Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Hematol ; 101(5): 1031-1038, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35262868

RESUMO

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be late complications following mutagenic treatment. Limited data is available on the outcome of patients developing therapy-related MDS and AML after treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). We identified 250 patients with therapy-associated MDS or AML in the Duesseldorf MDS registry. Of those, 50 patients were previously diagnosed with multiple myeloma (mm-MDS/AML). We compared them to patients with de novo MDS (n = 4862) and to patients with MDS following other underlying diseases (tMDS) (n = 200). mm-MDS patients and tMDS patients showed similar karyotypes and degrees of cytopenia. However, mm-MDS patients had significantly higher blast counts and more often belonged to the high-risk group according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) (both p < 0.05). Although the rate of progression to AML was similar in mm-MDS and tMDS, both transformed significantly more often than de novo MDS (p < 0.05). Median overall survival of patients with mm-MDS (13 months; range: 1-99) and tMDS (13 months; range 0-160) was also similar yet significantly shorter than patients with de novo MDS (32 months; range 0-345 months; p < 0.05). Furthermore, survival of mm-MDS patients was not affected by myeloma activity. Despite significantly more high-risk disease and higher blast cell counts, myeloma-associated MDS-patients show features akin to other tMDS. Survival is similar to other tMDS and irrespective of myeloma remission status or transformation to AML. Thus, patient outcome is not determined by competing clones but rather by MDS governing the stem cell niche.


Assuntos
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Mieloma Múltiplo , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Humanos , Cariotipagem , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/induzido quimicamente , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/complicações , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/terapia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia
3.
J Thromb Haemost ; 15(3): 473-476, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27992120

RESUMO

Essentials Whether or not dabigatran enhances the risk of myocardial infarction is under discussion. We measured platelet reactivity and thrombin receptor expression in dabigatran patients. Platelet reactivity and thrombin receptor expression is enhanced during dabigatran treatment. This should be considered when choosing the optimal direct oral anticoagulant for individuals. SUMMARY: Background The direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor. Its landmark trial, the RE-LY study, observed a trend towards a higher incidence of myocardial infarctions (MIs) in dabigatran-treated patients. Since then, there have been discussions on whether dabigatran increases the risk of MI. Objective In this study, we aimed to assess platelet reactivity and platelet thrombin receptor expression in dabigatran-treated patients. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in 13 hospitalized patients with planned initiation of dabigatran medication. Platelet reactivity was measured by light-transmission aggregometry and platelet thrombin receptor expression was measured by flow cytometry analysis. Results Platelet reactivity was higher after initiation of dabigatran medication as compared with baseline (baseline 44 ± 24% vs. dabigatran 70 ± 25%). Accordingly, the density of both platelet thrombin receptors (protease activated receptor [PAR]-1 and PAR-4) on platelets increased during dabigatran treatment (PAR1, baseline 63 ± 11% vs. dabigatran 70 ± 10%; PAR4, baseline 1.1 ± 0.5% vs. dabigatran 1.6 ± 0.9%). Conclusions Dabigatran increases platelet reactivity by enhancing the thrombin receptor density on platelets. This finding should be considered while choosing the optimal DOAC in individualized medicine.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/metabolismo , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Dabigatrana/administração & dosagem , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Receptores de Trombina/metabolismo , Administração Oral , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Ácido Araquidônico/química , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Colágeno/química , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos Piloto , Agregação Plaquetária , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Trombina/antagonistas & inibidores , Trombina/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA