Bone turnover markers to explain changes in lumbar spine BMD with abaloparatide and teriparatide: results from ACTIVE.

Early PINP changes correlate with 18-month lumbar spine BMD changes and the correlation was greater with abaloparatide versus teriparatide. The uncoupling index was similar between the two agents. INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the relationship between early PINP changes and subsequent changes in spine BMD following abaloparatide and teriparatide treatments. We also explored the use of an "uncoupling index" (UI), the balance between bone formation and bone resorption, which we hypothesised would be similar in response to these treatment groups. METHODS: Blood samples were taken for measurement of bone turnover markers (BTMs) s-PINP and s-CTX at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months from 189 abaloparatide patients and 227 teriparatide patients randomly selected from all participants who completed the study. BMD was measured by DXA at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. Correlations were calculated between log ratio of BTMs from baseline to 3 months and percent change from baseline in BMD at 18 months. A UI was calculated using log transformation and subtraction of the standard deviate for s-CTX from the standard deviate for s-PINP for each patient. RESULTS: Early BTM changes were associated with subsequent BMD changes for both treatments. Pearson correlations for the log ratio of PINP over baseline at 3 months and BMD percent change from baseline at 18 months were larger (P < 0.0001) with abaloparatide (r = 0.561) than teriparatide (r = 0.198). The mean UI at 1 month was greater for abaloparatide versus teriparatide (1.743 and 1.493, respectively; P = 0.03) but was similar at 3 months or later time points. CONCLUSIONS: Early s-PINP changes correlate with percentage change in lumbar spine BMD 18 months after treatment with both abaloparatide and teriparatide, though the correlation with abaloparatide was greater. The UI was similar between abaloparatide and teriparatide suggesting that the balance between formation and resorption markers was similar.

FRAX and the effect of teriparatide on vertebral and non-vertebral fracture.

UNLABELLED: Daily teriparatide injections have been shown to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Here, we demonstrate that the magnitude of fracture risk reduction is independent of baseline fracture probability assessed by FRAX. INTRODUCTION: Daily administration of 20 or 40 µg teriparatide has been shown to significantly decrease the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fracture compared with placebo. The aim of the present study was to evaluate fracture risk assessed at baseline using the FRAX® tool and to determine the efficacy of teriparatide as a function of baseline fracture risk. METHODS: One thousand six hundred thirty-seven postmenopausal women in the pivotal phase three trial, randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 544), teriparatide 20 µg per day (n = 541) or teriparatide 40 µg per day (n = 552), were studied. Baseline clinical risk factors were entered into country-specific FRAX models to compute the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures with or without input of femoral neck BMD. Because there was no difference in effect of 20 and 40 µg teriparatide daily on fracture occurrence, the two active groups were merged. The interaction between probability of a major fracture and treatment efficacy was examined by Poisson regression. RESULTS: The 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures (with BMD) ranged from 2.2-67.2 %. Treatment with teriparatide was associated with a 37 % decrease in all non-vertebral fractures (95 % CI 10-56 %) and a 56 % decrease in low-energy non-vertebral fractures (95 % CI 24-75 %) compared with placebo. The risk of morphometric vertebral fractures decreased significantly by 66 % (95 % CI 50-77 %). Hazard ratios for the effect of teriparatide on the fracture outcome did not change significantly with increasing fracture probability (p > 0.30). Similar findings were noted for the interaction when BMD was excluded from the FRAX model, or when probability of hip fracture was used as the marker of baseline risk. CONCLUSION: We conclude that teriparatide significantly decreases the risk of non-vertebral and morphometric vertebral fractures in women by a similar extent, irrespective of baseline fracture probability.

The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

UNLABELLED: The effect of teriparatide and risedronate on back pain was tested, and there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in back pain between groups after 6 or 18 months. Patients receiving teriparatide had greater increases in bone mineral density and had fewer vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to understand the effect of teriparatide in reducing back pain in patients with prevalent back pain and vertebral fracture compared to risedronate. METHODS: In an 18-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we investigated the effects of teriparatide (20 µg/day) vs. risedronate (35 mg/week) in postmenopausal women with back pain likely due to vertebral fracture. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of subjects reporting ≥30% reduction in worst back pain severity from baseline to 6 months as assessed by a numeric rating scale in each treatment group. Pre-specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included assessments of average and worst back pain at additional time points, disability and quality of life, bone mineral density, incidence of fractures, and safety. RESULTS: At 6 months, 59% of teriparatide and 57% of risedronate patients reported ≥30% reduction in worst back pain and there were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing reduction in worst or average back pain at any time point, disability, or quality of life. There was a greater increase from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (p = 0.001) and femoral neck (p = 0.02) with teriparatide compared to risedronate and a lower incidence of vertebral fractures at 18 months (4% teriparatide and 9% risedronate; p = 0.01). Vertebral fractures were less severe (p = 0.04) in the teriparatide group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in back pain-related endpoints, patients receiving teriparatide had greater skeletal benefit than those receiving risedronate.

The need for a transparent, ethical, and successful relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry: a view of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES).

UNLABELLED: This paper provides recommendations for fair and unbiased relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry. INTRODUCTION: Real or perceived problems in the relationship between academics and the industry have been the subject of much recent debate. It has been suggested that academic clinicians should sever all links with the industry-a view that is rarely challenged. METHODS: Academic experts and members of the pharmaceutical industry were invited to an expert consensus meeting to debate this topic. This meeting was organized by the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science. Conflict of interest, competing interest, right and duties of academic scientist, authorship, and staff and student education were discussed. RESULTS: Guidelines for a transparent, ethical, strong, and successful partnership between the academic scientist and the pharmaceutical industry have been provided. CONCLUSIONS: The Group support interactions between the industry and clinicians provided that it is transparent and ethical.

Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting.

SUMMARY: The utility of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA to detect prevalent vertebral fracture in a multicenter setting was investigated by comparison to conventional radiography. While limited by lower image quality, overall performance of VFA was good but had a tendency to miss mild prevalent fractures. INTRODUCTION: In osteoporosis clinical trials standardized spine radiographs are used to detect vertebral fractures as a study endpoint. Lateral spine imaging with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners, known as vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA, presents a potential alternative to conventional radiography with lower radiation dose and greater patient convenience. METHODS: We investigated in a multicenter setting the ability of VFA to detect fractures in comparison with conventional radiography. The study examined 203 postmenopausal women who had imaging of the spine by DXA and radiography. Three radiologists experienced in vertebral fracture assessment independently read the VFA scans and radiographs using the Genant semiquantitative method on two occasions. CONCLUSIONS: Analyzing the data from all readable vertebrae, the kappa statistic, sensitivity, and specificity ranged from 0.64-0.77, 0.65-0.84, and 0.97-0.98, respectively. Considering only moderate and severe fractures improved the kappa statistic (0.80-0.91) and sensitivity (0.70-0.86). While image quality of VFA is inferior to radiography, the detection of vertebral fractures using visual scoring is feasible. However, VFA underperformed due to unreadable vertebrae and reduced sensitivity for mild fractures. Nevertheless, VFA correctly identified most moderate and severe vertebral fractures. Despite this limitation, VFA by DXA provides an important tool for clinical research.

Beyond hip: importance of other nonspinal fractures.

It is widely accepted that hip and spine fractures are associated with substantial morbidity, but there is growing awareness that other fractures are under-recognized. The incidence of nonspinal, nonhip fractures is higher than for hip fractures because they occur at an earlier age. Furthermore, the incidence of nonspinal, nonhip fractures exceeds that of hip fractures in men and women >80 years old. Nonspinal, nonhip fractures are associated with considerable morbidity. On average, women with humeral, ankle, distal forearm, and foot fractures experience substantial numbers of limited activity days, and nonspinal, nonhip fractures account for almost a third of health care expenditures attributable to osteoporotic fractures. Nonspinal, nonhip fractures are associated with low bone mineral density, thus it may be possible to identify those at risk. Because these fractures also are indicative of increased risk at other sites, those susceptible might benefit from assessments including these other fracture types. It is the clinician's responsibility to attend to and recognize that nonspinal, nonhip fractures are usually associated with osteoporosis and should be treated.

Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fracture is currently underdiagnosed, despite its common severity and its value to predict further osteoporotic fracture. Morphometry using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) [vertebral fracture assessment (VFA)] is a new technique that may facilitate detection of many vertebral fractures, as images are obtained at the same time as bone mineral density (BMD) measurement, and would also allow avoiding spine radiographs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the diagnostic value of Instant Vertebral Assessment (IVA), which is a morphometry scan using the Hologic Delphi densitometer, to detect prevalent vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Interobserver precision was assessed, then IVA scans were compared with lateral spine radiographs, considered the gold standard, to test diagnostic agreement between the two techniques. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated, as well as the likelihood ratio of the positive test, using sensitivity and specificity at each vertebral level. RESULTS: Among 85 patients of whom 50% had at least one vertebral fracture identified with radiographs, we found that interobserver precision was moderate, with frequent difficulties in discerning upper thoracic vertebrae. On a per-vertebra basis, sensitivity was around 70% from L4 to T11 and lower above T11 whereas specificity was above 90% for all vertebrae, and the negative predictive value remained above 80% from L4 to T7 and decreased above T7. On a per-patient basis, sensitivity was 0.69, specificity 0.74, positive predictive value equalled 0.72 and negative predictive value 0.71. When only grades 2 and 3 fractures were considered, results were comparable, with slightly improved specificity. Then, with the likelihood ratios calculated in our sample, we obtained posttest probabilities using the prevalence of vertebral fracture at lumbar and thoracic levels in a large sample of postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis with and without vertebral fracture [baseline data in women of the Multiple Outcomes on Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial]. At levels where fractures were most common, likelihood ratios of the positive test were good or excellent, associated with sizeable posttest probabilities. CONCLUSION: IVA allowed diagnosis of vertebral fracture at levels where vertebral fracture were most common, i.e., the lumbar and mid and lower thoracic levels, but its value was weaker at the upper thoracic levels.

Fracture risk reduction during treatment with teriparatide is independent of pretreatment bone turnover.

INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide is a bone formation agent that increases bone turnover and mass, resulting in an increase in bone strength and a decrease in fracture risk. METHODS: The primary purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the association between pretreatment bone turnover marker (BTM) concentrations and the absolute and relative fracture risks after adjusting for baseline femoral neck BMD, number of prevalent vertebral fractures, and age. Because femoral neck BMD is commonly attained in the assessment of patients at risk for osteoporosis, we examined the ability of a multivariate assessment including pretreatment BTM concentration and femoral neck BMD to predict future fracture risk after adjusting for the number of prevalent vertebral fractures. We examined data from the Fracture Prevention Trial, a study designed to determine the effect of teriparatide 20 mcg/day and teriparatide 40 mcg/day on vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BTM were analyzed in two subsets of women within the Fracture Prevention Trial, and included serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), serum carboxy-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type I (PICP), serum amino-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type I (PINP), urinary free deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and urinary N-terminal telopeptide (NTX). RESULTS: Teriparatide significantly reduced the risk of fracture [four BTM subset (n = 520), placebo = 14.3%, teriparatide = 5.8%, P < 0.05; PINP subset (n = 771), placebo = 17.7%, teriparatide = 5.5%, P < 0.05]. Subjects with the highest pretreatment BTM concentrations had the greatest fracture risk. Teriparatide-mediated absolute risk reduction was greatest for women with high pretreatment bone turnover; however, the relative fracture risk reduction was independent of pretreatment bone turnover. After adjusting for pretreatment BTM and number of prevalent vertebral fractures, baseline femoral neck BMD was not a significant predictor of fracture risk. CONCLUSION: Teriparatide-mediated relative fracture risk reduction was independent of pretreatment bone turnover, demonstrating that this therapy offers clinical benefit to patients across a range of disease severity.

Teriparatide effects on vertebral fractures and bone mineral density in men with osteoporosis: treatment and discontinuation of therapy.

