Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 64(2): 95-103, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737451

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persistent pelvic pain (PPP) is a complex and often debilitating condition. While widely accepted to be multifactorial in nature, the precise aetiology of PPP remains elusive. In many cases, women who undergo laparoscopy for PPP will have no visible pathology identified (a 'negative' laparoscopy). Currently, there are no consensus guidelines which outline the recommended management following a negative laparoscopy, and the woman's experiences and outcomes are not widely known. AIMS: This review aims to identify and summarise the literature surrounding the experiences of women with PPP who have a negative laparoscopy; specifically, their outcomes of pain, quality of life (QoL), satisfaction with care, and their overall management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the electronic databases Ovid Medline, PubMed and Embase was performed. Studies in English exploring the outcomes of women with PPP following a negative laparoscopy were included. RESULTS: Four studies consisting of a total of 200 women were included. Results were inconsistent. Three studies concluded that the majority of women with PPP had persistent pain following a negative laparoscopy. A single study found that pain significantly improved after negative laparoscopy. QoL outcomes varied, with two studies reporting a positive impact and two studies reporting a deleterious impact on QoL following a negative laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The impact on pain outcomes and QoL following a laparoscopy that does not diagnose pathology remains unknown, and the available evidence is insufficient to guide evidence-based practice. This review highlights a significant gap in our understanding of surgical management for PPP.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Feminino , Qualidade de Vida , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Dor Pélvica/cirurgia , Endometriose/complicações
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37753632

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory condition characterised by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Given the multi-system nature of the disease and the potential for significant negative impact on quality of life, there has been a long-standing recognition of the need for multidisciplinary care for people with endometriosis. However, there is paucity to the data supporting this approach, and much of the evidence is anecdotal. AIM: This systematic review aims to describe recent evidence-based models and patient-centred perspectives of multidisciplinary care for endometriosis, to improve understanding of the role of an integrated, multidisciplinary team in effectively addressing patients' care needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles published between 1 January 2010 to 7 July 2022. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and pinpointed a multidisciplinary team consisting of gynaecologists, pain specialists, nurses, physiotherapists, psychologists, sex therapists, nutritionists, complementary medicine practitioners, and social workers to be most commonly utilised in holistically managing people with pelvic pain and endometriosis. Furthermore, patient perspectives on care highlighted the need for reliable information, respect and validation of experiences or preferences, discussion of long-term treatment plans and social and emotional supports. CONCLUSION: The trend for multidisciplinary team care for people with endometriosis is growing. Further consumer-driven clinical studies and outcome evaluations need to be conducted to determine the effect of multidisciplinary care on improvements to quality of life for people living with endometriosis and or pelvic pain.

4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 288: 49-55, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37423122

RESUMO

Obesity is a leading risk factor for endometrial cancer and its precursor, endometrial hyperplasia (EH). Currently, weight loss is recommended for people with EH and obesity, but evidence to guide weight management as primary or adjunctive therapy is limited. This systematic review aims to assess the role of weight loss in inducing histopathological regression of EH in women with obesity. A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library databases was conducted in January 2022. Studies reporting on participants with EH who underwent weight loss interventions, incorporating comparisons of pre- and post-intervention histology, were included. Studies were limited to those published in English with full text available. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which reported outcomes after bariatric surgery. Three studies reported outcomes for the same group of participants, therefore only one outcome set was included. Pre-operative endometrial biopsy results were available for 167 women, and 81 had post-operative biopsies reported. Nineteen women (11.4% of those biopsied) had EH pre-operatively; 17 underwent repeat sampling post-operatively. Twelve (71%) had complete histological resolution, 1 (6%) had partial regression from complex hyperplasia to simple hyperplasia, 1 (6%) had persistent atypical hyperplasia, and 3 (18%) had persistent simple hyperplasia. One patient with a normal pre-intervention biopsy had simple hyperplasia post-operatively. Due to poor quality and overall scarcity of data, the role of weight loss in the primary or adjunctive treatment of EH is unknown. Future studies should prospectively assess weight loss modalities and targets, as well as use of concurrent therapies.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Endometrial , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patologia , Hiperplasia/patologia , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/patologia , Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Redução de Peso
5.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 285: 153-158, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37120911

