Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 313, 2019 Aug 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31455286

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders have become a significant life-threatening issue due to its increased incidence, morbidity and mortality. Several studies have tried to identify the risk factors for PAS disorders. The ideal management for PAS disorders is a matter of debate. The study objectives were to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of PAS disorders and to compare different management strategies at a tertiary referral hospital, Minia, Egypt. METHODS: This prospective study included 102 women diagnosed with PAS disorders admitted to Minia Maternity university hospital, Egypt between January 2017 to August 2018. These cases were categorized into three groups according to the used approach for management: Group (A), (n = 38) underwent cesarean hysterectomy, group (B), (n = 48) underwent cesarean section (CS) with cervical inversion and ligation of both uterine arteries and group (C), (n = 16): the placenta was left in place. RESULTS: The incidence of PAS disorders during the study period was 9 / 1000 maternities (0.91%). The mean age of cases was 32.4 ± 4.2 years, 60% of them had a parity ≥3 and 82% of them had ≥2 previous CSs. Also, 1/3 of them had previous history of placenta previa. Estimated blood loss (EBL) and blood transfusion in group A were significantly higher than other groups. Group (C) had higher mean hospital stay duration. Group A was associated with significantly higher complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PAS disorders was 0.91%. Maternal age > 32 years, previous C.S. (≥ 2), multiparity (≥ 3) and previous history of placenta previa were risk factors. The management of PAS disorders should be individualized. Women with PAS disorders who completed their family should be offered cesarean hysterectomy. Using the cervix as a tamponade combined with bilateral uterine artery ligation appears to be a safe alternative to hysterectomy in patients with focal placenta accreta and low parity desiring future fertility. Patients with diffuse placenta accreta keen to preserve the uterus could be offered the option of leaving the placenta aiming at conservative management after proper counseling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered 28th October 2015, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02590484 .


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ligadura/estatística & dados numéricos , Placenta Acreta/epidemiologia , Placenta Acreta/terapia , Adulto , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Egito , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Ligadura/métodos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do Tratamento , Artéria Uterina/cirurgia
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 351, 2018 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30157787

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Placenta previa is major obstetric surgical risk as it is associated with higher percentage of intraoperative and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), increased requirement of blood transfusion and further surgical procedures. The current study aimed to evaluate uterine artery ligation prior to uterine incision as a procedure to minimize blood loss during cesarean section in patients with central placenta previa. METHODS: One hundred and four patients diagnosed with central placenta previa antenatally and planned to have elective caesarean section were recruited from the antenatal clinic at Minia Maternity University hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into either ligation group or control group. RESULTS: Both groups were similar regarding demographic features and preoperative risk factors for bleeding. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the ligation group as compared with the control group (569.3 ± 202.1 mL vs. 805.1 ± 224.5 mL respectively, p = 0.002). There was a significant increase in the requirement for blood transfusion in the control group as compared with the ligation group (786 ± 83 mL vs. 755 ± 56 mL respectively, p = 0.03) Three cases in the control group required further surgical interventions to control intraoperative bleeding, while no cases in the ligation required further surgical techniques and that was statistically significant (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Uterine artery ligation prior to uterine incision may be a helpful procedure to minimize intraoperative and postpartum blood loss in cases with central placenta previa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02002026 - December 8, 2013.


Assuntos
Ligadura/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Obstétricos/métodos , Placenta Prévia/cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Cesárea/métodos , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA