[Unawareness of the K/DOQI guidelines for bone and mineral metabolism in predialysis chronic kidney disease: results of the OSERCE Spanish multicenter-study survey]. / Desconocimiento de las guías K/DOQI sobre la alteración del metabolismo óseo-mineral asociada a la enfermedad renal crónica no en diálisis: resultados de la encuesta en el estudio multicéntrico español OSERCE.

Since its publication in 2003, the K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease (CKD) have become a worldwide reference. The aim of this study was to analyze the observance to these guidelines in patients with a glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1,73m2 not yet included in dialysis in a Spanish multicenter cohort. A questionnaire by investigator/centre was completed by 32 different nephrologists participating in the OSERCE study and representing the overall Spanish public health net. We observed that biochemical parameters were measured less frequently than recommended, except in CKD stage 3. The therapeutic goals for intact PTH were not properly reported by 59 % of the consulted nephrologists for stages 3 and 4, whereas only 22% did not report them properly for stage 5. The goals for phosphorus were not adequately reported in 50 % of cases (stages 3 y 4) and 60 % (stage 5). For calcium, these values were 70 %, 73.3 % and 65.5 % for stages 3, 4 and 5, respectively. A corrected plasma calcium between 9.5 and 10.2 mg/dl is still considered adequate for 31%. As much as 87% nephrologists stated that they did not sistematically measure calcidiol plasma levels. In general, these results demonstrate that there is a great degree of unawareness of K/DOQITM predialysis guidelines. Thus, their poor implementation is probably not only due to the lower availability of approved therapeutic agents, the difficult achievement of goals or the disbelief on current recommendations. It would be desirable that forthcoming guidelines such as the KDIGO could also consider the need of educational efforts for CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder.

The PDQ-39 Spanish version: reliability and correlation with the short-form health survey (SF-36).

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) was the first specific instrument for evaluation of the "health-related quality of life" (QoL) in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 has been subjected to adaptation to Spanish language and culture (PDQ-39 Spanish version, PDQ-39SV) and this version has been validated in aspects of internal consistency and construct validity. The present study assess the test-retest reliability and the convergent validity of the PDQ-39SV with a generic QoL instrument (SF-36). RESULTS: Most of the PDQ-39 dimensions showed an adequate consistency-Cronbach's alpha > 0.7 for six dimensions. As a whole, test-retest reliability resulted satisfactory. Two dimensions-activities of daily living and emotional well-being- showed a low grade significant difference (paired Student t-test, p < 0.05) due to improvement in the second survey (at 10 to 14 days from the first one) perhaps related to adjustments of the treatment at the first visit. A strong association (Spearman r, p < 0.001), indicative of convergent validity, was obtained for the PDQ-39 dimensions and the relevant SF-36 scales, as well as for the physical and mental component summary scores of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account these results and previous studies, it is concluded that the PDQ-39 SV is a reliable measure that has construct validity.