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE(S): To measure the success rate of primary medical therapy in managing retained products of conception (RPOC) in women with secondary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and to identify factors associated with need for surgical management. STUDY DESIGN: Postpartum patients presenting to a tertiary women's hospital Emergency Department between July 2020 and December 2022 with secondary PPH and evidence of RPOC on ultrasound were recruited. Clinical information relating to the presentation was collected prospectively. Antenatal and intrapartum data were collected from medical record and Birthing Outcome System database review. The primary outcome was the success of medical management for RPOC, defined by the implementation of medical or expectant management without subsequent need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with RPOC underwent primary medical or expectant management. Twelve patients (29%) were managed successfully with medical management, while twenty-nine (71%) proceeded to surgical management. Medical management involved antibiotics (n = 37, 90%), prostaglandin E1 analogue (n = 14, 34%) and other uterotonics (n = 3, 7%). A greater endometrial thickness on ultrasound was significantly associated with a requirement for secondary surgical intervention (p < 0.05). There was an association approaching statistical significance between a higher sonographic volume of RPOC and the failure of medical management (p = 0.07). There was no statistically significant association between the mode of delivery or the number of days postpartum with the success of medical management. CONCLUSION(S): For patients presenting with secondary PPH and sonographic RPOC, over two thirds required surgical management. Increased endometrial thickness was associated with an increased requirement for surgical management.


Assuntos
Placenta Retida , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Complicações na Gravidez , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Período Pós-Parto , Endométrio , Placenta Retida/diagnóstico por imagem , Placenta Retida/cirurgia
6.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(3): 308-313, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36944552

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Secondary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a condition which affects 0.2-3.0% of women. Despite its impact on maternal morbidity, there is a lack of understanding of the cost burden of disease. AIMS: To determine the economic cost of secondary PPH in the postpartum period, compared to the costs for women without this diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on a cohort of 97 women who presented with secondary PPH to the emergency department (ED) between July 2020 and February 2021. A case-control design was then used to compare postpartum cost data from these patients to a group of 97 controls who were matched to maternal demographics, and who did not present with secondary PPH. RESULTS: For women with secondary PPH, there were significantly more hospital attendances, and postpartum costs were higher for all cost subcategories across ED, admissions, and outpatient attendances (P < 0.0001), compared to controls. The total cost of postpartum care for 97 patients with secondary PPH was $254 377.62 with an average cost per patient of $2622.45, compared to $26 670.46 for 97 controls with an average cost of $274.95 per patient (P < 0.0001). This demonstrates a 9.5-fold increase in postpartum costs per woman with secondary PPH. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary PPH is an under-researched condition which presents a significant cost burden for the health system. Evidence-based guidelines addressing the prevention and management of secondary PPH may assist in minimising this cost burden for both the health service and the patient.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Humanos , Feminino , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Período Pós-Parto , Austrália/epidemiologia
7.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 282: 116-123, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36708658

RESUMO

Secondary postpartum haemorrhage is a significant cause of postnatal morbidity and admission to hospital. It can be managed medically, surgically or with interventional radiological techniques, however, there is limited evidence to inform the most appropriate use of these treatments. This review aimed to summarise the existing evidence and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the management options available for secondary postpartum haemorrhage. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Clinicaltrials.gov and ICTRP were searched from conception to August 2021. Eligible studies described the management of participants with secondary postpartum haemorrhage occurring between 24 h and 12 weeks after a pregnancy of at least 20 weeks gestation. All treatment interventions were eligible. Outcomes included reduction of bleeding, hospital admissions, re-presentations to hospital, secondary surgical procedures, blood transfusions, adverse effects of treatment, surgical complications, hysterectomy, ICU admissions, severe morbidity and mortality. The protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021274146). Eleven studies, describing 834 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Five studies reported outcomes of a single intervention and six studies reported outcomes of more than one treatment modality. Assessed interventions included medical management, surgical procedures, and radiological techniques. Resolution of bleeding was seen in 8.2-84.6 % of participants following medical management, 89.3-100 % following surgical management and 87.5-100 % post transcatheter arterial embolisation. When considering only studies published in the last 30 years, these results are 71.9-73.7 %, 89.3-92.0 % and 87.5-100 % respectively. All included studies were small and retrospective observational in design with poor methodological quality leading to a serious or critical risk of bias. This review has highlighted the deficiencies in evidence for the management of secondary PPH. Future, well designed, prospective studies are needed to provide guidance to clinicians managing this condition.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(1): 52-58, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35699126

