Association of Mismatch Profiles and Clinical Outcome from Endovascular Therapy in Large Infarct: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether patients with large infarct and the presence or absence of perfusion mismatch are associated with endovascular treatment benefit. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the Endovascular Therapy in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion with a Large Infarct (ANGEL-ASPECT) randomized trial, which enrolled patients within 24 hours of onset with ASPECTS 3 to 5 or ASPECTS 0 to 2 with an infarct core 70 to 100 ml. Mismatch ratio was defined as time-to-maximum (Tmax) >6 s cerebral volume/ischemic core volume, and mismatch volume was defined as Tmax >6 s volume minus ischemic core volume. We divided patients into mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml, and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml groups. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal distribution. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: There were 425 patients included. In both the mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml (mismatch+, n = 395; mismatch-, n = 31) and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml groups (mismatch+, n = 346; mismatch-, n = 80), better 90-day modified Rankin Scale outcomes were found in the endovascular treatment group compared with the MM group (4 [2-5] vs 4 [3-5], common odds ratio [cOR], 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.7, p = 0.001; 4 [2-5] vs 4 [3-5], cOR, 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8, p = 0.001, respectively), but not in patients without mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml (5 [3-6] vs 5 [4-6], cOR, 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.1, p = 0.83), and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml (4 [3-6] vs 5 [3-6], cOR, 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.7, p = 0.60). However, no interaction effect was found in both subgroups (p interaction >0.10). CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment was more efficacious than MM in patients with mismatch profiles, but no treatment effect or interaction was noted in the no mismatch profile patients. However, the small sample size of patients with no mismatch may have underpowered our analysis. A pooled analysis of large core trials stratified by mismatch is warranted. ANN NEUROL 2024.

Thrombectomy Plus Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis Versus Thrombectomy for Acute Large Vessel Occlusions: a Matched-Control Study.

AIM: We conducted a matched-control analysis to compare the outcomes of large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) plus Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) versus those treated with MT alone. METHODS: The subjects of this study were chosen from ANGEL-ACT registry. All patients who received MT were identified and categorized into two groups: "MT + IAT" and "MT," based on whether or not they received additional intra-arterial medication IAT during the MT procedure. After being subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching, the outcome measures, including modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, successful recanalization at the final angiogram, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 h, and death within 90 days, were compared. RESULTS: The study encompassed a total of 1607 patients, with 641 individuals assigned to the MT + IAT group and 966 to the MT group. After applying propensity score matching, a total of 524 pairs were identified for comparison. The results indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (median: 3 vs. 3 points; P = 0.83), successful recanalization (89.9 vs. 88.9%; P = 0.62), sICH (8.3 vs. 8.7%; P = 0.79), and death (15.5 vs. 16.4%; P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: IAT during MT does not confer an elevated risk of sICH or mortality. Furthermore, the combination of MT and IAT may produce comparable functional outcomes in comparison to MT alone, when treating acute LVO patients.

DRug-coated Balloon for Endovascular treatment of sYmptOmatic intracraNial stenotic Disease (DR. BEYOND): the protocol of a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Although endovascular stenting is considered an effective and safe therapeutic option for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD), an elevated rate of restenosis remains an important issue for the conventional bare-metal stent (BMS). Recent evidence from observational studies suggests that applying drug-coated balloons (DCB) in sICAD may decrease restenosis occurrence. Additional large randomised studies are warranted to provide firmer evidence and to determine which patients would benefit most from DCB. AIM: To design a randomised trial to examine DCB angioplasty (Taijieweiye intracranial paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter) versus BMS stenting (Wingspan intracranial stent system) in patients with sICAD. DESIGN: This is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point study to assess whether DCB angioplasty reduces the risk of restenosis compared with BMS stenting in sICAD patients with high-grade stenosis (≥70%-99%). Our goal is to randomly assign 198 eligible individuals at a 1:1 ratio to undergo DCB angioplasty (intervention group) or BMS stenting (control group). OUTCOME: The primary efficacy outcome is restenosis at 6 months post treatment, that is, >50% stenosis in or within 5 mm of the treated segment and >20% absolute luminal loss. The primary safety outcome is stroke or death within 30 days post treatment. DISCUSSION: The DRug-coated Balloon for Endovascular treatment of sYmptOmatic intracraNial stenotic Disease trial aims to produce strong evidence on the efficacy and safety of DCB angioplasty as a promising therapeutic option for sICAD cases with high-grade stenosis.

