RESUMO
AIMS: To determine the magnitude of arm symptom-associated distress and quality of life in patients suffering from lymphedema after axillary dissection for breast cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred and two breast cancer patients were interviewed, including 101 lymphedema cases and 101 controls who were matched in terms of surgery date, axillary radiotherapy and cancer stage. The FACT-B+4 quality-of-life instrument was used to assess breast, emotional, functional, physical, and social well-being. A self-devised Arm Symptom Distress scale was used to collect information about arm morbidities including swelling, pain, numbness or tingling, limitation of movement, infection; and their interference on daily life. Arm circumference at different levels was measured to determine the presence and severity of lymphedema. The association between lymphedema and quality of life was evaluated, controlling for patient demographics and clinical factors. RESULTS: Compared with controls, individuals with lymphedema had a significantly worse score on FACT-B+4 and the Arm Symptom Distress scale. The score was significantly lower in five of the six domains of FACT-B+4, and significantly higher in both subscales of the Arm Symptom Distress scale. Patients with severe lymphedema had a significantly worse Symptom Severity sub-score on the Arm Symptom Distress scale than those with mild lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: Among women who have undergone axillary dissection for breast cancer, lymphedema was associated with an inferior quality of life and a higher level of arm symptom-associated distress. Patients with severe lymphedema had more arm symptom-associated distress than those with mild lymphedema.
Assuntos
Braço , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Axila/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfedema/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIMS: To investigate the bacteriological status of post-irradiation wounds and its relationship to wound healing in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-six nasopharyngeal cancer patients with post-irradiation wounds on one or both sides of the neck were studied prospectively. Swabs were taken from the wounds at the initial study visit for bacteriological examination. A further swab for culture was taken when possible signs of infection developed. Wound healing was assessed on alternate days with respect to wound condition, the presence of clinical infection and healing time. RESULTS: The results showed that most of the post-irradiation wounds were colonised with bacteria. This was not associated with clinical signs of infection in any instance. There was no association between wound healing time and the presence of organisms, the identity of organisms, the number of species of organisms, or the use of antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of bacteria in post-irradiation wounds, in the absence of clinical signs of wound infection, is not a barrier to wound healing. Oncology practitioners should recognise the unique features of radiation-induced wounds and skin reactions with confidence and provide appropriate treatment as needed.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Lesões por Radiação/microbiologia , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nasofaringe/patologia , Lesões por Radiação/patologiaRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of gentian violet and nonadherent absorbent dressing in the healing of postirradiation wounds in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. This was a randomized controlled trial. A sample of 146 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients who had developed postirradiation wounds was assessed. Comparisons were made regarding parameters related to wound healing, including healing time, presence of infection, and wound pain, and also regarding the impact of wound on the patient, including mood changes, restriction of neck movement, social isolation, sleep problem, and disturbance in body image. The results showed that patients in the 2 groups did not have any significant difference on wound-healing time, disturbance in mood, sleep, social interaction, appearance, and neck mobility. However, there was a trend of higher wound pain score, not reaching statistical significance, in the gentian violet group.