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Secondary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) complicates ~1% of pregnancies and can cause serious maternal morbidity. However, evidence guiding optimal management is scarce and often based on case series and expert opinion. AIMS: To measure the success of primary medical therapy in managing secondary PPH and to identify factors associated with need for surgical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postpartum patients presenting to a tertiary women's hospital emergency department between July 2020 and October 2021 with secondary PPH were recruited. Data from the acute presentation were prospectively collected. Antenatal and intrapartum data were collected from medical record review. The primary outcome was the success of medical management for secondary PPH, defined by the implementation of medical or expectant measures without subsequent need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty patients underwent primary medical management for secondary PPH. Ninety-eight (82%) were managed successfully with medical management and 22 (18%) required surgery. Medical management involved misoprostol (n = 33; 27.5%), antibiotics (n = 108; 90%), and less commonly other uterotonics (n = 6; 5%). Factors associated with lower rates of successful medical management included: antecedent manual removal of placenta (MROP) (odds ratio (OR) 0.2, P = 0.047), primary PPH ≥500 mL (OR 0.39, P = 0.048) or ≥1 L (OR 0.24, P = 0.009), >200 mL blood loss at presentation (OR 0.17, P = 0.015), increasing time post-delivery (OR 0.84, P = 0.044), retained products of conception (RPOC) on ultrasound (OR 0.024, P = 0.001) and vaginal birth (OR 0.27, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Medical management was highly successful. Vaginal birth, MROP, primary PPH, RPOC on ultrasound and increasing time post-delivery were associated with increased need for surgical management.


Assuntos
Misoprostol , Ocitócicos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Parto , Período Pós-Parto , Ocitócicos/uso terapêutico
9.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(6): 887-893, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35989428

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An incidental finding of a thickened endometrium on ultrasound in the postmenopausal patient without bleeding is a common presentation to gynaecological services; however there is limited evidence to guide clinical practice as to when hysteroscopic evaluation and endometrial sampling is required. AIMS: To determine the endometrial thickness at which endometrial sampling is indicated in asymptomatic postmenopausal women referred with thickened endometrium on ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective case series of postmenopausal women without bleeding undergoing hysteroscopy was conducted. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between a range of variables and pre-malignant or malignant pathology and endometrial thickness. The optimal endometrial thickness threshold was identified to maximise model sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 404 postmenopausal women were included in this study, having undergone a hysteroscopy at the study site between 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2018. The mean (SD) age of patients at presentation was 65 (9.09) years and the mean body mass index was 29.86 kg/m2 (6.52). Of these women, nine (2.2%) were diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma and seven (1.7%) had endometrial hyperplasia with atypia. The most common histopathological finding was of a benign endometrial polyp (153: 37.9%). When including hyperplasia with or without atypia in histopathology of interest, a cut-off of ≥9 mm provides the greatest sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (63.8%) for a diagnosis of pre-malignant or malignant pathology (classification accuracy of 64.8%; area under the receiver operating characteristic: 0.7358, 95% CI: 0.6439, 0.8278) in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Using an endometrial thickness of ≥9 mm can be used as a cut-off for endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women without bleeding.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Endometrial , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Pólipos , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Pós-Menopausa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hiperplasia Endometrial/diagnóstico por imagem , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patologia , Histeroscopia , Endométrio/diagnóstico por imagem , Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Ultrassonografia , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Uterina/etiologia
10.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(5): 732-739, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35754324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB), a common symptom of endometrial cancer, necessitates prompt clinical and sonographic assessment, often followed by hysteroscopy. Unfortunately, due to traditional gynaecology outpatient clinic paradigms, unnecessary patient-clinician encounters are common and may lead to delays in diagnosis. AIM: The aim was to assess a novel clinic model for the management of women with PMB based on virtual assessment and routine use of the outpatient hysteroscopy clinic. METHODS: An unblinded pragmatic randomised controlled trial was performed, comparing a 'virtual clinic' to routine outpatient clinical care. The primary outcome for assessment was time, measured as the interval (days) between referral triage and discharge for definitive management or to the general practitioner. Demographical and clinical data were collected. After discharge from the system, patients completed a satisfaction and feedback questionnaire. Log-rank tests were used to compare the equality of time-to-event functions across randomised groups. RESULTS: There were 96 participants, 46 in the intervention arm and 50 controls. The total time spent in the gynaecology system differed between groups (Χ2 (1) = 6.94, P = 0.008), with a median total time of 55 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 37-66 days) for the intervention group compared to a median of 84 days (95% CI: 54-101 days) for the control group. The number of in-person gynaecology encounters differed between those randomised to intervention (P < 0.001). Overall, 96% of respondents indicated a positive score for overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed clinic model resulted in a significant reduction in the time between referral and discharge, without compromising patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Ginecologia , Procedimentos Clínicos , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia/métodos , Pós-Menopausa , Gravidez , Hemorragia Uterina/etiologia , Hemorragia Uterina/terapia
11.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(4): 581-588, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35394065

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gynaecology trainees struggle to obtain adequate procedural experience. Training programs integrating virtual reality simulators (VRS) have been suggested as a solution. AIMS: The study aimed to assess if a VRS training program (LapSim® , Surgical Sciences, Göteborg, 2017) improved live operating performance at six months for novice and experienced trainees. Additional outcomes included the association between LapSim® logged time and live operating performance at six months, LapSim® scores and live operating performance at zero and sixmonths and the difference in benefit for novice and experienced gynaecology trainees. METHODS: A prospective intervention study was conducted. Novice and experienced trainees were enrolled, and comparisons made at zero- and six-month time points. The intervention groups were provided with a laparoscopic gynaecology curriculum incorporating VRS. Controls underwent routine training only. Assessment of live operating performance was conducted after six months training. RESULTS: Thirty-five trainees participated, and 25 had access to the VRS curriculum (17 novice and eight experienced trainees). Access to the VRS curriculum and time spent training on the LapSim® made no difference to live operating ability for either intervention group (P > 0.05). The median (interquartile range) hours of VRS usage were 7.9 (4.5-10.8) and 6.0 (4.0-6.8) for novice and experienced trainees respectively. The intervention group provided positive feedback on the utility of VRS in their laparoscopic skill development. CONCLUSION: Optimal utilisation of VRS in Australian training paradigms remains incompletely understood. Further research is required to establish the most effective integration of VRS into training models to ensure uptake and transferability to the operating theatre.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Laparoscopia , Austrália , Simulação por Computador , Currículo , Humanos , Laparoscopia/educação , Estudos Prospectivos
12.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(3): 434-438, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects one in nine Australian women of reproductive age, and is often associated with pain and infertility. However, many women may be asymptomatic, or present with alternative symptoms. AIM: To identify reasons for initial specialist referral among patients with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were identified as having endometriosis intraoperatively based on International Classification of Diseases coding. Operation reports were reviewed and graded for severity of disease. This cohort was then retrospectively audited to identify reasons for initial referral to the general gynaecology, endosurgery, gynae-oncology, reproductive medicine outpatient departments (OPD) at the Mercy Hospital for Women in Melbourne between 1 February 2015 and 31 December 2016. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were identified as having endometriosis at laparoscopy, including 90 women with Stage IV disease. Patients were a mean (SD) age of 33.1 (7.6) years. While pain remained a common reason for referral (61.7% of referrals), 36.7% of women with Grade IV disease did not have pain included in their referral letter. Severe disease was associated with increased age (regression coefficient 0.05; 95% CI: 0.03-0.07, P < 0.01), but not with pain symptoms. Women referred with ovarian cysts or masses were more likely to be diagnosed with severe disease (regression coefficient 0.69; 95% CI: 0.37-1.01, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although pelvic pain is not a good predictor for a diagnosis of endometriosis, it remains a common symptom among women with the disease. However, more than one in three patients with Grade IV endometriosis presented without mention of pain symptoms, encouraging clinicians to adopt a broader approach to the presenting symptoms of endometriosis.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Dor Pélvica , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Endometriose/complicações , Endometriose/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 61(5): 777-784, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34128537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persistent pelvic pain (PPP) remains an important cause of morbidity. Pelvic floor muscle spasm is an important contributor to PPP. AIMS: The study's primary aim was to assess if botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection to pelvic floor muscles altered pain scores or quality of life (QoL) at six, 12 and 26 weeks. Secondary aims included investigating the impact of BoNT on opiate usage, examining the role of pain catastrophising, and assessing for complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre prospective cohort study enrolled 21 patients with PPP who had failed physiotherapy techniques. Each participant underwent BoNT injection to muscles of the pelvic floor and pudendal nerve block. Questionnaires and digital vaginal examinations were conducted at baseline, six, 12 and 26 weeks. Pain score quantification used visual analogue scales (VAS) and numerical rating scales (NRS). Other outcome assessments included The