Association between renal function and fracture incidence during treatment with teriparatide or alendronate: an exploratory subgroup analysis of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05.

The association of renal function with fracture incidence during teriparatide or alendronate treatment in elderly Japanese women was examined. Fracture incidence differed by fracture type, renal function, and treatment protocol. The results provide important information on pharmacotherapy in clinical practice for osteoporosis. PURPOSE: Incidence rate of morphometric vertebral fracture was lower under treatment with once-weekly teriparatide (TPTD) followed by alendronate (ALN) than under treatment with ALN throughout the study among elderly Japanese women at high fracture risk in JOINT-05. This is an exploratory subgroup analysis according to chronic kidney disease (CKD) status at baseline. METHODS: Participants received sequential therapy with TPTD for 72 weeks, followed by ALN for 48 weeks (TPTD-ALN group, N = 483) or ALN monotherapy for 120 weeks (ALN group, N = 496). Baseline CKD status was classified by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and categorized as: CKD 1/2 (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), CKD 3a (eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2), or CKD 3b/4 (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Incidences of vertebral fractures including morphometric fractures, non-vertebral fractures, and all fractures were evaluated during follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were not different between treatment groups. Higher stages of CKD were associated with age and number of prevalent vertebral fracture. In CKD 1/2 patients (N = 556 with 90 incidents of morphometric vertebral fracture), the incidence of vertebral fractures was lower in the TPTD-ALN group than in the ALN group (p = 0.01). In CKD 3b/4 patients (N = 112 with 10 incidents of non-vertebral fracture), the incidence of non-vertebral fractures was lower in the ALN group than in the TPTD-ALN group, although the number of fractures was small. In the ALN group, the incidences of vertebral fractures, non-vertebral fractures, and all fractures remained constant across CKD stages. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis showed that fracture incidence on ALN was constant regardless of renal function. It also suggested that the incidence of vertebral fractures on TPTD-ALN was lower than ALN monotherapy in CKD 1/2 patients. These results provide important information for drug selection in the clinical practice of osteoporosis.

Predictors of discontinuation of osteoporosis treatment: sub-analysis of the Japanese osteoporosis intervention trial-05 (JOINT-05).

INTRODUCTION: To identify predictors of discontinuing treatment with teriparatide (TPTD) and alendronate (ALN), data from a randomized, controlled trial (JOINT-05) involving postmenopausal Japanese women at high risk of fracture were re-analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants received sequential therapy with once-weekly TPTD for 72 weeks followed by ALN for 48 weeks (TPTD-ALN group) or monotherapy with ALN for 120 weeks (ALN group). Background data including comorbidities, fracture prevalence, cognitive function, quality of life, activities of daily living, bone metabolism parameters, and nutrient intake were collected. The endpoints were 3 types of discontinuations by the reason: a poor compliance, adverse events (AEs), or any reason including those unrelated to AEs or poor compliance. Odds ratios (ORs) of baseline predictors of discontinuation were evaluated by single or multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 234 (49.0%) patients in the TPTD-ALN group and 167 (34.2%) patients in the ALN group discontinued. In the TPTD-ALN group, a lower serum calcium level was a significant predictor of compliance-related discontinuation. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were lower in patients with lower serum calcium levels than with higher serum calcium levels. In the ALN group, poor cognitive function was significantly associated with compliance-related discontinuation, and higher body mass index and alcohol intake were predictors of AE-related discontinuation. Predictors of discontinuation were drug-specific. Lower serum calcium levels and poor cognitive function were predictors of discontinuing once-weekly TPTD and ALN, respectively. CONCLUSION: When starting TPTD and ALN treatment, careful attention to patients with lower serum calcium levels and poor cognitive function, respectively, may be needed for better treatment continuity.

Intraoperative Ablation Control Based on Real-Time Necrosis Monitoring Feedback: Numerical Evaluation.

Ablation therapy is a type of minimally invasive treatment, utilized for various organs including the brain, heart, and kidneys. The accuracy of the ablation process is critically important to avoid both insufficient and excessive ablation, which may result in compromised efficacy or complications. The thermal ablation is formulated by two theoretical models: the heat transfer (HT) and necrosis formation (NF) models. In modern medical practices, feed-forward (FF) and temperature feedback (TFB) controls are primarily used as ablation control methodologies. FF involves pre-therapy procedure planning based on previous experiences and theoretical knowledge without monitoring the intraoperative tissue response, hence, it can't compensate for discrepancies in the assumed HT or NF models. These discrepancies can arise due to individual patient's tissue characteristic differences and specific environmental conditions. Conversely, TFB control is based on the intraoperative temperature profile. It estimates the resulting heat damage based on the monitored temperature distribution and assumed NF model. Therefore, TFB can make necessary adjustments even if there is an error in the assumed HT model. TFB is thus seen as a more robust control method against modeling errors in the HT model. Still, TFB is limited as it assumes a fixed NF model, irrespective of the patient or the ablation technique used. An ideal solution to these limitations would be to actively monitor heat damage to the tissue during the operation and utilize this data to control ablation. This strategy is defined as necrosis feedback (NFB) in this study. Such real-time necrosis monitoring modalities making NFB possible are emerging, however, there is an absence of a generalized study that discusses the integration and quantifies the significance of the real-time necrosis monitor techniques for ablation therapy. Such an investigation is expected to clarify the universal principles of how these techniques would improve ablation therapy. In this study, we examine the potential of NFB in suppressing errors associated with the NF model as NFB is theoretically capable of monitoring and suppressing the errors associated with the NF models in its closed control loop. We simulate and compare the performances of TFB and NFB with artificially generated modeling errors using the finite element method (FEM). The results show that NFB provides more accurate ablation control than TFB when NF-oriented errors are applied, indicating NFB's potential to improve the ablation control accuracy and highlighting the value of the ongoing research to make real-time necrosis monitoring a clinically viable option.

Achieving osteoporosis treat-to-target goals with teriparatide or alendronate: sub-analysis of Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05).

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bone mineral density (BMD) ≥ -2.5 SD could be used as the treat-to-target (T2T) goal when treating osteoporosis with teriparatide (TPTD) and alendronate (ALN), and to investigate the relationship with incident vertebral fracture by re-analyzing data from a randomized, controlled trial (JOINT-05) involving postmenopausal Japanese women at high fracture risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants received sequential therapy with once-weekly TPTD for 72 weeks, followed by ALN for 48 weeks (TPTD-ALN group) or ALN monotherapy for 120 weeks (ALN group). BMDs were measured at the lumbar spine (L2-4), total hip, and femoral neck at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 120 weeks by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The T2T goal was BMD ≥ -2.5 SD, and the endpoint was the proportion of participants with baseline BMD < -2.5 SD in three measurement sites achieving BMD ≥ -2.5 SD. RESULTS: A total of 559 participants were selected. BMD ≥ -2.5 SD at 120 weeks in the L2-4, total hip, and femoral neck sites was achieved in 20.5%, 23.1%, and 5.9%, respectively, in the TPTD-ALN group and 22.2%, 11.7%, and 7.3%, respectively, in the ALN group. Incident vertebral fractures occurred in areas of both lower and high BMD. CONCLUSION: During the 1.5-year treatment period, more than 20% of participants achieved BMD ≥ -2.5 SD as a T2T goal at L2-4. Since the achievement level differed depending on the BMD measurement site, the appropriate site should be selected according to the baseline BMD level.

Asia-Pacific consensus on long-term and sequential therapy for osteoporosis.

