Indications for jaw gape-related control of relative muscle activation in sequent chewing strokes.

Jaw muscle activity ratios in unilateral isometric biting differ from ratios of unilateral chewing but approach the latter if the jaw gape in biting is made as small as the minimum interocclusal distance (MID) of chewing. Especially, the masseter working/balancing side ratio (W/B-ratio) becomes as asymmetric as in chewing, because of reduction in balancing side (BS) masseter activity. This behaviour of ratios might reflect a 'chewing-specific' motor strategy induced when isometric biting is performed with a 'chewing-like' gape. If this hypothesis applies, activity ratios should be associated with MIDs of sequent chewing strokes in a similar manner as with incremented jaw gapes in isometric biting. To test this prediction, bilateral surface electromyograms of masseter and anterior temporalis muscles and incisor movements were recorded during unilateral chewing in 52 subjects. W/B-ratios of masseter and temporalis activities and temporalis/masseter-ratios on both sides were calculated. The ratios were related to MIDs of consecutive chewing cycles. Three of the four ratios were associated with masticatory MID in the same manner as with jaw gape in isometric biting. In particular with decreasing MID, the masseter W/B-ratio increased from 1.5 to 2.2 (P < 0.01). This increase in asymmetry was attributed to a stronger decrease in masseter activity on the BS than on the working side. We conclude that relative jaw muscle activation is associated with interocclusal distance in a similar way in isometric biting and in chewing. This analogy supports the idea of a common jaw gape-related neuromuscular strategy facilitated by afferent signalling of interocclusal distance.

Motor control of jaw muscles in chewing and in isometric biting with graded narrowing of jaw gape.

When a certain bite force is applied during unilateral chewing, the combination of jaw elevator muscle activities is different than when a comparable force is applied in unilateral isometric biting, e.g. on a force transducer. Masticatory peak force is generated in a nearly isometric phase of the chewing cycle, with a jaw gape of about 1 mm. In contrast, peak force in isometric biting on force measuring equipment usually induces jaw gapes of 6 mm or even more. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the jaw gape influences relative activation of elevator muscles in unilateral isometric biting. We further examined whether such influence could explain the different activity combinations of chewing and isometric biting. In thirty asymptomatic males, masseter and temporalis activities were recorded during intermittent isometric biting with jaw gapes of 6, 5, 3, 2 and 1 mm and during unilateral chewing. Activity combinations were described by working/balancing ratios and by temporalis/masseter ratios. With decreasing jaw gape the working/balancing ratio of the posterior temporalis decreased (P < 0.002) while that of the masseter increased (P < 0.001). Likewise, the temporalis/masseter ratio on the balancing side increased (P < 0.001). With decreasing jaw gape, activity ratios of isometric biting approached ratios of chewing. We conclude that: (i) relative jaw muscle activation in isometric biting depends on the jaw gape, (ii) relative muscle activation in chewing resembles relative activation of isometric biting with a small 'chewing-like' gape. This suggests that characteristic activity combinations in chewing are mainly a result of the approximately isometric contraction during the slow closing phase of the chewing cycle.