World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQoL-BREF), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), and modified Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ). ACTRN12620000067976. RESULTS: Following BoNT injection, median VAS scores decreased for all domains at six and 12 weeks, with VAS for dyspareunia significant at six weeks (P = 0.026). Scores returned to baseline by 26 weeks. Opiate usage was significantly less following BoNT injection, with a percentage reduction of 23.8% (95% CI -48.3 to 0.7, P = 0.06). Sexual function improved significantly (P < 0.01), and at six months, four previously apareunic participants reported successful penetrative vaginal intercourse. Health-related QoL and PCS demonstrated sustained improvement (P = 0.02-0.05). NRS for muscle tenderness decreased for all assessed muscle groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BoNT requires further assessment as a treatment modality for select women with PPP.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Diafragma da Pelve , Dor Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Espasmo/tratamento farmacológico , Espasmo/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 61(5): 765-772, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34028794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common condition which significantly impacts the quality of life and wellbeing of many women. Laparoscopy with histopathology is recommended for investigation of pelvic pain and identification of endometriosis with concurrent removal. Never-the-less, the association between endometriosis and pelvic pain is challenging, with endometriosis identified in only 30-50% of women with pain. AIMS: To explore the predictors for undergoing surgery, for identifying endometriosis and endometriosis severity in a cohort of women with CPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study forms part of the Persistent Pelvic Pain project, a prospective observational cohort study (ANZCTR:ACTRN12616000150448). Women referred to a public gynaecology clinic with pain were randomised to one of two gynaecology units for routine care and followed for 36 months with 6-monthly surveys assessing demographics, medical history, quality of life, and pain symptoms measured on a Likert scale. Operative notes were reviewed and endometriosis staged. RESULTS: Of 471 women recruited, 102 women underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy, of whom 52 had endometriosis (n = 37 stage I-II; n = 15 Stage III-IV). Gynaecology unit, pelvic pain intensity and lower parity were all predictors of surgery (odds ratio (OR) 0.342; 95% CI 0.209-0.561; OR 1.303; 95% CI: 1.079-1.573; OR 0.767; 95% CI: 0.620-0.949, respectively). There were no predictors identified for endometriosis diagnosis and the only predictor of severity was increasing age (OR 1.155; 95% CI: 1.047-1.310). CONCLUSIONS: Gynaecology unit and pain intensity were key predictors of undergoing laparoscopy; however, pain severity did not predict endometriosis diagnosis or staging. These findings indicate the need to review current frameworks guiding practice toward surgery for pelvic pain.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Laparoscopia , Endometriose/complicações , Endometriose/diagnóstico , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida
15.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 61(2): E6-E11, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33386748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persistent pelvic pain affects between 10-20% of women with a significant impact on their physical and mental health, sexual relationships, families and society. Estimates of the cost to women and the community is over $9 billion/annum. Although endometriosis is considered a leading cause of pelvic pain, no symptoms reliably allow the identification of those with and without endometriosis. Furthermore, the significance of mild endometriosis is now debated. The optimal clinical approach for pelvic pain and endometriosis remains unclear, with increasing evidence of other contributing factors such as central sensitisation. Studies to date have significant limitations due to their sample size, relatively short follow-up, and inclusion of only women with laparoscopically identified endometriosis. AIMS: To undertake a real-world study of women referred with pain to gynaecology outpatients of a women's hospital and explore factors influencing three-year outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred women will be randomised to one of two gynaecology units. The units will provide routine clinical care but their approaches to management of women with pelvic pain and endometriosis differ: one with skilled endoscopic gynaecologists has greater emphasis on surgery, the other, gynaecologists have more medical expertise in managing pain and menstrual problems. Participants will complete six-monthly questionnaires regarding pain and quality of life for three years. This information will not be available to clinicians. Their medical care will be followed from their medical records. The cost of outpatient care and admissions will be calculated. Data will be analysed using STATA software with appropriate post hoc tests. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR:ACTRN12616000150448).


