EADV Task Force Pruritus White Paper on chronic pruritus and chronic prurigo: Current challenges and future solutions.

Chronic pruritus (CP) is frequent in general medicine and the most common complaint in general dermatology. The prevalence of CP is expected to rise in the future due to the ageing population. The clinical presentation, underlying aetiology and treatment strategy of CP are heterogeneous. Also, individual treatment aims and physical, psychic and economic burdens of patients might vary. Chronic prurigo (CPG) is the most severe disease in the chronic pruritus spectrum, being associated with long-standing scratch-induced skin lesions and a therapy refractory itch-scratch-cycle. It is thus important to raise disease awareness for CP and CPG in the general public and among decision-makers in the health system. Further, there is a need to support a rational clinical framework to optimize both diagnostics and therapeutics. Currently, there is still a shortcoming regarding approved therapies and understanding CP/CPG as severe medical conditions. Therefore, the EADV Task Force Pruritus decided to publish this white paper based on several consensus meetings. The group consented on the following goals: (a) ensure that CP is recognized as a serious condition, (b) increase public awareness and understanding of CP and CPG as chronic and burdensome diseases that can greatly affect a person's quality of life, (c) clarify that in most cases CP and CPG are non-communicable and not caused by a psychiatric disease, (d) improve the support and treatment given to patients with CP to help them manage their disease and (e) publicize existing therapies including current guidelines. We aim to point to necessary improvements in access and quality of care directed to decision-makers in health policy, among payers and administrations as well as in practical care.

Dermatological patients with itch report more stress, stigmatization experience, anxiety and depression compared to patients without itch: Results from a European multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Itch as the most common symptom in dermatology has been shown to be related to psychological factors such as stress, anxiety and depression. Moreover, associations were found between perceived stigmatization and itch. However, studies investigating the differences between patients with dermatoses with and without itch regarding perceived stress, stigmatization, anxiety and depression are missing. Therefore, one of the aims of the second study of the European Society for Dermatology and Psychiatry (ESDaP study II) was to investigate these relationships in a large cohort of patients with different itchy dermatoses. RESULTS: 3399 patients with 14 different itchy dermatoses were recruited at 22 centres in 17 European countries. They filled in questionnaires to assess perceived stigmatization, stress, signs of clinically relevant anxiety or depression, itch-related quality of life, the overall health status, itch duration, frequency and intensity. The most significant association between the severity of itching and the perception of stress was observed among individuals with rosacea (correlation coefficient r = 0.314). Similarly, the strongest links between itch intensity and experiences of stigmatization, anxiety, and depression were found in patients with seborrheic dermatitis (correlation coefficients r = 0.317, r = 0.356, and r = 0.400, respectively). Utilizing a stepwise linear regression analysis, it was determined that within the entire patient cohort, 9.3% of the variation in itch intensity could be accounted for by factors including gender, levels of anxiety, depression, and perceived stigmatization. Females and individuals with elevated anxiety, depression, and perceived stigmatization scores reported more pronounced itch intensities compared to those with contrary attributes. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the connection between experiencing itch and its intensity and the psychological strain it places on individuals. Consequently, psychological interventions should encompass both addressing the itch itself and the interconnected psychological factors. In specific cases, it becomes imperative for dermatologists to direct individuals towards suitable healthcare resources to undergo further psychological assessment.

Systematic literature review assessing the overall costs and societal impacts of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Europe.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease, driven by type 2 inflammation. The condition manifests as moderate-to-severe disease in approximately 20% of adults with AD across Europe and is associated with a substantial burden on patients, society and healthcare systems. However, systematic assessments capturing the totality of disease burden associated with moderate-to-severe AD are limited; therefore, the overall impacts of the disease may be underestimated. A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out to assess the overall costs of moderate-to-severe AD across Europe, including the financial, societal and humanistic impacts. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies published between 1 January 2010 and 2 June 2020. Scientific conference proceedings, health technology assessment websites and patient association group websites were also searched for relevant information. Twenty-seven publications, corresponding to 22 unique studies, were included in the analysis. Total costs (direct and productivity losses) reached €20 695 per-person-per-year (PPPY) for adults with uncontrolled symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD. Direct medical costs ranged between €307 and €6993 PPPY; prescription medications and specialist dermatologist visits were the main contributors. Costs increased with disease severity or with uncontrolled disease. Patients with AD also incurred personal costs of €927 per year for healthcare items not reimbursed, which increased by 9% for those with moderate-to-severe forms. Annual work productivity losses comprised most of the total costs reported for adults with moderate-to-severe AD (up to 60.8% of the total burden) and were highest in those with uncontrolled disease (€13 702 PPPY). Patients with moderate-to-severe disease also experienced physical, emotional, and social impacts. The overall costs of moderate-to-severe AD greatly impact on healthcare systems, patients and society. Sustained control of moderate-to-severe AD, through effective treatment and care management, is essential to limit the burden caused by the disease.