Teriparatide (rhPTH[1-34]), a bone-forming agent for the treatment of osteoporosis, increases bone mineral density in men and women, and reduces the risk of fractures in women with osteoporosis. However, fracture efficacy has not yet been confirmed in men. Further, there is limited information on the effect of withdrawal of teriparatide. The purpose of this manuscript is to report on bone mineral density and vertebral fracture incidence during a 42-month observation period, from the baseline of the previously reported treatment study in men [1] through 30 months of posttreatment follow-up. Three hundred fifty-five men who were treated with once-daily self-injections of either placebo or 20 or 40 microg of teriparatide participated in the follow-up study. Bone mineral density gradually decreased following discontinuation of teriparatide therapy. However, the lumbar spine and total hip values remained significantly higher than baseline after 30 months of follow-up (p< or =0.001). Antiresorptive treatment prevented the decline and tended to further increase bone mineral density. Lateral thoracic lumbar radiographs obtained at baseline and 18 months after discontinuation of teriparatide were available for 279 men. Of these men, 11.7% assigned to placebo, 5.4% treated with teriparatide 20 microg, and 6.0% treated with teriparatide 40 microg had an incident vertebral fracture. In the combined teriparatide treated groups vs placebo, the risk of vertebral fracture was reduced 51% (nonsignificant, p=0.07). The incidence of moderate or severe fractures was significantly reduced by 83% (p=0.01). In conclusion, men who received teriparatide and who may have received follow-up antiresorptive therapy had a decreased risk of moderate and severe vertebral fractures.

Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Once-daily injections of parathyroid hormone or its amino-terminal fragments increase bone formation and bone mass without causing hypercalcemia, but their effects on fractures are unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1637 postmenopausal women with prior vertebral fractures to receive 20 or 40 microg of parathyroid hormone (1-34) or placebo, administered subcutaneously by the women daily. We obtained vertebral radiographs at base line and at the end of the study (median duration of observation, 21 months) and performed serial measurements of bone mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: New vertebral fractures occurred in 14 percent of the women in the placebo group and in 5 percent and 4 percent, respectively, of the women in the 20-microg and 40-microg parathyroid hormone groups; the respective relative risks of fracture in the 20-microg and 40-microg groups, as compared with the placebo group, were 0.35 and 0.31 (95 percent confidence intervals, 0.22 to 0.55 and 0.19 to 0.50). New nonvertebral fragility fractures occurred in 6 percent of the women in the placebo group and in 3 percent of those in each parathyroid hormone group (relative risk, 0.47 and 0.46, respectively [95 percent confidence intervals, 0.25 to 0.88 and 0.25 to 0.861). As compared with placebo, the 20-microg and 40-microg doses of parathyroid hormone increased bone mineral density by 9 and 13 more percentage points in the lumbar spine and by 3 and 6 more percentage points in the femoral neck; the 40-microg dose decreased bone mineral density at the shaft of the radius by 2 more percentage points. Both doses increased total-body bone mineral by 2 to 4 more percentage points than did placebo. Parathyroid hormone had only minor side effects (occasional nausea and headache). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated. The 40-microg dose increased bone mineral density more than the 20-microg dose but had similar effects on the risk of fracture and was more likely to have side effects.

Long-term effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and serum lipid levels in early postmenopausal women: three-year data from 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal women, raloxifene hydrochloride has favorable effects on bone and lipid metabolism and does not stimulate reproductive tissues. The studies reported herein evaluated the long-term (3-year) effects of raloxifene treatment on bone mineral density (BMD), serum lipid levels, and drug tolerability in healthy postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 1145 healthy European and North American postmenopausal women aged 45 through 60 years were enrolled in 2 parallel, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of identical design and randomly assigned to receive raloxifene hydrochloride, 30, 60, or 150 mg, or placebo daily; all groups received 400 to 600 mg of elemental calcium. Assessments included measurements for BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, markers of bone turnover, and serum lipid levels. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD changed from baseline to 36 months as follows: placebo (mean percentage change + SE), -1. 32% +0.22%; raloxifene, 30 mg, 0.71% +0.23%; raloxifene, 60 mg, 1. 28% +0.23%; and raloxifene, 150 mg, 1.20% +0.24%. Comparable BMD changes were observed in the hip and total body. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were suppressed by raloxifene to normal premenopausal ranges through 3 years. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was reduced 7% to 12% below baseline through 3 years. Study withdrawals due to any reason (37%) and withdrawals due to adverse events (14%) were not different among groups. The only significant adverse effect of therapy was hot flashes (25% in the 60-mg raloxifene group vs 18% in the placebo group); hot flashes were typically reported as mild and were not associated with study withdrawal (1.7% for 60-mg raloxifene vs 2.4% for placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene preserves BMD at important skeletal sites, lowers serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and has a tolerability profile comparable to placebo. These results indicate a favorable benefit-risk profile of raloxifene for long-term use in healthy postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3444-3450.

Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

CONTEXT: Raloxifene hydrochloride, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women, but whether it reduces fracture risk in these women is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of raloxifene therapy on risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. DESIGN: The Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study, a multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7705 women aged 31 to 80 years in 25 countries who had been postmenopausal for at least 2 years and who met World Health Organization criteria for having osteoporosis. The study began in 1994 and had up to 36 months of follow-up for primary efficacy measurements and nonserious adverse events and up to 40 months of follow-up for serious adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to 60 mg/d or 120 mg/d of raloxifene or to identically appearing placebo pills; in addition, all women received supplemental calcium and cholecalciferol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident vertebral fracture was determined radiographically at baseline and at scheduled 24- and 36-month visits. Nonvertebral fracture was ascertained by interview at 6-month-interim visits. Bone mineral density was determined annually by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: At 36 months of the evaluable radiographs in 6828 women, 503 (7.4%) had at least 1 new vertebral fracture, including 10.1% of women receiving placebo, 6.6% of those receiving 60 mg/d of raloxifene, and 5.4% of those receiving 120 mg/d of raloxifene. Risk of vertebral fracture was reduced in both study groups receiving raloxifene (for 60-mg/d group: relative risk [RR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.8; for 120-mg/d group: RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7). Frequency of vertebral fracture was reduced both in women who did and did not have prevalent fracture. Risk of nonvertebral fracture for raloxifene vs placebo did not differ significantly (RR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-1.1 for both raloxifene groups combined). Compared with placebo, raloxifene increased bone mineral density in the femoral neck by 2.1 % (60 mg) and 2.4% (120 mg) and in the spine by 2.6% (60 mg) and 2.7% (120 mg) P<0.001 for all comparisons). Women receiving raloxifene had increased risk of venous thromboembolus vs placebo (RR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.2). Raloxifene did not cause vaginal bleeding or breast pain and was associated with a lower incidence of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, raloxifene increases bone mineral density in the spine and femoral neck and reduces risk of vertebral fracture.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators: a look ahead.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are structurally diverse compounds that bind to estrogen receptors (ER) and elicit agonist or antagonist responses depending on the target tissue and hormonal milieu. They are being evaluated primarily for conditions associated with aging, including hormone-responsive cancer, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Several SERMs are marketed or are in clinical development, including triphenylethylenes (tamoxifen and its derivatives: toremifene, droloxifene and idoxifene), chromans (levormeloxifene), benzothiophenes (raloxifene, LY353381) and naphthalenes (CP336,156). Tamoxifen and toremifene, both used to treat advanced breast cancer, also have beneficial effects on bone mineral density and serum lipids in postmenopausal women. Tamoxifen was recently shown to decrease the risk of invasive breast cancer in women at high risk. Unfortunately, both drugs also have stimulatory effects on the endometrium. Raloxifene, used for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and fragility fractures, also has favourable effects on bone mineral density, serum lipids and the incidence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women but does not stimulate the endometrium. Like replacement estrogens, SERMs increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. SERMs offer post-menopausal women many of the advantages of estrogen replacement while mitigating some of the disadvantages, particularly the concern over breast cancer. Newer SERMs, exemplified by raloxifene, also eliminate the concerns over endometrial stimulation that were not addressed by first generation SERMs. The clinical success of SERMs has set the stage for a variety of drug therapies based on selective modulation of nuclear receptor activity.

Geographic differences in bone turnover: data from a multinational study in healthy postmenopausal women.

Biochemical markers of bone metabolism (bone markers) are used increasingly to monitor response to therapy and may be predictors of bone loss and fractures. The relationship between fracture rates, which differ between countries, and the rate of bone turnover has not been examined. Therefore, we explored the geographic variability of bone turnover in a selected, healthy study population of 619 postmenopausal women, ages 40-61, participating in a clinical trial of raloxifene hydrochloride for osteoporosis prevention. The subjects were distributed among 38 investigative sites in 10 countries (9-211 subjects/country) on four continents (North America, n = 277, Europe, n = 168, Australia, n = 125, and Africa, n = 49). Specimens for serum osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), and urine type I collagen fragment/urinary creatinine ratio (CTX) were handled in a uniform fashion and assayed in a central laboratory. Mean levels of OC (P < 0.001), BSAP (P = 0. 006), and CTX (P < 0.001) varied significantly by country (ANOVA), with the lowest values typically in German and Spanish subjects and the highest in American and Canadian subjects. The consistent pattern and wide ranges of mean bone marker values (OC 1.6-fold, BSAP 1.7-fold, CTX 3.1-fold) between countries suggest clinically significant differences in bone turnover. Geographic differences in bone markers were not explained by the determined potential confounders of age, years posthysterectomy, total serum cholesterol, and serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). We conclude that bone marker values vary substantially by country in this selected study population, suggesting systematic geographic differences in bone metabolism that potentially relate to osteoporotic fracture rates.

Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Long-term estrogen therapy can reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. At present, however, these beneficial effects are not separable from undesirable stimulation of breast and endometrial tissues. METHODS: We studied the effect of raloxifene, a nonsteroidal benzothiophene, on bone mineral density, serum lipid concentrations, and endometrial thickness in 601 postmenopausal women. The women were randomly assigned to receive 30, 60, or 150 mg of raloxifene or placebo daily for 24 months. RESULTS: The women receiving each dose of raloxifene had significant increases from base-line values in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, whereas those receiving placebo had decreases in bone mineral density. For example, at 24 months, the mean (+/-SE) difference in the change in bone mineral density between the women receiving 60 mg of raloxifene per day and those receiving placebo was 2.4+/-0.4 percent for the lumbar spine, 2.4+/-0.4 percent for the total hip, and 2.0+/-0.4 percent for the total body (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Serum concentrations of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in all the raloxifene groups, whereas serum concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides did not change. Endometrial thickness was similar in the raloxifene and placebo groups at all times during the study. The proportion of women receiving raloxifene who reported hot flashes or vaginal bleeding was not different from that of the women receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Daily therapy with raloxifene increases bone mineral density, lowers serum concentrations of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and does not stimulate the endometrium.

In search of optimal long-term female hormone replacement: the potential of selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) comprise a group of structurally diverse compounds which are distinguished from estrogens by their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor but to act as either an estrogen agonist or antagonist depending on the target tissue and hormonal milieu. The mechanisms by which SERMs elicit tissue-specific responses are being intensively investigated, and recently a novel pathway for estrogen receptor-mediated gene activation by the SERM raloxifene has been demonstrated. The tissue-specific activity of SERMs suggests that they may be clinically useful as, for example, potential substitutes for long-term female hormone replacement therapy. Large-scale clinical testing currently in progress for raloxifene, and soon to begin for other SERMs, will evaluate this important potential.

Sequential effects of chronic human PTH (1-84) treatment of estrogen-deficiency osteopenia in the rat.

Although daily injections of parathyroid hormone (PTH) can rapidly reverse estrogen-deficiency bone loss in rats, PTH treatment of osteoporotic humans has to date produced more modest increases in bone mass. To explore the reasons for this important difference, we evaluated the dose- and time-dependence of human PTH 1-84 treatment effects on bone mass and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in rats with estrogen-deficiency bone loss. The highest doses of PTH increased spinal, femoral, and total skeletal mass to supra-normal levels and stimulated cortical endosteal bone formation. Spine and whole skeleton mass and density increased rapidly at first, but then increased more slowly; the rate of change decreased significantly (p < 0.01) during continued treatment with the highest doses of PTH. The effects of PTH treatment on biochemical markers also were both dose-dependent and time-dependent. Serum osteocalcin, a marker of osteoblast function, increased with the highest doses of PTH (p < 0.001), but reached an early plateau and later returned toward baseline. Urinary excretion of pyridinolines, a marker of osteoclast function, increased in a time-dependent fashion throughout treatment (p < 0.001). Serum 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D levels increased in a dose-related fashion, but then decreased toward control levels despite continued treatment. We demonstrate that both osteoblast and osteoclast function are increased during daily PTH therapy in the rat. The pattern of response depends on both the dose of PTH and the duration of therapy. These dose- and time-related effects should be taken into account when designing experimental PTH treatments for osteoporosis, and they deserve intensive study.

