Whole-Genome-Sequence-Based Evolutionary Analyses of HoBi-like Pestiviruses Reveal Insights into Their Origin and Evolutionary History.

HoBi-like pestivirus (HoBiPeV), classified under Pestivirus H species, is an emerging cattle pathogen of high economic impact. However, the origin and evolution of HoBiPeV are not very clear due to a lack of full genomic sequences from diverse clades. This study aimed to determine full-genome sequences of HoBiPeV strains of three novel clades (c, d and e) and perform full-genome-based genetic and evolutionary analyses. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses herein confirmed the existence and independent evolution of four main HoBiPeV clades (a, c, d and e) globally, with genetic divergence ranging from 13.0% to 18.2%. Our Bayesian molecular clock estimates revealed that HoBiPeV most likely originated in India, with a dated tMRCA of 1938 (1762-2000), evidencing a more recent origin of HoBiPeV. The evolution rate of HoBiPeV was estimated to be 2.133 × 10-3 subs/site/year at full-genome level but varied widely among individual genes. Selection pressure analyses identified most of the positively selected sites in E2. Additionally, 21.8% of the ORF codon sites were found under strong episodic diversifying selection, providing first evidence of negative selection in HoBiPeV evolution. No recombination event was evident for HoBiPeV-c, d and e strains. These findings provide new insights into HoBiPeV origin and evolutionary history for better understanding the epidemiology and host-pathogen interactions and stimulate vaccine research.

Evaluation of currently available bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) and HoBi-like pestivirus (HoBiPeV) specific diagnostic tests in detection of highly divergent HoBiPeVs in cattle.

The emergence of novel and divergent HoBi-like pestivirus (HoBiPeV) strains in cattle in Asia recently has raised concerns with regard to their reliable and accurate diagnosis. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate currently available BVDV diagnostic tests and HoBiPeV-specific diagnostic tests in detection of genetically divergent strains of HoBiPeV. One strain each of HoBiPeV-c and d were subjected to two BVDV diagnostic RT-PCR tests, one HoBiPeV specific RT-PCR test, three BVDV diagnostic qRT-PCR tests, one HoBiPeV specific qRT-PCR test and two BVDV antigen capture ELISAs. Archived cattle sera (n = 41) from farms with reports of HoBiPeV natural infection were assessed for detection of HoBiPeV antibodies by VNT and two commercial BVD antibody ELISA kits. BVDV diagnostic qRT-PCR tests had better sensitivity than BVDV diagnostic RT-PCR tests, while majority of them except a commercial kit showed a lower sensitivity for HoBiPeV-d strain. The HoBiPeV specific qRT-PCR test was found more sensitive than HoBiPeV specific RT-PCR but both had lower sensitivity for HoBiPeV-d strain, as displayed by primer/probe sequence mismatches. The BVDV Erns antigen ELISA detected both the strains of HoBiPeV, but with a lower sensitivity for HoBiPeV-d strain, whereas BVDV NS3 antigen ELISA failed to detect them even at a high HoBiPeV titre. Compared to VNT, commercial BVDV antibody ELISA showed low to moderate sensitivity in detection of HoBiPeV antibodies, with a failure rate of 31.25% for the whole virus antigen based ELISA and a failure rate of 56.25% for NS3 antibody ELISA. The present study demonstrated new challenges in HoBiPeV diagnosis indicating a need in improvement of both HoBiPeV specific diagnostic RT-PCR and qRT-PCR for better utility in HoBiPeV epidemiology and biological product safety. Although more studies are required, this study reinforces that combined use of BVDV Erns and NS3 antigen ELISA may have some utility in preliminary differentiation between HoBiPeV and BVDV infection in PI cattle. Additionally, we show that the comparative VNT has a better sensitivity in detection of HoBiPeV exposure and there is a need of robust antibody ELISA for reliable detection of antibodies against this emerging bovine pestivirus.