Unveiling the true costs and societal impacts of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Europe.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, auto-immune condition that imposes a high burden on individuals, society, and the healthcare system. Approximately 4.4% of adults and up to 18.6% of children/adolescents have AD in Europe, with 20% of all cases accounting for moderate-to-severe forms. This form of the condition in adults results in annual societal costs across Europe of an estimated €30 billion; €15.2 billion related to missed workdays or reduced work productivity, €10.1 billion related to direct medical costs and €4.7 billion related to personal expenditure of patients/families. AD can also substantially impact physical, emotional, and social quality-of-life. Several studies have shown the debilitating itch-scratch cycle is the main cause of the multifaceted burden, as it causes substantial sleep deprivation and stigmatisation due to the physical appearance of the skin, and confidence issues. These factors lead to psychosocial issues and can cumulate over time and prohibit patients reaching their 'full life potential'. Despite this, many patients with the condition are undertreated, resulting in uncontrolled symptoms and a further strain placed on patients, society, and the economy. The authors of this White Paper comprise the European Atopic Dermatitis Working Group, which is a network of international specialists with expertise in dermatology and healthcare policy decisions. Their programme of action is focused on harnessing their expertise to build consensus, advance research, share knowledge, and ultimately seek to improve AD care outcomes through achieving long-term symptom control. This White Paper presents a systematic evaluation of the overall financial and humanistic burden of moderate-to-severe AD and the current challenges that exist with AD care. It introduces recommendations for how, collaboratively, key stakeholders and policy makers can support improvements in AD management to achieve better disease control, thus reducing the costs and associated burden placed on individuals, society, and the economy.

Development and preliminary validation of the patient-reported Chronic Itch Burden Scale assessing health-related quality of life in chronic pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pruritus (CP) significantly affects patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Very few self-reported HRQoL questionnaires exploring CP have been developed according to international guidelines, thus limiting their use in preauthorization trials. OBJECTIVES: To develop a self-reported HRQoL questionnaire in patients with CP owing to psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, seborrhoeic dermatitis of the scalp or idiopathic dermatitis, and to explore the preliminary psychometric properties of the questionnaire. METHODS: The study was performed in France. A conceptual framework was developed based on a structured literature review and expert insight, and was improved using three focus groups involving 19 participants. A 50-item questionnaire was created and tested with 21 participants using cognitive debriefings; 11 items were removed. A cross-sectional study including 251 participants was performed to explore the preliminary psychometric properties of the 39-item questionnaire. Dimensionality was explored using principal component analysis. Cronbach's alpha and correlation coefficients (interitem, item-total score and item-dimension score) were measured. The number of items was reduced through expert consensus. RESULTS: In the 39-item version, three main dimensions were identified (Cronbach's alpha = 0·94) and all correlation coefficients were > 0·34. Upon review, 13 items were deleted owing to poor quality and six items were deleted by the team, generating a 20-item version. The questionnaire's factorial structure was best reflected with a two-dimension solution, i.e. (i) social and emotional repercussions and (ii) relation to others, fear of judgement. CONCLUSIONS: The Chronic Itch Burden Scale patient-reported questionnaire explores broad aspects of HRQoL that are relevant for patients with various skin diseases. Its good cross-sectional validity makes it useful for trials and practitioners.

Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP.