Objectives: This study aimed to present the Asia-Pacific consensus on long-term and sequential therapy for osteoporosis, offering evidence-based recommendations for the effective management of this chronic condition. The primary focus is on achieving optimal fracture prevention through a comprehensive, individualized approach. Methods: A panel of experts convened to develop consensus statements by synthesizing the current literature and leveraging clinical expertise. The review encompassed long-term anti-osteoporosis medication goals, first-line treatments for individuals at very high fracture risk, and the strategic integration of anabolic and antiresorptive agents in sequential therapy approaches. Results: The panelists reached a consensus on 12 statements. Key recommendations included advocating for anabolic agents as the first-line treatment for individuals at very high fracture risk and transitioning to antiresorptive agents following the completion of anabolic therapy. Anabolic therapy remains an option for individuals experiencing new fractures or persistent high fracture risk despite antiresorptive treatment. In cases of inadequate response, the consensus recommended considering a switch to more potent medications. The consensus also addressed the management of medication-related complications, proposing alternatives instead of discontinuation of treatment. Conclusions: This consensus provides a comprehensive, cost-effective strategy for fracture prevention with an emphasis on shared decision-making and the incorporation of country-specific case management systems, such as fracture liaison services. It serves as a valuable guide for healthcare professionals in the Asia-Pacific region, contributing to the ongoing evolution of osteoporosis management.

Fragility Fracture Network-Japan: The challenge of establishment of a national hip fracture database and successful achievement of nationwide health system change for hip fracture care in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In April 2022, a new reimbursement scheme for hip fracture was implemented by the Japanese health ministry. Japan is one of the world's most aged societies, facing a significant, rapidly growing burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The incidence of hip fractures is projected to increase from 240,000 in 2020 to 320,000 by 2040. In 2015, Fragility Fracture Network-Japan (FFN-Japan) was formally established as a nonprofit organization in order to create the optimal fragility fracture care system in Japan. METHODS: FFN-Japan launched the Japan National Hip Fracture Database (JNHFD) in 2017, initially with only eight participating hospitals across Japan. The number of patients enrolled from May 2017 to the end of 2020 in the JNHFD from the 16 hospitals registered the patients during this period with amounting to 4271 patients in total. FFN-Japan invited officials from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) to participate in round table meetings to discuss the data collected in the JNHFD and to consider opportunities for nationwide improvement in hip fracture care. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who underwent surgery within 36 h of arrival at hospital was 48.1% in 2018, 58.6% in 2019, and 44.9% in 2020 indicating the delay of surgery. Regarding secondary fracture prevention, initiation of osteoporosis treatment during the in-patients was 60.2% in 2018, 54.0% in 2019, and 64.5% in 2020 indicating the inadequate post fracture care. In April 2022, the Central Social Insurance Medical Council of the Japanese MHLW announced a new reimbursement scheme for hip fracture care including two key components: Early surgery (within 48 h from injury) and Secondary fracture prevention immediately after fracture. DISCUSSION: The new reimbursement scheme of hip fracture care in Japan will catalyze and underpin major improvements on acute multidisciplinary care and post-fracture care with secondary fracture prevention. FFN-Japan played a key role on these policy changes to the health system by means the close collaboration and ongoing communication with the government. CONCLUSION: Within five years of establishment of the JNHFD, FFN-Japan in collaboration with visionary leaders from the Japanese government have successfully achieved a major reform of the Japanese health system's reimbursement of hip fracture care. This reform has laid the foundation for transformation of management of this debilitating and life-threatening injury that currently afflicts almost a quarter of a million older Japanese citizens each year.

Intraoperative Ablation Control Based on Real-time Necrosis Monitoring Feedback: Numerical Evaluation.

Ablation therapy is a type of minimally invasive treatment, utilized for various organs including the brain, heart, and kidneys. The accuracy of the ablation process is critically important to avoid both insufficient and excessive ablation, which may result in compromised efficacy or complications. The thermal ablation is formulated by two theoretical models: the heat transfer (HT) and necrosis formation (NF) models. In modern medical practices, feed-forward (FF) and temperature feedback (TFB) controls are primarily used as ablation control methodologies. FF involves pre-therapy procedure planning based on previous experiences and theoretical knowledge without monitoring the intraoperative tissue response, hence, it can't compensate for discrepancies in the assumed HT or NF models. These discrepancies can arise due to individual patient's tissue characteristic differences and specific environmental conditions. Conversely, TFB control is based on the intraoperative temperature profile. It estimates the resulting heat damage based on the monitored temperature distribution and assumed NF model. Therefore, TFB can make necessary adjustments even if there is an error in the assumed HT model. TFB is thus seen as a more robust control method against modeling errors in the HT model. Still, TFB is limited as it assumes a fixed NF model, irrespective of the patient or the ablation technique used. An ideal solution to these limitations would be to actively monitor heat damage to the tissue during the operation and utilize this data to control ablation. This strategy is defined as necrosis feedback (NFB) in this study. Such real-time necrosis monitoring modalities making NFB possible are emerging, however, there is an absence of a generalized study that discusses the integration and quantifies the significance of the real-time necrosis monitor techniques for ablation therapy. Such an investigation is expected to clarify the universal principles of how these techniques would improve ablation therapy. In this study, we examine the potential of NFB in suppressing errors associated with the NF model as NFB is theoretically capable of monitoring and suppressing the errors associated with the NF models in its closed control loop. We simulate and compare the performances of TFB and NFB with artificially generated modeling errors using the finite element method (FEM). The results show that NFB provides more accurate ablation control than TFB when NF-oriented errors are applied, indicating NFB's potential to improve the ablation control accuracy and highlighting the value of the ongoing research to make real-time necrosis monitoring a clinically viable option.

Reliability of early stage symptoms/clinical findings of osteonecrosis of the jaw: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05).

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the differences in the incidence rates of suspected stage 0/1 osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and incidence risk of relevant clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ between patients treated with sequential therapy comprising weekly teriparatide for 72 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks vs. those who received monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Suspected stage 0/1 ONJ was defined by non-specific symptoms. Tooth mobility and periodontal symptoms (gingival bleeding, swelling, and/or pain) were selected as clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ. Poisson regression models were applied to calculate the incidence rate ratios of suspected stage 0/1 between the teriparatide group (TG) and alendronate group (AG). Generalized linear models were used to calculate the risk ratios of clinical findings between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-one participants in the TG and 344 in the AG answered a structured questionnaire on oral health and were included in this study. There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence rate of suspected stage 0/1 ONJ at both 72 and 120 weeks. The risk ratio of the TG to AG for tooth mobility was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.88, p = 0.02) at 72 weeks and 0.90 (95% CI 0.40-2.03, p = 0.83) at 120 weeks. The incidence rate of tooth mobility related to periodontal symptoms decreased in the TG and increased in the AG during the study. CONCLUSION: Tooth mobility accompanied by clinical periodontal symptoms may be a useful early sign of stage 0 ONJ.

Effect of Bone Resorption Inhibitors on Serum Cholesterol Level and Fracture Risk in Osteoporosis: Randomized Comparative Study Between Minodronic Acid and Raloxifene.

The positive link between osteoporosis and hypercholesterolemia has been documented, and bone resorption inhibitors, such as nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BP) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), are known to reduce serum cholesterol levels. However, the relationship between the baseline cholesterol level and incident fracture rate under the treatment using the bone resorption inhibitors has not been documented. We investigated the relation between vertebral fracture incident and the baseline cholesterol levels and cholesterol-lowering effect of N-BP and SERM in osteoporosis through a prospective randomized open-label study design. Patients with osteoporosis (n = 3986) were allocated into two groups based on the drug used for treatment: minodronic acid (MIN) (n = 1624) as an N-BP and raloxifene (RLX) as an SERM (n = 1623). Serum levels of cholesterol and incidence of vertebral fracture were monitored for 2 years. The vertebral fracture rates between the two groups were compared using the pre-specified stratification factors. The patients receiving MIN with baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level of ≥ 140 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 40 mg/dL, age group of ≥ 75 years, and T score of BMD ≥ -3 SD had significantly lower vertebral fracture rates than those receiving RLX (incidence rate ratios (IRR) 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 0.75, p = 0.001], 0.25 [95% CI 0.09 0.65, p = 0.005], 0.71 [95% CI 0.56 0.91, p = 0.006], 0.47 [95% CI 0.30 0.75, p = 0.0012], respectively). The cholesterol-lowering effect was stronger in the RLX group than in the MIN group, regardless of prior statin use. These results indicated that MIN treatment was more effective in reducing fracture risk in patients with higher LDL cholesterol levels, although its cholesterol-lowering ability was lesser than the RLX treatment.Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), No. UMIN000005433; date: April 13, 2011.

