Covered self-expandable metallic stents versus plastic stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Covered self-expandable metallic stents (cSEMS) have become popular for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting (EUS-HGS). We compared the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), complications, and reintervention rates between EUS-HGS using plastic stent (PS) and cSEMS in patients with unresectable malignancies at multicenter institutions in Japan. METHODS: Patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2015 and July 2020 at any of the six participating facilities were enrolled. Primary endpoint: TRBO; secondary endpoints: rate of complications other than recurrent biliary obstruction and technical success rate of reintervention were evaluated. RESULTS: PS and cSEMS were used for EUS-HGS in 109 and 43 patients, respectively. The TRBO was significantly longer in the cSEMS group than in the PS group (646 vs. 202 days). Multivariate analysis identified two independent factors associated with a favorable TRBO: combined EUS-guided antegrade stenting with EUS-HGS and the use of cSEMS. No significant difference was observed in the rate of complications other than recurrent biliary obstruction between the two groups. The technical success rate of reintervention was 85.7% for PS and 100% for cSEMS (p=0.309). CONCLUSION: cSEMS might be a better option for EUS-HGS in patients with unresectable malignancies, given the longer TRBO.

A retrospective multicenter study comparing the punctures to B2 and B3 in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

Objectives: In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has been performed as an important salvage option for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary drainage. However, technical issues, such as puncture site (bile duct of segment 3 [B3] or bile duct of segment 2 [B2]), dilation method, stent selection, and procedural safety, need to be resolved for the optimization of EUS-HGS. The present study was to compare the safety, difficulty, and technical and functional success between biliary access via B2 and B3 during EUS-HGS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective investigation of 161 consecutive EUS-HGS cases across a total of 6 facilities, including those at our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to the successful drainage route: the puncture to B2 (P-B2) or the puncture to B3 (P-B3). We compared the technical and functional success rates, technical difficulty, and adverse events between the two groups. We also conducted a subgroup analysis to show the factors related to the procedure time. Results: There were 92 cases in the P-B2 group and 69 cases in the P-B3 group. There were no significant differences in the technical success, functional success, or adverse events between the groups; however, the procedure time was significantly shorter in P-B2 cases than in P-B3 cases. The multivariate analysis showed that the puncture site was the only factor related to the procedure time. Conclusions: Based on these findings, P-B2 appears useful and safe. P-B2 is as effective as P-B3 and was able to be performed in a shorter period of time. The B2 approach can be considered a useful option for EUS-HGS.

Safe Performance of Track Dilation and Bile Aspiration with ERCP Catheter in EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy with Plastic Stents: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic-ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) with plastic stent placement is associated with a high incidence of adverse events that may be reduced using an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) contrast catheter in the track dilation step. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of track dilation and bile aspiration performed with an ERCP contrast catheter in EUS-HGS with plastic stent placement. METHODS: In a multicenter setting, 22 EUS-HGS cases dilated with an ERCP contrast catheter were analyzed retrospectively and compared between a bile aspiration group and no bile aspiration group. RESULTS: Overall, adverse events occurred in three (13.6%) cases of bile leakage, three (13.6%) cases of peritonitis, and one (4.5%) case of bleeding. Comparing patients with and without bile aspiration, 6 of the 11 patients (54.5%) with no bile aspiration had adverse events, whereas only 1 of the 11 patients (9.1%) who had bile aspiration, as much bile as possible, had an adverse event (bleeding). In univariate analysis, the only factor affecting the occurrence of adverse events was bile aspiration whenever possible (odds ratio, 12.0; 95%CI 1.12-128.84). CONCLUSIONS: In EUS-HGS with plastic stent placement, track dilation and bile aspiration with an ERCP contrast catheter may be useful in reducing adverse events.

Impact of antibiotic timing relative to percutaneous aspiration on culture positivity rate and clinical outcomes: A retrospective study of patients with pyogenic liver abscess.

The optimal timing of antibiotic administration relative to liver abscess aspiration is debatable. This retrospective cohort study investigated whether the timing affects the abscess culture positivity rate and clinical outcomes. Twenty-nine patients with 30 percutaneously drained liver abscess cases were analyzed. Antibiotics were administered before aspiration (pre-aspiration antibiotics) in 22 cases and following aspiration (post-aspiration antibiotics) in 8 cases (i.e., 1 patient underwent aspiration twice, both before and following antibiotics). Both groups demonstrated similar patient characteristics, short time to aspiration, and high antibiotic appropriateness. Most patients were immunocompetent and non-septic. Pre-aspiration antibiotics did not reduce the culture yield (95% with pre-aspiration antibiotics vs. 100% with post-aspiration antibiotics; p = 1). Post-aspiration antibiotics were not associated with higher mortality, longer length of hospitalization, or an increased rate of clinical deterioration following aspiration. With appropriate antibiotic and aspiration, antibiotics timing can be either before or after aspiration without compromising the culture positivity rate and clinical outcomes.

[A case of amebic colitis that developed after corticosteroid therapy in which perforation occurred during metronidazole treatment].

Although amebiasis is usually asymptomatic, fulminant amebic colitis is associated with a high mortality rate. Here, we report the case of a patient with amebic colitis in which bowel perforation occurred despite treatment with metronidazole. A man in his 70s underwent steroid pulse therapy to treat serious acute hepatitis A. After corticosteroid therapy, he developed acute abdomen because of amebic colitis. We immediately administered metronidazole and his symptoms improved. After completing treatment, he developed colon perforation. Amebic colitis can progress to bowel perforation even after administering the appropriate medication, so this abdominal symptom requires careful attention.

Portal and Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis Associated with Hyperthyroidism.

BACKGROUND Non-malignant and non-cirrhotic portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis is rare. It has been reported that the hyperthyroid state is associated with increased risks of venous thrombosis due to increases in levels of various coagulation and anti-fibrinolytic factors. Particularly, changes in levels of these factors are also reported in cases of portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis. Although hyperthyroidism is not known as a risk factor for portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis, it might be an underlying pathogenesis of hyperthyroidism-associated portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis. CASE REPORT A 59-year-old Japanese man with a history of Grave's disease presented with acute portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis and hyperthyroidism. Anticoagulation therapy was initiated and the dose of antithyroid drug was increased. He underwent various tests to identify causes of portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis. However, all test results were within normal range except for hyperthyroidism. Therefore, we discontinued anticoagulation therapy after normalization of thyroid hormone status. After 3 years, he experienced recurrence of portal vein thrombosis concomitant with hyperthyroidism. CONCLUSIONS Hyperthyroidism might be associated with portal vein thrombosis. Thyroid function tests should be performed in cases of portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis in the absence of other risk factors.

[A Slight Change of Cholangiography Revealed Papillary Carcinoma of the Duodenum after Endoscopic Sphincterotomy(EST)].

A 79-year-old woman with chillness and nausea was admitted to our hospital. CT findings displayed a common extended bile duct with stacked stones and duodenal diverticulosis. The diagnosis was cholangitis with choledocholithiasis. She underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)to remove the common bile duct stones. Thereafter, she developed cholangitis several times without any obvious cause of biliary obstruction. A careful follow-up was continued using ERCP, and finally, a slightly irregular edge of the distal common bile duct was observed. Subsequently, bile duct brush cytology revealed adenocarcinoma. The final diagnosis was distal cholangiocarcinoma. An operation was performed and the pathological diagnosis of papillary carcinoma of the duodenum invading the common bile duct was made. We reviewed the first ERCP image findings retrospectively and noticed an abnormal papillary of the duodenum. We could not evaluate the papilla after endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST). We learned 2 important things. The first is to carefully observe naïve papilla, and the second is to pay attention to a slight change of cholangiography.

Nasogastric Tubes Can Cause Intramural Hematoma of the Esophagus.

BACKGROUND Intramural hematoma of the esophagus (IHE), a rare manifestation of acute mucosal injuries of the esophagus, can be caused by trauma such as endoscopic surgeries. Coagulation disorders increase the risk of IHE. The most common location of IHE is in the distal esophagus. The characteristic clinical triad of manifestations comprises acute retrosternal pain, odynophagia or dysphagia, and hematemesis. It is important to distinguish IHE from other acute conditions such as acute coronary syndrome, aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. CASE REPORT An 84-year-old male was scheduled for coil embolization for an endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. For this reason, he was taking aspirin and warfarin. A nasogastric tube had been inserted during surgery and subsequently removed without any problems reported. Postoperatively, he experienced chest pain and hematemesis of sudden onset. Urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated a large, dark red, non-pulsatile, submucosal, esophageal mass in the area of the mid-esophagus with a little oozing. He was diagnosed as having an IHE; other possible diagnoses were excluded by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and aortography. He was treated with fasting, a proton pump inhibitor, and cessation of anti-thrombotic drugs; he recovered completely. The bleeding spot in the esophagus was in the area of the mid-esophagus, which was around the second natural constriction site. It was possible that the nasogastric tube had contact with the esophageal wall at this second natural constriction, and caused intramural esophageal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Nasogastric tubes are not generally recognized as a cause of IHE. However, they can cause them, especially when a patient is taking anti-thrombotic drugs.