Relevance of biopsy-derived pancreatic organoids in the development of efficient transcriptomic signatures to predict adjuvant chemosensitivity in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are frequently treated by chemotherapy. Even if personalized therapy based on molecular analysis can be performed for some tumors, PDAC regimens selection is still mainly based on patients' performance status and expected efficacy. Therefore, the establishment of molecular predictors of chemotherapeutic efficacy could potentially improve prognosis by tailoring treatments. We have recently developed an RNA-based signature that predicts the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine using 38 PDAC primary cell cultures. While demonstrated its efficiency, a significant association with the classical/basal-like PDAC spectrum was observed. We hypothesized that this flaw was due to the basal-like biased phenotype of cellular models used in our strategy. To overcome this limitation, we generated a prospective cohort of 27 consecutive biopsied derived pancreatic organoids (BDPO) and include them in the signature identification strategy. As BDPO's do not have the same biased phenotype as primary cell cultures we expect they can compensate one with each other and cover a broader range of molecular phenotypes. We then obtained an improved signature predicting gemcitabine sensibility that was validated in a cohort of 300 resected PDAC patients that have or have not received adjuvant gemcitabine. We demonstrated a significant association between the improved signature and the overall and disease-free survival in patients predicted as sensitive and treated with adjuvant gemcitabine. We propose then that including BDPO along primary cell cultures represent a powerful strategy that helps to overcome primary cell cultures limitations producing unbiased RNA-based signatures predictive of adjuvant treatments in PDAC.

Randomized phase III trial in elderly patients comparing LV5FU2 with or without irinotecan for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (FFCD 2001-02).

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) frequently occurs in elderly patients. However, data from a geriatric tailored randomized trial about tolerance to and the efficacy of doublet chemotherapy (CT) with irinotecan in the elderly are lacking. The benefit of first-line CT intensification remains an issue in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Elderly patients (75+) with previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design (four arms) to receive 5-FU (5-fluorouracil)-based CT, either alone (FU: LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU2) or in combination with irinotecan [IRI: LV5FU2-irinotecan or simplified LV5FU2-irinotecan (FOLFIRI)]. The CLASSIC arm was defined as LV5FU2 or LV5FU2-irinotecan and the SIMPLIFIED arm as simplified LV5FU2 or FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), safety and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: From June 2003 to May 2010, 71 patients were randomly assigned to LV5FU2, 71 to simplified LV5FU2, 70 to LV5FU2-irinotecan and 70 to FOLFIRI. The median age was 80 years (range 75-92 years). No significant difference was observed for the median PFS: FU 5.2 months versus IRI 7.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84 (0.66-1.07), P = 0.15 and CLASSIC 6.5 months versus SIMPLIFIED 6.0 months, HR = 0.85 (0.67-1.09), P = 0.19. The ORR was superior in IRI (P = 0.0003): FU 21.1% versus IRI 41.7% and in CLASSIC (P = 0.04): CLASSIC 37.1% versus SIMPLIFIED 25.6%. Median OS was 14.2 months in FU versus 13.3 months in IRI, HR = 0.96 (0.75-1.24) and 15.2 months in CLASSIC versus 11.4 months in SIMPLIFIED, HR = 0.71 (0.55-0.92). More patients presented grade 3-4 toxicities in IRI (52.2% versus 76.3%). CONCLUSION: In this elderly population, adding irinotecan to an infusional 5-FU-based CT did not significantly increase either PFS or OS. Classic LV5FU2 was associated with an improved OS compared with simplified LV5FU2. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00303771.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) consensus recommendations 2013.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Europe and worldwide, with the peak incidence in patients >70 years of age. However, as the treatment algorithms for the treatment of patients with CRC become ever more complex, it is clear that a significant percentage of older CRC patients (>70 years) are being less than optimally treated. This document provides a summary of an International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) task force meeting convened in Paris in 2013 to update the existing expert recommendations for the treatment of older (geriatric) CRC patients published in 2009 and includes overviews of the recent data on epidemiology, geriatric assessment as it relates to surgery and oncology, and the ability of older CRC patients to tolerate surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, treatment of their metastatic disease including palliative chemotherapy with and without the use of the biologics, and finally the use of adjuvant and palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of older rectal cancer patients. An overview of each area was presented by one of the task force experts and comments invited from other task force members.

Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial.

BACKGROUND: The SHIVA trial is a multicentric randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with any type of refractory cancer. RESULTS of the feasibility study on the first 100 enrolled patients are presented. METHODS: Adult patients with any type of metastatic cancer who failed standard therapy were eligible for the study. The molecular profile was performed on a mandatory biopsy, and included mutations and gene copy number alteration analyses using high-throughput technologies, as well as the determination of oestrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Biopsy was safely performed in 95 of the first 100 included patients. Median time between the biopsy and the therapeutic decision taken during a weekly molecular biology board was 26 days. Mutations, gene copy number alterations, and IHC analyses were successful in 63 (66%), 65 (68%), and 87 (92%) patients, respectively. A druggable molecular abnormality was present in 38 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a comprehensive tumour molecular profile was safe, feasible, and compatible with clinical practice in refractory cancer patients.

Elderly patients with colorectal cancer: treatment modalities and survival in France. National data from the ThInDiT cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist on how elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are actually treated in real-life practice. Based on a national cohort, we analysed routine treatment modalities of the elderly who were diagnosed with CRC in France in 2009. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The characteristics of patients and tumours and the cancer treatments received during the first year of all national incident cases of CRC diagnosed between 1st April and 31st December 2009, were compared between a 'younger group' (YG), under 75 years of age (N = 18,410 patients), and an 'older group' (OG), aged 75 and over (N = 13,255 patients). In the OG with metastases at baseline, we analysed two-year overall survival (OS) according to the treatment received (e.g. chemotherapy, surgery) and well-known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among patients with localised CRC (N = 25,353), surgery was equally performed in both groups in more than 80% of the cases (p=0.52); time to surgery was shorter in the OG (8 versus 23 days) because there was more emergency surgery for occlusion among the OG. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 15% of the OG (versus 29% in the YG) and consisted of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) monotherapy in more than 50% of OG patients. Among patients with metastatic CRC (N = 6,312), palliative chemotherapy was given to 48% of the OG versus 85% of the YG. Chemotherapy regimens included 30% monotherapy with 5FU, 30% oxaliplatin combination and 20% bevacizumab combination in the OG; compared to 10%, 34% and 35%, respectively, in the YG. The median OS for the OG was 8.4 months (versus 22.3 months in the YG) and 17.1 months among elderly patients who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: CRC is more frequently complicated at diagnosis among elderly patients. Adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy is less frequently prescribed among elderly patients. This could be explained by the fact that unfit elderly patients do not deserve chemotherapy, but certainly also reflect the fact that some fit elderly patients are undertreated.

Improvement in survival of metastatic colorectal cancer: are the benefits of clinical trials reproduced in population-based studies?

AIM OF THE STUDY: To describe trends in survival of non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) over a 34-year period in a French population-based registry taking into account major advances in medical therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 3804 patients with non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1976 and 2009 were included. Three periods (1976-96, 1997-2004 and 2005-09) were considered. RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy dramatically increased from 19% to 57% between the first two periods, then increased steadily thereafter reaching 59% during the last period (p<0.001). Median relative survival increased from 5.9 months during the 1976-96 period to 10.2 months during the 1997-2004 period but, despite the availability of targeted therapies, remained at 9.5 months during the 2005-09 period. During the last study period, less than 10% of elderly patients received targeted therapies compared to more than 40% for younger patients. Their median relative survival was 5.0 months compared to 15.6 months in younger patients. CONCLUSION: There was an improvement in survival in relation with the increased use of more effective medical treatment. However, at a population-based level, patients are not all treated equally and most of them, especially the elderly, do not benefit from the most up-to-date treatment options.

New strategies and designs in pancreatic cancer research: consensus guidelines report from a European expert panel.

