A systematic review of 3251 emergency department thoracotomies: is it time for a national database?

PURPOSE: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a potentially life-saving procedure, performed on patients suffering traumatic cardiac arrest. Multiple indications have been reported, but overall survival remains unclear for each indication. The objective of this systematic review is to determine overall survival, survival stratified by indication, and survival stratified by geographical location for patients undergoing EDT across the world. METHODS: Articles published between 2000 and 2016 were identified which detailed outcomes from EDT. All articles referring to pre-hospital, delayed, or operating room thoracotomy were excluded. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated comparing differing indications. RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles, containing 3251 patients who underwent EDT, were identified. There were 277 (8.5%) survivors. OR demonstrate improved survival for; penetrating vs blunt trauma (OR 2.10; p 0.0028); stab vs gun-shot (OR 5.45; p < 0.0001); signs of life (SOL) on admission vs no SOL (OR 5.36; p < 0.0001); and SOL in the field vs no SOL (OR 19.39; p < 0.0001). Equivalence of survival was demonstrated between cardiothoracic vs non-cardiothoracic injury (OR 1.038; p 1.000). Survival was worse for USA vs non-USA cohorts (OR 1.59; p 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating injury remains a robust indication for EDT. Non-cardiothoracic cause of cardiac arrest should not preclude EDT. In the absence of on scene SOL, survival following EDT is extremely unlikely. Survival is significantly higher in the non-USA publications; reasons for this are highly complex. A UK multicentre prospective study which collects standardised data on all EDTs could provide robust evidence for better patient stratification.

Should pre-hospital resuscitative thoracotomy be reserved only for penetrating chest trauma?

PURPOSE: The indications for pre-hospital resuscitative thoracotomy (PHRT) remain undefined. The aim of this paper is to explore the variation in practice for PHRT in the UK, and review the published literature. METHODS: MEDLINE and PUBMED search engines were used to identify all relevant articles and 22 UK Air Ambulance Services were sent an electronic questionnaire to assess their PHRT practice. RESULTS: Four European publications report PHRT survival rates of 9.7, 18.3, 10.3 and 3.0% in 31, 71, 39 and 33 patients, respectively. All patients sustained penetrating chest injury. Six case reports also detail survivors of PHRT, again all had sustained penetrating thoracic injury. One Japanese paper presents 34 cases of PHRT following blunt trauma, of which 26.4% survived to the intensive therapy unit but none survived to discharge. A UK population reports a single survivor of PHRT following blunt trauma but the case details remain unpublished. Ten (45%) air ambulance services responded, each service reported different indications for PHRT. All perform PHRT for penetrating chest trauma, however, length of allowed pre-procedure down time varied, ranging from 10 to 20 min. Seventy percent perform PHRT for blunt traumatic cardiac arrest, a procedure which is likely to require aggressive concurrent circulatory support, despite this only 5/10 services carry pre-hospital blood products. CONCLUSIONS: Current indications for PHRT vary amongst different geographical locations, across the UK, and worldwide. Survivors are likely to have sustained penetrating chest injury with short down time. There is only one published survivor of PHRT following blunt trauma, despite this, PHRT is still being performed in the UK for this indication.

72 h Is the Time Critical Point to Operate in Acute Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Delay of operative management of acute appendicitis may adversely affect post-operative outcomes and increase the likelihood of post-operative complications occurring. We aim to correlate the duration of symptoms with intra-operative findings to create a timeline of the pathological change in appendicitis. METHODS: Appendicectomies performed at a large teaching hospital between June 2015 and July 2016 were prospectively analysed. Time of onset of pain, operative findings, pre-operative C-reactive protein (CRP) and white cell count (WCC) were recorded. Intra-operative findings were categorised by the macroscopic appearance of the appendix, which was subdivided into erythematous, purulent, necrotic and perforated. These results were correlated with the symptom duration. Statistical analysis was completed using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients had histologically confirmed appendicitis during the study period. Median time to operation from symptom onset was 49 h. Median time for the appearances of erythematous, purulent, necrotic and perforated appendicitis to develop was 36.5, 41, 55.5 and 86 h, respectively (p value < 0.0001). Median CRP of the non-perforated and perforated appendicitis groups was 22 and 161 mg/L, respectively (p value < 0.0001). Our data demonstrated that after 72 h of symptoms, the likelihood of a perforated appendicitis increased significantly (p value < 0.0001) when compared to 60-72 h. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in the likelihood of a perforated appendicitis occurs after 72 h of symptoms, when compared to 60-72 h. We can therefore argue that it may be reasonable to prioritise patients approaching 72 h of symptoms for operative management.

Pictorial review: the pearls and pitfalls of the radiological manifestations of gallstone ileus.

We present a pictorial review of a range of typical and atypical cases of gallstone ileus (GI), across a wide range of imaging modalities. GI is a complication of gallstone disease causing mechanical intestinal obstruction due to impaction of gallstone in the gastrointestinal tract. The spectrum of presentation can vary enormously, and we highlight the importance of accurate imaging diagnosis of GI especially early use of computed tomography. This will lead to timely and appropriate surgical intervention with the potential avoidance of unnecessary outcomes. The ambition of pictorial synopsis is to make the radiologists to be more vigilant to the common and more obscure imaging findings of GI.

The Handbook: an end to 'I wish I had known that before I started'.

The importance of an effective handover between clinicians is vital, particularly for junior doctors when commencing a new clinical rotation. When junior doctors commence a new rotation there is often a significant amount of new information and tasks that they must learn, whilst also maintaining a high level of care for patients. However, very little information is formally passed from the outgoing junior doctor to the incoming junior doctor when changing rotations, resulting in a gap in knowledge and information having to be relearned by each junior doctor for each ward. Through a junior doctor led service improvement initiative we created an intranet-based, updateable, easily accessible, and secure resource to assist junior doctors during this transition period. Our project was not only beneficial to junior doctors when starting on a new rotation but also helped them understand their role within the ward environment and become more efficient in their clinical work. The project is an example of a sustainable service improvement project implemented with no cost that due to its format and low maintenance, could be easily adapted on a wider scale in other hospitals or Trusts.

Pyrexia after cardiac surgery: natural history and association with infection.

BACKGROUND: Pyrexia is common after major surgery, and infection is often an important consideration. To investigate the natural history and association with infection, we performed a prospective observational study. METHODS: From November 2000 to January 2001, we studied 219 patients undergoing cardiac surgery screening daily for wound, respiratory, urinary tract, and other infections. Pyrexia was defined as temperature above 37.5 degrees C. RESULTS: Of 219 patients, 7 intraoperative deaths occurred and 1 patient was excluded because of preoperative endocarditis, leaving 211. The mean age (SD) was 64 (10) years, consisting of 172 male patients (81.5%). The proportion pyrexial on days 1, 2, and 5 was 30.0%, 25.8%, and 10.3%, respectively. More patients undergoing urgent or emergency procedures (17.7% versus 7.8%; P =.03) subsequently developed pyrexia. However, there were no differences in wound infection (3.4% versus 8.3%; P =.13), positive cultures for respiratory (14.7% versus 11.4%; P =.16), urinary tract (5.2% versus 2.0%; P =.09), or other infection (8.6% versus 7.3%; P =.71) in patients experiencing postoperative pyrexia compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrexia is common after cardiac surgery and resolves in the majority of patients by day 5. Because there is no association between early pyrexia and infection, diagnosis of early postoperative infection by pyrexia alone is insufficient and is better established by clinical assessment with microbiological evidence.