FLOSEAL Versus SURGIFLO in Lumbar Surgery: Similar Outcomes, Different Costs in a Matched Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Flowable gelatin-based matrices with thrombin for hemostatic control are commercially available as Floseal (Baxter International Inc.) and Surgiflo (Ethicon Inc.). The objective of this study is to compare the rate of blood transfusions following the use of Floseal and Surgiflo in lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: Elective lumbar spine surgery patients between September 2019 and March 2021 were identified via CPT codes. Floseal 10 mL (N=102) and Surgiflo matrix 8 mL (N=108) cohorts excluded those younger than 18 years or those who underwent surgeries for infection, trauma, or tumor. The primary outcome was blood transfusion. Surgical complexity was controlled using the Surgical Invasiveness Index and Adult Spinal Deformity Invasiveness Score. The 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using demographic information, Surgical Invasiveness Index, Adult Spinal Deformity Invasiveness Score, and tranexamic acid use. RESULTS: A total of 77 Floseal patients were propensity score matched with 77 Surgiflo patients. There was no difference in the rate of blood transfusion (p=0.441). There was also no difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, or postoperative hemoglobin levels. The Surgiflo cohort used more units per surgery (p=0.004) and cost $102.45 more per surgery. Switching to Floseal saves $102,450 per year per 1000 surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in transfusion rates between using Floseal or Surgiflo for lumbar spine surgery. Surgiflo had higher usage per surgery and costs than Floseal.

Similar Accuracy of Surgical Plans After Initial In-Person and Telemedicine Evaluation of Spine Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare accuracy of surgical plans generated from in-person and telemedicine evaluations and assess the reasons for surgical plan changes between initial evaluation and surgery. The secondary objective was to assess the effect of changes in surgical planning on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients who were evaluated as new patients by orthopaedic spine faculty between 2019 and 2021 were divided by appointment type: telemedicine (n = 39) and in-person (n = 92). Patients were included if the surgeon documented a definitive surgical plan at the initial visit. The primary outcome was change in surgical plan from initial assessment to actual procedure performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the accuracy of initial surgical plans between the telemedicine and in-person cohorts (79.5% vs. 82.6%, P = 0.673). The most common modification in the surgical plan (79%) was change in the number of operated levels, of which 18 of 19 patients had 1 added operated level. Less common reasons were change in approach (13%) and change in procedure (8%). Patients with changes to their surgical plan experienced longer length of stay (3.1 vs. 2.0 days, P = 0.027) than patients with consistent surgical plans. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine and in-person evaluations generated similarly accurate surgical plans. Changes to the initial surgical plans most often involved adding operative levels. Our findings show that telemedicine visits are an acceptable option for preoperative assessment to generate surgical plans; however, further research is needed.

Surgical fixation of pathologic and traumatic spinal fractures using single position surgery technique in lateral decubitus position.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine complications, readmission, and revision surgery rates in patients undergoing single position surgery (SPS) for surgical treatment of traumatic and pathologic thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: A multi-center review of patients who underwent SPS in the lateral decubitus position (LSPS) for surgical management of traumatic or pathologic thoracolumbar fractures between January 2016 and May 2020 was conducted. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, readmissions, and revision surgeries were collected. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients with a mean age of 45 years (66.67% male) were included. The majority of patients underwent operative treatment for acute thoracolumbar trauma (66.67%) with a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 16.71. Mean operative time was 175.5 min, mean EBL of 816.67 cc. Five patients experienced a complication, two of which required revision surgery for additional decompression during the initial admission. All ambulatory patients were mobilized on postoperative day 1. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 9.67 days. CONCLUSION: The results of this case series supports LSPS as a feasible alternative to the traditional combined anterior-posterior approach for surgical treatment of pathologic and thoracolumbar fractures. These results are similar to reductions in operative time, EBL, and LOS seen in the elective spine literature with LSPS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.