Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing backward walking to forward walking training on balance in multiple sclerosis: The TRAIN-MS trial.

Balance impairment and accidental falls are a pervasive challenge faced by persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), significantly impacting their quality of life. While exercise has proven to be an effective intervention for improving mobility and functioning in PwMS, current exercise approaches predominantly emphasize forward walking (FW) and balance training, with variable improvements in balance and fall rates. Backward walking (BW) has emerged as a promising intervention modality for enhancing mobility and strength outcomes; however, significant gaps remain. Specifically, there is limited knowledge about the efficacy of BW interventions on outcomes such as static, anticipatory, and reactive balance, balance confidence, falls, and cognition. This randomized controlled trial aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of 8-weeks of backward walking training (TRAIN-BW) as compared to forward walking training (TRAIN-FW). Ninety individuals with MS with self-reported walking dysfunction or ≥ 2 falls in the past 6 months will be randomized in blocks, stratified by sex and disease severity to either the TRAIN-BW or TRAIN-FW intervention groups. Adherence and retention rates will be used to determine feasibility and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire will be used to assess acceptability. The primary outcomes will be static, anticipatory, and reactive balance. Secondary outcomes include walking velocity, balance confidence, concern about falling, cognition, physical activity, and fall rates measured prospectively for 6 months after post-testing. Additionally, the extent to which cognitive functioning influences response to intervention will be examined. Backward walking training may be an innovative intervention to address balance impairments and falls in persons with MS.

Measurement Properties of Backward Walking and Its Sensitivity and Feasibility in Predicting Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: People with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience mobility impairments that elevate fall risk, increasing the need to identify clinical measures that accurately predict falls. Backward walking (BW) better differentiates fallers from nonfallers in MS. However, no studies have reported the measurement properties of the backward walking Timed 25-Foot Walk (B-T25-FW) and BW metrics, like BW velocity. Additionally, it is unknown whether BW can predict future falls in MS or its link to activity levels. This study assessed the reliability and responsiveness of B-T25-FW and BW metrics, including BW velocity. It also examined whether BW could predict falls at 3 and 6 months and its association with activity levels. METHODS: During 2 separate visits, 23 people with MS completed the forward walking Timed 25-Foot Walk (F-T25-FW) and B-T25-FW, as well as forward walking and BW assessments in which spatiotemporal measures were recorded. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients, and minimum detectable changes were calculated. Correlation analyses explored the relationship between BW velocity, B-T25-FW, prospective falls, and activity levels. RESULTS: B-T25-FW and BW velocity exhibited excellent test-retest reliability. Large effect sizes to interpret clinically meaningful change in the B-T25-FW and BW velocity were also found. Both metrics demonstrated modest negative correlations with falls at 3 and 6 months and correlated strongly with very active minutes at 3- and 6-months post study. CONCLUSIONS: The B-T25-FW and BW velocity are effective and reliable in clinical use for evaluating functional mobility in people with MS, are sensitive enough to detect subtle changes, and may be a meaningful marker for tracking disease progression and treatment efficacy.

Functional lower extremity strength influences stepping strategy in community-dwelling older adults during single and dual-task walking.

As age increases, a decline in lower extremity strength leads to reduced mobility and increased fall risks. This decline outpaces the age-related reduction in muscle mass, resulting in mobility limitations. Older adults with varying degrees of mobility-disability use different stepping strategies. However, the link between functional lower extremity strength and stepping strategy is unknown. Therefore, understanding how age-related reductions in functional lower extremity strength influence stepping strategy is vital to unraveling mobility limitations. Twenty participants (17F, 72 ± 6 years) were recruited and tested at a local community event. Participants were outfitted with inertial measurement units (IMU) and walked across a pressurized walkway under single and dual motor task conditions (walking with and without carrying a tray with water) at their usual and fast speeds. Participants were dichotomized into normal (11) or low functional strength groups (9) based on age-specific normative cutoffs using the instrumented 5-repetition Sit-to-Stand test duration. Our study reveals that older adults with normal strength prefer adjusting their step time during walking tasks, while those with reduced strength do not exhibit a preferred stepping strategy. This study provides valuable insights into the influence of functional lower extremity strength on stepping strategy in community-dwelling older adults during simple and complex walking tasks. These findings could aid in diagnosing gait deviations and developing appropriate treatment or management plans for mobility disability in older adults.

Evaluating Postural Transition Movement Performance in Individuals with Essential Tremor via the Instrumented Timed Up and Go.

