Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Regarding Renal Function in Post-Liver Transplant Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus and a 100% 12-Week Sustained Virologic Response-A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients after liver transplantation (LT) with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection often suffer from renal or hepatic impairment. Treating patients after LT with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) might result in decreasing renal function due to interaction of DAA and immunosuppressive therapy. In this single-center study we analyzed clinical parameters of 18 HCV-infected patients treated with DAA therapy after LT. METHODS: The primary end points were change of renal function (glomerular filtration rate) and sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12). For secondary end points, we investigated the influence of DAA therapy on transaminases, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, noninvasive fibrosis measurement, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. RESULTS: Five out of 18 patients treated with DAA suffered from renal impairment stage 2, and 7 patients of renal impairment stage 3. Renal function at SVR12 was not influenced by preexisting renal impairment (P > .5), type of immunosuppressant (P > .5), or type of DAA regimen (P > .5). All patients reached SVR12. The levels of transaminases and bilirubin declined rapidly, as expected. Ten out of 18 patients already suffered from cirrhosis or liver fibrosis >F3 according to noninvasive measurement before initiation of treatment. Single-point acoustic radiation force impulse imaging improved in 9 patients (P = .012). In 7 patients, MELD score improved owing to the decrease of bilirubin levels. In 6 patients it worsened. CONCLUSIONS: DAA therapy in LT patients was effective and safe in this single-center real-life cohort. Renal function was not influenced by the administered drug combinations, even in patients with preexisting renal impairment.

Dysbalance in sympathetic neurotransmitter release and action in cirrhotic rats: impact of exogenous neuropeptide Y.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Splanchnic vasodilation is an essential disturbance in portal hypertension. Increased systemic sympathetic nerve activity is well known, but potential corresponding vascular desensitization is incompletely characterized. Release of splanchnic sympathetic neurotransmitters noradrenaline (NA) and co-transmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY) remains to be elucidated. Finally, the effects of exogenous NPY on these mechanisms are unexplored. METHODS: Portal vein ligated cirrhotic, and control rats were used for in vitro perfusion of mesenteric arteries. Depletion of vascular pressure response was induced by repetitive electric sympathetic perivascular nerve stimulation (PNS) and performed in the absence and presence of exogenous NPY. Additionally, PNS-induced release of NA and NPY was measured. RESULTS: Mesenteric PNS-induced pressure response was lower in portal hypertension. Depletion of the pressure response to PNS, representing the degree of desensitization, was enhanced in portal hypertension. NA release was elevated, whereas NPY release was attenuated in cirrhosis. Administration of exogenous NPY led to marked recovery from desensitization and vasoconstrictive improvement in cirrhotic rats, being associated with more pronounced decrease of NA release. CONCLUSIONS: Pronounced depletion of splanchnic arterial pressure-response to repetitive sympathetic nerve stimulation in cirrhosis is partly attributable to altered NA release as well as to deficient NPY release. External NPY restores vascular contractility and attenuates pathologically elevated NA release in the portal hypertensive mesenteric vasculature, revealing post-, and prejunctional effects at the vascular smooth muscle motor endplate; therefore outlining encouraging therapeutic strategies.

Splanchnic sympathectomy prevents translocation and spreading of E coli but not S aureus in liver cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is mainly caused by bacterial translocation of enteric Gram-negative bacteria, predominantly Escherichia coli. The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is activated in advanced cirrhosis, particularly in the splanchic circulation, and exerts potent immunosuppressive actions. However, the role of splanchnic SNS activity in bacterial translocation and bacterial spreading in cirrhosis remains unclear. METHODS: E coli or Stapylococcus aureus (10(6) CFU) were given intraperitoneally. After 6 h, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), liver, spleen, lung and peripheral blood were harvested from ascitic cirrhotic rats (LC) and healthy controls with and without splanchnic sympathectomy (SE). The bacterial tissue burden was determined by standard microbiological culture techniques. In vitro phagocytic activity of peritoneal polymorphonuclear leucocytes was assessed by FACS analysis. RESULTS: Under basal conditions SE reduced bacterial translocation to MLN in LC rats from 45% to 17%. LC rats had a marked increase in bacteraemia after E coli and S aureus challenge and an increased incidence and degree of E coli translocation to MLN, liver, spleen and lung compared with control rats. SE prevented bacteraemia in LC rats after E coli but not after S aureus challenge. Prior SE abolished the difference in incidence as well as the bacterial tissue burden in each organ after E coli application in LC rats, being no longer significantly different from control rats with or without SE. The protective effects of SE against E coli were associated with a greater influx of mononuclear cells into the peritoneal cavity and increased phagocytic activity of peritoneal polymorphonuclear leucocytes. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhosis with bacterial peritonitis, hyperactivity of the splanchnic sympathetic nervous system contributes to the translocation of E coli but not S aureus to MLN and extraintestinal sites. This indicates a key role for sympathetic drive in the impairment in host defence against Gram-negative bacteria in cirrhosis.