A single-center review of pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab-cilgavimab in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to negatively impact solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr). Data on the use of tixagevimab-cilgavimab (tix-cil) in vaccinated SOTr during circulation of Omicron and its subvariants are limited. Therefore, this single-center review was conducted to evaluate tix-cil efficacy in multiple organ transplant groups during a study period where Omicron B.1.1.529, BA.2.12.1, and BA.5 predominated. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated the incidence of COVID-19 infection in adult SOTr who did or did not receive pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tix-cil. SOTr were included if they were at least 18 years of age and met emergency use authorization criteria for tix-cil use. The primary outcome analyzed was the incidence of COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Ninety SOTr met inclusion criteria and comprised of two groups, tix-cil PrEP (n = 45) and no tix-cil PrEP (n = 45). Of SOTr who received tix-cil PrEP, three (6.7%) developed COVID-19 infection, compared to eight (17.8%) in the no tix-cil PrEP group (p = .20). Of the 11 SOTr diagnosed with COVID-19, 15 (82.2%) were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 prior to transplantation. Moreover, 18.2% and 81.8% of the COVID-19 cases observed were asymptomatic and mild-to-moderate, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study results, which included months when BA.5 was in increased circulation, suggest no significant difference in COVID-19 infection with or without use of tix-cil PrEP in our solid organ transplant groups. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, clinical utility of tix-cil should be evaluated against new, emerging strains.

Applying Diagnostic Stewardship to Proactively Optimize the Management of Urinary Tract Infections.

A urinary tract infection is amongst the most common bacterial infections in the community and hospital setting and accounts for an estimated 1.6 to 2.14 billion in national healthcare expenditure. Despite its financial impact, the diagnosis is challenging with urine cultures and antibiotics often inappropriately ordered for non-specific symptoms or asymptomatic bacteriuria. In an attempt to limit unnecessary laboratory testing and antibiotic overutilization, several diagnostic stewardship initiatives have been described in the literature. We conducted a systematic review with a focus on the application of molecular and microbiological diagnostics, clinical decision support, and implementation of diagnostic stewardship initiatives for urinary tract infections. The most successful strategies utilized a bundled, multidisciplinary, and multimodal approach involving nursing and physician education and feedback, indication requirements for urine culture orders, reflex urine culture programs, cascade reporting, and urinary antibiograms. Implementation of antibiotic stewardship initiatives across the various phases of laboratory testing (i.e., pre-analytic, analytic, post-analytic) can effectively decrease the rate of inappropriate ordering of urine cultures and antibiotic prescribing in patients with clinically ambiguous symptoms that are unlikely to be a urinary tract infection.