Impact of first pass effect in endovascular treatment of large core stroke: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial.

BACKGROUND: The first-pass effect (FPE) is linked to better safety and efficacy prognosis in patients with small- to- moderate sized ischemic infarctions. We evaluated the incidence, prognosis, and predictors of FPE in patients with large core infarctions (LCIs). METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the Trial of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core (ANGEL-ASPECT). The FPE was defined as a successful recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2 c/3, and eTICI 2b-3 as modified FPE (mFPE)) after one pass. The primary outcome was clinical functional independence, and the secondary outcomes were independent ambulation, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) defined by the Heidelberg bleeding classification, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and death within 90 days of stroke onset. RESULTS: Of the 226 patients in the study, FPE and mFPE were achieved in 33 (14.6%) and 82 (36.3%) patients, respectively. Patients with FPE exhibited shorter onset-to-puncture times (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 0.996), and patients with mFPE were older (OR 1.039; 95% CI: 1.005 to 1.075). mFPE was significantly associated with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin score [mRS] 0-2: OR 2.64; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.07; mRS 0-3: OR 3.31; 95% CI: 1.73 to 6.33). FPE tended to improve outcomes (mRS 0-3: OR 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92 to 4.97; p=0.08). ICH rates (OR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.05; p=0.07) and 90-day deaths (OR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.09; p=0.09) tended to decrease in patients who achieved mFPE but not in patients who achieved FPE. CONCLUSIONS: In the ANGEL-ASPECT trial, patients who achieved mFPE had a higher rate of independent ambulation and functional independence, and the rates of any ICH and 90-day death tended to decrease.

Bailout intracranial angioplasty or stenting following thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion in China (ANGEL-REBOOT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Unsuccessful recanalisation or reocclusion after thrombectomy is associated with poor outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischaemic stroke (LVO-AIS). Bailout angioplasty or stenting (BAOS) could represent a promising treatment for these patients. We conducted a randomised controlled trial with the aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of BAOS following thrombectomy in patients with LVO. METHODS: ANGEL-REBOOT was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial conducted at 36 tertiary hospitals in 19 provinces in China. Participants with LVO-AIS 24 h after symptom onset were eligible if they had unsuccessful recanalisation (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of 0-2a) or risk of reocclusion (residual stenosis >70%) after thrombectomy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned by the minimisation method in a 1:1 ratio to undergo BAOS as the intervention treatment, or to receive standard therapy (continue or terminate the thrombectomy procedure) as a control group, both open-label. In both treatment groups, tirofiban could be recommended for use during and after the procedure. The primary outcome was the change in modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were compared between groups. This trial was completed and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05122286). FINDINGS: From Dec 19, 2021, to March 17, 2023, 706 patients were screened, and 348 were enrolled, with 176 assigned to the intervention group and 172 to the control group. No patients withdrew from the trial or were lost to follow-up for the primary outcome. The median age of patients was 63 years (IQR 55-69), 258 patients (74%) were male, and 90 patients (26%) were female; all participants were Chinese. After random allocation, tirofiban was administered either intra-arterially, intravenously, or both in 334 [96%] of 348 participants. No between-group differences were observed in the primary outcome (common odds ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·59-1·24], p=0·41). Mortality was similar between the two groups (19 [11%] of 176 vs 17 [10%] of 172), but the intervention group showed a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (eight [5%] of 175 vs one [1%] of 169), parenchymal haemorrhage type 2 (six [3%] of 175 vs none in the control group), and procedure-related arterial dissection (24 [14%] of 176 vs five [3%] of 172). INTERPRETATION: Among Chinese patients with unsuccessful recanalisation or who are at risk of reocclusion after thrombectomy, BAOS did not improve clinical outcome at 90 days, and incurred more complications compared with standard therapy. The off-label use of tirofiban might have affected our results and their generalisability, but our findings do not support the addition of BAOS for such patients with LVO-AIS. FUNDING: Beijing Natural Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Program Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program, Shanghai HeartCare Medical Technology, HeMo (China) Bioengineering, Sino Medical Sciences Technology.

Unsuccessful Recanalization versus Medical Management of Patients with Large Ischemic Core : Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The outcomes of patients with large ischemic core who fail to recanalize with endovascular therapy (EVT) compared to medical management (MM) are uncertain. The objective was to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes of patients who underwent EVT in patients with large ischemic core and unsuccessful recanalization. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT randomized trial. Unsuccessful recanalization was defined as patients who underwent EVT with eTICI 0-2a. The primary endpoint was 90-day very poor outcome (mRS 5-6). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted controlling for ASPECTS, occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and time to treatment. RESULTS: Of 455 patients 225 were treated with MM. Of 230 treated with EVT, 43 (19%) patients had unsuccessful recanalization. There was no difference in 90-day very poor outcomes (39.5% vs. 40%, aOR 0.93, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.47-1.85, p = 0.95), sICH (7.0% vs. 2.7%, aOR 2.81, 95% CI 0.6-13.29, p = 0.19), or mortality (30% vs. 20%, aOR 1.65, 95% CI 0.89-3.06, p = 0.11) between the unsuccessful EVT and MM groups, respectively. There were higher rates of ICH (55.8% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001), infarct core volume growth (142.7 ml vs. 90.5 ml, ß = 47.77, 95% CI 20.97-74.57 ml, p < 0.001), and decompressive craniectomy (18.6% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) in the unsuccessful EVT versus MM groups. CONCLUSION: In a randomized trial of patients with large ischemic core undergoing EVT with unsuccessful recanalization, there was no difference in very poor outcomes, sICH or death versus medically managed patients. In the unsuccessful EVT group, there were higher rates of any ICH, volume of infarct core growth, and decompressive craniectomy.

Outcomes of antiplatelet therapy before endovascular treatment of acute large vessel occlusion: Data from the ANGEL-ACT registry.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether single or dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT or DAPT) within 24 hours before endovascular treatment (EVT) could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). METHODS: Patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry were divided into antiplatelet therapy (APT) and non-APT groups. The APT group was divided into SAPT and DAPT groups. Outcome measurement included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution, change in the NIHSS at 7 days or discharge, number of passes, modified first pass effect (mFPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and mortality within 90 days. To compare the outcomes, we performed multivariable analyses by adjusting for the propensity score calculated by the logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 1611 patients, 1349 were in the non-APT group, while 262 (16.3 %) were in the APT group (122 [46.6 %] received SAPT, 140 [53.4 %] received DAPT). APT, SAPT or DAPT were not associated with a shift to better outcomes (non-APT vs. APT, 3[0-5] vs. 3[0-5], common odds ratio [OR], 1.04, 95 %confidence interval [CI]:0.82-1.34, P = 0.734). DAPT was associated with mFPE (OR,2.05, 95 %CI:1.39-3.01, P<0.001), more NIHSS reduction at 7 days or discharge (ß, -2.13, 95 %CI: -4.02--0.24, P = 0.028), lower number of passes (ß, -0.40, 95 %CI: -0.68--0.12, P=0.006), and shorter procedure duration (ß, -12.4, 95 %CI: -23.74--1.05, P = 0.032) without increasing odds of successful recanalization, PH within 24 hours and mortality with 90 days . CONCLUSIONS: APT before MT for AIS due to LVO does not affect clinical outcome in 90 days despite a tendency to reduce MT procedure time and number of passes. APT before MT in LVO does not increase SICH or mortality rates.

The impact of intraarterial, intravenous, and combined tirofiban on endovascular treatment for acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion.

Background and purpose: Adjunctive tirofiban administration in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) has been investigated in several studies. However, the findings are conflict. This study aimed to compare the effect of different administration pathways of tirofiban on patients undergoing EVT for acute LVO with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Methods: Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Registry Study) and divided into four groups: intra-arterial (IA), intravenous (IV), and intra-arterial plus intravenous (IA+IV) and non-tirofiban. The primary outcome was 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the secondary outcomes included the rates of mRS 0-1, 0-2, and 0-3 at 90-day, successful recanalization. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and other safety endpoints. The multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential baseline confounders were performed to compare the outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1:1:1 ratio was conducted among four groups, and the outcomes were then compared in the post-matched population. Results: A total of 502 patients were included, 80 of which were in the IA-tirofiban group, 73 in IV-tirofiban, 181 in (IA+IV)-tirofiban group, and 168 in the non-tirofiban group. The median (IQR) 90-day mRS score in the four groups of IA, IV, IA+IV, and non-tirofiban was, respectively 3(0-5) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 3(0-5). The adjusted common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.45-1.30, P = 0.330), with IV-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.78-2.36, P = 0.276), and with (IA+IV)-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.64-1.64, P = 0.912). The adjusted OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27-0.98, P = 0.042) and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.26-0.94, P = 0.033). The other outcomes of each group were similar with non-tirofiban group, all P was >0.05. After PSM, the common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.18-0.94, P = 0.036), and the OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11-0.74, P = 0.011) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.09-0.67, P = 0.006). Conclusions: Intra-arterial administration of tirofiban was associated with worse outcome than non-tirofiban, which suggested that intra-arterial tirofiban had a harmful effect on patients undergoing EVT for ICAD-LVO. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Prediction of Venous Trans-Stenotic Pressure Gradient Using Shape Features Derived From Magnetic Resonance Venography in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition of unknown etiology associated with venous sinus stenosis. This study aimed to develop a magnetic resonance venography (MRV)-based radiomics model for predicting a high trans-stenotic pressure gradient (TPG) in IIH patients diagnosed with venous sinus stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 105 IIH patients (median age [interquartile range], 35 years [27-42 years]; female:male, 82:23) who underwent MRV and catheter venography complemented by venous manometry. Contrast enhanced-MRV was conducted under 1.5 Tesla system, and the images were reconstructed using a standard algorithm. Shape features were derived from MRV images via the PyRadiomics package and selected by utilizing the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. A radiomics score for predicting high TPG (≥ 8 mmHg) in IIH patients was formulated using multivariable logistic regression; its discrimination performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A nomogram was constructed by incorporating the radiomics scores and clinical features. RESULTS: Data from 105 patients were randomly divided into two distinct datasets for model training (n = 73; 50 and 23 with and without high TPG, respectively) and testing (n = 32; 22 and 10 with and without high TPG, respectively). Three informative shape features were identified in the training datasets: least axis length, sphericity, and maximum three-dimensional diameter. The radiomics score for predicting high TPG in IIH patients demonstrated an AUROC of 0.906 (95% confidence interval, 0.836-0.976) in the training dataset and 0.877 (95% confidence interval, 0.755-0.999) in the test dataset. The nomogram showed good calibration. CONCLUSION: Our study presents the feasibility of a novel model for predicting high TPG in IIH patients using radiomics analysis of noninvasive MRV-based shape features. This information may aid clinicians in identifying patients who may benefit from stenting.

New evidence for fractional pressure ratio prediction by pulsatility index from transcranial Doppler in patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular stenosis disease.

Background: The pulsatility index (PI) derived from transcranial Doppler (TCD) assessment may represent the cerebral resistance and altered cerebral blood flow. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of the TCD PI in correlation with wire-based fractional pressure ratio (FPR). Methods: This study included 33 patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions of the extracranial and intracranial large arteries, specifically the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery (MCA), vertebral artery (VA) V4 segment, and basilar artery (BA), all of which exhibited luminal stenosis ranging from 50% to 70%. TCD was performed prior to angiography in order to determine the flow distal to the lesion. We performed cerebrovascular angiography with a pressure wire to measure the FPR of vessels with stenotic lesions. Bland-Altman analysis and ordinal least square (OLS) linear regression were used to quantify the correlation between PI and FPR. Results: A total of 42 TCD data points were analyzed. At the TCD locations distal to the lesions, the correlation coefficients were no less than 0.90%, with almost all P values <0.001, which indicated very strong positive correlations; the exception to this was the distal TCD for MCA segment lesions (r=0.897; P=0.015) and VA V4 segment (r=0.964; P=0.036). The Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a small difference (0.003) between the distal TCD PI and the FPR, with an acceptable 95% confidence interval [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-0.12]. Conclusions: The PI obtained through TCD assessment distal to the stenotic lesion exhibited a correlation with the FPR computed using pressure wire measurements.

Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The superiority of balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management (AMM) to AMM alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS) on efficacy and safety profiles still lacks evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). AIM: To demonstrate the design of an RCT on balloon angioplasty plus AMM for sICAS. DESIGN: Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS) trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point trial to investigate whether balloon angioplasty plus AMM could improve clinical outcome compared with AMM alone in patients with sICAS. Patients eligible in BASIS were 35-80 years old, with a recent transient ischaemic attack within the past 90 days or ischaemic stroke between 14 days and 90 days prior to enrolment due to severe atherosclerotic stenosis (70%-99%) of a major intracranial artery. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive balloon angioplasty plus AMM or AMM alone at a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will receive identical AMM, including standard dual antiplatelet therapy for 90 days followed by long-term single antiplatelet therapy, intensive risk factor management and life-style modification. All participants will be followed up for 3 years. STUDY OUTCOMES: Stroke or death in the next 30 days after enrolment or after balloon angioplasty procedure of the qualifying lesion during follow-up, or any ischaemic stroke or revascularisation from the qualifying artery after 30 days but before 12 months of enrolment, is the primary outcome. DISCUSSION: BASIS trail is the first RCT to compare the efficacy and safety of balloon angioplasty plus AMM to AMM alone in sICAS patients, which may provide an alternative perspective for treating sICAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03703635; https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Sex differences in outcomes of endovascular therapy for acute vertebrobasilar occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT Registry.

BACKGROUND: Understanding sex disparities in stroke can identify gaps in clinical care. The objective of this study was to investigate whether sex differences could influence clinical outcomes of patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT). METHODS: Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3). Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS distribution, excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), functional independence (mRS 0-2), early neurological improvement, recanalization, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality within 90 days. The above outcomes were compared by two adjustment models, including (1) multivariable logistics analysis adjusting for all baseline and procedural variables with a P < 0.05; (2) adjusting for the propensity score. RESULTS: There were 347 acute VBAO patients treated with EVT included, of whom 72 (20.7%) were women and 275 (79.3%) were men. Women were older (72[63-76] vs. 62[53-69], P < 0.001) and had a higher rate of atrial fibrillation (31.9% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.001), lower rates of underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (30.6% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.007), and tandem occlusion (8.3% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.009) than men. The rate of favorable outcome (mRS 0-3) was similar between women and men (41.7% vs. 51.3%, adjusted odds ratio 1.56, 95%CI: 0.83-2.95, P = 0.171). There were no sex differences in other clinical outcomes (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the ANGEL-ACT registry, the percentage of men with acute VBAO undergoing EVT was approximately fourfold higher than that of women with acute VBAO undergoing EVT. Sex differences did not modify the outcomes of acute VBAO after EVT.

Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, Infarct Core Volume, and Endovascular Therapy Outcomes in Patients With Large Infarct: A Secondary Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Trial.

Importance: Endovascular therapy (EVT) demonstrated better outcomes compared with medical management in recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of patients with large infarct. Objective: To compare outcomes of EVT vs medical management across different strata of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) and infarct core volume in patients with large infarct. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified secondary analysis of subgroups of the Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients With a Large Infarct Core (ANGEL-ASPECT) RCT included patients from 46 stroke centers across China between October 2, 2020, and May 18, 2022. Participants were enrolled within 24 hours of symptom onset and had ASPECTS of 3 to 5 or 0 to 2 and infarct core volume of 70 to 100 mL. Patients were divided into 3 groups: ASPECTS of 3 to 5 with infarct core volume less than 70 mL, ASPECTS of 3 to 5 with infarct core volume of 70 mL or greater, and ASPECTS of 0 to 2. Interventions: Endovascular therapy or medical management. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Results: There were 455 patients in the trial; median age was 68 years (IQR, 60-73 years), and 279 (61.3%) were male. The treatment effect did not vary significantly across the 3 baseline imaging subgroups (P = .95 for interaction). The generalized odds ratio for the shift in the 90-day mRS distribution toward better outcomes with EVT vs medical management was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.06-1.85; P = .01) in patients with ASPECTS of 3 to 5 and infarct core volume less than 70 mL, 1.22 (95% CI, 0.81-1.83; P = .23) in patients with ASPECTS of 3 to 5 and infarct core volume of 70 mL or greater, and 1.59 (95% CI, 0.89-2.86; P = .09) in patients with ASPECTS of 0 to 2. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, no significant interaction was found between baseline imaging status and the benefit of EVT compared with medical management in patients with large infarct core volume. However, estimates within subgroups were underpowered. A pooled analysis of large core trials stratified by ASPECTS and infarct core volume strata is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04551664.

Differentiation Between the Low and High Trans-Stenotic Pressure Gradient in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Using 4D Flow MRI-Derived Hemodynamic Parameters.