BACKGROUND: Aquagenic pruritus (AP), an intense sensation of scratching induced after water contact, is the most troublesome aspect of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Mostly described in polycythemia vera (PV, ~ 40%), it is also present in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (10%). Even if this symptom can decrease or disappear under cytoreductive treatments, 30% of treated MPN patients still persist with a real impact on the quality of life (QoL). Because its pathophysiology is poorly understood, efficient symptomatic treatments of AP are missing. The neuropeptide substance P (SP) plays a crucial role in the induction of pruritus. Several studies showed the efficacy of aprepitant, an antagonist of SP receptor (NK-1R), in the treatment of chronic pruritus but never evaluated in AP. The objectives of APHYPAP are twofold: a clinical aim with the evaluation of the efficacy of two drugs in the treatment of a persistent AP for MPN patients and a biological aim to find clues to elucidate AP pathophysiology. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized study will include 80 patients with MPN (PV or ET or PMF) treated since at least 6 months for their hemopathy but suffering from a persistent AP (VAS intensity ≥6/10). Patients will be randomized between aprepitant (80 mg daily) + placebo to match to hydroxyzine OR hydroxyzine (25 mg daily) + placebo to match to aprepitant for 14 days. At D0, baseline information will be collected and drugs dispense. Outcome measures will be assessed at D15, D30, D45, and D60. The primary study endpoint will be the reduction of pruritus intensity below (or equal) at 3/10 on VAS at D15. Secondary outcome measures will include the number of patients with a reduction or cessation of AP at D15 or D60; evaluation of QoL and AP characteristics at D0, D15, D30, D45, and D60 with MPN-SAF and AP questionnaires, respectively; modification of plasmatic concentrations of cytokines and neuropeptides at D0, D15, D30, and D60; and modification of epidermal innervation density and pruriceptor expression at D0 and D15. DISCUSSION: The APHYPAP trial will examine the efficacy of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine (reference treatment for AP) to treat persistent AP in MPN patients. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine to treat persistent AP of MPN patients. The treatment received will be considered efficient if the AP intensity will be reduced at 3/10 or below on VAS after 14 days of treatment. The results of this study may provide a new treatment option for this troublesome symptom and also give us more insights in the pathophysiology understanding of AP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: APHYPAP. NCT03808805 , first posted: January 18, 2019; last update posted: June 10, 2021. EudraCT 2018-090426-66.

Relationship between sensitive skin and sleep disorders, fatigue, dust, sweating, food, tobacco consumption or female hormonal changes: Results from a worldwide survey of 10 743 individuals.

BACKGROUND: Sensitive skin is related to environmental factors. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the roles of poorly known associated and triggering factors on sensitive skin in a large global population. METHODS: A survey was administrated to a representative sample of the adult population aged 18-75 years in five different countries (Brazil, China, France Russia, and the United States). All participants answered a web-based questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, sensitive skin and environmental factors. RESULTS: Among the 10 743 included individuals (5285 men and 5458 women), 48.2% declared that they had sensitive skin. The group with sensitive skin reported significant increases in fatigue, dust or sweating and to a lesser extent food or tobacco consumption. The members of this group also declared that they experienced more sleep disorders than individuals without sensitive skin. Sensitive skin was very frequent in pregnant women, women with painful menstruations or women using contraceptive pills. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study identified new factors, including female hormonal status, fatigue, sleep disorders and food, associated with sensitive skin. These associations suggest that sensitive skin is not restricted to an epidermal disorder but may be included in a larger context. The identified factors are potential upstream drivers of neurogenic inflammation in sensitive skin.

Psychological and professional impact of COVID-19 lockdown on French dermatologists: Data from a large survey.

AIM: To evaluate the extent to which COVID-19-related lockdown affected dermatologists. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was proposed to all French dermatologists and dermatology residents to assess the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on their professional activity, their level of stress and their psychological state, as well as their coping strategies. RESULTS: Exactly 800 dermatologists completed the survey. The respondents noted changes in behaviour in their professional and personal environment. The number of cancelled or rescheduled appointments was very high, with a huge financial impact for private practitioners. Stigmatisation was also reported. Anxiety and a feeling of increased stress were very frequent. Increased substance use was also reported. CONCLUSION: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown was significant for French dermatologists, with risks to their own health, profound changes in their practice, and financial and psychological impact, but also the development of new consultation and evaluation strategies to improve their work-life balance.

Pruritus Intensity Scales across Europe: a prospective validation study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pruritus (CP) is a subjective symptom, and it is necessary to assess its intensity with validated patient-reported outcome tools in order to allow determination of the treatment course. OBJECTIVES: So far, the itch intensity scales were validated in small cohorts and in single languages. Here, we report the validation of the numerical rating scale, the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale for the worst and average pruritus intensity in the last 24h in several languages across Europe and across different pruritic dermatoses. METHODS: After professional translation, the intensity scales were digitized for use as a tablet computer application. Validation was performed in clinics for Dermatology in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland and Turkey. RESULTS: A total of 547 patients with contact dermatitis, chronic nodular prurigo, psoriasis vulgaris, lichen planus or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma were included. The intensity scales showed a high level of reproducibility and inter-correlations with each other. The correlation with the Dermatology Life Quality Index was weak to strong in nearly all countries and dermatoses with the exception of France and patients with chronic nodular prurigo, for which no statistically significant correlations were found. CONCLUSIONS: The numerical rating scale, the verbal rating scale und the visual analogue scales are valid instruments with good reproducibility and internal consistency in German (Germany, Austria, Switzerland), French, Italian, Polish, Russian, Spanish and Turkish for different pruritic dermatoses. VAS worst was the best reproducible and consistent measuring instrument in all countries.