Although the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a huge challenge, it is entering a new era with the development of new strategies and trial designs. Because there is an increasing number of novel therapeutic agents and potential combinations available to test in patients with PDAC, the identification of robust prognostic and predictive markers and of new targets and relevant pathways is a top priority as well as the design of adequate trials incorporating molecular-driven hypothesis. We presently report a consensus strategy for research in pancreatic cancer that was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from different European institutions and collaborative groups involved in pancreatic cancer. The expert panel embraces the concept of exploratory early proof of concept studies, based on the prediction of response to novel agents and combinations, and randomised phase II studies permitting the selection of the best therapeutic approach to go forward into phase III, where the recommended primary end point remains overall survival. Trials should contain as many translational components as possible, relying on standardised tissue and blood processing and robust biobanking, and including dynamic imaging. Attention should not only be paid to the pancreatic cancer cells but also to microenvironmental factors and stem/stellate cells.

Efficacy of venlafaxine for the prevention and relief of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity: results of EFFOX, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity is dose limiting and may present as acute symptoms and/or cumulative peripheral neuropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2005 to May 2008, patients with oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity were randomized into a double-blind study, to receive either venlafaxine 50 mg 1 h prior oxaliplatin infusion and venlafaxine extended release 37.5 mg b.i.d. from day 2 to day 11 or placebo. Neurotoxicity was evaluated using numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity and experienced relief under treatment, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and the oxaliplatin-specific neurotoxicity scale. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a 100% relief under treatment. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (27 males, median age: 67.6 years). Most patients had colorectal cancer (72.9%). Median number of cycles administered at inclusion was 4.5 (mean cumulative oxaliplatin dose: 684.6 mg). Twenty out of 24 patients in arm A (venlafaxine) and 22 out of 24 patients in arm B (placebo) were assessable for neurotoxicity. Based on the NRS, full relief was more frequent in the venlafaxine arm: 31.3% versus 5.3% (P=0.03). Venlafaxine side-effects included grade 1-2 nausea (43.1%) and asthenia (39.2%) without grade 3-4 events. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine has clinical activity against oxaliplatin-induced acute neurosensory toxicity.

Efficacy of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (MGA) treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The most commonly used schedules are 5-FU in combination with CDDP with or without epirubicin (ECF) or docetaxel (TCF) in treatment of MGA patients (pts), independently of HER status. We evaluated the efficacy of FOLFIRI regimen in a large retrospective series of MGA pts. METHODS: Two hundred and twelve pts from 13 French centers were treated with at least one cycle of FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) over 90 minutes on day 1 with folinic acid (FA) 400mg/m2 i.v. over two hours followed by 5-FU 400mg/m2 i.v. bolus then 5- FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours on day 1, repeated every 14 days). Primary tumour sites were 120 (58%) stomach and 92 (42%) gastroesophageal junction. FOLFIRI was administered as first-line in 137 (65%) pts and as later-line in 75 (35%) pts for MGA. RESULTS: There was no difference between chemonaive and not chemonaive pts treated as firstline in terms of response rate 37% (95% CI: 25-50) vs 44% (95% CI: 21-69), median PFS, 6.7 (95% CI: 5.5-9.9) vs 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.9) (P = 0.25), and OS, 13.1 (95% CI: 11.7-18.7) vs 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.3­15.6) (P = 0.19), respectively. There was no difference between pts treated as second or later-line in terms of response rate 20% (95% CI: 8-39) vs 22% (95% CI: 6-48), median PFS, four months (95% CI: 2.8-5.4) vs 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.5) (P = 0.56), and OS, 10.4 months (95% CI: 5.4-14.4) vs 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.5-11.3) (P = 0.58), respectively. The global grade 3-4 toxicities were: diarrhea 11%, vomiting 9%, neutropenia 18%, febril neutropenia 4% (one toxic death). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study confirms the activity and good tolerance of FOLFIRI regimen in MGA as first-line as well as later-line.

Chemotherapy of advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma: a multicenter AGEO study.