BACKGROUND: Trans-stenotic pressure gradient (TPG) measurement is essential for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients with transverse sinus (TS) stenosis. Four-D flow MRI may provide a noninvasive imaging method for differentiation of IIH patients with different TPG. PURPOSE: To investigate the associations between 4D flow parameters and TPG, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 4D flow parameters in differentiating patients with high TPG (GroupHP) from low TPG (GroupLP). STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 31 IIH patients with TS stenosis (age, 38 ± 12 years; 23 females) and 5 healthy volunteers (age, 25 ± 1 years; 2 females). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, 3D phase contrast MR venography, and gradient recalled echo 4D flow sequences. ASSESSMENT: Scan-rescan reproducibility of 4D flow parameters were performed. The correlation between TPG and flow parameters was analyzed. The netflow and velocity difference between inflow plane, outflow plane, and the stenosis plane were calculated and compared between GroupHP and GroupLP. STATISTICAL TESTS: Pearson's correlation or Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Independent samples t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analyses, Receiver operating characteristic curves. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between TPG and netflow parameters including Favg,out-s, Favg,in-s, Fmax,out-s, and Fmax,in-s (r = 0.525-0.565). Significant differences were found in Favg,out-s, Fmax,out-s, Favg,in-s, and Fmax,in-s between GroupHP and GroupLP. Using the cut-off value of 2.19 mL/sec, the Favg,out-s showed good estimate performance in distinguishing GroupHP from GroupLP (AUC = 0.856). The ICC (ranged 0.905-0.948) and Bland-Altman plots indicated good scan-rescan reproducibility. DATA CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow MRI derived flow parameters showed good correlations with TPG in IIH patients with TS stenosis. Netflow difference between outflow and stenosis location at TS shows the good performance in differentiating GroupHP and GroupLP cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting after mechanical thrombectomy: who can benefit?

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty and/or stenting is a rescue therapy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute intracranial large vessel occlusion. This study was undertaken to determine whether rescue angioplasty and/or stenting improves the outcome after MT and to investigate whether outcomes differ by subgroup of rescue indication. METHODS: We performed propensity score matching (PSM) with data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment. Patients were divided into the MT alone group and the MT with rescue therapy group. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. PSM was also performed in the failed MT (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 0-2a) and the residual severe stenosis (mTICI 2b-3) subgroups, respectively. RESULTS: 326 patients of mean±SD age 62.7±12.0 years (90 women, 27.6%) were matched from 1274 patients. In the matched cohort, functional independence at 90 days was higher in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (44.2% vs 29.5%; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.06, P=0.008). In the failed MT subgroup with 66 matched pairs, more patients had functional independence in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (39.0% vs 17.0%; OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29 to 7.59, P=0.01). In the residual stenosis subgroup with 63 matched pairs, functional independence rates were similar in the rescue therapy and the MT alone groups (51.6% vs 55.7%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.72, P=0.65). CONCLUSION: Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting could improve the clinical outcome in patients with acute large vessel occlusion with failed MT, while no benefit was seen in those with residual severe stenosis but substantial reperfusion.

Endovascular treatment for young patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke in China: analysis of the ANGEL-ACT registry.

Background: The incidence of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion is relatively infrequent in the young adult population. We sought to evaluate their clinical outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT) and stroke etiology compared with older patients. Methods: We examined data from the ANGEL-ACT registry, a nationwide study in China focusing on EVT for acute ischemic stroke. We compared two age groups: <50 years old and ≥50 years old. Our analysis focused on outcome measures such as the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We adjusted for confounding variables. Results: We included 1,691 patients, and 216 patients (13%) were <50 years old. Young patients had lower median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (14 vs. 17, P < 0.001) and fewer cardiovascular comorbidities than older patients. Underlying intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) was higher in young patients (39.4 vs. 28.7%, P = 0.001). Clinical outcome was less favorable in older compared to younger patients (mRS shift: 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.99]); functional independence [mRS score 0-2] 61% vs. 39% (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.7 [95% CI, 0.51-0.97]). Mortality and sICH did not differ between groups. Onset to puncture time (OTP) was longer in young patients (357 min vs. 294 min, P = 0.001). Conclusion: An estimated 13% of patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke were <50 years old. Symptomatic underlying ICAD was more prevalent in the younger patient population. Despite a prehospital delay, younger patients exhibited more favorable outcomes than their older counterparts.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomic features aid in selecting endovascular candidates among patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) can cause sinus obstruction and stenosis, with potentially fatal consequences. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI) can diagnose CVST qualitatively, although quantitative screening methods are lacking for patients refractory to anticoagulation therapy and who may benefit from endovascular treatment (EVT). Thus, in this study, we used radiomic features (RFs) extracted from HRMRI to build machine learning models to predict response to drug therapy and determine the appropriateness of EVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RFs were extracted from three-dimensional T1-weighted motion-sensitized driven equilibrium (MSDE), T2-weighted MSDE, T1-contrast, and T1-contrast MSDE sequences to build radiomic signatures and support vector machine (SVM) models for predicting the efficacy of standard drug therapy and the necessity of EVT. RESULTS: We retrospectively included 53 patients with CVST in a prospective cohort study, among whom 14 underwent EVT after standard drug therapy failed. Thirteen RFs were selected to construct the RF signature and CVST-SVM models. In the validation dataset, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve performance for the RF signature model were 0.833, 0.937, and 0.977, respectively. The radiomic score was correlated with days from symptom onset, history of dyslipidemia, smoking, fibrin degradation product, and D-dimer levels. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for the CVST-SVM model in the validation set were 0.917, 0.969, and 0.992, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CVST-SVM model trained with RFs extracted from HRMRI outperformed the RF signature model and could aid physicians in predicting patient responses to drug treatment and identifying those who may require EVT.

Incidence and predictors of futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion patients: insight from the ANGEL-ACT registry.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the occurrence rate and predictors of futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO). METHODS: Participants of the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischaemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) registry were selected for the analysis. Futile recanalisation was defined as patients did not achieve a 90-day good outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) despite successful recanalisation (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischaemia Scale ≥2b) after the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to find independent predictors of futile recanalisation in VBAO patients undergoing EVT. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen patients with VBAO who achieved successful recanalisation after EVT were included in current analysis, of whom, 155 (49.2%) suffered futile recanalisation, and 160 achieved effective recanalisation. After the multivariable analysis, we found admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥19 (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.76 to 8.39, p<0.001), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥162.2 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.27, p=0.001), onset-to-puncture time (OTP) ≥334 min (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.68, p=0.005) and use of general anesthesia (GA) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.22, p=0.024) were associated with futile recanalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Futile recanalisation after EVT occurred 49.2% of VBAO patients in the ANGEL-ACT registry. NIHSS≥19, PLR≥162.2, OTP≥334 min and use of GA were independent predictors of futile recanalisation.

Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Pressure Ratio in Patients with Extracranial or Intracranial Symptomatic Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the performance of fast and straightforward Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (µQFR) computation in cerebrovascular stenosis. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with symptomatic stenosis of 50%-70% luminal stenosis and underwent fractional pressure ratio (FPR) assessment at our hospital were included in the present study. µQFR was applied to the interrogated vessel. An artificial intelligence algorithm was proposed for automatic delineation of lumen contours of cerebrovascular stenosis. We used invasive FPRs as a reference standard. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to assess the correlation strength between the µQFR and FPR, and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between the µQFR and FPR. An analysis of the receiver operating characteristic was used to evaluate the performance of µQFR. RESULTS: Our results displayed a strong positive correlations (r = 0.92; P < 0.001) between the µQFR and pressure wire FPR. Excellent agreement was observed between the µQFR and FPR with a mean difference of 0.01 ± 0.08 (range, -0.16 to 0.14; P = 0.263). The overall accuracy for identifying an FPR of ≤0.7 was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%-100%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was higher for the µQFR (0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98) than for diameter stenosis (0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95). The positive likelihood ratio was 3.9 for the µQFR with a negative likelihood ratio of 0. CONCLUSIONS: The µQFR computation has a strong correlation and agrees with the FPR calculated from the pressure wire. Therefore, the µQFR might provide an essential therapeutic aid for patients with symptomatic stenosis.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Underlying Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of acute ischemic stroke worldwide. Patients with acute large vessel occlusion due to underlying ICAD (ICAD-LVO) often do not achieve successful recanalization when undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone, requiring rescue treatment, including intra-arterial thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stenting. Therefore, early detection of ICAD-LVO before the procedure is important to enable physicians to select the optimal treatment strategy for ICAD-LVO to improve clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of ICAD-LVO is challenging in the absence of consensus diagnostic criteria on noninvasive imaging and early digital subtraction angiography. In this review, we summarize the clinical and diagnostic criteria, prediction of ICAD-LVO prior to the procedure, and EVT strategy of ICAD-LVO and provide recommendations according to the current literature.