Sequential therapy with once-weekly teriparatide injection followed by alendronate versus monotherapy with alendronate alone in patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture: final results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05.

In this randomized, controlled trial, sequential therapy with once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide for 72 weeks, followed by alendronate for 48 weeks resulted in a significantly lower incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture than monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks in women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. PURPOSE: To determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of sequential therapy with teriparatide, followed by alendronate is superior to that of monotherapy with alendronate, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial was performed. METHODS: Japanese women aged at least 75 years were eligible for the study, if they had primary osteoporosis and if they were at high risk of fracture. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the sequential therapy (once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide 56.5 µg for 72 weeks, followed by alendronate for 48 weeks) or monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks. The primary endpoint in the final analysis was the incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture during the 120-week follow-up period. RESULTS: Between October 2014 and June 2020, 505 patients in the sequential therapy group and 506 in the monotherapy group were enrolled. Of these, 489 and 496, respectively, were included in the main analysis. The incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture during the 120-week follow-up period in the sequential therapy group (64 per 627.5 person-years, annual incidence rate 0.1020) was significantly lower than that in the monotherapy group (126 per 844.2 person-years, annual incidence rate 0.1492), with a rate ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.88, P < 0.01). After 72 weeks, no patient had a severe adverse event that was considered related to the study drug. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly injection of teriparatide, followed by alendronate resulted in a significantly lower incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture than alendronate monotherapy in women with osteoporosis who were at high risk of fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER, DATE OF REGISTRATION: jRCTs031180235 and UMIN000015573, March 12, 2019.

Association of Urinary Pentosidine Levels With the Risk of Fractures in Patients With Severe Osteoporosis: The Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05).

Associations between urinary pentosidine, one of the advanced glycation end products in collagen, and the risk of fracture in patients with severe osteoporosis are unknown. In this study, we investigated whether the urinary pentosidine level is associated with the incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture and nonvertebral fracture using data of a randomized, controlled trial, JOINT-05. JOINT-05 enrolled Japanese women aged 75 years or older with primary osteoporosis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sequential therapy (teriparatide followed by alendronate) or monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks. Incidences of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were assessed morphologically. During treatment, urinary levels of pentosidine and serum levels of bone turnover markers (osteocalcin, procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b) were measured. A total of 967 patients with baseline pentosidine levels were included in the study. Of these, 137 had vertebral fractures, and 42 had nonvertebral fractures. The rate ratios for vertebral fracture for the second (30-39 pmol/mL), third (40-49 pmol/mL), and fourth quartile (≥50 pmol/mL) groups divided by pentosidine level compared with the first quartile (<30 pmol/mL) group were 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-2.75, p = 0.06), 1.51 (95% CI 0.87-2.61, p = 0.14), and 1.69 (95% CI 1.01-2.83, p = 0.05), respectively. The corresponding rate ratios for nonvertebral fracture were 3.07 (95% CI 0.88-10.70, p = 0.08), 2.34 (95% CI 0.61-8.95, p = 0.22), and 3.95 (95% CI 1.14-13.67, p = 0.03), respectively. The association of the urinary pentosidine level with the incidence of nonvertebral fracture was the strongest among the biomarkers assessed in the study. In conclusion, the urinary pentosidine level was associated with the risk of fracture in patients with severe osteoporosis receiving teriparatide or alendronate. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Prevention of New Metastatic Lesions by Eribulin Monotherapy Is Associated with Better Prognosis in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Eribulin therapy has been reported to prolong overall survival (OS) but not progression-free survival, probably because it prevents the development of metastatic lesions; however, this effect has not yet been confirmed. METHODS: We reviewed the medical charts of 50 patients with metastatic breast cancer who underwent eribulin monotherapy at our hospital between 2014 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, those who discontinued eribulin because of disease progression due to development of new lesions (NL group) and those who discontinued eribulin for other reasons, such as lesion growth and unacceptable side effects (non-NL group). Survival times were estimated for both groups and we investigated if eribulin-mediated suppression of new metastasis increased OS. RESULTS: Median OS for all patients, from eribulin initiation, was 14.4 months (range 1.2-60.1), whereas it was 4.6 months (range 1.7-24.7) in the NL group and 16.8 months (range 1.2-60.1) in the non-NL group. OS was significantly poorer in the NL group than in the non-NL group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Eribulin monotherapy-mediated suppression of new metastatic lesions results in a better prognosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Influence of symptomatic periodontal disease on changes in skeletal bone density during medication therapy for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04 and JOINT-05.