BACKGROUND: Small-bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumor of poor prognosis. Data on the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced SBA are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with advanced SBA who received frontline chemotherapy from 1996 to 2008 were eligible for this retrospective multicenter study. RESULTS: Ninety-three consecutive patients were included. In the entire population, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 6.6 and 15.1 months, respectively. Median PFS times among patients treated with LV5FU2 (n = 10), FOLFOX (n = 48), FOLFIRI (n = 19) and LV5FU2-cisplatin (n = 16) were 7.7, 6.9, 6.0 and 4.8 months, respectively, while median OS times were 13.5, 17.8, 10.6 and 9.3 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, World Health Organization performance status (PS) (P < 0.0001) and elevated serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P = 0.02) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) (P = 0.03) were the only variables significantly associated with poor OS. In the subgroup of patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, multivariate analysis showed that LV5FU2-cisplatin was associated with poorer PFS (P < 0.0001) and OS (P = 0.02) compared with FOLFOX. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of chemotherapy in advanced SBA. Baseline PS and CEA and CA 19-9 levels were the main prognostic factors. FOLFOX seems to be the most effective platinum-based chemotherapy regimen.

[The role of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases]. / Intérêt de la chimiothérapie péri-opératoire dans la prise en charge des métastases hépatiques résécables d'origine colorectale.

Surgical resection remains the only treatment of colorectal liver metastases that can ensure long-term survival and cure in some patients, but only a minority of patients with liver metastases is directly amenable to surgery. Cancer relapse is observed in the majority of patients after resection of liver metastases despite progress in surgical technique and improved surgical skills. In order to decrease the risk of cancer relapse, it has been proposed to combine surgery and chemotherapy, which could be administered before, after or before and after surgery. It has been demonstrated that perioperative chemotherapy can reduce the risk of cancer relapse and should be considered as the standard of care for most patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. However perioperative chemotherapy has also potential disadvantages. This review will summarize the current data on the rationale, benefits and potential disadvantages of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases.

[Clinical significance of BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer]. / Intérêt clinique des mutations de BRAF dans le cancer colorectal.

BRAF mutations, present in 5 to 10% of colorectal cancers, have a proved oncogenic effect which is linked to their implication in the RAS/MAPK intracellular signalling pathway and they occurred at early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. Many studies have therefore assessed their clinical significance as diagnostic and prognostic marker in colorectal cancers. More recently, their location downstream to EGFR and KRAS in the RAS/MAPK pathway have led to their evaluation as predictive marker of resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. This article aims to review the role of BRAF mutations in the diagnostic strategy of Lynch syndrome, their prognostic value in colorectal cancers and their potential value as predictive marker of resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies.

Second- and third-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility and potential benefits in a retrospective series of 117 patients.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is effective in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC), but the benefits of second- and third-line chemotherapy remain unclear. METHODS: We studied all patients followed consecutively for metastatic PAC, and registered at our institution between 1997 and 2006. We retrospectively analyzed the following data in terms of chemotherapy: tumor response; time to tumor progression (TTP) for each line; and overall survival (OS). Efficacy of second-line regimens was assessed using the growth modulation index (GMI). RESULTS: Out of 117 patients, 99 (85%) received at least one line of chemotherapy, 53 (45%) received two lines and 24 (21%) had three or more lines. Median OS was 6.7 months for all 117 patients, 1.8 months for 18 patients who never received chemotherapy, 4.6 months for 46 patients who received one-line chemotherapy and 11.5 months for 53 patients who received at least two lines. Median OS from the beginning of the second-line was 4.7 months. The GMI demonstrated beneficial effects of second-line treatment on disease progression, with a GMI greater than 1.33 in 57% (30/53) of patients. CONCLUSION: More than half the patients with metastatic PAC progression while receiving one-line chemotherapy achieved better disease control on receiving two lines of treatment.

[Targeted biotherapy: a revolution in the management of patients with colorectal cancer?]. / Cancers colorectaux avant et après les biothérapies: une révolution dans la prise en charge des patients?

In metastatic colorectal cancers (CRC), progress of chemotherapies in 40 years greatly increased their median survival from 6 to 8 months to 20 months. The first step of this development has been: the discovery of 5-fluorouracil, its optimisation by folinic acid and continuous perfusions. In the years 1990 to 2000, oxaliplatin and irinotecan opened the era of polychemotherapies. Their use in fisrt line treatment is not mandatory for all patients for whom chemotherapy may only have a palliative role without need for high response rates as for patients with symptomatic metastases or metastases hardly resectable. Targeted therapies have increased the life expectancy of the metastatic CRC and for some of them to facilitate secondary resections. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, in combination with an irinotecan based regimen increased dramatically the life expectancy with an acceptable toxicity, at least in patients of less than 70 years old. Efficacy of bevacizumab has also been demonstrated in combination with oxaliplatin based regimen (XELOX and FOLFOX) in first and second line, and in combination with 5-fluorouracil alone. Presently, bevacizumab is the most used targeted therapies in first line chemotherapy in combination with FOLFIRI, FOLFOX or XELOX. Cetuximab and panitumumab have first demonstrated their efficacy in the population of fully resistant patients to chemotherapies with a progression free survival gain of about 4 months as single treatment (cetuximab and panitumumab) or combined to irinotecan (cetuximab). Two studies have demonstrated that the adjonction of cetuximab in the first line treatment to FOLFIRI or FOLFOX increased the response rates. The presence of epithelial growth factor receptors (EGFR) at the cell'surface in immunohistochemistry is not a prerequisite for responses to cetuximab and panitumumab, and only patients with tumors without mutation of oncogene KRAS (60% of patients) are able to respond to anti-EGFR. This activity for the KRAS non mutated population has also been demonstrated in patients resistant to chemotherapy, compared to best supportive cases with panitumumab and with cetuximab. Thus, utilisation of anti-EGFR is only authorized in non mutated KRAS tumors and for the first time in metastatic CRC, we have the possibility to enrich the population in selecting non mutated KRAS population and to treat only patients having increased chance of response and of secondary resections of initially non resectable metastases. The cost of these targeted therapies is elevated and we need to find factors which will allow a personalized medicine with the dual selection of the good drug for the right patients.

Thermal hyperalgesia as a marker of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity: a prospective quantified sensory assessment study.

Neurotoxicity represents a major complication of oxaliplatin. This study aimed to identify early clinical markers of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity, in comparison with cisplatin, and detect predictors of chronic neuropathy. Forty-eight patients with mainly colorectal cancer were evaluated prospectively before oxaliplatin (n=28) or cisplatin (n=20) administration and then 2 weeks after the third (C3), sixth (C6) and ninth (C9) cycles. Eighteen oxaliplatin patients were re-assessed at 12+/-2 months. Evaluation included quantitative sensory testing, i.e., detection/pain thresholds for mechanical, vibration, cold and heat stimuli; pain induced by suprathreshold cold (5-25 degrees C) and heat (38-48 degrees C) stimuli and quantified assessment of symptoms (neuropathic pain symptom inventory). Symptoms of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity (cold-triggered dysesthesia of the hands; 96% of the cases) were reversible between cycles for up to C6. In contrast, thermal testing identified sustained (irreversible between cycles) neurotoxicity two weeks after C3 in the oxaliplatin group only, characterized by hyperalgesia to cold (5-25 degrees C) (F=11.4; p=0.0002 relative to cisplatin patient responses in the hand) and heat stimuli (38-48 degrees C) (F=4.1; p=0.049 for the hand). Cold-evoked symptoms lasting 4 days or more after C3 predicted chronic neuropathy (OR: 22; 95% CI: 1.54-314.74; p=0.02) whereas enhanced pain in response to cold (20 degrees C stimulus on the hand) predicted severe neuropathy (OR: 39; 95% CI: 1.8-817.8 p=0.02). Thermal hyperalgesia is a relevant clinical marker of early oxaliplatin neurotoxicity and may predict severe neuropathy.

Epidermoid anal cancer prognosis comparison among HIV+ and HIV- patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest a poor prognosis of epidermoid anal cancer in HIV+ patients. AIM: To investigate the long-term outcome of epidermoid anal cancer in HIV+ and HIV- patients in the highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) era. METHODS: We included all patients with epidermoid anal cancer referred to six hospitals from 1998 to 2004. RESULTS: In all, 151 patients (44 HIV+, 107 HIV-) were reviewed retrospectively for 27 (median of 16-44) months. HIV+ patients were male (100% vs. 27%, P < 0.001) and younger (45 vs. 62 years old, P < 0.001) than HIV- patients. No significant differences were observed in the tumour stage, pelvic radiotherapy dose or concomitant chemotherapy, according to the HIV status. After chemoradiotherapy, similar numbers of HIV+ and HIV- patients had grade III-IV toxicity. A complete response was obtained in 82% and 75% (N.S.) of cases, respectively. The disease-free survival rates were 77% and 67% (N.S.) and the overall survival rates were 85% and 84% (N.S.), respectively, after 3 years of follow-up. Duration of HIV infection, viral load and CD4 count had no effect on the survival rate of HIV+ patients with EAC. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome of HIV+ patients with epidermoid anal cancer is similar to that of HIV- patients. Therefore, the same therapeutic guidelines should be applied to both populations.

Thirteen-month registration of patients with gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours in France.

The prevalence, clinical profiles and management of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours (GEP) in France are not known. From August 1, 2001 to September 1, 2002, standardized records on patients with GEP were prospectively completed in 87 participating centres. The total group amounted to 668 patients (median age: 56 years, range: 12-89). WHO performance status was 0/1 for 80.2% of patients. The primary sites were the small bowel and colon (288), pancreas (211), unknown (77), stomach (33), non-digestive primary sites (24), appendix (20), rectum-anus (12), and oesophagus or cardia (3). GEP were functional in 260 patients (39%). Most pancreatic tumours were non-functional (72%). Metastatic disease was observed in 73.4% of cases. Most tumours (85.8%) were well or moderately differentiated. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was performed in only 55% of patients. The following treatment modalities were employed: resection of primary tumour: 66%; systemic chemotherapy: 41%; somatostatin analogues: 44 and 26% for GEP of small intestine and pancreas, respectively; interferon: 12%, and intra-arterial hepatic (chemo)embolization in 23 and 15% of GEP arising from the midgut and pancreas, respectively. Despite their low prevalence, well-differentiated GEP represent a significant and heterogeneous clinical group, which warrants improved medical education, referral to expert centres at an early stage, and the design of prospective therapeutic trials.

Review article: benefits and risks of chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is largely a disease of older individuals, our understanding of disease processes and their optimal treatment has been gained through trials with populations largely confined to younger individuals. AIM: To identify through a review issues specific to geriatric patients with mCRC (physiological changes associated with aging, burden of coexisting illnesses, altered drug pharmacokinetics and functional impairment) and assess challenges to elderly patients posed by malignancy and exposure to cytotoxic medication. METHODS: Our literature search for indexed articles published between 2000 and May 2008 employed terms including irinotecan, oxaliplatin, elderly, mCRC, targeted agents and biologicals. RESULTS: Underrepresentation of older patients in clinical trials makes it difficult to extrapolate findings to older age groups. However, some trials have demonstrated that elderly patients can achieve survival benefits and toxicity comparable to younger patients, although dosage modifications may be required. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, benefits with pharmacological therapy are suggested but not proven in the elderly population. Although concurrent illnesses and disabilities can complicate treatment decision making, chronological age alone should not disqualify these patients with mCRC from receiving optimal treatment similar to that offered to their younger cohorts.

Treatment of the elderly colorectal cancer patient: SIOG expert recommendations.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the commonest malignancies of Western countries, with approximately half the incidence occurring in patients >70 years of age. Elderly CRC patients, however, are understaged, undertreated and underrepresented in clinical trials. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology created a task force with a view to assessing the potential for developing guidelines for the treatment of elderly (geriatric) CRC patients. A review of the evidence presented by the task force members confirmed the paucity of clinical trial data in elderly people and the lack of evidence-based guidelines. However, recommendations have been proposed on the basis of the available data and on the emerging evidence that treatment outcomes for fit, elderly CRC patients can be similar to those of younger patients. It is hoped that these will pave the way for formal treatment guidelines based upon solid scientific evidence in the future.