Assuntos
Endometriose , Qualidade de Vida , Austrália , Endometriose/complicações , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
16.
Front Reprod Health ; 3: 750750, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36303984

RESUMO

A diagnosis of endometriosis is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes including placenta praevia and preterm birth. Some studies have also suggested associations with gestational hypertension, foetal growth restriction, gestational diabetes, perinatal death, and obstetric haemorrhage. This review aims to assess the impact of pre-pregnancy surgical treatment of endometriosis on future obstetric outcomes. A search of the Medline, Embase and PubMed electronic databases was performed to identify studies reporting pre-pregnancy surgery for endometriosis and subsequent pregnancy outcome compared to controls with unresected endometriosis. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogenous in design, definition of study groups and outcome measures. All three studies were judged at critical risk of bias. Pre-pregnancy excision of endometriosis was associated with an increased risk of caesarean section in one of two studies, OR 1.72 (95% CI 1.59-1.86) and OR 1.79 (95% CI 0.69-4.64). Placenta praevia rates were also increased in one of two studies OR 2.83 (95% CI 0.56-12.31) and OR 2.04 (95% CI 1.66-2.52). One study found increased risks of preterm birth, small for gestational age, gestational hypertension, and antepartum and postpartum haemorrhage (all p < 0.05) with pre-pregnancy excision of endometriosis. There is insufficient evidence examining the role of pre-pregnancy endometriosis surgery in ameliorating adverse pregnancy outcomes, and thus reliable conclusions cannot be drawn. Prospectively designed studies are needed to assess the relationship between surgical treatments for endometriosis and obstetric outcome and examine potential confounders such as comorbid adenomyosis and infertility.

18.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 59(1): 66-70, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29672825

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following a primary caesarean section (CS), women must decide between attempted vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) in subsequent pregnancies. Both options carry potential morbidity and mortality for mother and child, with the most feared being uterine rupture and its consequences. In attempts to reduce morbidity, several predictive nomograms have been developed to assist in delivery mode decisions. AIM: To assess the validity of the predictive nomogram developed by Grobman et al. in our regional Australian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, patients at term, with one previous CS who had a trial of labour were assigned a 'Grobman score' based on antenatal details. Outcomes were noted and patient groups analysed according to percentage deciles of estimated VBAC success, compared with actual VBAC success rates. RESULTS: A total of 395 women underwent trial of labour after a single prior CS, with a VBAC success rate of 83%. The Grobman model displayed adequate calibration and the re-calibrated model good calibration with the slope coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI 0.54-1.19) and intercept 0.19 (95% CI -0.34-0.72). Discrimination was moderate with receiver operating characteristic area of 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.76). CONCLUSION: This analysis supports further validation studies in larger Australian settings, and suggests that use of the original Grobman predictive nomogram may be appropriate in Australia.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Prova de Trabalho de Parto , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Regionalização da Saúde , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
19.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(23): 3821-6, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26940295

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the delivery indication (maternal or fetal) for patients with preterm preeclampsia and assess whether disease characteristics at presentation are predictive of delivery indication. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia (Mercy Hospital for Women). We assessed indication for delivery for participants presenting with preeclampsia from 23(+0) to 32(+6) weeks gestation. We compared baseline disease characteristics, disease features at delivery and postnatal outcomes between those delivered for maternal or fetal indications, or for both maternal and fetal indications. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty six participants presented with preterm preeclampsia and 108 were eligible for inclusion in our study. More participants were delivered for maternal indications at 65.7% compared to those requiring delivery on fetal grounds at 19.4% or for both indications at 14.8% (p < 0.0001). Maternal disease characteristics at presentation were similar between groups; however, there was a higher proportion of growth restriction and abnormal Dopplers among those delivered on fetal grounds. Participants delivered on maternal grounds gained less gestation, had higher blood pressure and higher incidence of abnormal liver function tests than those delivering for fetal indications at delivery. CONCLUSION: Participants with preterm preeclampsia were predominantly delivered due to maternal disease progression compared to fetal compromise.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Conduta Expectante , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade Perinatal , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA