Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 22(1): 88, 2023 Sep 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37740207

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) bacterial isolates that produce extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) contribute to global life-threatening infections. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence of ESBLs in co-existing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from humans, animals and the environment. METHODS: The systematic review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [ID no: CRD42023394360]. This study was carried out following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One hundred and twenty-six eligible studies published on co-existing antibiotic resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae between 1990 and 2022 were included. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae was 33.0% and 32.7% for humans, 33.5% and 19.4% for animals, 56.9% and 24.2% for environment, 26.8% and 6.7% for animals/environment, respectively. Furthermore, the three types of resistance genes that encode ESBLs, namely blaSHVblaCTX-M,blaOXA, and blaTEM, were all detected in humans, animals and the environment. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of "One-Health" surveillance is critical to tracking the source of antimicrobial resistance and preventing its spread. The emerging state and national surveillance systems should include bacteria containing ESBLs. A well-planned, -implemented, and -researched alternative treatment for antimicrobial drug resistance needs to be formulated.


Assuntos
Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Animais , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Escherichia coli/genética , Prevalência , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , beta-Lactamases/genética
2.
Microorganisms ; 11(6)2023 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37374941

RESUMO

Houseflies are alleged reservoirs as well as vectors of human and animal pathogens, including bacteria, because they frequently have contact with animal excreta and decaying organic substances. The rapid adaptation process of ingested microbes in the insect gut may involve gene transfer, including antibiotic resistance determinants among different bacterial strains. Six hundred and fifty-seven (n = 657) houseflies were collected from hospices and were identified morphologically and genetically using the 16S rRNA, CO1, and ITS2 barcoding genes. This study also characterized the bacterial communities harboured by the captured houseflies using 16S rRNA metabarcoding on the next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform and further sought to detect antibiotic resistance traits by using gene-specific PCR assays. Generated sequences for the targeted gene fragments matched with Musca domestica and all the sequences were deposited to the GenBank database. The 16S rRNA metabarcoding analysis revealed that the most abundant phyla detected with variable abundance observed among all the houseflies were Proteobacteria, followed by Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes. Furthermore, the NGS data revealed the presence of multiple bacterial genera, including Providencia, Enterobacter, Dysgonomonas, Escherichia-Shigella, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and Streptococcus, which are known to harbour potentially pathogenic species of animals and humans. Antibiotic resistance genes detected from the housefly DNA in this study included ermB, tetA, blaSHV, and blaTEM. Moreover, these genes are associated with resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, and beta-lactams antibiotics, respectively. The presence of bacterial pathogens and the detection of antibiotic resistance genes from the houseflies collected from the hospices indicates the possible health risk to patients in hospices and the surrounding community. Therefore, it is imperative to keep high standards of hygiene, food preparation, safety, and control of houseflies in hospices.

3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 125: 294-304, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36336247

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prevalence and antibiotic resistance (AR) profiles of Campylobacter spp. isolated from animals, humans, and the environment in South Africa based on available published data. METHODS: Original articles published from January 1, 1990 to January 1, 2021 were searched from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Africa Index Medicus, Scopus, and African Journal Online databases. Data were analyzed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (version 3.0). RESULTS: After screening, articles on animals (n = 25), humans (n = 7), environment (n = 3), animals/environment (n = 2), and a (n = 1) study on animals, humans, and the environment were included in this review. The pooled prevalence estimates (PPEs) were 28.8%, 16.4%, and 28.4% in animals, humans, and the environment, respectively. The Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli species were commonly isolated from humans, animals, and the environment in South Africa. The AR profiles were screened from 2032 Campylobacter spp., with the highest PPE of AR observed against clindamycin (76.9%) and clarithromycin (76.5%). Campylobacter isolates tested with the disk diffusion assay and minimum inhibitory concentration methods recorded an overall AR prevalence of 35.3% and 37.1%, respectively, whereas multidrug resistance PPE was 35.3%. CONCLUSION: Regular surveillance of Campylobacter spp. prevalence and its antimicrobial resistance strains is recommended, as well as the formulation of a "One Health" approach for better management and control of Campylobacter spp. infection in South Africa.


Assuntos
Infecções por Campylobacter , Campylobacter jejuni , Campylobacter , Animais , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Prevalência , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Campylobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Campylobacter/epidemiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
4.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 54(3): 170-177, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705574

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is a global health concern and has become more complex to diagnose due to mutations in the causative agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In a setting with high TB prevalence, having a rapid and accurate diagnosis may reduce the rate of infections. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in sputum samples from suspected tuberculosis patients. METHODS: A total of 1 328 sputum samples were collected from patients, across 12 clinics in the Shiselweni region, Eswatini. One thousand one hundred and ten (1110; 84%) samples were simultaneously processed on GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and MGIT culture. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-seven (297) samples tested GeneXpert positive and 813 GeneXpert negatives, while 310 samples tested positive and 800 tested negative on the MGIT culture method. The positive predictive value on GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay was 83% while the negative predictive value was 97.80%. At p-value = .796, sputum quality did not affect the positivity of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF results. Sputum volume had a significant impact on the performance of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF with increased sensitivity in 4 ml and 6 ml samples. CONCLUSIONS: Although detection of tuberculosis using the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in sputum samples is not limited to one specific characteristic, sputum volume assessment should be considered as an integral part of routine laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis especially in high tuberculosis prevalent settings. However, the ability of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF to provide rapid TB diagnosis is not dependent on sputum quality.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos , Tuberculose Pulmonar , Essuatíni , Humanos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Rifampina , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Escarro/microbiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia
5.
Vet Med Sci ; 8(2): 827-844, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33955703

RESUMO

Housefly (Musca domestica) is an excellent candidate for the distribution of susceptible and resistant bacterial strains that potentially threaten public health. To date, there is a paucity of information on the global distribution of pathogenic bacteria of medical and veterinary importance from diverse environmental settings. Therefore, this study was undertaken to conduct a systemic review and meta-analysis to estimate occurrence of various bacterial species of medical and veterinary importance harboured by houseflies around the world. Published articles from 1980 to 2020 were retrieved from electronic databases and assessed for eligibility according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Seventy-eight studies were included in the review with only 44 studies being eligible for meta-analysis. Results indicated that eligible studies used in this review were from four continents, i.e., Asia (47.4%) America (23.1%), Africa (20.5%) and Europe (8.9%). The majority of the studies (56.4%) used the culture method for the identification of bacterial pathogens, while 30.7% used both culture and PCR techniques. For meta-analysis, we focused on five pathogenic bacterial species including Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. High heterogeneity was found among studies investigating different pathogens including E. coli (Q = 10,739.55; I2  = 99.60; Q-p 0.0001), E. faecium (Q = 317.61; I2  = 86.46; Q-p < 0.0001), K. pneumonia (Q = 1,576.61; I2  = 97.27; Q-p < 0.0001), S. aureus (Q = 2,439.12; I2  = 98.24; Q-p < 0.0001) and P. aeruginosa (Q = 1,283.0; I2  = 96.65; Q-p < 0.0001). Furthermore, it was observed that houseflies carried a considerable number of susceptible and antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains that pose considerable threats to public health. Findings from this study have provided more insight on the vectoral potential of houseflies in the transmission of significant bacterial pathogens from different regions across the world. Further investigation is required to quantify the bacterial contamination and dissemination by houseflies.


Assuntos
Moscas Domésticas , Animais , Antibacterianos , Bactérias , Escherichia coli , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA