Safety and Feasibility of Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria to Identify Patients With "Good Prognosis" Rectal Cancer Eligible for Primary Surgery: The Phase 2 Nonrandomized QuickSilver Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT), followed by surgery, is the recommended approach for stage II and III rectal cancer. While CRT decreases the risk of local recurrence, it does not improve survival and leads to poorer functional outcomes than surgery alone. Therefore, new approaches to better select patients for CRT are important. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria to select patients with "good prognosis" rectal tumors for primary surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective nonrandomized phase 2 study at 12 high-volume colorectal surgery centers across Canada. From September 30, 2014, to October 21, 2016, a total of 82 patients were recruited for the study. Participants were patients newly diagnosed as having rectal cancer with MRI-predicted good prognosis rectal cancer. The MRI criteria for good prognosis tumors included distance to the mesorectal fascia greater than 1 mm; definite T2, T2/early T3, or definite T3 with less than 5 mm of extramural depth of invasion; and absent or equivocal extramural venous invasion. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with rectal cancer with MRI-predicted good prognosis tumors underwent primary surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) rate. Assuming a 10% baseline probability of a positive CRM, a sample size of 75 was estimated to yield a 95% CI of ±6.7%. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (74% male) participated in the study. The median age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range, 37-89 years). Based on MRI, most tumors were midrectal (65% [n = 53]), T2/early T3 (60% [n = 49]), with no suspicious lymph nodes (63% [n = 52]). On final pathology, 91% (n = 75) of tumors were T2 or greater, 29% (n = 24) were node positive, and 59% (n = 48) were stage II or III. The positive CRM rate was 4 of 82 (4.9%; 95% CI, 0.2%-9.6%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of MRI criteria to select patients with good prognosis rectal cancer for primary surgery results in a low rate of positive CRM and suggests that CRT may not be necessary for all patients with stage II and III rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com identifier: ISRCTN05107772.

Intrahepatic insulin exposure, intrahepatocellular lipid and regional body fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

CONTEXT: Insulin is pivotal in regulating hepatic lipid synthesis, metabolism, and export. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that intrahepatic insulin exposure is an important determinant of intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL), taking into account regional adiposity and both glucoregulatory and antilipolytic insulin sensitivity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared 21 European males with known nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with 19 healthy male controls. Insulin sensitivity, secretion, and percentage hepatic extraction were derived from iv glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations. Intrahepatic insulin exposure was calculated as percentage hepatic insulin extraction multiplied by basal or IVGTT insulin secretion. IHCL was quantified by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Total and regional adipose tissue was measured using whole body magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Percentage hepatic extraction of newly secreted insulin differed between cases with NAFLD and controls at borderline significance (median, 76 vs. 83%; P = 0.07). Cases had higher intrahepatic insulin exposure than controls, both in the basal (34 vs. 18 pmol; P = 0.0002) and glucose-stimulated states (58 vs. 24 pmol; P = 0.01). IHCL was significantly related to both basal (r(s) = 0.62; P < 0.0001) and IVGTT intrahepatic insulin exposure (r(s) = 0.47; P = 0.002). As predictors of IHCL, both basal and IVGTT intrahepatic insulin exposure were dependent on the waist-to-hip ratio and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance, but not on magnetic resonance imaging fat measures or IVGTT insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Men with NAFLD have higher intrahepatic insulin exposure than controls. This correlates with IHCL, but the principal determinants of IHCL were fat distribution and hepatic rather than peripheral insulin resistance.

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and ultrasound for hepatic fat quantification.

AIM: The increasing prevalence of fatty liver disease requires routine assessment methods. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) is increasingly used for steatosis measurement, but due to cost, is unlikely to become a widely-used screening tool. Ultrasound is cheaper and more widely available, although subject to observer variability. Our aim was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound against (1)H MRS, using MRS as a gold standard, for the detection and quantification of hepatic fat content. METHODS: Fifty adults participated (43 men, seven women) in this study. Hepatic steatosis was assessed by ultrasound and (1)H MRS. Images were graded by two independent radiologists to classify severity and distribution of liver fat. RESULTS: Ultrasound detected liver fat infiltration in 82% of cases measurable by (1)H MRS, while liver fat was detectable in 44% of cases graded absent by ultrasound. Ultrasound grading was subjective, with the radiologists in agreement in 53% of cases (kappa = 0.39, P = 0.002). Considerable overlap in intrahepatocellular lipid content was observed between different grades: absent (0.0-1.58%), mild (2.2-16.2%), moderate (4.9-26.7%) and severe (8.1-76.8%) steatosis. Ultrasound could not detect liver fat levels below 2% as measured by (1)H MRS Conclusion: Ultrasound is less sensitive than (1)H MRS in detecting very low levels of liver fat content, but is sensitive to fatty infiltration greater than 2%. There is a tendency of higher ultrasound grades to correlate with higher degrees of fatty infiltration, although some overlap exists. Our findings are still consistent with ultrasound being useful as a low cost screening tool.

Use of second generation contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of focal liver lesions.

Ultrasound (US) is often the first imaging modality employed in patients with suspected focal liver lesions. The role of US in the characterisation of focal liver lesions has been transformed with the introduction of specific contrast media and the development of specialized imaging techniques. Ultrasound now can fully characterise the enhancement pattern of hepatic lesions, similar to that achieved with contrast enhanced multiphasic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). US contrast agents are safe, well-tolerated and have very few contraindications. Furthermore, real-time evaluation of the vascularity of focal liver lesions has become possible with the use of the newer microbubble contrast agents. This article reviews the enhancement pattern of the most frequent liver lesions seen, using the second generation US contrast media. The common pitfalls for each type of lesion are discussed. The recent developments in US contrast media and specific imaging techniques have been a major advance and this technique, in view of the intrinsic advantages of US, will undoubtedly gain popularity in the years to come.