Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound and Concussion-Supplemental Symptoms with Physiology: A Systematic Review.

Sport-related concussion (SRC) can impair the cerebrovasculature both acutely and chronically. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound assessment has the potential to illuminate the mechanisms of impairment and provide an objective evaluation of SRC. The current systematic review investigated studies employing TCD ultrasound assessment of intracranial arteries across three broad categories of cerebrovascular regulation: neurovascular coupling (NVC), cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), and dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). The current review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42021275627). The search strategy was applied to PubMed, as this database indexes all biomedical journals. Original articles on TCD for athletes with medically diagnosed SRC were included. Title/abstract and full-text screening were completed by three authors. Two authors completed data extraction and risk of bias using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network checklists. Of the 141 articles identified, 14 met the eligibility criteria. One article used an NVC challenge, eight assessed CVR, and six investigated dCA. Methodologies varied widely among studies, and results were heterogeneous. There was evidence of cerebrovascular impairment in all three domains roughly 2 days post-SRC, but the magnitude and recovery of these impairments were not clear. There was evidence that clinical symptom resolution occurred before cerebrovascular function, indicating that physiological deficits may persist despite clinical recovery and return to play. Collectively, this emphasizes an opportunity for the use of TCD to illuminate the cerebrovascular deficits caused by SRC. It also highlights that there is need for consistent methodological rigor when employing TCD in a SRC population.

Comparison of the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test With a Physiologically Informed Cycle Test: Calgary Concussion Cycle Test.

BACKGROUND: Sport-related concussions are a complex injury requiring multifaceted assessment, including physical exertion. Currently, concussion testing relies primarily on a treadmill-based protocol for assessing exertion-related symptoms in persons after concussion. This study compared a modified cycle protocol (Calgary Concussion Cycle Test [CCCT]) with the clinically adopted standard, the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT), across multiple physiological parameters. HYPOTHESIS: Treadmill and cycle matched workload protocols would produce similar results for cerebral blood velocity, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2), but heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (VO2) would be higher on the treadmill than the cycle modality. STUDY DESIGN: Crossover study design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A total of 17 healthy adults (8 men, 9 women; age, 26 ± 3 years; body mass index, 23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2) completed the BCTT and CCCT protocols, 7 days apart in a randomized order. During both exertional protocols, the physiological parameters measured were middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity (MCAv), MAP, PETCO2, VO2, and HR. Analysis of variance with effect size computations, coefficient of variation, and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement were used to compare exercise tests. RESULTS: The BCTT and CCCT produced comparable results for both male and female participants with no significant differences for average MCAv, MAP, and PETCO2 (all P > 0.05; all generalized eta squared [η2G] < 0.02 [negligible]; P value range, 0.29-0.99) between stages. When accounting for exercise stage and modality, VO2 (P < 0.01) and HR (P < 0.01) were higher on the treadmill compared with the cycle. Aside from the final few stages, all physiology measures displayed good-to-excellent agreeability/variability. CONCLUSION: The CCCT was physiologically similar to the BCTT in terms of MCAv, PETCO2, and MAP; however, HR and VO2 differed between modalities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Providing a cycle-based modality to exertional testing after injury mayincrease accessibility to determine symptom thresholds in the future.