Autoimmune Hepatitis A Case Report and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a cause of chronic liver disease. It is usually suspected based on clinical presentation and laboratory findings, but the diagnosis relies on the presence of specific autoantibodies and characteristic histology. Other unexplained findings should always prompt investigation for coexisting syndromes. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is a 60-year-old Hispanic female with a history of mild asthma presented with exertional and pleuritic chest pain with weight loss, arthralgia, subjective fever, and night sweats for the last 3 months. Given the nonspecific nature of the presentation, further workup was pursued. Laboratory results indicated pancytopenia, elevated INR, and positive autoimmune panel including ANA, anti-chromatin, anti-histone, and rheumatoid factor as well as abnormal C3 and C4. Subsequent liver biopsy with interface hepatitis lead to a diagnosis of AIH with concurrent systemic lupus erythematosus suspected. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic work up for AIH is multimodal and aims to differentiate other etiologies such as congestive hepatopathy, iron overload, viral hepatitis, and other autoimmune liver diseases. In this particular case, unusual clinical and laboratory findings led to diagnosis of the overlap syndrome. Treatment for both was necessary to prevent further progression of disease.

Low-Dose Allopurinol Promotes Greater Serum Urate Lowering in Gout Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Compared with Normal Kidney Function.

OBJECTIVES: Gout patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) accumulate the active allopurinol metabolite oxypurinol, suggesting that allopurinol may promote greater serum urate (sU) lowering in CKD patients. METHODS: We identified all patientswith gout diagnoses on either 100 mg or 300 mg of allopurinol daily, with available pre- and on-treatment sU levels, in our system in a 1-year period. Mean sU decrement by dosing per CKD groups was determined by CKD stage. RESULTS: Of 1,288 subjects with gout, 180 met entry criteria, with 83 subjects receiving 100 mg and 97 receiving 300 mg allopurinol. Subjects with CKD stage 1 experienced less sU lowering with 100 mg than 300 mg of allopurinol. Subjects with stage 4 and 5 CKD had equivalent sU decreases across the 100 mg and 300 mg allopurinol groups. However, the 100 mg group started at a higher pre-treatment sU and ended at a higher final sU than the 300 mg group. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of titrating allopurinol to sU in patients with kidney impairment may result in greater sU lowering at lower doses than in patients without CKD but may also pose a treatment challenge from a possible drug ceiling effect.

Comparison of dual-energy CT, ultrasound and surface measurement for assessing tophus dissolution during rapid urate debulking.

Tophaceous gout is painful and impairs quality of life. The optimal modality for assessing tophus resolution in response to urate-lowering treatment remains poorly defined. Using pegloticase as a model system for resolving tophi, we compared multiple imaging and physical diagnostic strategies for assessing tophus resolution. A 32-year-old subject with chronic refractory tophaceous gout was enrolled and received 6 months of pegloticase treatment. Measurements of tophi using vernier calipers (monthly), photographs and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US; every 3 months), and dual-energy CT (DECT) were compared. Pegloticase persistently lowered the patient's sUA to <0.5 mg/dl. After 6 months, caliper measurements revealed 73, 60, and 61% reductions of three index tophi, while MSK-US revealed 47, 65, and 48% reductions. In contrast, DECT revealed 100% resolution of monosodium urate deposition in all three index tophi, and resolution or improvement of all other tophi identified. On caliper and MSK-US measurement, index tophus size fluctuated, with some lesions enlarging before ultimately contracting. Correlation between assessment modalities during tophus resolution may be poor. DECT identifies urate deposits invisible to physical exam and reveals that some urate deposits completely resolve even as their physically/sonographically measurable lesions persist. Recognition of urate resorption during the urate-lowering process may be confounded by fluctuating lesion volumes during initial tophus breakdown. While DECT was superior for identifying total (including occult) urate deposition, and assessing volume of deposits, other modalities may permit better assessment of non-urate tophus components.