Safety of Ixekizumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Pooled Analysis of Three Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ixekizumab safety in adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Safety data from 2 integrated data sets are presented: 1) 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2; and 2) all ixekizumab-treated patients of SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 plus SPIRIT-P3 open-label period. We report adverse event (AE) frequency and exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years at 12-week intervals to week 96. RESULTS: The placebo-controlled period had 678 patients (safety population): 224 placebo, 229 ixekizumab every 4 weeks, and 225 ixekizumab every 2 weeks. Overall, 1,118 patients received ixekizumab (total exposure 1,373.4 patient-years). In the placebo-controlled period, the frequencies of ixekizumab-treated patients experiencing ≥1 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) and those experiencing serious AEs were 68.1% (56.7% placebo) and 4.4% (2.7% placebo), respectively. Injection site reactions (ISRs) were very common (21.4% ixekizumab [4.5% placebo]), with ISR discontinuation rates of 1.1% (ixekizumab) and 0.4% (placebo). Through week 96, the incidence rates of ISRs decreased with increasing ixekizumab exposure. The frequencies of AEs of special interest were 32.8% (ixekizumab) and 27.7% (placebo); for serious infections, the frequencies were 1.3% and 0%, respectively; Candida infections, 2.6% and 0.4%; confirmed major adverse cardiac events, 0% and 0%; malignancy, 0.4% and 0%; hypersensitivities, 5.3% and 1.8%; and depression-related, 1.8% and 1.3%. The frequency of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (investigator-reported) was 0% in both groups, and the frequencies of sponsor-determined inflammatory bowel disease were 0.2% in the ixekizumab group and 0% in the placebo group. Overall, no active tuberculosis, invasive Candida infections, anaphylaxis, or suicide/self-injury behaviors were reported. CONCLUSION: The PsA ixekizumab safety integrated data set reached 1,373.4 patient-years total exposure. Ixekizumab-treated patients had higher rates of overall TEAEs, serious infections, mucocutaneous Candida, hypersensitivities (non-anaphylactic), and ISRs than placebo-treated patients. No unexpected safety outcomes were reported.

Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 52-week Results from a Phase III Study (SPIRIT-P1).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin 17A antagonist, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) after 52 weeks in a phase III study. METHODS: Patients were initially randomly assigned to IXE 80 mg every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) or every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W) after a 160-mg starting dose, placebo (PBO), or adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg Q2W. At Week 24 (Week 16 for inadequate responders), ADA (8-week washout before starting IXE) and PBO patients were rerandomized to IXEQ2W or IXEQ4W. Six treatment groups were evaluated in the extension period (weeks 24-52): IXEQ2W/IXEQ2W, IXEQ4W/IXEQ4W, ADA/IXEQ2W, ADA/IXEQ4W, PBO/IXEQ2W, and PBO/IXEQ4W. The extension period population (EPP) included patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study medication during the extension period. RESULTS: There were 381/417 (91.4%) patients who entered the extension period. In the IXEQ4W/IXEQ4W and IXEQ2W/IXEQ2W groups (EPP), respectively, American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 (69.1% and 68.8%), ACR50 (54.6% and 53.1%), and ACR70 (39.2% and 39.6%) response rates were sustained at Week 52. Patients rerandomized to IXE also demonstrated efficacy measured by ACR response rates at Week 52. A similar pattern was observed for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index outcomes. Radiographic progression in all 6 groups was minimal. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (≥ 4%) were nasopharyngitis, injection site reaction, injection site erythema, upper respiratory tract infection, and back pain. No deaths were reported, and serious adverse event frequency was 0-4% with IXE. CONCLUSION: During the extension period, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W treatment demonstrated sustained efficacy in key PsA domains with a safety profile consistent with other studies investigating IXE. Clinical trial number: NCT01695239; EudraCT 2011-002326-49.

In vitro characterization of oritavancin clearance from human blood by low-flux, high-flux, and continuous renal replacement therapy dialyzers.

BACKGROUND: Oritavancin is an investigational lipoglycopeptide antibiotic under clinical development for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. The impact of hemodialysis on plasma concentrations of oritavancin is unknown and may be important in making dosage adjustments in such patients. The present study sought to determine the clearance of oritavancin from human blood by various commercially available dialyzers in an in vitro hemodialysis model. METHODS: Three types each of low-flux (Dicea 130, F6, and Polyflux 14L) and high-flux (Revaclear, Exeltra 150, and Optiflux F160NR) dialyzers and one type of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) dialyzer (Prismaflex M100) were studied. Heparinized human blood containing oritavancin (200 mg/L) was circulated from a reservoir to the dialyzers and back to the reservoir. Fresh dialysate was pumped through the dialyzers in a countercurrent manner. Blood samples from each side of the dialyzers and contaminated dialysate samples were collected at periodic intervals. Oritavancin levels were analyzed by a liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method with a limit of quantification of 12.5 ng/mL and plasma clearances of oritavancin were calculated. RESULTS: The mean dialytic clearance of oritavancin was insignificant for each of the low-flux, high-flux and CRRT dialyzers. Clinically significant amounts of oritavancin were not detected in dialysate during any of the experimental dialysis sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The clearance of oritavancin from human blood by the dialyzers used in this study is insignificant. Further clinical studies would be required before making changes in dosage of oritavancin in hemodialysis patients.

A randomized, double-blind phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of an oral fusidic acid loading-dose regimen to oral linezolid for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Fusidic acid (CEM-102), an orally bioavailable fusidane antibiotic with a unique mode of action, is under development for treatment of acute gram-positive bacterial skin and skin structure infections, including those caused by methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci. A phase 2, adaptive design, randomized, double-blind, multiple-center study of 198 adult patients with cellulitis or wound infections was conducted to evaluate an oral CEM-102 loading-dose regimen (1500 mg twice per day on day 1 followed by 600 mg twice per day) compared with oral linezolid (600 mg twice per day) administered for 10-14 days. The CEM-102 loading-dose regimen demonstrated efficacy, safety, and tolerability that was comparable to linezolid for the treatment of acute gram-positive bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Clinical Trials registration. NCT00948142.