Flexibility in performing various movements like standing, walking, and turning is crucial for navigating dynamic environments in daily life. Individuals with essential tremor often experience movement difficulties that can affect these postural transitions, limiting mobility and independence. Yet, little research has examined the performance of postural transitions in people with essential tremor. Therefore, we assessed postural transition performance using two versions of the timed up and go test: the standard version and a more complex water-carry version. We examined the total duration of the standard and water-carry timed up and go in 15 people with and 15 people without essential tremor. We also compared the time taken for each phase (sit-to-stand phase, straight-line walk phase, stand-to-sit phase) and the turning velocity between groups. Our findings revealed decreased performance across all phases of standard and water-carry timed up and go assessments. Further, both ET and non-ET groups exhibited reduced performance during the water-carry timed up and go compared to the standard timed up and go. Evaluating specific phases of the timed up and go offers valuable insights into functional movement performance in essential tremor, permitting more tailored therapeutic interventions to improve functional performance during activities of daily living.

Functional Lower Extremity Strength Influences Stepping Strategy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults During Single and Dual-Task Walking.

As age increases, a decline in lower extremity strength leads to reduced mobility and increased fall risks. This decline outpaces the age-related reduction in muscle mass, resulting in mobility limitations. Older adults with varying degrees of mobility-disability use different stepping strategies. However, the link between functional lower extremity strength and stepping strategy is unknown. Therefore, understanding how age-related reductions in functional lower extremity strength influence stepping strategy is vital to unraveling mobility limitations. Participants were recruited and tested at a local community event, where they were outfitted with IMUs and walked across a pressurized walkway. Our study reveals that older adults with normal strength prefer adjusting their step time during walking tasks, while those with reduced strength do not exhibit a preferred stepping strategy. This study provides valuable insights into the influence of functional lower extremity strength on stepping strategy in community-dwelling older adults during simple and complex walking tasks. These findings could aid in diagnosing gait deviations and developing appropriate treatment or management plans for mobility disability in older adults.

Establishing the Reliability of The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) in Multiple Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the inter- and intra-rater reliability of The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and examine its relation to clinical mobility measures, cognition, and activity levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: STEPS performance was rated by 3 raters at the initial visit. Two raters observed the STEPS performance via videotape at the initial visit and then 1 week later. Participants also completed in lab clinical mobility tests and cognitive assessments at their initial visit. Activity levels were tracked for the subsequent 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 23 people with relapsing-remitting MS (N=23). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, while correlation analyses compared STEPS performance with cognition, clinical mobility assessments, and activity levels. The inter-rater reliability analysis among the 3 raters included scoring from only the initial evaluation. For the intra-rater reliability, 2 raters viewed and rated the videotaped session for each of the participants and then repeated the same process 1 week later. RESULTS: Total STEPS scores demonstrated excellent agreement by ICC for inter- (ICC=0.97) and intra-rater reliability (ICC>0.95) and significant correlations with established clinical mobility assessments in PwMS. Better performance on STEPS was associated with information processing speed and prospective activity levels in PwMS. CONCLUSIONS: Stair ambulation is a challenging task, integral for mobility and independence, therefore, having a sensitive and valid reliable assessment of stair performance is critical for PwMS. The STEPS assessment is a quick, easily administered, reliable, and valid tool for assessing stair ambulation in PwMS.

Backwards walking speed reserve in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Decreased gait speed is common in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and has been associated with elevated fall risk. The walking speed reserve (WSR) indicates the ability to increase gait speed on demand and has previously been examined in PwMS. Backward walking is a sensitive measure of fall risk in PwMS; however, no studies have reported on the utility of backward walking speed reserve (BW-WSR) as a clinical assessment tool of functional mobility or fall risk in PwMS, nor have they associated this measure with cognition. METHODS: 23 PwMS completed walking trials at their preferred walking speed (PWS) and maximal walking speed (MWS). Participants performed these walking trials in both the forward (FW) and backward direction (BW). The forward walking speed reserve (FW-WSR) was calculated as the difference between MWS and PWS in the forward direction, while the backward walking speed reserve (BW-WSR) was calculated as the difference between MWS and PWS in the back backward direction. Correlation analyses examined the relationship between the FW- and BW-WSR with clinical assessments of functional mobility (the timed up-and-go) as well as cognitive functioning (the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, the California Verbal Learning Test, and the Trail Making Test A and B). Correlations also examined the relationship between FW- and BW-WSR with prospective falls. RESULTS: A lower BW-WSR was associated with disease severity and poorer performance on clinical walking and balance assessment, as well as with decreased information processing speed and attentional performance. Interestingly, FW-WSR showed similar relations. Neither FW- or BW-WSR were associated with prospective risk in this small sample of PwMS. CONCLUSION: The BW-WSR did not offer a distinct advantage over other measures, such as the FW-WSR, PWS, or MWS, in the forward or backward direction. The selection of the most sensitive clinical measures of functional mobility and fall risk is crucial; our study holds valuable clinical implications for PwMS by providing novel insights into functional mobility assessments in PwMS.