Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain (LiCPain): study protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients experience unrelieved neuropathic cancer-related pain. Most current analgesic therapies have psychoactive side effects, lack efficacy data for this indication and have potential medication-related harms. The local anaesthetic lidocaine (lignocaine) has the potential to help manage neuropathic cancer-related pain when administered as an extended, continuous subcutaneous infusion. Data support lidocaine as a promising, safe agent in this setting, warranting further evaluation in robust, randomised controlled trials. This protocol describes the design of a pilot study to evaluate this intervention and explains the pharmacokinetic, efficacy and adverse effects evidence informing the design. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods pilot study will determine the feasibility of an international first, definitive phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an extended continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine for neuropathic cancer-related pain. This study will comprise: a phase II double-blind randomised controlled parallel-group pilot of subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine hydrochloride 10% w/v (3000 mg/30 mL) or placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%) over 72 hours for neuropathic cancer-related pain, a pharmacokinetic substudy and a qualitative substudy of patients' and carers' experiences. The pilot study will provide important safety data and help inform the methodology of a definitive trial, including testing proposed recruitment strategy, randomisation, outcome measures and patients' acceptability of the methodology, as well as providing a signal of whether this area should be further investigated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Participant safety is paramount and standardised assessments for adverse effects are built into the trial protocol. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. This study will be considered suitable to progress to a phase III study if there is a completion rate where the CI includes 80% and excludes 60%. The protocol and Patient Information and Consent Form have been approved by Sydney Local Health District (Concord) Human Research Ethics Committee 2019/ETH07984 and University of Technology Sydney ETH17-1820. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR ACTRN12617000747325.

Dying of mesothelioma: A qualitative exploration of caregiver experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experience of family caregivers of people with mesothelioma with focus on end-of-life issues. METHODS: A qualitative sub-study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen caregivers were interviewed; 11 were bereaved. The overarching theme was the impact of patients' diagnosis, treatment and death on caregivers and families. Three main themes were identified: (i) information provision and decision-making; (ii) grief and bereavement; and (iii) involvement and timing of palliative care. Caregivers initially had minimal knowledge of mesothelioma and wanted more information. Prognostic uncertainty caused distress. Grief and bereavement sub-themes were (i) coping and personal priorities; (ii) reflections on dying; and (iii) reflections on care. Caregivers highlighted the importance of creating meaningful events, having hope, 'doing something' and support from family and external sources. Reflections on dying contrasted regret after a 'bad', often unexpected death, with 'good' deaths. Care was made difficult by challenges navigating the health system and perceived gaps. Caregivers reported late referral to palliative care. CONCLUSION: Lack of information caused challenges for caregivers. Grief and bereavement outcomes varied and may have been adversely impacted by lack of engagement with palliative care. Integrated care with lung cancer coordinators and improved palliative care access may reduce caregiver burden.

Nonopioid pharmacological management of malignant bowel obstruction: a New Zealand-wide survey.

BACKGROUND: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common condition among palliative patients and has limited management options. There is a paucity of widely accepted national and international evidence-based guidelines to direct the management of MBO in palliative patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to survey current practice in New Zealand of nonopioid pharmacological management of MBO and compare it with the available literature. METHODS: The study utilized a survey consisting of three scenarios: probable incomplete malignant bowel obstruction (PIMBO), incomplete malignant bowel obstruction (IMBO), and complete malignant bowel obstruction (CMBO). An online survey was conducted over 2 months targeting palliative medicine practitioners working in a hospital, hospice inpatient unit, or community setting in New Zealand. RESULTS: Forty-eight doctors responded. Of the respondents, 56.3% used guidelines to manage MBO; however, 88.9% of the guidelines used were locally generated at the doctor's institution. Metoclopramide was the drug of choice in treating PIMBO, whereas haloperidol and hyoscine butylbromide (HB) were the preferred drugs as the severity of bowel obstruction increased. Dexamethasone was accepted as standard practice for managing all severities of MBO. A variation in the preferred starting and maximum dose of all the drugs was seen. There was a decrease in the use of laxatives and enemas as the severity of MBO increased. CONCLUSION: Variation in practice for managing MBO was evident among doctors in New Zealand. There is a need for national and international evidence-based guidelines to help define best management for the differing severities of this problematic condition.