The effect of systemically administered PDGF-BB on the rodent skeleton.

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), an osteoblast mitogen, has been demonstrated to accelerate fracture healing and periodontal bone repair when applied locally in vivo. To explore whether PDGF could stimulate bone formation in intact bone, we administered it systemically to rats rendered acutely estrogen-deficient. Because PDGF may stimulate bone resorption in vitro, PDGF was administered with and without an antiresorptive agent (alendronate). All treatments were given by intravenous injection 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Spinal bone mineral density (BMD) decreased by 5% in the vehicle-treated ovariectomized (OVX) rats by the end of the study as determined by DXA. Treatment with PDGF prevented this bone loss and significantly (p < 0.05) increased the bone density in the spine (9%) and whole skeleton (5.8%). Combined treatment with PDGF and alendronate resulted in a greater increase at the spine (18%) and whole skeleton (12.8%) than either agent alone. Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that treatment with PDGF increased the osteoblast number and osteoblast perimeter without consistent changes in osteoclast estimates. Biomechanical testing demonstrated that PDGF administration increased the vertebral body compressive strength and femoral shaft torsional stiffness and resulted in a trend for enhanced femoral head shearing strength. Coadministration of alendronate further increased these indices of bone strength. PDGF administration also caused premature closure of the growth plate, decreased body fat, and resulted in extraskeletal collagen deposition. We therefore demonstrate, for the first time, that systemic administration of PDGF can increase bone density and strength throughout the skeleton.

A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia.

Because bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at various sites differ in the relative amounts of cortical and trabecular bone that they assess, they also differ in their sensitivity for detecting osteopenia. Lateral spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allows measurement of BMD of the vertebral bodies, which contain mainly trabecular bone, without contribution from the posterior vertebral elements, which are rich in cortical bone. Thus, we hypothesized that lateral spine DXA would detect osteopenia more frequently than anterior-posterior (AP) spine DXA. To assess the ability of DXA to estimate trabecular bone mass, we compared AP and lateral DXA spine measurements with trabecular bone measurements by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in 58 patients. We then compared AP vs. lateral spine DXA measurements in 1) 300 women referred for routine bone densitometry, 2) 30 glucocorticoid-treated women, and 3) 44 women with vertebral compression fractures. To compare short term reproducibility, we performed repeat AP and lateral DXA scans in 50 women. The association between QCT and DXA measurements was stronger when DXA measurements were made in the lateral (r = 0.784) or midlateral (r = 0.823) projection than in the AP (r = 0.571) projection. The association of BMD with age was stronger when DXA measurements were made in the lateral (r = 0.536) or midlateral (r = 0.536) projection than in the AP (r = 0.382) projection. The declines in BMD with age for AP, lateral, and midlateral DXA measurements were 0.48%, 0.60%, and 0.88%/yr, respectively. In the women referred for routine densitometry, lateral DXA measurements were significantly (P < 0.05) more abnormal than AP measurements compared with those in young women. This was also true in the women treated with glucocorticoids and women with vertebral compression fractures. Lateral DXA often detected osteopenia in patients whose AP DXA was normal. The 95% confidence limits for changes in BMD attributable to measurement error for AP, lateral, and midlateral DXA were 0.027, 0.038, and 0.057 g/cm2, respectively. These results indicate that lateral DXA measurements identify patients with osteopenia more often than AP DXA measurements, probably because lateral DXA more accurately estimates trabecular bone mass. Short term reproducibility of lateral DXA is nearly as good as that for AP DXA.