Ripple map delineation of the reentrant circuit in a tricuspid annular atrial tachycardia mimicking focal activity.

A 70-year-old man with hypertensive heart disease underwent catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. After completing the pulmonary vein isolation, atrial burst pacing induced an annular atrial tachycardia (AT). Overdrive pacing exhibited constant fusion, indicating a macroreentrant mechanism of the AT. However, the CARTO3 activation map created using the Octaray catheter (both Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA) exhibited a centrifugal spread with the earliest activation site at the 4 o'clock position of the tricuspid annulus. In contrast, the Ripple map revealed a clear reentrant circuit with its isthmus located at the 4-6 o'clock position of the tricuspid annulus. The local electrograms in these areas recorded systolic and diastolic potentials simultaneously, and the misannotation of the large far-field potentials caused this discrepant result. Handling low-amplitude complex fractionated electrograms remains a challenge in creating a precise activation mapping. The Ripple map, especially when combined with the Octaray catheter, was effective in dynamically visualizing all these electrograms and accurately delineating the reentrant circuit.

Discrepant results of the total pacing prematurity in orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia with right bundle branch block.

The total pacing prematurity (TPP) is useful for distinguishing orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, but it may not be effective in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB). We faced this challenge in an elderly woman, as RBBB and a prolonged transseptal conduction made it difficult to diagnose the tachycardia using the TPP. It is important to consider the presence or absence of RBBB when evaluating the results of the TPP.

Recurrence as isthmus-related atrial tachycardia: A cautionary point of low-voltage area homogenization of persistent atrial fibrillation.

A 66-year-old female underwent persistent atrial fibrillation ablation. After pulmonary vein isolation and homogenization of low-voltage areas (LVAs), atrial tachycardia (AT) was not induced at the first session; however, it recurred one year after the procedure. During the second session, the extensive LVAs were distributed in the same area of the left atrial anterior wall and expanded possibly due to the previous LVA homogenization. The activation map revealed a macroreentrant AT circuit with the critical isthmus between the isolated right superior pulmonary vein and homogenized LVAs. Although the Ripple map algorithm failed to visualize dynamic bars, extremely low voltage and fractionated potentials (amplitude, 0.04 mV) were observed at the isthmus. Currently, there are various procedural endpoints of LVA-guided ablation (e.g. local electrogram reduction > 50 % or <0.1 mV in amplitude). In this case, incomplete transmural lesions may have led to slow conduction, which could have become an AT substrate. In cases with extensive LVAs on the left atrial anterior wall, eliminating any potential channels may be important for preventing future iatrogenic ATs. LVA-guided ablation should be performed on an individual basis, considering the potential benefits and harms based on the extent and location of LVAs. Learning objective: Currently, the procedural endpoint of low-voltage area (LVA)-guided ablation varies across studies. Because any low-voltage potentials, except scars, can cause slow conduction, LVA-guided ablation with an endpoint of local electrogram voltage reduction can unintentionally generate an iatrogenic slow conduction isthmus. LVA-guided ablation should be individually performed, considering the potential benefits and harms based on the extent and location of LVAs.

Two cases of hemodynamic improvement by modulation of atrioventricular delay in cardiac operations.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic sick sinus syndrome is one of the indications for pacemaker implantation, and we have to consider to program the pacemaker to an asynchronous pacing mode during an operation. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported two cases with a pacemaker implanted for sick sinus syndrome undergoing cardiac operation. We changed programming of the pacemaker to an asynchronous pacing mode (DOO) and modulated the programmed atrioventricular delay to avoid ventricular pacing, resulting in better hemodynamic condition. Although we observed premature ventricular contraction, no lethal arrhythmias induced by the R-on-T phenomenon were noted. CONCLUSION: Programming of the pacemaker to an asynchronous pacing mode and modulation of the programmed atrioventricular delay to avoid ventricular pacing may be an option for pacemaker management during an operation.