Japanese postmenopausal women with symptomatic periodontal disease had a significantly smaller increase in the T-score for total hip bone density than those without periodontal disease during medication therapy for osteoporosis. Intervention to treat symptomatic periodontal disease before and/or during osteoporosis therapy could maintain the effect of osteoporosis medications. PURPOSE: Women with periodontal disease may be more likely to develop osteoporosis. We evaluated whether the presence of symptomatic periodontal disease can influence changes in skeletal bone mineral density (BMD) during medication therapy for osteoporosis in Japanese postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 4,258 postmenopausal women participated in the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-04 trial) and number 5 (JOINT-05 trial), which were multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trials in Japan. Of these, 3,670 non-edentulous subjects participated in the study. Subjects who had self-reported symptoms of periodontal disease at baseline were defined as having periodontal disease. The study outcome was the difference in BMD changes during the study between subjects with and without periodontal disease. Mixed models for repeated measures after adjusting for covariates were used to investigate the difference in the BMD changes during the study between subjects with and without periodontal disease. RESULTS: Subjects with periodontal disease had significantly lower T-scores for total hip (p = 0.035) and metacarpal (p = 0.048) BMD than those without periodontal disease at baseline. During medication therapy for osteoporosis, subjects with periodontal disease had a significantly smaller increase in T-score for total hip BMD than those without periodontal disease (p = 0.021), although no significant differences were observed in the changes in T-scores for other skeletal BMD measurements between subjects with and without periodontal disease. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of self-reported symptoms of periodontal disease may be associated with a decrease in the effect of osteoporosis medications in Japanese postmenopausal women.

Survival With Surgery Is Superior to Survival Without Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients Aged 85 years or Older: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of breast cancer patients aged 85 years or older is still controversial. METHODS: A series of surgically treated breast cancer patients aged 85 years or older was evaluated. The clinicopathological features and outcomes of these patients were compared with the features and outcomes of breast cancer patients in the same age group who were managed without surgery. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients (75%) received surgical treatment, and 15 patients (25%) were managed without surgery. Significantly more patients treated by surgery underwent systemic treatment than patients managed without surgery (P = .003). The 5-year disease-free survival rate of patients treated by surgery was 80.7% (95% confidence interval: 66.2-98.5%), which was significantly higher than that of the patients managed without surgery (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of breast cancer patients aged 85 years or older is warranted. This outcome was achieved with the use of hormonal therapy.

Risk factors for incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis pharmacotherapy: a 2-year, prospective, observational study.

