher perioperative opioid usage. Multivariable regression models including psychosocial scores, total acetaminophen usage, length of surgery, and other simultaneous surgeries were developed for total opioid usage, patient-reported pain, and length of hospital stay. Patient-reported anxiety was independently predictive of higher perioperative opioid use (ß=0.36, p = 0.01) and higher pain scores (ß=0.39, p = 0.02), but not length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We identified an association for patient-reported anxiety and perioperative opioid use and pain in a CLP cohort undergoing ABG. Future considerations in preoperative patient and family consultation may be indicated in patients self-reporting higher anxiety in an effort to minimize perioperative opioid usage.

Gastric outlet obstruction caused by heterotopic pancreas in a patient with alcohol use disorder.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Heterotopic Pancreas (HP) is defined by the presence of pancreatic tissue in an anatomically distinct location from the main pancreas. While often clinically silent, it may present symptomatically. If located in the gastric antrum, HP may cause gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The objective of this paper is to present a rare case of HP in the gastric antrum causing GOO. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we report a 43-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain and non-bilious emesis in the setting of COVID-19 infection and alcohol consumption. During the initial workup, computed-tomography (CT) was non-specific but demonstrated GOO, concerning for cancer. Cold forceps biopsies taken during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) confirmed benign HP. Since the patient was symptomatic from gastric outlet compression, he underwent resection via laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and Billroth II gastrojejunostomy. At 1-month postoperative follow-up, the patient recovered uneventfully. We hypothesized that GOO by HP in this case may have been associated with cumulative effects of alcohol consumption and COVID-19 infection on the ectopic tissue. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: HP is rare and difficult to diagnose preoperatively. When located in gastric antrum, HP can cause GOO, mimicking gastric malignancy. Combination of EGD/EUS, biopsy/FNA, and surgical resection are necessary to definitively make the diagnosis. Finally, it is important to consider that heterotopic pancreatitis or structural changes in HP may occur due to classic pancreatic stressors like alcohol and viral infections. CONCLUSION: HP may cause GOO presenting with non-bilious emesis and abdominal pain, mistaken for malignancy on CT imaging.

COVID-19 Pandemic Associated With Increased Self-reported Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Congenital Craniofacial Diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: The current study investigated the influence of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with congenital craniofacial diagnoses. METHODS: Patients (n = 66) with craniofacial diagnoses aged between 8 and 17 were prospectively evaluated with longitudinal psychosocial assessments using the anger, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and peer relationships instruments within the pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The COVID-19 cohort (n = 33) included patients with assessments within 2 years prior to the pandemic (t0) and during the pandemic (t1; March 2020 to March 2021). An age-matched comparison cohort (n = 33) with similar demographics and diagnoses included patients assessed twice over 3 years prior to the pandemic. RESULTS: All PROMIS measures were in the average range clinically for both groups across time points. However, the COVID-19 group reported a significant increase in depressive symptoms during the pandemic (t1) compared to pre-pandemic (t0) scores (48.2 ± 10.1 vs 44.3 ± 9.4, P = .04, d = -0.37), while the comparison group did not demonstrate any differences in psychosocial functioning between t0 and t1. For the COVID-19 cohort, only the pandemic timeframe (r = 0.21, P = .03) was significantly associated with increased depressive symptom scores, and no other sociodemographic or medical variables were associated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported depressive symptoms increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with congenital craniofacial diagnoses. Longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate whether such changes will be persistent or compound known variables associated with psychosocial functioning.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the 2010 ASGE non-invasive predictors of choledocholithiasis and comparison to the 2019 ASGE predictors.

In 2019, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guideline on the endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis modified the individual predictors of choledocholithiasis proposed in the widely referenced 2010 guideline to improve predictive performance. Nevertheless, the primary literature, especially for the 2019 iteration, is limited. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to examine the diagnostic performance of the 2010, and where possible the 2019, predictors. PROSPERO protocol CRD42020194226. A comprehensive literature search from 2001 to 2020 was performed to identify studies on the diagnostic performance of any of the 2010 and 2019 ASGE choledocholithiasis predictors. Identified studies underwent keyword screening, abstract review, and full-text review. The primary outcomes included multivariate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for each criterion. Secondary outcomes were reported sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive value. A total of 20 studies met inclusion criteria. Based on reported ORs, of the 2010 guideline "very strong" predictors, ultrasound with stone had the strongest performance. Of the "strong" predictors, CBD > 6 mm demonstrated the strongest performance. "Moderate" predictors had inconsistent and/or weak performance; moreover, all studies reported gallstone pancreatitis as non-predictive of choledocholithiasis. Only one study examined the new predictor (bilirubin > 4 mg/dL and CBD > 6 mm) proposed in the 2019 guideline. Based on this review, aside from CBD stone on ultrasound, there is discordance between the proposed strength of 2010 choledocholithiasis predictors and their published diagnostic performance. The 2019 guideline appears to do away with the weakest 2010 predictors.