INTRODUCTION: To identify predictors for incident fractures in patients on pharmaceutical treatment for osteoporosis by a secondary analysis of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-04), which was a 2-year, randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial of minodronate and raloxifene in women with primary osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study using JOINT-04 data, in which biomarkers, such as undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC), N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), bone alkaline phosphatase, homocysteine, and pentosidine in blood, and physical functions, such as the timed up and go test and one-leg standing test with eyes open (OLST), and the fall risk index, were measured. The relationships of incident morphometric vertebral fractures during the treatment period, as well as prevalent vertebral fractures, and baseline data were analyzed. RESULTS: The full analysis set of the JOINT-04 included 3247 patients (1623 in the minodronate group and 1624 in the raloxifene group). The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for incident vertebral fractures over 2 years of pharmacotherapy, adjusted for confounders, was 0.93 (0.90-0.96) for ucOC, 1.15 (1.08-1.23) for TRACP-5b, 1.02 (1.01-1.03) for pentosidine, 0.91 (0.88-0.94) for the OLST, and 1.27 (1.01-1.60) for the fall risk index, which were all independent predictors. CONCLUSION: Evaluating fracture risk for patients with osteoporosis considering these potential risk factors for fracture in addition to the established risk factors may be useful when starting pharmaceutical treatment.

Randomized head-to-head comparison of minodronic acid and raloxifene for fracture incidence in postmenopausal Japanese women: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04.

AIMS: We conducted a head-to-head randomized trial of minodronate, a bisphosphonate, and raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, to obtain clinical evidence and information about their efficacy and safety. METHODS: The Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-04) trial is a multi-center, open-labeled, blinded endpoints, head-to-head randomized trial of minodronate and raloxifene. Ambulatory elderly women with osteoporosis (age, >60 years) were randomly allocated to the raloxifene or minodronate group by central registration. The co-primary endpoints included any one of osteoporotic fractures (vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial fractures), vertebral fractures, and major osteoporotic fractures (clinical vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial fractures). The biological effects of each drug, patients' quality of life, and drug safety were assessed based on the secondary outcomes. This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) under trial identification number UMIN000005433. RESULTS: A total of 3896 patients were randomized to the minodronate and raloxifene groups, and drug efficacy assessments were performed for 3247 patients (1623 and 1624 patients, respectively). Among these patients, 1176 and 1187 patients received allocated treatment for 2 years. The incidence rate ratios for osteoporotic, vertebral, and major osteoporotic fractures in the minodronate group were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.78-1.13, p = .494), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.70-1.05, p = .147), and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.86-1.74, p = .274), respectively. Compared to the raloxifene group, the minodronate group showed significantly increased bone mineral density of the lumbar spine for each visit (6 months: p = .007, 12 months: p = .0003, 24 months: p<.0001). Also, serious adverse reactions were observed for four and six patients in the minodronate and raloxifene groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there were no statistical differences in the incidence rates of osteoporotic, vertebral, or major osteoporotic fractures between the two groups. Serious adverse reactions were rare in both groups.

Design of a randomized trial of teriparatide followed by alendronate: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05).

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in drug treatment, the optimal treatment strategy for severe osteoporosis remains uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article reports the design and rationale for the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05), a randomized, controlled trial that compares the efficacy and safety of teriparatide followed by alendronate with alendronate monotherapy for severe osteoporosis. RESULTS: Postmenopausal women aged at least 75 years were eligible for the study if they were at high risk of fracture. Patients were recruited from 113 institutions in Japan between October 2014 and December 2017. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the sequential therapy arm (once-weekly subcutaneous injections of teriparatide 56.5 µg for 72 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks) or monotherapy arm (alendronate for 120 weeks). The regimens for alendronate are 5 mg (orally administered once daily), 35 mg (orally administered once weekly), or 900 µg (intravenously administered once every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint is the incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture at 72 weeks. The secondary endpoints include the incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture at 120 weeks; incidence of morphometric vertebral or non-vertebral fractures at 72 and 120 weeks; incidence of clinical vertebral fracture at 72 and 120 weeks; changes in bone mineral density, quality of life scores (EuroQol 5 Dimensions and the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire short form), and a visual analog scale for back pain; and adverse events. CONCLUSION: We reported the design and rationale for the JOINT-05. The trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180235) and the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000015573).